How to do transforms on a CALayer? - ios

Before writing this question, I've
had experience with Affine transforms for views
read the Transforms documentation in the Quartz 2D Programming Guide
seen this detailed CALayer tutorial
downloaded and run the LayerPlayer project from Github
However, I'm still having trouble understanding how to do basic transforms on a layer. Finding explanations and simple examples for translate, rotate and scale has been difficult.
Today I finally decided to sit down, make a test project, and figure them out. My answer is below.
Notes:
I only do Swift, but if someone else wants to add the Objective-C code, be my guest.
At this point I am only concerned with understanding 2D transforms.

Basics
There are a number of different transforms you can do on a layer, but the basic ones are
translate (move)
scale
rotate
To do transforms on a CALayer, you set the layer's transform property to a CATransform3D type. For example, to translate a layer, you would do something like this:
myLayer.transform = CATransform3DMakeTranslation(20, 30, 0)
The word Make is used in the name for creating the initial transform: CATransform3DMakeTranslation. Subsequent transforms that are applied omit the Make. See, for example, this rotation followed by a translation:
let rotation = CATransform3DMakeRotation(CGFloat.pi * 30.0 / 180.0, 20, 20, 0)
myLayer.transform = CATransform3DTranslate(rotation, 20, 30, 0)
Now that we have the basis of how to make a transform, let's look at some examples of how to do each one. First, though, I'll show how I set up the project in case you want to play around with it, too.
Setup
For the following examples I set up a Single View Application and added a UIView with a light blue background to the storyboard. I hooked up the view to the view controller with the following code:
import UIKit
class ViewController: UIViewController {
var myLayer = CATextLayer()
#IBOutlet weak var myView: UIView!
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
// setup the sublayer
addSubLayer()
// do the transform
transformExample()
}
func addSubLayer() {
myLayer.frame = CGRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: 100, height: 40)
myLayer.backgroundColor = UIColor.blue.cgColor
myLayer.string = "Hello"
myView.layer.addSublayer(myLayer)
}
//******** Replace this function with the examples below ********
func transformExample() {
// add transform code here ...
}
}
There are many different kinds of CALayer, but I chose to use CATextLayer so that the transforms will be more clear visually.
Translate
The translation transform moves the layer. The basic syntax is
CATransform3DMakeTranslation(_ tx: CGFloat, _ ty: CGFloat, _ tz: CGFloat)
where tx is the change in the x coordinates, ty is the change in y, and tz is the change in z.
Example
In iOS the origin of the coordinate system is in the top left, so if we wanted to move the layer 90 points to the right and 50 points down, we would do the following:
myLayer.transform = CATransform3DMakeTranslation(90, 50, 0)
Notes
Remember that you can paste this into the transformExample() method in the project code above.
Since we are just going to deal with two dimensions here, tz is set to 0.
The red line in the image above goes from the center of the original location to the center of the new location. That's because transforms are done in relation to the anchor point and the anchor point by default is in the center of the layer.
Scale
The scale transform stretches or squishes the layer. The basic syntax is
CATransform3DMakeScale(_ sx: CGFloat, _ sy: CGFloat, _ sz: CGFloat)
where sx, sy, and sz are the numbers by which to scale (multiply) the x, y, and z coordinates respectively.
Example
If we wanted to half the width and triple the height, we would do the following
myLayer.transform = CATransform3DMakeScale(0.5, 3.0, 1.0)
Notes
Since we are only working in two dimensions, we just multiply the z coordinates by 1.0 to leave them unaffected.
The red dot in the image above represents the anchor point. Notice how the scaling is done in relation to the anchor point. That is, everything is either stretched toward or away from the anchor point.
Rotate
The rotation transform rotates the layer around the anchor point (the center of the layer by default). The basic syntax is
CATransform3DMakeRotation(_ angle: CGFloat, _ x: CGFloat, _ y: CGFloat, _ z: CGFloat)
where angle is the angle in radians that the layer should be rotated and x, y, and z are the axes about which to rotate. Setting an axis to 0 cancels a rotation around that particular axis.
Example
If we wanted to rotate a layer clockwise 30 degrees, we would do the following:
let degrees = 30.0
let radians = CGFloat(degrees * Double.pi / 180)
myLayer.transform = CATransform3DMakeRotation(radians, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0)
Notes
Since we are working in two dimentions, we only want the xy plane to be rotated around the z axis. Thus we set x and y to 0.0 and set z to 1.0.
This rotated the layer in a clockwise direction. We could have rotated counterclockwise by setting z to -1.0.
The red dot shows where the anchor point is. The rotation is done around the anchor point.
Multiple transforms
In order to combine multiple transforms we could use concatination like this
CATransform3DConcat(_ a: CATransform3D, _ b: CATransform3D)
However, we will just do one after another. The first transform will use the Make in its name. The following transforms will not use Make, but they will take the previous transform as a parameter.
Example
This time we combine all three of the previous transforms.
let degrees = 30.0
let radians = CGFloat(degrees * Double.pi / 180)
// translate
var transform = CATransform3DMakeTranslation(90, 50, 0)
// rotate
transform = CATransform3DRotate(transform, radians, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0)
// scale
transform = CATransform3DScale(transform, 0.5, 3.0, 1.0)
// apply the transforms
myLayer.transform = transform
Notes
The order that the transforms are done in matters.
Everything was done in relation to the anchor point (red dot).
A Note about Anchor Point and Position
We did all our transforms above without changing the anchor point. Sometimes it is necessary to change it, though, like if you want to rotate around some other point besides the center. However, this can be a little tricky.
The anchor point and position are both at the same place. The anchor point is expressed as a unit of the layer's coordinate system (default is 0.5, 0.5) and the position is expressed in the superlayer's coordinate system. They can be set like this
myLayer.anchorPoint = CGPoint(x: 0.0, y: 1.0)
myLayer.position = CGPoint(x: 50, y: 50)
If you only set the anchor point without changing the position, then the frame changes so that the position will be in the right spot. Or more precisely, the frame is recalculated based on the new anchor point and old position. This usually gives unexpected results. The following two articles have an excellent discussion of this.
About the anchorPoint
Translate rotate translate?
See also
Border, rounded corners, and shadow on a CALayer
Using a border with a Bezier path for a layer

