I'm in the process of adding in-app purchases IAP to my UWP app but when testing the process, it crashes the app but only once a purchase has been approved via the test dialog that's displayed when calling:
await CurrentAppSimulator.RequestProductPurchaseAsync(
IAPs.CoreFeatures, false);
Here is the full function that's contained in my ViewModel:
private async void UnlockFeaturesNow()
{
LicenseInformation licenseInformation = App.LicenseInformation;
if (!licenseInformation.ProductLicense[IAPs.CoreFeatures].IsActive)
{
try
{
// The customer doesn't own this feature, so show the purchase dialog.
await CurrentAppSimulator.RequestProductPurchaseAsyn(
IAPs.CoreFeatures, false);
//Check the license state to determine if the in-app purchase was successful.
if (!licenseInformation.ProductLicenses[IAPs.CoreFeatures].IsActive)
{
await this._messageBoxService.Show("features were not purchased.",
"Features");
}
else
{
await this._messageBoxService.Show("features were purchased
successfully.", "Features");
//Remove the purchase button from splitview popup menu.
SectionModel unlockFeatureSection = this.Sections.FirstOrDefault
(m => m.PageName == PageNameEnum.UnlockFeaturesPage);
if (unlockFeatureSection != null)
{
this.Sections.Remove(unlockFeatureSection);
unlockFeatureSection = null;
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
// The in-app purchase was not completed because an error occurred.
await this._messageBoxService.Show("Failed to purchase the features for
the following reason: " + ex.Message, "Features");
}
}
else
{
// The customer already owns this feature.
}
}
My app never crashes if I cancel the 'IAP test dialog' or if I select any other options other than OK.
If I select OK, it tells me that my IAP was purchased successfully and depending on where I'm in my app it works as expected but the second I click on my hamburger menu, it displays my SplitView menu and if I click anywhere else on my app it just crashes and displays the following error:
"A debugger is attached to myApp.exe but not configured to debug
this unhandled exception. To debug this exception, detach the current
debugger."
I checked my event viewer for additional information and this is what I found:
Faulting application name: MyApp.exe, version: 1.0.0.0, time stamp: 0x563304b4
Faulting module name: combase.dll, version: 10.0.10586.103, time stamp: 0x56a84cbb
Exception code: 0xc000027b
Fault offset: 0x00166d7e
Faulting process ID: 0x2138
Faulting application start time: 0x01d17a76e526db18
Faulting application path: C:\MyFolder\MyApp\bin\x86\Debug\AppX\MyApp.exe
Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\combase.dll
Report ID: bb041374-507f-4927-84b8-75bf7cb6df63
Faulting package full name: MyApp1.1.25.0_x86__z2199h13vtehs
Faulting package-relative application ID: App
So it looks like Combase.dll is crashing, but I have no idea what this .dll is for and why is it crashing only after selecting 'OK' and not the other options.
I've just tried the UWP Store sample provided by Microsoft which uses SplitView and provides the same IAP (scenario 2) option I'm using and when I'm selecting OK on the purchase 'IAP Test' dialog, everything works as expected, so it would make you think it's something to do with my code but I'm pretty sure it isn't as the app never crashes when used and never crashes when the IAP test dialog is displayed unless I select 'OK' option.
I will keep investigating tomorrow as one big difference between my app and the Microsoft sample is that I'm using MVVM and this code is in my ViewModel rather than in the Code-Behind from XAML Page.
Can you let me know if you've experience this problem and if you've managed resolved it?
Thanks.
I just found the answer to my problem by fluke and I still can't believe how poorly it is handled by .NET.
The culprit was removing the "Purchase" option item from a Listbox contained in the SplitView menu once the IAP is purchased successfully! Nothing to do with CurrentApp or CurrentAppSimulator:
//Remove the purchase button from splitview popup menu.
SectionModel unlockFeatureSection = this.Sections.FirstOrDefault
(m => m.PageName == PageNameEnum.UnlockFeaturesPage);
if (unlockFeatureSection != null)
{
this.Sections.Remove(unlockFeatureSection);
unlockFeatureSection = null;
}
without refreshing the list (Sections in this instance) of items which is binded to my Listbox in the SplitView Menu. So now, when remove the item, I make sure to raise an event via mvvmlight which will rebuild my list in my MainViewModel.
