While commenting on JIRA tickets, #username can be used to tag a team member. The thing that bugs me is that when I try to tag any team member, there is a special encoded text appear (something like this [~gbuc13]) for every person you tag in.
Now its very difficult to find which member you tagged in your comment by seeing this code. Is there any way that this strange encoded name could be replaced with a proper, meaningful names so that when a user is being tagged, [mike] is appeared instead of [~gbuc13]? I know this change will have to be adopted by every team member to define their aliases, but I am wondering where this (alias?) could be set.
The change you describe is is the difference between the saved view and the edited view and can't be changed:
at edit time you see the alias
once saved you see the full user name (which links to the Jira profile page showing all their activity)
Related
I am trying to find the correct template and id to use for a hotprint of an advanced pdf template of an Item Fulfillment.
The hot print url is (with the id bolded) https://system.na3.netsuite.com/app/accounting/print/hotprint.nl?regular=T&sethotprinter=T&id=7600&label=Packing%20Slip&printtype=packingslip&trantype=itemship&orgtrantype=TrnfrOrd&auxtrans=7605
For some reason only certain id=# seems to affect the outcome and the ids I have got to work for two different templates don't match the Custom Transaction Forms ID or the Advanced pdf script id. (example most ids=template 1, while 168,4954, and seemingly random other ids=template 2) I am very confused on how netsuite resolves the hot print url as it normally doesn't include the template= part though I have seen others use it for invoice print urls.
The parameters at the end of the url (the stuff after the ?) are used by Netsuite to control settings used by the webpage which prints the PDFs for you.
In this case, &id=##### refers to the internal id of the document you are printing. You can see this by going to the document, right clicking, selecting inspect, and typing nlapiGetRecordId() into the console. When you click Print, you should see that same number after &id=#####.
&template=### refers to the template you are printing. If you go to Customization -> Forms -> Advanced PDF/HTML Templates, you'll notice a Script ID field in the table. If you substitute the correct Script ID in for the number in &template=###, you'll notice you generate the same PDF. This Script ID acts the same as the number that was previously there.
The reason you're seeing unusual results when you change those numbers is because you're mismatching a record with a template not built for it. So it won't print exactly right, but will sometimes execute anyways.
Anyways, this sort of parameter scheme is a similar scheme to how Suitelets and Restlets work, so in the future, you might experience this sort of thing again.
EDIT: For those reading this in the future, please read the comments.
To customize a packing slip and return form:
If you are printing packing slips and need some customization, you can use a custom invoice form when printing packing slips. For example, you can customize an invoice form to hide the fulfilled item tax rate and amount, and the order total. Then, when you print the packing slip using the custom form through mass print, choose the the packing slip shows the customized information.
I have built a simple website and have the requirement to display all post from a blog for a year.
For example www.mysite.com/blogs/2015 should display all posts of 2015.
However, this year is not the real creation date of the post but it is given as input while creating the post (I have added new field to the editor).
I should also have a way to access a post with a unique URL like www.mysite.com/blogs/2015/2, which should display the second post of 2015.
The post number is unique for the year. So I cannot use the content id.
I was able to make this work with my own controller, but an issue remains:
When posts are listed it will attach the URL created by the AutoroutePart, which will be like www.mysite.com/blogs/first-post.
I attempted to change this URL while creating the post by updating the Path property of the AutoroutePart but had no luck.
Any suggestions or advise are appreciated.
You can define you own route for any content item which has the AutoroutePart.
Example in you situation you need to edit the content definition of the blog posts. So under the Content Definition menu you select Blog Post, then edit, then you click on the expando arrow next to the Autoroute label and you'll see the Patterns field where you can define your own pattern.
Let's say I have a language that models a part of stackoverflow. Users are held in one resource, questions in another.
Users:
user fred : fred#foobar.com
user notfred : notfred#foobar.com
Questions:
question 123 by fred message "smart question"
question 124 by notfred message "not so smart question"
Now, the user "fred" wants to remove his account, but this wouldn't work because after loading both resources into my ResourceSet I would have a non-empty Resource#getErrors().
I can work around this by filtering XtextLinkingDiagnostic from the errors, but still other users reading the "smart question" cannot tell anymore that it was asked by someone called "fred". The info is still there, I can access it for example when I set a LinkingDiagnosticMessageProvider with LazyLinkingResource#setDiagnosticMessageProvider(...); however, the best thing I can now do is, show other users validation errors that "fred" was deleted, but they wouldn't know "fred" wrote the message they are just reading. Knowing this would help them a lot because everybody knows that "fred" writes great questions, right?
Long story short, I have an application into which users can load a declaration and a definition file. In very few cases something goes wrong and both files don't match perfectly, which means the definition has entries that are not declared in the declaration. However, I know that ~95% of the entries will still match!
Users cannot fix this quickly, but it is likely that they are happy just editing the 95% definitions, but they still need to be able to read the names of the 5% declarations without editing them!
I am not currently using any UI-parts of Xtext to edit the definitions, but rather a custom UI in form of a table. The current state with the missing declarations is that everything except a value column will be empty. The reference ID would be in another column, and knowing this ID would help the user a lot! Is there a clean way to achieve this?
Have a look at the 'Node Model' e.g. org.eclipse.xtext.nodemodel.util.NodeModelUtils.findNodesForFeature(EObject, EStructuralFeature) allows you to access the text that is written in the file
We currently have a Jira instance and I have had another odd request to sort the posts by the number of customers affected. Is this at all possible or will this require some custom work on my part?
Simplest is to add a customer impact number to your configuration (a custom field of type number) and bump it each time a new customer is added to the company name field.
You might even add a simple javascript which automatically sets the field if the company name field is modified ...
I'm using an embedded relation to allow the user to edit/add books to a library and in the same form to add/remove n authors who wrote the book within the auto generated admin.
Here is my problem: An authors name is unique, so when I enter an author that already exists the sfValidatorDoctrineUnique produces the error.
An object with the same "name" already exist.
What I want to do is catch this error and tell the form not to try to add the exisiting author anew.
Do I use the event system for that, or modify the validators or how can I do that?
thank you very much
hoodie
PS:
after some searching I found something that might be a solution but I haven't made it work yet
http://symfonyguide.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/symfony-forms-saving-process/
I my opinion you should not to add new author if it already exists.
sfDoctrineActAsTaggablePlugin do the same way. It searches for an existing tags and merge them with current (added by user from form) tags.
But here is one issue: Two authors - Aleksander Pushkin and Alexander Pushkin, is it same authors for us, but different for machine.