I am using Rail 4 with latest AngularJS framework, I found when I use uglifier with mangle=false, everything is fine. But if I use uglifier with mangle=true, then I received the error like
Failed to instantiate module *** due to:
Error: [$injector:unpr] Unknown provider: e
You have to use 'Dependency Annotation' because all your services/controllers/directives are renamed and thus no longer working.
See https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/di
There are different ways to get around this. E.g. you could use the $inject property like this:
var MyController = function($scope, greeter) {
// ...
}
MyController.$inject = ['$scope', 'greeter'];
someModule.controller('MyController', MyController);
There is also a nice node plugin https://github.com/olov/ng-annotate that you can use in your build pipeline to automate the whole annotation stuff...
Related
cable_ready 4.5.0
rails 6.1.4.1
ruby 3.0.2p107
This is a simple example from the basic tutorial (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5hA79vKE_E) I suspect the error I am getting is because either cable_ready or rails evolved a little and created a tiny incompatibility.
I get this error in the JS console:
It is triggered when in my controller I ask cable ready to:
cable_ready["timeline"].console_log(message: "***** cable ready post created")
Which leads to my timeline_channel to:
received(data) {
console.log("******** Received data:", data.operations)
if (data.cableReady) CableReady.perform(data.operations)
}
My interpretation is perform causes this line in cable_ready.js line 13:
operations.forEach(function (operation) {
if (!!operation.batch) batches[operation.batch] = batches[operation.batch] ? ++batches[operation.batch] : 1;
});
Is finding something in the received data that it doesn't like.
That's where my trail ends. Can someone see what I am doing wrong, or tell me what other code you'd like me to include?
Solution: downgrade the version of the cable_ready javascript library.
I previously (maybe a year ago) did this tutorial using CableReady 4.5, Ruby 2.6.5 and Rails 6.0.4 and it worked like a charm back then as well as today.
But today, I tried this tutorial again on a duplicate project--same versions of CR, Ruby, and Rails and now I get java console errors similar to yours.
TypeError: undefined is not a function (near '...operations.forEach...')
perform -- cable_ready.js:13
received -- progress_bar_channel.js:8
I looked at the output of yarn list and saw that cable_ready was version 5.0.0-pre8 on the bad project and it was 5.0.0-pre1 on the good project. The downgrade could be accomplished with yarn add cable_ready#^5.0.0-pre1 in the bad project folder and now both projects work.
FYI for other newbies like me trying to understand how CableReady works: This tutorial gives another example of CableReady, and was also fixed the same way.
Trying MockWebServer for the first time on a Groovy/Spring project that uses Spock for unit testing.
I added MockWebServer dependencies as directed (I had to add the second line myself to avoid errors, but it's not documented:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:4.0.0")
testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib:1.3.40")
I have a basic Spock test that looks like this:
def 'server'() {
setup:
MockWebServer server = new MockWebServer()
expect:
server
}
But it fails with this output:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: okhttp3.internal.Util.immutableListOf([Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
at okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockWebServer.<init>(MockWebServer.kt:176)
Is there another dependency I'm missing? Does MockWebServer not play well with Groovy and Spock?
For what it's worth, using version 3.1.4 seems to work:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:3.14.2")
(I'm a first time user of MockWebServer)
Thank you!
Try adding this:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:4.0.0")
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:4.0.0")
With MockWebServer your OkHttp dependency must be the same version.
I got the same problem, I found the solution in version, just change the version to "3.7.0" and it's work fine.
there is some discussion about version changing to "3.4.1" but this version got the problem (Cannot inherit from final class) that discussed at this issue :
https://github.com/andrzejchm/RESTMock/issues/56
so the safest version is "3.7.0" :D
just notice that both versions should be the same..
change your to dependencies to below:
//mock retrofit
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:3.7.0")
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:3.7.0")
//if your source code is java
testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib:1.3.40")
I am trying to write a basic ngrx effects testing. However I keep getting the error as TypeError: expect(...).toBeObservable is not a function.
This is a new project setup with Angular 7. I had no issues with my previous projects which ran in angular 4.
Initially thought it could be something to do with packages so upgraded all packages to the most latest but no luck yet.
I event tried to test a very simple observable as expect(effects.test$).toBeObservable(5); but it gives the same error. As mentioned in the title I am using jasmine-marbles and the version is 0.4.1.