In my MainViewModel, I have the following in the constructor:
Messenger.Default.Register<bool>(this,
Tokens.LicenseInformationChanged, (value) =>
{
InitializeSections();
});
And I've now changed my Sections from a List to an ObservableCollection:
private void InitializeSections()
{
this.Sections = (this.Sections
?? new ObservableCollection<SectionModel>());
this.Sections.Clear();
.... Add sections (or not!)
}
But again, what a dreadful way .NET is handling this! Bombing out my app throwing the error without a proper exception being thrown is just dreadful!
Hope this helps others.
I think it crashes because you should use this code for your licenseInformation
#if DEBUG
LicenseInformation licenseInformation = CurrentAppSimulator.LicenseInformation;
#else
LicenseInformation licenseInformation = CurrentApp.LicenseInformation;
Related
I'm building a ReactJs PWA but I'm having trouble detecting updates on iOS.
On Android everything is working great so I'm wondering if all of this is related to iOS support for PWAs or if my implementation of the service worker is not good.
Here's what I've done so far:
Build process and hosting
My app is built using webpack and hosted on AWS. Most of the files (js/css) are built with some hash in their name, generated from their content. For those which aren't (app manifest, index.html, sw.js), I made sure that AWS serves them with some Cache-Control headers preventing any cache. Everything is served over https.
Service Worker
I kept this one as simple as possible : I didn't add any cache rules except precache for my app-shell:
workbox.precaching.precacheAndRoute(self.__precacheManifest || []);
Service-worker registration
Registration of the service worker occurs in the main ReactJs App component, in the componentDidMount() lifecycle hook:
componentDidMount() {
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js')
.then((reg) => {
reg.onupdatefound = () => {
this.newWorker = reg.installing;
this.newWorker.onstatechange = () => {
if (this.newWorker.state === 'installed') {
if (reg.active) {
// a version of the SW is already up and running
/*
code omitted: displays a snackbar to the user to manually trigger
activation of the new SW. This will be done by calling skipWaiting()
then reloading the page
*/
} else {
// first service worker registration, do nothing
}
}
};
};
});
}
}
Service worker lifecycle management
According to the Google documentation about service workers, a new version of the service worker should be detected when navigating to an in-scope page. But as a single-page application, there is no hard navigation happening once the app has been loaded.
The workaround I found for this is to hook into react-router and listen for route changes, then manually ask the registered service worker to update itself :
const history = createBrowserHistory(); // from 'history' node package
history.listen(() => {
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker
.getRegistration()
.then((reg) => {
if (!reg) {
return null;
}
reg.update();
});
}
});
Actual behavior
Throwing a bunch of alert() everywhere in the code showed above, this is what I observe :
When opening the pwa for the first time after adding it to the homescreen, the service worker is registered as expected, on Android and iOS
While keeping the app opened, I deploy a new version on AWS. Navigating in the app triggers the manual update thanks to my history listener. The new version is found, installed in the background. Then my snackbar is displayed and I can trigger the switch to the new SW.
Now I close the app and deploy a new version on AWS. When opening the app again :
On Android the update is found immediately as Android reloads the page
iOS does not, so I need to navigate within the app for my history listener to trigger the search for an update. When doing so, the update is found
After this, for both OS, my snackbar is displayed and I can trigger the switch to the new SW
Now I close the app and turn off the phones. After deploying a new version, I start them again and open the app :
On Android, just like before, the page is reloaded which detects the update, then the snackbar is displayed, etc..
On iOS, I navigate within the app and my listener triggers the search for an update. But this time, the new version is never found and my onupdatefound event handler is never triggered
Reading this post on Medium from Maximiliano Firtman, it seems that iOS 12.2 has brought a new lifecycle for PWAs. According to him, when the app stays idle for a long time or during a reboot of the device, the app state is killed, as well as the page.
I'm wondering if this could be the root cause of my problem here, but I was not able to find anyone having the same trouble so far.