Related

UIBezierPath corners curve according to the upcoming direction

I'm creating an audio waveform, which should look like this:
Notice how the corners of the lines are curved, according to the direction.
My waveform currently has only straight lines:
How can I achieve the desired results?
My current code for the waveform:
fileprivate func createPath(with points: [CGPoint], pointCount: Int, in rect: CGRect) -> CGPath {
let path = UIBezierPath()
guard pointCount > 0 else {
return path.cgPath
}
guard rect.height > 0, rect.width > 0 else {
return path.cgPath
}
path.move(to: CGPoint(x: 0, y: 0))
let minValue = 1 / (rect.height / 2)
for index in 0..<(pointCount / 2) {
var point = points[index * 2]
path.move(to: point)
point.y = max(point.y, minValue)
point.y = -point.y
path.addLine(to: point)
}
let scaleX = (rect.width - 1) / CGFloat(pointCount - 1)
let halfHeight = rect.height / 2
let scaleY = halfHeight
var transform = CGAffineTransform(scaleX: scaleX, y: scaleY)
transform.ty = halfHeight
path.apply(transform)
return path.cgPath
}
There are two ways to accomplish this:
Rather than treating each bar as a wide line, fill it as a shape, each with its own left, top, right, and bottom. And the top would then be a bézier.
Rather than adjust the top of each bar, you can make the bars all go from minimum to maximum values and then add a mask over the whole graph to render the smoothed shape.
E.g., this shows a few data points, overlays the Catmull Rom bézier, I then extend the bars (because sometimes the curve of the bézier goes above the existing bars, and then use the bézier as mask instead of an overlay.
Additional observations:
Please note, your first image with the curved tops of the bars has another feature that makes it look smooth: The data points, themselves, are smoothed. Your second image features far greater volatility than the first.
The source of this volatility (which is common in audio tracks, or pretty much any DSP dataset), or lack thereof, is not relevant here. What is relevant is that if the data samples are highly variable, an interpolation algorithm for curving the tops of the bars can actually exaggerate the volatility. Single point spikes will be unusually sharp. Double point spikes will actually appear higher than they really are.
E.g. consider this dataset:
With something this sort of variability, it could be argued that the “rounding” of the bars makes the results harder to read and/or is misleading:
While I have attempted to answer the question, one must ask whether this whole exercise is prudent. While there might be an aesthetic appeal to curves to the tops of the bars, it suggests a degree of continuity/precision that is greater than what the underlying data likely supports. The square bars more accurately represent the reality of ranges of values for which data was aggregated and, for this reason, are the common visual representation.

CGAffineTransform - anchor image to baseline?

