Let's say I have test on new input and test on new input when input is invalid (first test is on case input is valid).
For example (from my code):
scenario "valid input saving" do
visit program_stream_path(#program, #stream)
click_link "#link"
fill_in "#fill_in", :with=>"1"
click_button "Next"
expect(page).to have_current_path new_students_list_stream_path(#stream)
within("#student_0") do
fill_in "Имя", :with => "Name"
fill_in "Фамилия", :with => "Surname"
fill_in "Электронная почта", :with => "randommail#mail.com"
end
print page.html
click_button "Save"
expect(page).to have_current_path program_stream_path(#program, #stream)
#...other code
end
Obviously, test that checks behavior on invalid input repeats this part:
scenario "invalid input leads to correct input page" do
visit program_stream_path(#program, #stream)
click_link "#link"
fill_in "#fill_in", :with=>"1"
click_button "Next"
expect(page).to have_current_path new_students_list_stream_path(#stream)
#other code
How to avoid this copy-paste way?
You can use before blocks for this kind of thing
feature "..." do
before :each do
visit program_stream_path(#program, #stream)
click_link "#link"
fill_in "#fill_in", :with=>"1"
click_button "Next"
expect(page).to have_current_path new_students_list_stream_path(#stream)
end
scenario "valid input saving"
#unique code for this scenario
end
scenario "invalid input leads to correct input page"
# unique code for this scenario
end
end
The outer feature block could be a describe or a scenario block if wanted/needed since you can nest multiple levels. If you need to use the code across multiple feature files then it makes sense to move it to a method in one of your spec helper files.
You can place it in a method in your spec file like this and reuse it.
scenario "valid input saving" do
your_named_method
...
end
scenario "invalid input leads to correct input page" do
your_named_method
...
end
def your_named_method
visit program_stream_path(#program, #stream)
click_link "#link"
fill_in "#fill_in", :with=>"1"
click_button "Next"
expect(page).to have_current_path new_students_list_stream_path(#stream)
end
A great way to avoid duplication when testing with Capybara is to use Capybara Test Helpers.
RSpec.feature 'Program Stream', test_helpers: [:programs] do
before { visit program_stream_path(#program, #stream) }
scenario 'valid input saving' do
programs.click_to_add_student
programs.should.be_adding_a_student(#stream)
programs.add_student(name: 'Имя', surname: 'Фамилия', email: 'randommail#mail.com')
programs.should.have_new_student('Имя')
end
scenario 'invalid input leads to correct input page' do
programs.click_to_add_student
programs.should.be_adding_a_student(#stream)
programs.add_student(name: nil, surname: nil, email: nil)
programs.should.have_invalid_form("Name can't be blank")
end
end
Besides reducing code duplication, it has the benefit of being a lot more descriptive, which can help to make tests a lot easier to maintain in the long term.
class ProgramsTestHelper < Capybara::TestHelper
# Actions: Encapsulate complex actions to provide a cleaner interface.
def click_to_add_student
click_link '#link'
fill_in '#fill_in', with: '1')
click_button "Next"
end
def add_student(name:, surname:, email:)
fill_in 'Имя', with: name
fill_in 'Фамилия', with: surname
fill_in 'Электронная почта', with: email
click_button 'Save'
end
# Assertions: Allow to check on element properties while keeping it DRY.
def be_adding_a_student(stream)
have_current_path urls.new_students_list_stream_path(stream)
end
def have_new_student(name)
have_content(name)
end
def have_invalid_form(message)
have('form', text: message)
end
end
Have in mind that you could choose to combine click_to_add_student with add_student, running assertions inside the helper methods. It all boils down to how much granularity you need in tests.
Passing blocks to methods is also a nice way to customize interactions or outcomes.
Related
I have a feature test for user registration. How do I test that Devise confirmation instructions are sent correctly? I don't need to test the content of the email, only that the mailer has been called.
I am sending mails in the background.
#user.rb
def send_devise_notification(notification, *args)
devise_mailer.send(notification, self, *args).deliver_later
end
I have tried a few approaches that work for other mailers, including
it "sends the confirmation email" do
expect(Devise.mailer.deliveries.count).to eq 1
end
and
it "sends the confirmation email" do
message_delivery = instance_double(ActionMailer::MessageDelivery)
expect(Devise::Mailer).to receive(:confirmation_instructions).and_return(message_delivery)
expect(message_delivery).to receive(:deliver_later)
end
none of which are working as expected for Devise messages.
What am I doing wrong?
Edit
The feature spec looks like this:
feature "User signs up" do
before :each do
visit '/'
click_link 'Sign up'
fill_in 'user_email', with: valid_attributes[:email]
fill_in 'user_password', with: valid_attributes[:password]
fill_in 'user_password_confirmation', with: valid_attributes[:password]
click_button 'Sign up'
end
it "sends the confirmation email" ...
end
Since you're doing a high level feature spec, I would wager that as a result of clicking the 'Sign up' button, what you want to confirm is that an email job has been added to the queue.