So after a lot of digging and investigation, I finally found out what was my problem.
From what I was able to observe, I think there is a little difference in the way Android and iOS handle PWAs lifecycle, as well as service workers.
On Android, when starting the app after a reboot, it looks like starting the app and searching an update of the service worker (thanks to the hard navigation occuring when reloading the page) are 2 tasks done in parallel. By doing that, the app have enough time to subscribe to the already existing service worker and define a onupdatefound() handler before the new version of the service worker is found.
On the other hand with iOS, it seems that when you start the app after a reboot of the device (or after not using it for a long period, see Medium article linked in the main topic), iOS triggers the search for an update before starting your app. And if an update is found, it will be installed and and enter its 'waiting' status before the app is actually started. This is probably what happens when the splashscreen is displayed...
So in the end, when your app finally starts and you subscribe to the already existing service worker to define your onupdatefound() handler, the update has already been installed and is waiting to take control of the clients.
So here is my final code to register the service worker :
componentDidMount() {
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/sw.js')
.then((reg) => {
if (reg.waiting) {
// a new version is already waiting to take control
this.newWorker = reg.waiting;
/*
code omitted: displays a snackbar to the user to manually trigger
activation of the new SW. This will be done by calling skipWaiting()
then reloading the page
*/
}
// handler for updates occuring while the app is running, either actively or in the background
reg.onupdatefound = () => {
this.newWorker = reg.installing;
this.newWorker.onstatechange = () => {
if (this.newWorker.state === 'installed') {
if (reg.active) {
// a version of the SW already has control over the app
/*
same code omitted
*/
} else {
// very first service worker registration, do nothing
}
}
};
};
});
}
}
Note :
I also got rid of my listener on history that I used to trigger the search for an update on every route change, as it seemed overkill.
Now I rely on the Page Visibility API to trigger this search every time the app gets the focus :
// this function is called in the service worker registration promise, providing the ServiceWorkerRegistration instance
const registerPwaOpeningHandler = (reg) => {
let hidden;
let visibilityChange;
if (typeof document.hidden !== 'undefined') { // Opera 12.10 and Firefox 18 and later support
hidden = 'hidden';
visibilityChange = 'visibilitychange';
} else if (typeof document.msHidden !== 'undefined') {
hidden = 'msHidden';
visibilityChange = 'msvisibilitychange';
} else if (typeof document.webkitHidden !== 'undefined') {
hidden = 'webkitHidden';
visibilityChange = 'webkitvisibilitychange';
}
window.document.addEventListener(visibilityChange, () => {
if (!document[hidden]) {
// manually force detection of a potential update when the pwa is opened
reg.update();
}
});
return reg;
};
As noted by Speckles (thanks for saving me the headache), iOS installs the new SW before launching the app. So the SW doesn't get a chance to catch the 'installing' state.
Work-around: check if the registration is in the waiting state then handle it.
I've made an (untested) example of handling this. - a mod to the default CRA SW.
I am writing my first Android app, using Xamarin. I have an Exit button that, when clicked, closes the app. I want a test in Xamarin UITest that verifies clicking the button closes the app. I messed around with it for a while and finally found something that allows the test to pass.
In the app:
exitButton.Click += (o, e) =>
{
int pid = Android.OS.Process.MyPid();
Android.OS.Process.KillProcess(pid);
};
In UITest:
[Test]
public void ExitButtonClosesTheScreen()
{
try
{
app.Tap(c => c.Button("exitButton"));
Assert.Fail("App remains open.");
}
catch (System.Exception e)
{
Assert.AreEqual("The underlying connection was closed: The connection was closed unexpectedly.", e.InnerException.InnerException.InnerException.Message);
}
}
The test now passes so I guess I'm happy. My question is, is this really the best way to do this? Or is there a better way that I wasn't able to find?
Edit: Unfortunately, this is not the answer. This method allows the test to pass in VS but fails when I run it in App Center. Is there another way to run this test? Or is this something that is simply not testable with UITest? Thank you.
First of all the right code for closing the Application as per me is using finish affinity
In an Activity:
this.FinishAffinity();
In a Fragment:
this.Activity.FinishAffinity();
After doing this AppCenter should be able to figure that your app is closed.