I am expanding/reducing an image perfectly using CGAffineTransform, BUT it changes around the centre points of the image. I want to keep it fixed/anchored to the baseline? Is this possible? The image is displayed in a UIImageView.
UIView.animate(withDuration: 0.0, animations: {
// Sunrise
let multiplierSunrise = CGFloat(self.sunriseTime/self.sunriseMax)
var transformSunrise = CGAffineTransform.identity
transformSunrise = transformSunrise.translatedBy(x: 0, y: (self.imageHeight*(1-(multiplierSunrise/2))-(self.imageHeight/2)))
transformSunrise = transformSunrise.scaledBy(x: 1, y: 1*multiplierSunrise )
self.sunriseView.transform = transformSunrise
})
Transforms are applied around the view's layer's anchor point. This is the layer's bounds center by default, but you can move it, describing the desired anchor point in percentage terms. So if you want the transform to be applied around the bottom of the view, you could say:
self.sunriseView.layer.anchorPoint = CGPoint(x:0.5, y:1)
However, when you say that, the view itself will move! To prevent that, also move the view's center to compensate:
self.sunriseView.center.y += self.sunriseView.bounds.height/2
self.sunriseView.layer.anchorPoint = CGPoint(x:0.5, y:1)
Here's an example where, having done that, I proceed to apply a y-axis scale transform. As you can see, we are holding the bottom steady:

UIViews with subviews: calculating position when scaling

I have a view that I draw using Core Graphics, which in this example is a segmented circle. The user can touch the circle to create a point along its circumference; this creates a subview on the UIView that contains the circle graphic.
Then I've implemented a pinch-zoom gesture which causes the circle to redraw to its new size. I've seen most implementations of pinch zoom use transform properties, but I've chosen to redraw because it's all vectors and gives a clean result.
My problem is repositioning the point views. I calculate the required position of those points based on the scale of the parent view: as it changes I update the x/y coords of the point views. However, it seems there are some precision issues: as the circle shape size increases, the points drift so they aren't right on the line anymore. Here's a couple examples:
This is where the circle is at 100% scale. Note the perfect positioning of that black point. But when you zoom in...
The point drifts off-line.
And here's some code. I derive the new size of the circle from the pinch gesture's scale (I modify if a bit to constrain and slow it down for UI purposes, so that's deltaScale) and then draw it like so:
let currentSize = self.shape!.bounds.size
let newSize = CGSize(width: self.originalSize.width * deltaScale, height: self.originalSize.height * deltaScale)
self.shape?.frame.size = newSize
self.shape?.center = self.originalCentre!
self.shape?.shapeSize = newSize
self.shape?.setNeedsDisplay()
As the pinch-zoom gesture completes, I calculate the factor:
let xScale = Double(newSize.width) / Double(currentSize.width)
let yScale = Double(newSize.height) / Double(currentSize.height)
self.points = self.points.map{(thisPoint) -> UIView in
thisPoint.center = CGPoint(x: Double(thisPoint.center.x) * xScale, y: Double(thisPoint.center.y) * yScale)
return thisPoint
}
(I was using CGFloats, but switched to Doubles in the hope that it would give me the precision I needed. Alas.)
You're accumulating roundoff errors. This is getting executed repeatedly:
thisPoint.center = CGPoint(x: Double(thisPoint.center.x) * xScale, y: Double(thisPoint.center.y) * yScale)
Repeating any calculation of the form 'x=f(x)' with anything less than unlimited precision will result in drift.
Trick is to not have 'thisPoint.center' on both sides of the equal sign. Best way to do that is to have thisPoint.center be a pure function of some other state. Commenter suggested storing desired angle, that would work well. Then you could do:
thisPoint.center = f(thisPoint.someRadians), where 'f' converts from polar to rectangular coordinates, factoring in the scale of the circle.

