I'm new to serviceworkers and I wonder how could I connect my serviceworker to my asp.net application. My js client already is communicated with a service worker and it's able to show notifications.
However, I've seen that some webs (e.g facebook) send notifications even the browser's tab ins't opened (not inactive, not opened). I use signalR to communicate my app with the server. Would it be possible to communicate the serviceworker with the server? It would require to add signalR code to the serviceworker if I'm not wrong, but I don't think it's possible. I've seen that google has another way of communication, Google Cloud Communication
I can't use that, so any ideas of how could I solve this problem?
To make use of offline notifications (i.e., your browser is open but your page isn't), the browser itself needs to know about a messaging service that it can respond to, and which would let it know to wake up your service worker and give it a notification. These services are hard-coded into the browser. In Chrome's case, the service is GCM. And I believe Firefox is rolling out something of its own. You cannot wake up your service worker yourself from your server without going through one of these messaging services.
Remember that generally your service worker is asleep. The browser only wakes it up in response to specific events, and, if your pages are closed, there is no way to trigger a service worker event from your server, unless the browser provides a messaging service such as GCM.
Related
I am working on an application which GET and POST information to a server. I am doing so using AFNetworking framework. My aim is to push a notification to a client whenever someone posts new info to the server. Eg: a new grade is published, the student who's grade was published must receive a notification on his iDevice.
Although I am not familiar with how Apple Push Notification works, from what I read I concluded that I need to add server side code in order to trigger a notification.
Note that I don't have access to the server. Service is provided by Fedena.
Any suggestions or hints from where to start?
APNS needs a server in order to work. The usual flow goes like this:
The iOS Application asks user to enable push notifications
Upon access granted, a device token is generated and then must be sent to the server.
Your server must be setup with the proper APNS certificates generated from the Apple Developer site
Then in your server's, when a new post is created, you need to add some logic where you load all the APNS token you've received already and then send the notification to the devices.
This is a very simple flow description but I guess you understood that you need to have access to the server to be able to do what you are trying to achieve.
Some third parties exists to handle push notifications (like Urban Airship), but those push notifications are usually pushed manually from a person, and not triggered from a server event
I recommend that you can use secondary server of your own as intermediate and use it as infrastructure back bone.You can use SignalR library. Use secondary server as to create connection between two devises. One client will push events and another client will listen to events.
Here is the link to the signalR library code written in IOS.
I am currently using these library. What you can do is start hub and connection using these library.
This library allows invoking method on server. Something like this.
[_hub invoke:#"MehtodName" withArgs:params];
What i would do is to create event registry on server. So one client can listen to event on server and other can push events or vice versa.
So your student device can invoke method "subscribe to events" and server will add it into the registry list. You can create secondary service "Publish Events". Grade publisher can publish via calling this method. Here publish events will look up registry and find interested clients and call desired method on client.
Read more about signalr through this site.
Benefit of using Signalr Over APNS.
Cost Effective. As this will save you money which you might have to pay to Apple for pushing notification.
Can Easily make it cross plateform in future. Just have to impletement similar library in Android/Windows.
Quicker as the data does not travel to apple server from your server.
Worst case you can fallback to apns any day, just put push notification code in any of your secondary server methods.
I have done battery and performance testing as well and works perfectly fine.
If you wanna know, here how it handles connection which is very reliable.
SRAutoTransport chooses the best supported transport for both client
and server. This achieved by falling back to less performant
transports. The default transport fallback is:
SRWebSocketTransport
SRServerSentEventsTransport
SRLongPollingTransport
Let me know if you have anyother question. i am currently doing similar work, might be able to help you with your issue.
I am currently in the process of writing an iOS app and it's now been decided that there will no longer be an in-built real time messaging service. This was the main reason around using Socket.io on the server. So basically when the app is loaded it logged in in the background by sending the login credentials with the connection request. Now that I don't need the messaging service, most of the app is just information requests and the server responds with the relevant information. I could still utilize the real time aspect by sending updated information to the device if it gets updated on the server and some in-app notifications could utilize this too. However I'm pretty sure it can be all done using http requests and I'm not sure how likely I would need real time functionality in a future update.