I did a brief read up on this the other day for something similar and I am certain that the ActivityManager class would be the best way to go about this.
https://developer.xamarin.com/api/type/Android.App.ActivityManager/
There is a method within this class called RunningAppProcesses which returns a list of application processes that are running on the device - and from there I guess you can assert if your app process is on the list or not.
Hope this helps
After almost 4 years, i've encountered with the same issue.
I will do it this way in your case:
[Test]
public void ExitButtonClosesTheScreen()
{
app.Tap(c => c.Marked("exitButton"));
/** I asume exitButton click action will just exit,
no popups or alerts appear before exiting. **/
app.WaitForNoElement(q => q.Marked("exitButton"),
"Timeout waiting for element exitButton",
new TimeSpan(0, 0, 30));
AppResult[] result = app.Query();
Assert.IsTrue(result.Length == 0);
}
app.Query() returns all views visible by default, unless a query is especified by a lambda expression, as you should alredy know.
If the Application is gone, the Views visible will be 0, and as such, app.query() will return and array lenght of 0.
For WaitForNoElement's timeout I use a TimeSpan of 30 seconds, but you can use whatever timeout you prefer for this operation, i just considered 30 seconds will be ok.
We are using Ionic 3.9.2 and are having a strange intermittent error on iPhones.
On a specific page, when calling this.navCtrl.pop() (triggered by the user clicking the close button), it's removing the pages below it (including the root page) but not the specific page itself.
When the user clicks the close again, these errors are triggered:
You can't remove all the pages in the navigation stack. nav.pop() is probably called too many times
and
Unhandled Promise rejection:
navigation stack needs at least one root page
I tried replacing the pop() method with this.navCtrl.removeView(this.viewCtrl, { animate: false }); but still have the same problem.
Has anyone else come across such a bug?
Is this page pushed? Or setted like root?
To use .pop(), the page must be pushed
Maybe?
import { App } from 'ionic-angular/components/app/app';
/* define in constructor */
constructor(public platform: Platform, app: App){
this.platform.ready().then(() => {
this.platform.registerBackButtonAction(() => {
app.navPop();
});
})
}
I am writing UI test cases using the new Xcode 7 UI Testing feature. At some point of my app, I ask the user for permission of camera access and push notification. So two iOS popups will show up: "MyApp Would Like to Access the Camera" popup and "MyApp Would Like to Send You Notifications" popup. I'd like my test to dismiss both popups.
UI recording generated the following code for me:
[app.alerts[#"cameraAccessTitle"].collectionViews.buttons[#"OK"] tap];
However, [app.alerts[#"cameraAccessTitle"] exists] resolves to false, and the code above generates an error: Assertion Failure: UI Testing Failure - Failure getting refresh snapshot Error Domain=XCTestManagerErrorDomain Code=13 "Error copying attributes -25202".
So what's the best way of dismissing a stack of system alerts in test? The system popups interrupt my app flow and fail my normal UI test cases immediately. In fact, any recommendations regarding how I can bypass the system alerts so I can resume testing the usual flow are appreciated.
This question might be related to this SO post which also doesn't have an answer: Xcode7 | Xcode UI Tests | How to handle location service alert?
Thanks in advance.
Xcode 7.1
Xcode 7.1 has finally fixed the issue with system alerts. There are, however, two small gotchas.
First, you need to set up a "UI Interuption Handler" before presenting the alert. This is our way of telling the framework how to handle an alert when it appears.
Second, after presenting the alert you must interact with the interface. Simply tapping the app works just fine, but is required.
addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription("Location Dialog") { (alert) -> Bool in
alert.buttons["Allow"].tap()
return true
}
app.buttons["Request Location"].tap()
app.tap() // need to interact with the app for the handler to fire
The "Location Dialog" is just a string to help the developer identify which handler was accessed, it is not specific to the type of alert.
I believe that returning true from the handler marks it as "complete", which means it won't be called again. For your situation I would try returning false so the second alert will trigger the handler again.