How to "center" SKTexture in SKSpriteNode

I'm trying to make Jigsaw puzzle game in SpriteKit. To make things easier I using 9x9 squared tiles board. On each tile is one childNode with piece of image from it area.
But here's starts my problem. Piece of jigsaw puzzle isn't perfect square, and when I apply SKTexture to node it just place from anchorPoint = {0,0}. And result isn't pretty, actually its terrible.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/2di30hk5evdd5fr/IMG_0086.jpg?dl=0
I managed to fix those tiles with right and top "hooks", but left and bottom side doesn't care about anything.
var sprite = SKSpriteNode()
let originSize = frame.size
let textureSize = texture.size()
sprite.size = originSize
sprite.texture = texture
sprite.size = texture.size()
let x = (textureSize.width - originSize.width)
let widthRate = x / textureSize.width
let y = (textureSize.height - originSize.height)
let heightRate = y / textureSize.height
sprite.anchorPoint = CGPoint(x: 0.5 - (widthRate * 0.5), y: 0.5 - (heightRate * 0.5))
sprite.position = CGPoint(x: frame.width * 0.5, y: frame.height * 0.5)
addChild(sprite)
Can you give me some advice?
I don't see a way you can get placement right without knowing more about the piece texture you are using because they will all be different. Like if the piece has a nob on any of the sides and the width width/height the nob will add to the texture. Hard to tell in the pic but even if it doesn't have a nob and instead has an inset it might add varying sizes.
Without knowing anything about how the texture is created I am not able to offer help on that. But I do believe the issue starts with that. If it were me I would create a square texture with additional alpha to center the piece correctly. So the center of that texture would always be placed in the center of a square on the grid.
With all that being said I do know that adding that texture to a node and then adding that node to a SKNode will make your placement go smoother with the way you currently have it. The trick will then only be placing that textured piece correctly within the empty SKNode.
For example...
let piece = SKSpriteNode()
let texturedPiece = SKSpriteNode(texture: texture)
//positioning
//offset x needs to be calculated with additional info about the texture
//for example it has just a nob on the right
let offsetX : CGFloat = -nobWidth/2
//offset y needs to be calculated with additional info about the texture
//for example it has a nob on the top and bottom
let offsetY : CGFloat = 0.0
texturedPiece.position = CGPointMake(offsetX, offsetY)
piece.addChild(texturedPiece)
let squareWidth = size.width/2
//Now that the textured piece is placed correctly within a parent
//placing the parent is super easy and consistent without messing
//with anchor points. This will also make rotations nice.
piece.position = CGPoint(x: squareWidth/2, y: squareWidth/2)
addChild(piece)
Hopefully that makes sense and didn't confuse things further.