Ignoring time and money, should I fundamentally re-write the way the server and the app communicate or would it be okay to continue using Socket.io and websockets?
I have a chat application developed by JS. I want to send PING to server once in a while. Its not a problem if app runs on fore ground. The problem is when user minimizes it or open another app. My app looses its focus and gets into suspended state.
I have following two use-cases.
To keep the chat session open I need to send PING to server (Its an IRC server) every X minutes even the app runs in background.
We also need to check for new messages (by ajax on a local http server) and add a local notification to the notification queue so when user clicks on it app can resume
I have found apple does not allow running apps in the background. if they allow they require special permission. I found some apps does it by requesting finite length execution time.
What is the best way to get highest possible background execution time? As a chat app can I request permission for voip, location or any other way ?
Note: the app will be running in an environment where there is no Internet. Hence push notification will not work here.
Update: After doing a lot searching I found background fetch. It seem background fetch will suite it. But still the problem remains, its not called in a timely manner.
This sounds like an interesting problem. From reading the various comments, it sounds like you want this to work when you're on a local network - so you have wifi, but the wifi router/base station isn't connected to the actual internet?
Because background refresh isn't going to be predictable - you'll never know when it is going to update - you might want to get creative.
You could look into exploiting iOS VOIP support, only without the Voice! Apple has some tips on VOIP here. VOIP basically uses something called SIP (Session Initiation Protocol), which is signalling layer of the call, and a lot like HTTP. It's this SIP layer that you want to take advantage of.
This isn't going to be terribly easy, but it should be achievable. Setup your app to use VOIP, and then look into something like PJSip as your SIP library. Then, on your local network have a SIP Server (I'm sure there are plenty open source implementations) that you can register your iPhone against (so your server knows where your phone is, pretending to be a VOIP phone). This should work, because it doesn't need to go through Apple as far as I am aware... And will run happily on your local network.
Then, the server can send a message via SIP to the handset, as if it were instigating a VOIP session. You app is awoken, gets the messages - ideally from the SIP message if possible - and then just doesn't start the session. SIP was designed just for creating sessions, not just VOIP. When I worked in Telecoms R&D (a long time ago) we were using it to swap between Text/Voice/Video, all using local servers.
You'll have to jump a lot of hoops to make this work, but it would be pretty awesome. I have never tried this actual use case - especially with iOS, but I'm fairly sure it will work. It is a bit of a fudge, but should get you where you need to go.
Good luck!
You can use something like PubNub to build this chat app with iOS using native Objective-C code, or with the Phonegap (Cordova) libs.
The beauty with using a real-time messaging network like PubNub is that when the app goes to the background, you can easily have the chat messages come in on APNS.
When the app is in the foreground, it can just receive them as the native (PubNub) message. And if it needs to "catch-up" with the messages it missed while in the background (but received via APNS), its trivial to implement.
Also, PubNub is platform agnostic -- so you can easily also use it on Web, Android, BB, Windows Phone, etc.
http://www.pubnub.com/blog/build-real-time-chat-10-lines-code/
http://www.pubnub.com/blog/html5-websockets-beautiful-real-time-chat-on-mobile-using-pubnubs-channel-presence/
https://github.com/pubnub/objective-c/tree/master/iOS
https://github.com/pubnub/javascript/tree/master/phonegap
geremy
I want to make an iOS application (for iPad specifically), which behave like a web server.
I saw the examples coming with COCOAHTTPSERVER, but i didn't understand something.
Is it possible for my application, while being in background, to receive a request from another application running in the same device?
If it is possible how can i do this?
Otherwise, if it is impossible, what is the meaning of a web server application, that can't work in background?
