I have Devise Admin & Devise User;
I want to use namespaces;
What I want to achieve:
only devise admin can create devise user
registerable for user is not deleted so that he can edit only page
user can see only current_user/show page
What I have
routes:
Rails.application.routes.draw do root :to => 'dashboard#index'
devise_for :users, controllers: { registrations: 'user_registrations' }
devise_for :admins, controllers: { registrations: 'admin_registrations' }
get 'dashboard/index'
namespace :admin do
root 'dashboard#index'
resources :users
end
user_registration_controller:
class UserRegistrationsController < Devise::RegistrationsController
end
users_controller:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
def index
#users = User.all
end
def show
#user = User.find(params[:id])
end
def new
#user = User.new
end
def edit
end
def create
#user = User.new(user_params)
respond_to do |format|
if #guest.save
format.html { redirect_to users_path }
else
format.html { render :new }
end
end
end
def update
respond_to do |format|
if #user.update(user_params)
format.html { redirect_to #user }
else
format.html { render :edit }
end
end
end
def destroy
user = User.find(params[:id])
user.destroy
redirect_to users_path
end
private
def set_user
#user = User.find(params[:id])
end
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:email, :password, :password_confirmation)
end
end
+ I have user views as they would be in a normal scaffold.
=> With this setup, anyone can create a user
Any ideas how to solve the questions on top?..
Don't use separate user classes with Devise, use roles instead. Devise is only really made to authenticate a single class, while you can hack it into using two classes its a mess. You have to override all the logic of serializing/desearializing users from the session among other things so that devise knows if it should load the Admin or User class.
Its also a bad solution since you are push down a authorization problem into the authentication layer. Devise's job is to verify that the user is who she/he claims to be, which is no small feat. Authorization, on the other hand is rules about what a user can do. "Only admins can create users" is a clear cut authorization rule.
The simplest possible role based authorization would be something like this:
class AddRoleToUser < ActiveRecord::Migration
def change
add_column :users, :role, :integer, default: 0
add_index :users, :role
end
end
class User
# ...
enum role: [:visitor, :admin]
end
We use an enum which is a single bitmask column to store the users role. Declaring it as an enum column also gives us a few methods for free:
user.visitor?
user.admin?
user.admin!
So lets create a basic authorization check:
def create
unless current_user.admin?
redirect_to root_path, status: 401, error: 'You are not authorized to perform this action' and return
end
# ...
end
But we don't want to repeat that every time we want to authorize, so lets clean it up:
class AuthorizationError < StandardError; end
class ApplicationController
rescue_from AuthorizationError, with: :deny_access!
private
def authorize_admin!
raise AuthorizationError, unless current_user.admin?
end
def deny_access!
redirect_to root_path,
status: 401,
error: 'You are not authorized to perform this action'
end
end
So then we can setup the controller with a filter to check the authorization before the action is performed:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
before_action :authorize_admin!, except: [:show]
# ...
end
However instead of reinventing the wheel you might want to have a look at Pundit or CanCanCan which are solid authorization libraries with great communities. You also might want to look at Rolify.
Related
I am currently building a simple web app with Ruby on Rails that allows logged in users to perform CRUD actions to the User model. I would like to add a function where:
Users can select which actions they can perform per controller;
Ex: User A can perform actions a&b in controller A, whereas User B can only perform action B in controller A. These will be editable via the view.
Only authorized users will have access to editing authorization rights of other users. For example, if User A is authorized, then it can change what User B will be able to do, but User B, who is unauthorized, will not be able to change its own, or anyone's performable actions.
