In my App there is PubNub used for Chat function,and for delete chat history,there is Web service,In app chat history clear successfully,but when application in background state and another user send message to me,notification is received and if I open that notification, it redirect to Chat Controller, but my problem is that when chat history clear successfully,still on my chat page all deleted message are present,is there is solution to delete message from pub-nub?
PubNub Message Update & Delete Features - NEW
Update Published Messages using the Message Actions feature.
pubnub.addMessageAction(
{
channel: 'chats.room123'
messageTimetoken: '15610547826970040',
action: {
type: 'updated',
value: 'Hello World! (edited)',
},
},
function(status, response) {
}
);
Delete Messages using the deleteMessages API.
There is a setting to accept delete from history requests for a key, which you must enable by checking the Enable Delete-From-History checkbox in the key settings for your key in the Admin Portal.
Requires Initialization with the secret key.
pubnub.deleteMessages(
{
channels: 'chats.room1',
start: "15526611838554309",
end: "15526611838554310",
},
function (status, response) {
console.log(status, response);
}
);
Soft Delete a Message, using the Message Actions feature.
"action": {
"type": "deleted",
"value": "."
}
UPDATE: THIS DESIGN PATTERN IS STILL LEGITIMATE BUT IS OUTDATED. PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE FOR BEST PRACTICES.
PubNub Storage/History Update & Delete Design Pattern
Although PubNub's API does not directly support the editing of stored messages, you can use a design pattern authored by one of our very own Solution Architects.
Message Updates and Deletes Design Pattern
Related
We are trying to implement a chatbot on our website.
My code successfully triggers the Flow. The Conversations log on Twilio shows that my code sent a message of "Hi" and the Flow triggered and sent the expected greeting.
The problem is that I'm not seeing anyplace where the Flow output is being sent to my website callback and so I'm not able to output the Flow messages to my website user.
When the Flow sends a message, where is the configuration that makes a callback to my website so I can output the message to the user?
onMessageAdded DOES get called on my website callback, but only for messages sent by the website code - not the Flow.
At this point I think the problem is a Twilio configuration for Conversations, Messages or the Flow, but it could be a configuration problem in my code.
Here is my rough initial code:
TwilioClient.Init(_twilioAccountSid, _twilioAuthToken);
//
// Create Conversation
var conversation = ConversationResource.Create(
friendlyName: "Test conversation",
messagingServiceSid: _twilioMessagingServiceSid,
attributes: null,
xTwilioWebhookEnabled: ConversationResource.WebhookEnabledTypeEnum.True
);
_log.Info("Conversation.Create: " + conversation.Sid);
//
// Attach Flow to Conversation
var webhook = WebhookResource.Create(
configurationMethod: WebhookResource.MethodEnum.Post,
configurationFlowSid: _twilioStudioFlowSid,
target: WebhookResource.TargetEnum.Studio,
configurationFilters: new List<string> {
"onMessageAdded",
"onMessageUpdated",
"onMessageRemoved",
"onConversationUpdated",
"onConversationRemoved",
"onParticipantAdded",
"onParticipantUpdated",
"onParticipantRemoved"
},
pathConversationSid: conversation.Sid
);
_log.Info("WebhookResource.Create: " + webhook.Sid);
//
// Create a Participant
var participant = ParticipantResource.Create(
identity: _identity,
pathConversationSid: conversation.Sid
);
_log.Info("Participant.Create: " + participant.Sid);
//
// Send Message
var message = MessageResource.Create(
author: _identity,
body: "Hi!",
xTwilioWebhookEnabled: MessageResource.WebhookEnabledTypeEnum.True,
pathConversationSid: conversation.Sid
);
_log.Info("Message.Create: " + message.Sid);
Is there a reason you decided to not use the Twilio Conversations SDK for JavaScript?
The architecture you are using may require this additional configuration.
Triggering Webhooks for REST API Events
Upon configuration, only actions from SDK-driven clients (like mobile phones or browsers) or SMS-based Participants will cause webhooks without further action on your part. This includes both Service-level webhooks and Conversation-Scoped Webhooks. This is a default behavior to help avoid infinite feedback loops.