Xcode 7.0
The following will dismiss a single "system alert" in Xcode 7 Beta 6:
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.launch()
// trigger location permission dialog
app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].tap()
Beta 6 introduced a slew of fixes for UI Testing and I believe this was one of them.
Also note that I am calling -element directly on -alerts. Calling -element on an XCUIElementQuery forces the framework to choose the "one and only" matching element on the screen. This works great for alerts where you can only have one visible at a time. However, if you try this for a label and have two labels the framework will raise an exception.
Objective - C
-(void) registerHandlerforDescription: (NSString*) description {
[self addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription:description handler:^BOOL(XCUIElement * _Nonnull interruptingElement) {
XCUIElement *element = interruptingElement;
XCUIElement *allow = element.buttons[#"Allow"];
XCUIElement *ok = element.buttons[#"OK"];
if ([ok exists]) {
[ok tap];
return YES;
}
if ([allow exists]) {
[allow tap];
return YES;
}
return NO;
}];
}
-(void)setUp {
[super setUp];
self.continueAfterFailure = NO;
self.app = [[XCUIApplication alloc] init];
[self.app launch];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” would like to make data available to nearby Bluetooth devices even when you're not using app."];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” Would Like to Access Your Photos"];
[self registerHandlerforDescription:#"“MyApp” Would Like to Access the Camera"];
}
Swift
addUIInterruptionMonitorWithDescription("Description") { (alert) -> Bool in
alert.buttons["Allow"].tap()
alert.buttons["OK"].tap()
return true
}
Gosh.
It always taps on "Don't Allow" even though I deliberately say tap on "Allow"
At least
if app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].exists {
app.tap()
}
allows me to move on and do other tests.
For the ones who are looking for specific descriptions for specific system dialogs (like i did) there is none :) the string is just for testers tracking purposes. Related apple document link : https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xctest/xctestcase/1496273-adduiinterruptionmonitor
Update : xcode 9.2
The method is sometimes triggered sometimes not. Best workaround for me is when i know there will be a system alert, i add :
sleep(2)
app.tap()
and system alert is gone
God! I hate how XCTest has the worst time dealing with UIView Alerts. I have an app where I get 2 alerts the first one wants me to select "Allow" to enable locations services for App permissions, then on a splash page the user has to press a UIButton called "Turn on location" and finally there is a notification sms alert in a UIViewAlert and the user has to select "OK". The problem we were having was not being able to interact with the system Alerts, but also a race condition where behavior and its appearance on screen was untimely. It seems that if you use the alert.element.buttons["whateverText"].tap the logic of XCTest is to keep pressing until the time of the test runs out. So basically keep pressing anything on the screen until all the system alerts are clear of view.
This is a hack but this is what worked for me.
func testGetPastTheStupidAlerts() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.launch()
if app.alerts.element.collectionViews.buttons["Allow"].exists {
app.tap()
}
app.buttons["TURN ON MY LOCATION"].tap()
}
The string "Allow" is completely ignored and the logic to app.tap() is called evreytime an alert is in view and finally the button I wanted to reach ["Turn On Location"] is accessible and the test pass
~Totally confused, thanks Apple.
The only thing I found that reliably fixed this was to set up two separate tests to handle the alerts. In the first test, I call app.tap() and do nothing else. In the second test, I call app.tap() again and then do the real work.
On xcode 9.1, alerts are only being handled if the test device has iOS 11. Doesn't work on older iOS versions e.g 10.3 etc. Reference: https://forums.developer.apple.com/thread/86989
To handle alerts use this:
//Use this before the alerts appear. I am doing it before app.launch()
let allowButtonPredicate = NSPredicate(format: "label == 'Always Allow' || label == 'Allow'")
//1st alert
_ = addUIInterruptionMonitor(withDescription: "Allow to access your location?") { (alert) -> Bool in
let alwaysAllowButton = alert.buttons.matching(allowButtonPredicate).element.firstMatch
if alwaysAllowButton.exists {
alwaysAllowButton.tap()
return true
}
return false
}
//Copy paste if there are more than one alerts to handle in the app
#Joe Masilotti's answer is correct and thanks for that, it helped me a lot :)
I would just like to point out the one thing, and that is the UIInterruptionMonitor catches all system alerts presented in series TOGETHER, so that the action you apply in the completion handler gets applied to every alert ("Don't allow" or "OK"). If you want to handle alert actions differently, you have to check, inside the completion handler, which alert is currently presented e.g. by checking its static text, and then the action will be applied only on that alert.