In order to do that, you may have to slightly change your spec set up:
feature "User signs up" do
before :each do
visit '/'
click_link 'Sign up'
fill_in 'user_email', with: valid_attributes[:email]
fill_in 'user_password', with: valid_attributes[:password]
fill_in 'user_password_confirmation', with: valid_attributes[:password]
end
it "queues up a confirmation email job" do
expect { click_button 'Sign up' }.to \
have_enqueued_job(ActionMailer::DeliveryJob)
end
end
You can have a look at the have_enqueued_job matcher for more options if the above one doesn't quite suit your use case.
I am trying to test a dynamic url path through an Rspec expectation, as below:
describe 'registering a user' do
context 'with valid data' do
it 'confirms user registration' do
visit '/users/new'
fill_in 'Name here...', with: 'johnny bloggs'
fill_in 'Your email here...', with: 'test1#test.com'
click_button 'Notify me'
expect(current_path).to eq '/users/#user.id'
expect(page).to have_content "johhny"
expect(page).not_to have_content "Sign up"
end
end
end
This is a feature test not a model unit test so I suppose this sort of object attribute , #user.id, expectation shouldn't be in a feature test. But testing the redirection to a certain path i guess is a valid thing for a feature test to be checking, and a key part of the functionality that i'm testing is that the action redirects to an object specific show page?!
So a) how should i correctly be testing this redirect thats new path involves a dynamic attribute and b) whether or not the correct thing to be doing here is testing a 'dynamic attribute' how would it be possible to test dynamic content within an rspec test? .erb perhaps?
Thank you in advance for the enlightenment.
You can use plain string interpolation:
expect(current_path).to eq "/users/#{ User.last.id }"
Or a route helper:
expect(current_path).to eq user_path(User.last)
I am writing some integration test cases for an existing application. My test works fine if there is only one 'it' block. However, If I add more than one 'it' block it throws an error. Below is my code that works:
require 'spec_helper'
describe 'Group' do
before do
visit 'http://groups.caremonkey.com/users/sign_in'
fill_in "Email", :with => "email#example.com"
fill_in "Password", :with => "password"
click_button "Login"
page.should have_link('Account')
end
it 'Should check all the links and functionality of groups' do
#add new subgroup with valid data should save a new group
find("#group-squares").click_link("Add")
fill_in "Group Name", :with => "Melbourne futsal"
click_on("Save")
page.should_not have_content("can't be blank")
page.execute_script("parent.$.fancybox.close();")
page.should have_link('Account')
#test edit group: should be able to update group info provided valid data are given
first(".actual img").click
page.should have_content("Group")
page.should have_link("Cancel")
fill_in "Group name", :with => "Futsal club"
page.execute_script("$('#sub-group-color-options').find('.color23').click()")
click_button "Save"
click_on("Cancel")
page.should have_link('Account')
end
end
It works perfectly fine when I put all the 'it' block together in a single 'it' block. But when I split them in different 'it' block, it stops working. For example if I split this ("test edit group: should be able to update group info provided valid data are given") test case into separate 'it' block as follows
require 'spec_helper'
describe 'Group' do
before do
visit 'http://groups.caremonkey.com/users/sign_in'
fill_in "Email", :with => "email#example.com"
fill_in "Password", :with => "password"
click_button "Login"
page.should have_link('Account')
end
it 'add new subgroup with valid data should save a new group' do
find("#group-squares").click_link("Add")
fill_in "Group Name", :with => "Melbourne futsal"
click_on("Save")
page.should_not have_content("can't be blank")
page.execute_script("parent.$.fancybox.close();")
page.should have_link('Account')
end
it 'should be able to update group info provided valid data are given' do
first(".actual img").click
page.should have_content("Group")
page.should have_link("Cancel")
fill_in "Group name", :with => "Futsal club"
page.execute_script("$('#sub-group-color-options').find('.color23').click()")
click_button "Save"
click_on("Cancel")
page.should have_link('Account')
end
end
then rspec fails, it passes the first test, however second test gets failed throwing following error.
Failure/Error: visit 'http://groups.caremonkey.com/users/sign_in'
ActionController::RoutingError:
No route matches [GET] "/users/sign_in"
One more thing, I have to test all the features in remote(url: http://groups.caremonkey.com/). Because, I am writing integration tests for an existing application. In addition, I need to login to the system before I test rest of the features of my application. Thanks in advance for your help.
Have you followed the Capybara documentation for calling remote servers? It says you should have the following:
Capybara.current_driver = :selenium # Or anything but rack_test, probably
Capybara.run_server = false # Don't run your app in-process
Capybara.app_host = 'http://groups.caremonkey.com/'
My guess is that when you have visited the site once, future visit calls are trying to use relative routes, which then is routed to the default server. I can't think why you would get a ActionController::RoutingError if you don't have some kind of Rack server running. Are you running these tests in some other Rails application?