Your Post-Event Webhook target, however, may be an important tool for archiving. In this case, you may also want to enable webhook "echoes" from actions you take on the REST API. To do so, you can add a header X-Twilio-Webhook-Enabled=true to any such request. Requests bearing this header will yield webhooks to the configured Post-Event webhook target.
Troubleshooting Webhook Delivery for Conversations or Chat
I don’t think there is a way to set this header when using Twilio Studio widgets.
I'm using the firebase Message class to create push notifications for a react native app. I want the notification to take users to a specific screen of the app. Right now tapping on the push notification just takes users to the last screen they were on before they back-grounded the app. I'm testing this on my iOS device. How can I embed a specific deep link in the message? Would I use setApnsConfig(ApnsConfig apnsConfig) or setFcmOptions(FcmOptions fcmOptions)?
I would use the APNS config since this is for an iOS app:
https://firebase.google.com/docs/reference/admin/java/reference/com/google/firebase/messaging/ApnsConfig.Builder
You could approach it different ways, but you could either include a URL in the header field, and use it for custom deep link logic, or you can have custom data in the putCustomData(String key, Object value) and then have your app process that info to deep link into the correct part of your app.
Your app would process this notification in the application(_:didReceiveRemoteNotification:fetchCompletionHandler:)
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/uikit/uiapplicationdelegate/1623013-application
I had integrated this feature in an app I made in react native aswell. Look at my solution below.
As you can see in the app I am waiting for a notification to come on and I check if it has a type available. My notifications are always routed to another page. In my case its the same page but I set a route as datatype in my payload.
After that you can use that route payload with your naviogator library in my case react-navigation to navigate to the correct screen.
You should chose which trigger works best for you ether onNotificationOpenedApp or getInitialNotification.
useEffect(() => {
// Assume a message-notification contains a "type" property in the data payload of the screen to open
messaging().onNotificationOpenedApp((remoteMessage) => {
console.log(
"Notification caused app to open from background state:",
remoteMessage
);
//navigation.navigate(remoteMessage.data.type);
});
// Check whether an initial notification is available
messaging()
.getInitialNotification()
.then((remoteMessage) => {
if (remoteMessage) {
console.log(
"Notification caused app to open from quit state:",
remoteMessage
);
const route = remoteMessage?.data?.route;
navigation.navigate(route, {
data: remoteMessage.data,
});
}
})
.catch((error) => console.log("Caught ", error));
}, []);
Intro:
was created a Google Smart Home project
was configured a proxy server via ngrok to redirect the Google request to my local machine
I develop an IoT project that has the ability to open/close a lock. I need to implement Google integration to use the Google Assistant to control the user locks. I have implemented OAuth Server for Google. Also I have implemented some controllers to handle Google Action Intents: SYNC, QUERY and EXECUTE. Google send a request with the SYNC intent and App response a payload that contain devices list with specific settings. Instance:
{
requestId: 'requestIdOfGoogle', // contains in the request body
payload: {
agentUserId: 'userId123', // matches user id inside app system
devices: [
{
id: 1,
type: 'action.devices.types.LOCK', // device type
traits: ['action.devices.traits.LockUnlock'], // feature that has a device
name: {
name: 'Kos Lock'
},
willReportState: true,
roomHint: 'Main Door',
deviceInfo: { // Test data
manufacturer: 'smart-home-inc',
model: 'hs1234',
hwVersion: '3.2',
swVersion: '11.4'
}
}
]
}
}
Then Google send requests to my server with QUERY intent to get info about state of a devices, instance
{
requestId: 'requestIdOfGoogle', // contains in the request body
payload: {
devices: {
1: {
status: 'SUCCESS',
online: true,
isLocked: true,
// isJammed - Boolean. Whether the device is currently jammed and therefore its
// locked state cannot be determined.
isJammed: false
}
}
}
}
But after sending a response a test lock isn't configured and a user can't control one with Google Assistant.
enter image description here
I have tried to add other traits for a lock but it didn't help me. Also I have the same problem when I try to configure a Door device. But when I send to Google a Light device it works successfully. When you use the LockUnlock trait then Google Doc recommends to setup secondary user verification but it's optional.