Here's small code snippet for applying the "Don't allow" action on the second alert, in series of three alerts, and "OK" action on the remaining two:
addUIInterruptionMonitor(withDescription: "Access to sound recording") { (alert) -> Bool in
if alert.staticTexts["MyApp would like to use your microphone for recording your sound."].exists {
alert.buttons["Don’t Allow"].tap()
} else {
alert.buttons["OK"].tap()
}
return true
}
app.tap()
This is an old question but there is now another way to handle these alerts.
The system alert isn't accessibly from the app context of the app you are launched in, however you can access the app context anyway. Look at this simple example:
func testLoginHappyPath() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
app.textFields["Username"].typeText["Billy"]
app.secureTextFields["Password"].typeText["hunter2"]
app.buttons["Log In"].tap()
}
In a vacuum with a simulator already launched and permissions already granted or denied, this will work. But if we put it in a CI pipeline where it gets a brand new simulator, all of the sudden it won't be able to find that Username field because there's a notification alert popping up.
So now there's 3 choices on how to handle that:
Implicitly
There's already a default system alert interrupt handler. So in theory, simply trying to typeText on that first field should check for an interrupting event and handle it in the affirmative.
If everything works as designed, you won't have to write any code but you'll see an interruption logged and handled in the log, and your test will take a couple seconds more.
Explicitly via interruptionmonitor
I won't rewrite the previous work on this, but this is where you explicitly set up an interruptionmonitor to handle the specific alert being popped up - or whatever alerts you expect to happen.
This is useful if the built-in handler doesn't do what you want - or doesn't work at all.
Explicitly via XCUITest framework
In xCode 9.0 and above, you can switch between app contexts fluidly by simply defining multiple XCUIApplication() instances. Then you can locate the field you need via familiar methods. So to do this explicitly would look like the following:
func testLoginHappyPath() {
let app = XCUIApplication()
let springboardApp = XCUIApplication(bundleidentifier: "com.apple.springboard")
if springboardApp.alerts[""FunHappyApp" would like permission to own your soul."].exists {
springboardApp.alerts.buttons["Allow"].tap()
}
app.textFields["Username"].typeText["Billy"]
app.secureTextFields["Password"].typeText["hunter2"]
app.buttons["Log In"].tap()
}
Sounds like the approach to implementing camera access and notifications are threaded as you say, but not physically managed and left to chance when and how they are displayed.
I suspect one is triggered by the other and when it is programatically clicked it wipes out the other one as well (which Apple would probably never allow)
Think of it you're asking for a users permission then making the decision on their behalf? Why? Because you can't get your code to work maybe.
How to fix - trace where these two components are triggering the pop up dialogues - where are they being called?, rewrite to trigger just one, send an NSNotification when one dialogue has been completed to trigger and display the remaining one.
I would seriously discourage the approach of programatically clicking dialogue buttons meant for the user.
I have an iOS5 iPad app that uses CLLocationManager that I'm testing with UIAutomation.
Before I run my test script, I manually press "OK" on the dialog that iOS presents when I use CLLocationManager.
Occassionally, my test scripts will fail to start. I press the "Play" icon in Instruments, and nothing happens for 12 seconds. Then, I get the following exception:
Target app is not frontmost
Once this happens, I usually have to restart to get instruments to work again.
I used to get this same exception when I left the CLLocationManager dialog in front of my application. Does anyone have any idea about how to fix this?
//Handling Externally Generated Alerts
UIATarget.onAlert = function onAlert(alert) {
var title = alert.name();
UIALogger.logWarning("Alert with title ’" + title + "’ encountered!");
if (title == "Add Something") {
alert.buttons()["Add"].tap();
return true; // bypass default handler
}
return false; // use default handler
}
Use this code to handle location alert
This happens when an alert view pops up before the app finishes launching fully. It's a bug with automation.