redirect creating unwanted text in path - asp.net-mvc

I'm working on an existing project that is not routing redirects as I would expect.
my redirect is like this:
return RedirectToAction("Display", "Ladder", new { DisplayDate = DateTime.Now.ToString("yyyyMMdd"), #id = details.CommunityId, slug = details.Slug, InnerId = activityId });
The url it takes me to is: http://localhost:8050/the-staples-club/communitydocuments/161/ladder-display/opq6l4et4bd7/20160429
The url is almost correct, except that a mysterious 'communitydocuments' has been inserted which causes the url to fail. When I remove that part, it works fine. As you can probably tell, I don't understand too much about routing, but where in the project could I investigate to stop it creating 'communitydocuments'?
edit: In routeconfig.cs there are a couple custom routes, but nothing explaining where 'communitydocuments' is coming from. I tried creating a custom route as follows but it still does the same thing:
routes.MapRoute(
name: "LadderDisplay",
url: "{slug}/{id}/{controller}-{action}/{innerid}/{displayDate}",
defaults: new
{
controller = "Ladder",
action = "Display",
displayDate = UrlParameter.Optional,
}
,
constraints: new
{
displayDate = #"\d{8}"
}
);

Related

Using one similar route url for two different parameter types

So I have following routes in place in my project, what I want to do here use one similar looking route url but direct it to two different actions based over the parameter provided, if the given parameter is a string it should pick the Search route and if the parameter is a digit/integer than it should pick the GetCategory route and to achieve this I have written the following code after seeking some existing online help here over SO, but this doesn’t seems to be working as expected.
No matter what the parameter value is it always picks whichever route appears first in the list.
//routes.MapRoute("GetCategory", "{pId}", new { controller = "Student", action = "Post", pId = #"^\d{1,3}$" });
routes.MapRoute("Search", "{category}", new { controller = "Student", action = "Search", category = UrlParameter.Optional });
routes.MapRoute("GetCategory", "{pId}", new { controller = "Student", action = "Post", pId = #"^\d{1,3}$" });
Can anybody help me out with what am I missing here?
Just tested this approach
routes.MapRoute("GetCategory", "{pId}", new { controller = "Student", action = "Post" },new {pId = #"\d"});
routes.MapRoute("Search", "{category}", new { controller = "Student", action = "Search", category = UrlParameter.Optional });
You should apply restrictions on your params within constraints argument, not in defaults section.
Have you tried moving the GetCategory route up above the other one. The problem with the Search route is you don't have a constraint on it so it would match anything. If you moved the GetCategory route to the top and provided a string, it wouldn't match since it is not a digit and would move to the next one.

Routing and reflection problem

I added routing to my solution in order to have a more user friendly URL in the address bar.
I start the solution and when I rollover my Favorites link, I see the URL .../Affaire/Favorite (picture below). This one is OK for me.
When I rollover my Recycle bin link, I see the URL ../Affaire/Deleted (picture below). This one is OK for me.
Then I click on the Recycle bin link, I navigate to the corresponding page and the URL showed in the address bar is OK for me (picture below).
Next, I rollover the Favorite link again (picture below), I see the URL ../Affaire/Delete?OnlyFavorite=true!! That's not OK.
The routing is now retrieving an attribute not from my link but from the active URL! This attribute is named OnlyFavorite and I don't want this attribute. This is the "reflexion". Notice that all of my routes are using the same controller and the same action but using different attributes for the routes.
Below are some links I used.
Example for navigating to the favorite page:
#Html.ActionLink("Favorites", "SearchAffaires", new { OnlyFavorite = true })
Example for navigating to the recycle bin page:
#Html.ActionLink("Recycle bin", "SearchAffaires", new { StatusCode = "DELETED" })
Here are my routes:
routes.MapRoute(
"Affaire Status Open/Closed/Deleted", // Route name
"{controller}/{StatusCode}", // URL with parameters
new { action = "SearchAffaires" }, // Parameter defaults
new { controller = "Affaire", StatusCode = "^Open$|^Closed$|^Deleted$" }// Contraints
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Affaire Only Favorite", // Route name
"{controller}/Favorite", // URL with parameters
new { action = "SearchAffaires", Page = 1, OnlyFavorite = true }, // Parameter defaults
new { controller = "Affaire" } // Contraints
);
Do you have any idea how can I proceed to avoid this behaviour?
I don't want the routing to get the attribute named OnlyFavorite from my current URL by reflexion. I already try to pass OnlyFavorite=null on the action link but it doesn't work: the routing says "ok, I don't have a value for OnlyFavorite on the link itself but I have OnlyFavorite on the URL so I use it!".
When you are on the Deleted page, the link is being processed that way because the StatusCode token is equal to Deleted, so the first route is satisfied. Change your link as follows:
#Html.ActionLink("Favorites", "SearchAffaires", new { StatusCode = String.Empty, OnlyFavorite = true })
UPDATED
The best solution is to reverse your routes. As a general rule, the most specific routes should always go first, and you should have more generic routes later. Since the "Affaire Only Favorite" route is more specific, it should always go first. If it is the first route satisfied, that should address your issue.
UPDATE #2
I ran a test, and all of the links were generated correctly, when I set the routes as follows:
routes.MapRoute(
"Affaire Only Favorite", // Route name
"Affaire/Favorite", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Affaire", action = "SearchAffaires",
StatusCode = String.Empty, Page = 1, OnlyFavorite = true } // Parameter defaults
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Affaire Status Open/Closed/Deleted", // Route name
"{controller}/{StatusCode}", // URL with parameters
new { action = "SearchAffaires" }, // Parameter defaults
new { controller = "Affaire", StatusCode = "^Open$|^Closed$|^Deleted$" } // Constraints
);
In addition, the following more generic routes also generated correctly:
routes.MapRoute(
"Favorite", // Route name
"{controller}/Favorite", // URL with parameters
new { action = "Search",
StatusCode = String.Empty, Page = 1, OnlyFavorite = true } // Parameter defaults
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Status Open/Closed/Deleted", // Route name
"{controller}/{StatusCode}", // URL with parameters
new { action = "Search" }, // Parameter defaults
new { StatusCode = "^Open$|^Closed$|^Deleted$" } // Constraints
);
For the more generic routes to work, I had to rename the action as Search and I had to change each link from SearchAffaires to Search.
Well, you could use Html.RouteLink helper to point exactly to the route used. However, as #counsellorben pointed out, you should set your more specific route to be the first one.
And if there's no problem to show your url like "Affaire/Favorite/True", then you can use the example below:
routes.MapRoute(
"Affaire Only Favorite", // Route name
"{controller}/Favorite/{OnlyFavorite}", // URL with parameters
new { action = "SearchAffaires", Page = 1, OnlyFavorite = ""}, // Parameter defaults
new { controller = "Affaire" } // Contraints
);