I already have my users controller set up with views and a model
class UsersController < ApplicationController
skip_before_action :already_logged_in?
skip_before_action :not_authorized, only: [:index, :show]
def index
#users = User.all
end
def new
#user = User.new
end
def create
#user = User.new(user_params)
if #user.save
redirect_to users_path
else
render :new
end
end
def show
set_user
end
def edit
set_user
end
def update
if set_user.update(user_params)
redirect_to user_path(set_user)
else
render :edit
end
end
def destroy
if current_user.id == set_user.id
set_user.destroy
session[:user_id] = nil
redirect_to root_path
else
set_user.destroy
redirect_to users_path
end
end
private
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:email, :password)
end
def set_user
#user = User.find(params[:id])
end
end
My sessions controller:
class SessionsController < ApplicationController
skip_before_action :login?, except: [:destroy]
skip_before_action :already_logged_in?, only: [:destroy]
skip_before_action :not_authorized
def new
end
def create
user = User.find_by(email: params[:email])
if user && user.authenticate(params[:password])
session[:user_id] = user.id
redirect_to user_path(user.id), notice: 'You are now successfully logged in.'
else
flash.now[:alert] = 'Email or Password is Invalid'
render :new
end
end
def destroy
session[:user_id] = nil
redirect_to root_path, notice: 'You have successfully logged out'
end
end
The login/logout function works, no problem there.
I started off by implementing a not_authorized method in the main application controller which by default prevents users from accessing the respective actions if the user role is not equal to 1.
def not_authorized
return if current_user.nil?
redirect_to users_path, notice: 'Not Authorized' unless current_user.role == 1
end
the problem is that I would like to make this editable. So users with role = 1 are able to edit each user's access authorization, if that makes sense.
How would I go about developing this further? I also do not want to use gems, as the sole purpose of this is for me to learn.
Any insights are appreciated. Thank you!
The basics of an authorization system is an exception class:
# app/errors/authorization_error.rb
class AuthorizationError < StandardError; end
And a rescue which will catch when your application raises the error:
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
rescue_from 'AuthorizationError', with: :deny_access
private
def deny_access
# see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3297048/403-forbidden-vs-401-unauthorized-http-responses
redirect_to '/somewhere', status: :forbidden
end
end
This avoids repeating the logic all over your controllers while you can still override the deny_access method in subclasses to customize it.
You would then perform authorization checks in your controllers:
class ThingsController
before_action :authorize!, only: [:update, :edit, :destroy]
def create
#thing = current_user.things.new(thing_params)
if #thing.save
redirect_to :thing
else
render :new
end
end
# ...
private
def authorize!
#thing.find(params[:id])
raise AuthorizationError unless #thing.user == current_user || current_user.admin?
end
end
In this pretty typical scenario anybody can create a Thing, but the users can only edit things they have created unless they are admins. "Inlining" everything like this into your controllers can quickly become an unwieldy mess through as the level of complexity grows - which is why gems such as Pundit and CanCanCan extract this out into a separate layer.
Creating a system where the permissions are editable by users of the application is several degrees of magnitude harder to both conceptualize and implement and is really beyond what you should be attempting if you are new to authorization (or Rails). You would need to create a separate table to hold the permissions:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :privileges
end
class Privilege < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :thing
belongs_to :user
end
class ThingsController
before_action :authorize!, only: [:update, :edit, :destroy]
# ...
private
def authorize!
#thing.find(params[:id])
raise AuthorizationError unless owner? || admin? || privileged?
end
def owner?
#thing.user == current_user
end
def admin?
current_user.admin?
end
def privileged?
current_user.privileges.where(
thing: #thing,
name: params[:action]
)
end
end
This is really a rudimentary Role-based access control system (RBAC).
I have a user model which uses Devise for authentication and also have an administrator model, which also uses Devise.