My exact problem is as follows: I need an iOS application that can receive a request from a javascript application, running on safari, in the same device. Can i create an application behaving like a web server in background (because safari must be in foreground), or there is another way to implement this?
You can run a web server in the background on iOS but unfortunately only for a limited time (up to 10 minutes max) and the OS can stop it at any time. See this tech note [1] for more info.
If that limitation is acceptable to you, you should use an already existing web server like GCDWebServer which handles background mode for you [2].
[1] https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/technotes/tn2277/_index.html
[2] https://github.com/swisspol/GCDWebServer#gcdwebserver--background-mode-for-ios-apps
This library may make your task much easier.
https://github.com/swisspol/GCDWebServer
No, iOS does not support web servers running in the background.
The reason Apple does this is that a web server has to listen for inbound network requests. Listening for inbound network requests requires that the radios be active all the time. Active radios drain the battery.
I have to add e-mail notifications to a client server application.
Notifications happen as the user do some particular action on the client UI.
If I had a middle tier or a service running at server I can imagine how to do it:
1) I simply create a DB tables with "pending notifications"
2) as a user does an action that generates a notification I add a record to the table
3) serverside I would continuously try to send those mails and removing them from the table once sending is succesful
Now I cannot do this now, I have a plan to add a service later on, but for now I must go the quick and dirty way.
So somehow what I was thinking to is to implement something like this:
1) as a notify-worth event occurs at client, the same client (my exe) tries to send the notification, upon failure it will log the notification in the "pending notifications" table (failure can be becuase lack of internet connection or any other problem)
2) I add a Timer that will work from any client machine to check for pending notifications. If there are any the client will try to send the e-mail (using a transaction: I will mark a field as "TryngToSendFromClientX" and in case of failure I will reset that field to NULL)
I think this approach would work, it has obvious limitations (if after failure no one logs into the system, no notification will be sent - same would be if service goes "down"). But can you comment on this approach and suggest a better one?
Additional notes (to better understand the scenario):
a) Note: all notifications are sent from the same e-mail account.
b) I don't need to keep track of who sent the e-mail.
c) the problem of creating the service now is that it will basically complicate significantly deployment and I need to create tools for monitoring the status of the service. Something that I will do in future but not now, in future I have plan to add more functionality (not only sending notifications) to the service, so in that case it makes more sense to create it.
d) I will send e-mails by using Indy components and SMTP server.
If you are not willing to create the service now, I think you are stuck with the scenario you describe. There are some things though you could do to circumvent the problem of no user firing up the client anymore while there are still pending messages.
You could add a commandline utility (or commandline parameter as bepe4711 suggested) that will only check for pending messages and try to send them.
Add this commandline utility to the StartUp folder or Run key in the registry. This way messages will at least get sent when the computer restarts, even if the user does not fire up the your app.
Add a scheduled task to run this utility at least once every day. The scheduled task can be added by code or by your installer.
If you do both, you will only have to worry about pending messages of users that never start their computer again.
Perhaps you can add a parameter to your client which causes it to just look at the pending notifications and send them. After this it can terminate itself. It will just act like some kind of service.
Then you install the client on the server and start it every x minutes.
I do something very similar to the approach you describe. Instead of sending emails I need to call a web service. My application is installed on several laptops and they are commonly not connected to any network.
When my application raises an exception I collect various bits of information including user comments and screen shots. Then I attempt to send this to our web service. If by chance the web service is not available. (i.e. not connected to the internet or web service is down) I write the results to an XML file on disk in the User Profile (App_Data) directory.
The one major difference is I don't poll to check to see if the server is up. I attempt to send them again on the startup of the application.
If both Systems are running on Windows, have a look at MS Message Queue. It is designed to send notifications to systems, which are not allways online. I did it in .Net, there are already easy to use classes implemented. Not sure about Delphi.
Latest version of Windows uses much more the Windows Task Scheduler, and now task can be fired on event (i.e. when a network card gets connected...). You could write a separate utility that tries to send pending notification, even if noone is logged in.