You need to init the test scheduler and add matchers in before each or toBeObservable will not be defined:
import { addMatchers, initTestScheduler } from 'jasmine-marbles';
beforeEach(() => {
...
initTestScheduler();
addMatchers();
});
I'm trying to upgrade Grails 2.3.7 project to Grails 3.2.3. In 2.3.7, I used custom constraints and register them in /conf/Config.groovy using:
org.codehaus.groovy.grails.validation.ConstrainedProperty.registerNewConstraint('description', my.validation.DescriptionConstraint)
Then I can use something like this in domain:
static constraints = {
approvedDate(description: '>= applyDate')
}
However, in Grails 3.2.3, When I put above command (and remove org.codehaus.groovy from package name) in /conf/application.groovy I got following error:
Error occurred running Grails CLI: No signature of method: groovy.util.ConfigObject.registerNewConstraint() is applicable for argument types: (groovy.util.ConfigObject, groovy.util.ConfigObject) values: [[:], [DESCRIPTION_CONSTRAINT:[:]]]
I've notice that validation class is somewhat changed in Grails 3. However using constraint class from Grails-validation still got the same error.
All validation plugins I found were long abandoned before Grails 3. And I can't find any document for register new constraint in Grails 3.2.
Calling ConstrainedProperty.registerNewConstraint in /grails-app/init/BootStrap.groovy works. (tested with Grails 3.2.4)
class BootStrap {
def init = { servletContext ->
grails.validation.ConstrainedProperty.registerNewConstraint('description', my.validation.DescriptionConstraint)
// The rest of bootstrap code
}
}
Note. Previously, I call it from main() in /grails-app/init/Application.groovy. It works for running application. However, it does not work with integration test.
Another way you can create the runtime.groovy under config and register your constraints in the runtime.groovy as in grails 2.x.x:
org.codehaus.groovy.grails.validation.ConstrainedProperty.registerNewConstraint('description', my.validation.DescriptionConstraint)
I have been developing a large AngularJS application inside of a .NET MVC Website. I've gone way to long without testing if it will sucesfully minifiy using the Bundle Optimiazation Features?
BundleTable.EnableOptimizations = True
And of Course, it fails. I've been playing with the Order I bundle my scripts, and ensuring I am using String Literals for my Controller Names (I wasn't, and that is a lot of re-factoring that I will have to do).
But I can not get my Core Scripts to Minifiy without the angular "Unknown Provider" error.
Here is the exact Error:
Uncaught Error: [$injector:modulerr] [http://errors.angularjs.org/1.3.14/$injector/modulerr?p0=ppAccount&p1=Error…redScripts%3Fv%3DknV3wkCOg32ajaw4GwiRSrTXdo8Ue7MRIn65CPYa1b81%3A1%3A379851)]1
Here is my bundle config that is failing:
bundles.Add(new ScriptBundle("~/bundles/PilotPartnerRequiredScripts")
.Include(
"~/UI/js/jquery/jquery-2.1.3.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/jquery-ui/jquery-ui.js",
"~/UI/js/bootstrap/bootstrap.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/pace/pace.min.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/slimscroll/jquery.slimscroll.js",
"~/UI/js/inspinia.js",
"~/UI/js/angular/angular.js",
"~/UI/js/ui-router/angular-ui-router.js",
"~/UI/js/bootstrap/ui-bootstrap-tpls-0.12.1.js",
"~/UI/js/angular/angular-resource.js",
"~/UI/js/angular/angular-sanitize.js",
"~/UI/js/angular/angular-route.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/switchery/switchery.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/angular-ui-switch/angular-ui-switch.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/angularLocalStorage/angular-local-storage.js",
"~/UI/js/plugins/ngDialog/ngDialog.js",
"~/Scripts/ngTags/ng-tags-input.js",
"~/Scripts/uiSortable/sortable.js",
"~/Scripts/kendo/2014.3.1119/kendo.all.min.js",
"~/Scripts/xeditable/xeditable.js"
For the life of me, I can't figure out which dependency isn't being resolved. I feel that if I can narrow it down to a specific dependency I know I can solve the issue.
Is there any way to track down the specific Module that is causing the issue?
Any suggestions on how to make this work?
Thank you for your help.
You should always follow strict di while injecting dependency (Array notation)
Angualar Doc has mentioned that, Do follow strict DI while doing minification, otherwise it could break you app
Eg.(Code)
angular.module('myModule', [])
.factory('serviceId', ['depService', function(depService) {
// ...
}])
.directive('directiveName', ['depService', function(depService) {
// ...
}])
.filter('filterName', ['depService', function(depService) {
// ...
}]);
In above snippet I followed inline array notation of DI, it has been applied on various angular component just to demonstrate it. You should make sure that you follow it wherever you're injecting dependency.