I want administrators to be able to edit users profile via administrators/users/{user.id}/edit, however I want this process to be done through Devise Controllers, therefore I tried to inherit from the Users::RegistrationsController as shown below:
class Administrators::UsersController < Users::RegistrationsController
before_action :set_user, only: [:show,:edit,:update,:destroy]
def index
#users=User.all
end
def show
end
def new
super
end
def update
#user.update(user_params)
redirect_to [:administrators,:users]
end
but I get the following error:
Could not find devise mapping for path "/administrators/users". This may happen for two reasons: 1) You forgot to wrap your route inside the scope block. For example: devise_scope :user do get "/some/route" => "some_devise_controller" end 2) You are testing a Devise controller bypassing the router. If so, you can explicitly tell Devise which mapping to use: #request.env["devise.mapping"] = Devise.mappings[:user]
I tried to change the routes but I still get the same error.
Could you please help me?
Inheriting from Devise::RegistrationsController may initially seem like a good idea from a code reuse standpoint but it really not a very good idea.
The intent of the controllers is very different - Devise::RegistrationsController partially deals with an un-authenicated user - and the Devise controllers are scary beasts due to the amount of flexibility built in Devise.
Instead you should just setup a plain old CRUD controller as the task at hand is not very complex compared to clobbering over half of Devise::RegistrationsController.
# config/routes.rb
namespace :administrators do
resources :users
end
# app/controllers/administrators/base_controller.rb
module Administrators
class AuthorizationError < StandardError; end
class BaseController
respond_to :html
before_action :authenticate_user!
# Replace with the lib of your choice such as Pundit or CanCanCan
before_action :authorize_user!
rescue_from AuthorizationError, with: :unauthorized
private
def authorize_user!
raise AuthorizationError and return unless current_user.admin?
end
def unauthorized
redirect_to new_session_path, alert: 'You are not authorized.'
end
end
end
class Administrators::UsersController < Administrators::BaseController
before_action :set_user, only: [:show, :edit, :update, :destroy]
def show
end
def index
#users = User.all
end
def new
#user = User.new
end
def create
#user = User.create(user_params)
respond_with(:administrators, #user)
end
def edit
end
def update
#user.update(user_params)
respond_with(:administrators, #user)
end
def destroy
#user.destroy
respond_with(:administrators, #user)
end
private
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:email, :password, :password_confirmation)
end
end
Instead you may want to focus on reusing the views through partials for example.
See:
ActionController::Responder
Pundit
CanCanCan
I am trying to make an app in Rails 4.
I want to use Pundit for authorisations. I also use Devise for authentication and Rolify for role management.
I have a user model and am making my first policy, following along with this tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qruGD_8ry7k
I have a users controller with:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
before_action :set_user, only: [:index, :show, :edit, :update, :destroy]
def index
if params[:approved] == "false"
#users = User.find_all_by_approved(false)
else
#users = User.all
end
end
# GET /users/:id.:format
def show
# authorize! :read, #user
end
# GET /users/:id/edit
def edit
# authorize! :update, #user
end
# PATCH/PUT /users/:id.:format
def update
# authorize! :update, #user
respond_to do |format|
if #user.update(user_params)
sign_in(#user == current_user ? #user : current_user, :bypass => true)
format.html { redirect_to #user, notice: 'Your profile was successfully updated.' }
format.json { head :no_content }
else
format.html { render action: 'edit' }
format.json { render json: #user.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
end
end
end
# GET/PATCH /users/:id/finish_signup
def finish_signup
# authorize! :update, #user
if request.patch? && params[:user] #&& params[:user][:email]
if #user.update(user_params)
#user.skip_reconfirmation!
sign_in(#user, :bypass => true)
redirect_to #user, notice: 'Your profile was successfully updated.'
else
#show_errors = true
end
end
end
# DELETE /users/:id.:format
def destroy
# authorize! :delete, #user
#user.destroy
respond_to do |format|
format.html { redirect_to root_url }
format.json { head :no_content }
end
end
private
def set_user
#user = User.find(params[:id])
end
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(policy(#user).permitted_attributes)
# accessible = [ :first_name, :last_name, :email ] # extend with your own params
# accessible << [ :password, :password_confirmation ] unless params[:user][:password].blank?
# accessible << [:approved] if user.admin
# params.require(:user).permit(accessible)
end
end
And this is my first go at the User policy.
class UserPolicy < ApplicationPolicy
def initialize(current_user, user)
#current_user = current_user
#user = user
end
def index?