Added a route and the behaviour changed

I would like to optimize the appearance of the URL like below:
http://localhost:3817/Affaire/SearchAffaires?OnlyFavorite=True
So I added a new route:
routes.MapRoute(
"Search Affaire Only Favorite", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/OnlyFavorite", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Affaire", action = "SearchAffaires", OnlyFavorite = true } // Parameter defaults
);
Now the URL is easier to read:
http://localhost:3817/Affaire/SearchAffaires/OnlyFavorite
But a new problem is occured: the other links on my page have changed because of the routing!
Example here: .../Affaire/SearchAffaires?LabelName=Baxter&OnlyLabel=True&OnlyFavorite=True
Before it was: .../Affaire/SearchAffaires?LabelName=Baxter&OnlyLabel=True
As you can see, the variable OnlyFavorite has been added to the URL. Finally I found the reason of this behaviour: the routing system is keen to make a match against a route, to the extent that it will reuse segment variable values from the incoming URL. The best way to deal with this behavior is to prevent it from happening. It is strongly recommend that you
do not rely on this behaviour, and that you supply values for all of the segment variables in a URL pattern.
That's a little bit annoying because I have a lot of variables!
Any solution on that problem? Why is that behaviour not happening whith one single route (the default one)?
Thanks
It looks like if I've registering routes like this, i get away from problem:
routes.MapRoute(
"Search Affaire", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Affaire", action = "SearchAffaires" } // Parameter defaults
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Search Affaire Only Favorite", // Route name
"{controller}/{action}/OnlyFavorite", // URL with parameters
new { controller = "Affaire", action = "SearchAffaires", OnlyFavorite = true } // Parameter defaults
);