I don't understand that do incorrect. If someone faced such a problem and solved it then could you help me, please
Prerequisites:
use node ^14.0.0
programming language - js
Touch controls are not supported for every device, and locks are not a device type that can be controlled directly. But they will still respond to voice commands.
I am using push plugin in ionic 3 app, everything is working fine but from my server end we are sending one message at a time and im receiving message to iPhone, but old message should overwrite with new message or once we receive new message then old message is clear automatically..
I'm not able to find anything related to this, please anybody help me to solve this.
const options: PushOptions = {
android: {},
ios: {
alert: 'true',
badge: true,
sound: 'false'
},
windows: {},
browser: {
pushServiceURL: 'http://push.api.phonegap.com/v1/push'
}
};
const pushObject: PushObject = this.push.init(options);
pushObject.on('notification').subscribe((notification: any) =>
console.log('Received a notification', notification));
It sounds like you aren't sending your messages configured to be "collapsible". By default each message will be distinct, not overwriting the last message. FCM documents this well:
https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/concept-options
Non-collapsible and collapsible messages
A non-collapsible message
denotes that each individual message is delivered to the device. A
non-collapsible message delivers some useful content, as opposed to a
collapsible message like a content-free "ping" to the mobile app to
contact the server to fetch data.
...
A collapsible message is a message that may be replaced by a new message if it has yet to be delivered to the device.
...
Or if you are not using FCM, here's a reference to Apple's APN docs directly.
To allow the coalescing of similar notifications, you can include a
collapse identifier within a notification request. Normally, when a
device is online, each notification request that you send to APNs
results in a notification delivered to the device. However, when the
apns-collapse-id key is present in your HTTP/2 request header, APNs
coalesces requests whose value for that key is the same. For example,
a news service that sends the same headline twice could use the same
collapse identifier value for both requests. APNs would then coalesce
the two requests into a single notification for delivery to the
device. For details on the apns-collapse-id key
Update with some code details:
public void sendMessage(String title, String body, Map<String, String> data, boolean shouldCollapse) {
PlatformConfiguration platformConfig = new PlatformConfiguration(30);
if (shouldCollapse)
messageBuilder.setAndroidConfig(platformConfig.getCollapsibleAndroidConfig("test")).setApnsConfig(platformConfig.getCollapsibleApnsConfig("test"));
...
public ApnsConfig getCollapsibleApnsConfig(String collapseKey) {
return getCoreApnsConfig().putHeader("apns-collapse-id", collapseKey)
.setAps(getNonCollapsibleApsBuilder().setCategory(collapseKey).setThreadId(collapseKey).build()).build();
}
public AndroidConfig getCollapsibleAndroidConfig(String collapseKey) {
return getCoreAndroidConfig().setCollapseKey(collapseKey)
.setNotification(
getNonCollapsibleAndroidNotificationBuilder().setTag(collapseKey).build()).build();
}
I'm building new KIK Card and i would like to create button which will send messages to 5 people selected from kik.pickUsers Is there any command that allow me to send messages directly, without pressing button "send"? This is my code:
cards.kik.pickUsers({
minResults: 5, // number >= 5
maxResults: 99 // number < 99
}, function (users) {
if (!users) {
return;
}
users.forEach(function (user) {
cards.kik.send(user.username, {
title: 'Message',
text: 'Text!!!'
});
});
});
Messages cannot be sent directly without user consent (via pressing the "send" button) - this is a tactic to avoid apps spamming content messages on behalf of the user.
Regarding sending to multiple people, as of this writing you can only send a message to a group if the conversation already exists in Kik.
Iterating over the array of users returned from the picker and trying to use kik.send() for each will only work for the first user in the array.
The Pop app on Kik has a good implementation to overcome this for inviting friends to use the app. This may or may not be relevant depending on what you are developing.