#current_user.admin?
end
def show?
#current_user.admin?
end
def edit?
#current_user.admin?
end
def update?
#current_user.admin?
end
def finish_signup?
#current_user = #user
end
def destroy?
return false if #current_user == #user
#current_user.admin?
end
private
def permitted_attributes
accessible = [ :first_name, :last_name, :email ] # extend with your own params
accessible << [ :password, :password_confirmation ] unless params[:user][:password].blank?
accessible << [:approved] if user.admin
params.require(:user).permit(accessible)
end
end
My questions are:
The tutorial shows something called attr_reader. I have started learning rails from rails 4 so I don't know what these words mean. I think it has something to do with the old way of whitelisting user params in the controller, so I think I don't need to include this in my user policy. Is that correct?
is it right that i have to initialise the user model the way I have above (or is that only the case in models other than user, since I'm initialising current_user, it might already get the user initialised?
is it necessary to move the strong params to the policy, or will this work if I leave them in the controller?
The tutorial shows something called attr_reader. I have started learning rails from rails 4 so I don't know what these words mean. I think it has something to do with the old way of whitelisting user params in the controller, so I think I don't need to include this in my user policy. Is that correct?
No, it is very important.
attr_reader creates instance variables and corresponding methods that return the value of each instance variable. - From Ruby Official Documentation
Basically if you do
class A
attr_reader :b
end
a = A.new
you can do a.b to access b instance variable. It is important because in every policies you might allow read access of instance variables. #current_user and #user is instance variable.
is it right that i have to initialise the user model the way I have above (or is that only the case in models other than user, since I'm initialising current_user, it might already get the user initialised?
You have to initialise it manually. Currently, the way you did it is correctly. Good.
is it necessary to move the strong params to the policy, or will this work if I leave them in the controller?
It is the matter of choice. It will work even if you kept it into controller. Move to policy only if you want to whitelist attributes in quite complex way.
Note: device , pundit and rolify gem works good but there share some of the same functionality so be careful and consistence what to do with what.
For example, You can use devise_for :users , :students , :teachers which will give 3 different links to login the respective resources. You can do lot of things with it. You can further authenticate the urls as per the resources with authenticate method. Check https://github.com/plataformatec/devise/wiki/How-To:-Define-resource-actions-that-require-authentication-using-routes.rb This sort of thing can also be done with pundit with policies and rolify with roles.
I want to allow Users to have two edit pages, one which is the default Devise page that requires a password and the other edit page which allows them to edit some parts of their profile without a password.
I have seen their guide pages like this which allows them to edit their profile without providing a password. However I want to have both options available to the user instead of just one.
How would I go about doing this?
My Attempt
I have tried to create my own update route in the Users controller which will solve the problem but this creates a problem when a User resets their password as it gets routed to the User#update which will cause an error as there is no User available during the password reset in Devise.
class UsersController < ApplicationController
before_action :authenticate_user!, :only => [:crop] #:edit , :update
def show
#user = User.find(params[:id])
authorize #user
end
def update
#user = User.find(params[:id])
authorize #user
if #user.update(user_params)
flash[:success] = "You have successfully updated your profile!"