I guess something like this:
require 'spec_helper'
describe 'Group' do
before do
visit 'http://groups.caremonkey.com/users/sign_in'
fill_in "Email", :with => "email#example.com"
fill_in "Password", :with => "password"
click_button "Login"
page.should have_link('Account')
find("#group-squares").click_link("Add") #apperently both specs are "scoped" to this page
end
it 'Should check all the links and functionality of groups' do
fill_in "Group Name", :with => "Melbourne futsal"
click_on("Save")
page.should_not have_content("can't be blank")
page.execute_script("parent.$.fancybox.close();")
page.should have_link('Account')
end
it "test edit group: should be able to update group info provided valid data are given"
first(".actual img").click
page.should have_content("Group")
page.should have_link("Cancel")
fill_in "Group name", :with => "Futsal club"
page.execute_script("$('#sub-group-color-options').find('.color23').click()")
click_button "Save"
click_on("Cancel")
page.should have_link('Account')
end
end
My gut feeling tells me both test need the follow this: find("#group-squares").click_link("Add") so I added it to the before block This test however is cryptic, what is first(".actual img")?
Using capybara+rspec how can i compile a form with empty fields?
I'm testing an edit resource page, so i have a compiled form and want to clean its text fields. This is a partial of test:
context "when submitting" do
before { visit edit_post_path(post) }
it {should have_content('Editing')}
it {current_path.should == edit_post_path(post)}
describe "whit invalid information" do
before do
fill_in "post[title]", :with => "" #not working
fill_in "post[body]", :with => "" #not working
click_button "update"
end
it {current_path.should == edit_post_path(post)}
end
describe "whit valid information" do
before do
fill_in "post[title]", with: "some"
fill_in "post[body]", with: "some"
click_button "update"
end
it {should have_content('some')}
it {should have_content('some')}
it {current_path.should == post_path(post)}
end
end
Check manually actual ID/name/label of relevant field in generated HTML of Edit-page via Chrome:InspectElement of Firefox:Firebug. High chances they are different to "post[title]".
UPD. Try to fill in empty strings manually on the page. Does it work fine? I mean error displayed and the route is correct. Firing "Update"-button and getting an error you're not on the edit_post_path anymore. It happens bc in case of unsuccessful #post.update you're rendering Post#edit-view from Post#update action.
Likely problem is that post[title] and post[body] are the names of the fields, and not the IDs.
Also, something you might want to look into to make your tests a little more rigorous: capybara has a builtin within function that yields a block in which you can perform more actions. Check out the documentation on the front page of the gem page: https://github.com/jnicklas/capybara. It would probably look something like:
describe "whit invalid information" do
before do
within("#post") do
fill_in "title", :with => ""
fill_in "body", :with => ""
click_button "update"
end
end
it {current_path.should == edit_post_path(post)}
end
I testing with rspec, Im still learning, I guess I'm on the right way... but when I test my rspec file I got this error:
Failures:
1) UsersController signup with valid information should create a user
Failure/Error: expect { click_button submit }.to change(User, :count).by(1)
count should have been changed by 1, but was changed by 0
# ./spec/controllers/user_controller_spec.rb:31
Finished in 1.16 seconds
2 examples, 1 failures
I know what this mean, but I don't know how to fix it, can anyone help me with this trouble please...Also I put my rspec file
require 'spec_helper'
describe UsersController do
describe "signup" do
before { visit new_user_registration_path }
let(:submit) { "Sign up" }
describe "with invalid information" do
it "should not create a user" do
expect { click_button submit }.not_to change(User, :count)
end
end
describe "with valid information" do
before do
fill_in "Email", :with=> "user#example.com"
fill_in "Password", :with=> "foobar"
#fill_in "password_confirmation", :with=> "foobar"
end
(here is that the error appears...below line)
it "should create a user" do
expect { click_button submit }.to change(User, :count).by(1)
end
end
end
end
thanks for your attention
So, you have a failing spec. The spec itself looks ok. So I would check on
is the implementation in place? You can try out the scenario in your browser. Does it work there? If not, you have a failing test (which is good) and need to add the implementation.
if the implementation works, check the spec again carefully. Is the provided information
fill_in "Email", :with=> "user#example.com"
fill_in "Password", :with=> "foobar"
sufficient to create a user?
if you still haven't found the cause, you could use capybaras save_and_open_page (install launchy gem for that) and peek at the page during your test.
ADDITION:
ok, as I said, this should be an integration test - move it from the spec/controllers to the spec/requests folder (and do change the first line, as you're not describing the UsersController! but that should not lead to the problem).