Generic ASP.NET MVC Route Conflict

I'm working on a Legacy ASP.NET system. I say legacy because there are NO tests around 90% of the system. I'm trying to fix the routes in this project and I'm running into a issue I wish to solve with generic routes.
I have the following routes:
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithPdn",
"{controller}/{action}/{pdn}",
new { controller = "", action = "Index", pdn = "" },
null
);
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithClientId",
"{controller}/{action}/{clientId}",
new { controller = "", action = "index", clientid = "" },
null
);
The problem is that the first route is catching all of the traffic for what I need to be routed to the second route. The route is generic (no controller is defined in the constraint in either route definition) because multiple controllers throughout the entire app share this same premise (sometimes we need a "pdn" sometimes we need a "clientId").
How can I map these generic routes so that they go to the proper controller and action, yet not have one be too greedy? Or can I at all? Are these routes too generic (which is what I'm starting to believe is the case).
My only option at this point (AFAIK) is one of the following:
In the contraints, apply a regex to match the action values like: (foo|bar|biz|bang) and the same for the controller: (home|customer|products) for each controller. However, this has a problem in the fact that I may need to do this:
~/Foo/Home/123 // Should map to "DefaultwithPdn"
~/Foo/Home/abc // Should map to "DefaultWithClientId"
Which means that if the Foo Controller has an action that takes a pdn and another action that takes a clientId (which happens all the time in this app), the wrong route is chosen.
To hardcode these contstraints into each possible controller/action combo seems like a lot of duplication to me and I have the feeling I've been looking at the problem for too long so I need another pair of eyes to help out.
Can I have generic routes to handle this scenario? Or do I need to have custom routes for each controller with constraints applied to the actions on those routes?
Thanks
Add constraints to your routes by removing the null and replacing it with the constraint needed for that route:
For PDN, use a regular expression for digits:
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithPdn",
"{controller}/{action}/{pdn}",
new { controller = "", action = "Index", pdn = "" },
new { pdn = #"\d+" }
);
For ClientID, use a regular expression for all characters:
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithClientId",
"{controller}/{action}/{clientid}",
new { controller = "", action = "index", clientid = "" },
new { clientid = #"[A-Za-z]+" }
);
Since I don't keep the minutia of regular expression stuff in my head, I generally use a cheat sheet.
You should add some route constraints that say the PDN route matches numbers and the ClientId matches strings
I usually create a series of matches to use throughout my route declaration like so:
readonly static string ALPHA_MATCH = #"[\da-zA-Z]";
readonly static string DIGIT_MATCH = #"\d+";
then add the constraints to the routes like this:
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithPdn",
"{controller}/{action}/{pdn}",
new { controller = "", action = "Index", pdn = "" },
new { pdn = DIGIT_MATCH }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"DefaultWithClientId",
"{controller}/{action}/{clientId}",
new { controller = "", action = "index", clientid = "" },
new { clientId = ALPHA_MATCH }
);

ASP.NET MVC - Mapping more than one query string parameter to a pretty url

I am a bit stuck on the design of my seo friendly urls for mvc....Take for example the following url:
http://myapp/venues/resturants.aspx?location=central&orderBy=top-rated
With my mvc app i have mapped it as follows:
http://myapp/venues/list/resturants/central/top-rated
{controller}/{action}/{category}/{location}/{order}
Now the only problem is that location and order are optional...so it should be possible to submit a request like: http://myapp/venues/list/resturants/top-rated . This proves to be a problem when the request hits the controller action, the location parameter has picked up "top-rated", naturally.
Any suggestions? I' am considering using explicit querystrings to handle more than one parameter but this is really my last option as i dont want to sacrifice SEO too much.
Has anyone eles run into such dilemmas? And how did you handle it?
Thanks in advance!
Click on your profile link and look at the URLs for Stats, Recent, Response, etc.
Examples:
https://stackoverflow.com/users/52065?sort=recent#sort-top
https://stackoverflow.com/users/52065?sort=stats#sort-top
with no sort it defaults to stats
https://stackoverflow.com/users/52065
Optional paramters should be query parameters
Assuming that the allowed values for location and order are unique (i.e. when they come in, you can tell them apart, or else if they only supply one, how are you going to know if it's a location or an order?), then you could just take two parameters and work out what they are in the controller.
Route: {controller}/{action}/{param1}/{param2}
Controller action:
public ActionResult MyAction(string param1, string param2)
{
string location;
string order;
if (!ParseLocation(param1, out location))
{ ParseLocation(param2, out location); }
// ...
}
Not particularly elegant, but does let you have the URLs you want.
You will always have this issue if you have multiple optional parameters. Either make one or both of them non-optional (and positioned earlier in the query string than the optional one) or use the querystring parameter notation.
ok guys just posting a solution i've been playing with so far.
I have set up my routes using constraints as follows:
routes.MapRoute(
"VenuesList",
"venues/list/{category}/{location}/{orderBy}",
new { controller = "venues", action = "list", category = "", location = "", orderBy = "" },
new { location = "central|east|west|south", orderBy = "top-rated|price" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"VenuesListByLocation",
"venues/list/{category}/{location}",
new { controller = "venues", action = "list", category = "", location = "" },
new { location = "central|east|west|south" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"VenuesListByOrder",
"venues/list/{category}/{orderBy}",
new { controller = "venues", action = "list", category = "", orderBy = "" },
new { orderBy = "top-rated|price" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"VenuesListDefault",
"venues/list/{category}",
new { controller = "venues", action = "list", category = "" }
);
routes.MapRoute(
"Default",
"{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" } // Parameter defaults
);
The idea is that if the validation fails it will go to the next route in the list...eventually hitting the default.
Needs some more testing but has worked well so far...
Why don't you create a property in the page for each possible querystring parameter?
This way you can handle it any way you choose with just a few lines of code...

Resources