redirect_to user_path(#user)
else
render :edit
end
end
def crop
#user = User.find(params[:id])
authorize #user
end
def index
end
private
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:poster_image_crop_x, :poster_image_crop_y, :poster_image_crop_w, :poster_image_crop_h)
end
end
Routes
Rails.application.routes.draw do
resources :users,only: [:show] do
member do
get :crop
end
end
devise_for :users, :controllers => { :omniauth_callbacks => "callbacks",:registrations => :registrations,:passwords => "passwords" }
as :user do
get "/login" => "devise/sessions#new"
get "/register" => "devise/registrations#new"
get "/edit" => "devise/registrations#edit"
delete "/logout" => "devise/sessions#destroy"
end
The code by Devise is suggesting to create your own controller. They probably always require password to be passed if it comes from an action in the UsersController. So you should create a seperate controller, let's call it ProfilesController, this controller is like your normal controller although it does not update a Profile model, but the User model directly... nothing special actually, just check authorization and let the User update any field you'd like directly on the User mode, do not forget to authorize the fields you'd wish to let the user update:
class ProfilesController < ApplicationController
def index
end
....... more code
def update
#user = User.find(params[:id])
authorize #user
if #user.update(user_params)
flash[:success] = "You have successfully updated your profile!"
redirect_to user_path(#user)
else
render :edit
end
end
....... more code
private
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:poster_image_crop_x, :poster_image_crop_y, :poster_image_crop_w, :poster_image_crop_h)
end
end
And add resources :profiles to your routes file.
First time poster, long time lurker here. I have a Users model and controller for a little video game application for Rails that I'm currently making. So I've read a couple of answers on here regarding this issue, but none of the answers really seem to have helped me. People have suggested adding a "user_id" column to my Users table, but my point of contention is, I thought the "user_id" was automatically made in Rails? Even if I use a user.inspect, I still see a user_id=7show up on the page. However, I still get the unknown attribute error when attempting to create a game and assign to the current user. Any help would be most appreciated in pinpointing the cause and solution to this. Thanks!
app/controllers/users_controller.rb:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
skip_before_filter :require_authentication, only: [:new, :create]
def index
#users = User.all
end
def show
end
def new
#user = User.new
end
def edit
#user = current_user
end
def create
#user = User.create!(user_params)
session[:user_id] = #user.id
redirect_to users_path, notice: "Hi #{#user.username}! Welcome to DuckGoose!"
end
def update
current_user.update_attributes!(user_params)
redirect_to users_path, notice: "Successfully updated profile."
end
def destroy
#user = User.find(params[:id])
#user.destroy
redirect_to users_url, notice: 'User was successfully destroyed.'
end
private
def user_params
params.require(:user).permit(:username, :firstname, :lastname, :email, :password, :password_confirmation)
end
end
app/config/routes.rb:
NkuProject::Application.routes.draw do
resources :users do
resources :games
end
resources :sessions
resources :games
get "sign_out", to: "sessions#destroy"
get "profile", to: "users#edit"
root to: "sessions#new"
end
app/controllers/games_controller.rb
class GamesController < ApplicationController
def new
#game = Game.new
end
def index
#games = Game.all
end
def destroy
#game = Game.find(params[:id])
#game.destroy
redirect_to games_url, notice: 'Game was successfully deleted.'
end
def create
#game = current_user.games.build(game_params)
if #game.save
redirect_to #game, notice: "Game successfully added"
else
render :new
end
end
def show
#game = Game.find(params[:id])
end
private
def game_params
params.require(:game).permit!
end
end
app/controllers/application_controller.rb
class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base
# Prevent CSRF attacks by raising an exception.
# For APIs, you may want to use :null_session instead.
protect_from_forgery with: :exception
before_filter :require_authentication
def current_user
#current_user ||= User.find_by(id: session[:user_id]) if session[:user_id].present?
end
helper_method :current_user
def require_authentication
if current_user
true
else
redirect_to new_session_path
end
end
end
I'm sure I'm missing some code to put in for reference, but if I need anything else please let me know.
Looking at the way your controller actions are defined, I can safely say that User and Game have a 1-M relationship, i.e.,
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :games
end
class Game < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
Now, based on that games table must have a field named user_id. Rails is not going to create it for you unless you specify it. You need to add field user_id in games table by creating a migration for the same. Right now, it doesn't seem like you have user_id foreign_key field in games table. Hence, the error while saving games record.