SceneKit applyTorque

I am trying to applyTorque to a node in my scene. The documentation states:
Each component of the torque vector relates to rotation about the
corresponding axis in the local coordinate system of the SCNNode
object containing the physics body. For example, applying a torque of
{0.0, 0.0, 1.0} causes a node to spin counterclockwise around its
z-axis.
However in my tests it seems that Physics animations do not affect actual position of the object. Therefore, the axis remain static (even though the actual node obviously moves). This results in the torque always being applied from the same direction (wherever the z axes was when the scene was initiated).
I would like to be able to apply torque so that it is always constant in relation to the object (e.g. to cause node to spin counterclockwise around z-axis of the node's presentationNode not the position node had(has?) when the scene was initiated)
SceneKit uses two versions of each node: the model node defines static behavior and the presentation node is what's actually involved in dynamic behavior and used on screen. This division mirrors that used in Core Animation, and enables features like implicit animation (where you can do things like set node.position and have it animate to the new value, without other parts of your code that query node.position having to working about intermediate values during the animation).
Physics operates on the presentation node, but in some cases--like this one--takes input in scene space.
However, the only difference between the presentation node and the scene is in terms of coordinate spaces, so all you need to do is convert your vector from presentation space to scene space. (The root node of the scene shouldn't be getting transformed by physics, actions, or inflight animations, so there's no practical difference between model-scene space and presentation-scene space.) To do that, use one of the coordinate conversion methods SceneKit provides, such as convertPosition:fromNode:.
Here's a Swift playground that illustrates your dilemma:
import Cocoa
import SceneKit
import XCPlayground
// Set up a scene for our tests
let scene = SCNScene()
let view = SCNView(frame: NSRect(x: 0, y: 0, width: 500, height: 500))
view.autoenablesDefaultLighting = true
view.scene = scene
let cameraNode = SCNNode()
cameraNode.camera = SCNCamera()
cameraNode.position = SCNVector3(x: 0, y: 0, z: 5)
scene.rootNode.addChildNode(cameraNode)
XCPShowView("view", view)
// Make a pyramid to test on
let node = SCNNode(geometry: SCNPyramid(width: 1, height: 1, length: 1))
scene.rootNode.addChildNode(node)
node.physicsBody = SCNPhysicsBody.dynamicBody()
scene.physicsWorld.gravity = SCNVector3Zero // Don't fall off screen
// Rotate around the axis that looks into the screen
node.physicsBody?.applyTorque(SCNVector4(x: 0, y: 0, z: 1, w: 0.1), impulse: true)
// Wait a bit, then try to rotate around the y-axis
node.runAction(SCNAction.waitForDuration(10), completionHandler: {
var axis = SCNVector3(x: 0, y: 1, z: 0)
node.physicsBody?.applyTorque(SCNVector4(x: axis.x, y: axis.y, z: axis.z, w: 1), impulse: true)
})
The second rotation effectively spins the pyramid around the screen's y-axis, not the pyramid's y-axis -- the one that goes through the apex of the pyramid. As you noted, it's spinning around what was the pyramid's y-axis as of before the first rotation; i.e. the y-axis of the scene (which is unaffected by physics), not that of the presentation node (that was rotated through physics).
To fix it, insert the following line (after the one that starts with var axis):
axis = scene.rootNode.convertPosition(axis, fromNode: node.presentationNode())
The call to convertPosition:fromNode: says "give me a vector in scene coordinate space that's equivalent to this one in presentation-node space". When you apply a torque around the converted axis, it effectively converts back to the presentation node's space to simulate physics, so you see it spin around the axis you want.
Update: Had some coordinate spaces wrong, but the end result is pretty much the same.
Unfortunately the solution provided by rickster does not work for me :(
Trying to solve this conundrum I have created (what i believe to be) a very sub-standard solution (more a proof of concept). It involves creating (null) objects on the axis i am trying to find, then I use their position to find the vector aligned to the axes.
As I have a fairly complex scene, I am loading it from a COLLADA file. Within that file i have modelled a simple coordinate tripod: three orthogonal cylinders with cones on top (makes it easer to visualise what is going on).
I then constrain this tripod object to the object I am trying to apply torque to. This way I have objects that allow me to retrieve two points on the axes of the presentationNode of the object I am trying to apply torque to. I can then use these two points to determine the vector to apply the torque from.
// calculate orientation vector in the most unimaginative way possible
// retrieve axis tripod objects. We will be using these as guide objects.
// The tripod is constructed as a cylinder called "Xaxis" with a cone at the top.
// All loaded from an external COLLADA file.
SCNNode *XaxisRoot = [scene.rootNode childNodeWithName:#"XAxis" recursively:YES];
SCNNode *XaxisTip = [XaxisRoot childNodeWithName:#"Cone" recursively:NO];
// To devise the vector we will need two points. One is the root of our tripod,
// the other is at the tip. First, we get their positions. As they are constrained
// to the _rotatingNode, presentationNode.position is always the same .position
// because presentationNode returns position in relation to the parent node.
SCNVector3 XaxisRootPos = XaxisRoot.position;
SCNVector3 XaxisTipPos = XaxisTip.position;
// We then convert these two points into _rotatingNode coordinate space. This is
// the coordinate space applyTorque seems to be using.
XaxisRootPos = [_rotatingNode convertPosition:XaxisRootPos fromNode:_rotatingNode.presentationNode];
XaxisTipPos = [_rotatingNode convertPosition:XaxisTipPos fromNode:_rotatingNode.presentationNode];
// Now, we have two *points* in _rotatingNode coordinate space. One is at the center
// of our _rotatingNode, the other is somewhere along it's Xaxis. Subtracting them
// will give us the *vector* aligned to the x axis of our _rotatingNode
GLKVector3 rawXRotationAxes = GLKVector3Subtract(SCNVector3ToGLKVector3(XaxisRootPos), SCNVector3ToGLKVector3(XaxisTipPos));
// we now normalise this vector
GLKVector3 normalisedXRotationAxes = GLKVector3Normalize(rawXRotationAxes);
//finally we are able to apply toque reliably
[_rotatingNode.physicsBody applyTorque:SCNVector4Make(normalisedXRotationAxis.x,normalisedXRotationAxis.y,normalisedXRotationAxis.z, 500) impulse:YES];
As you can probably see, I am quite inexperienced in SceneKit, but even I can see that much easier/optimised solution does exits, but I am unable to find it :(
I recently had this same problem, of how to convert a torque from the local space of the object to the world space required by the applyTorque method. The problem with using the node's convertPosition:toNode and fromNodes methods, is that they are also applying the node's translation to the torque, so this will only work when the node is at 0,0,0. What these methods do is treat the SCNVector3 as if it's a vec4 with a w component of 1.0. We just want to apply the rotation, in other words, we want the w component of the vec4 to be 0. Unlike SceneKit, GLKit gives us 2 options for how we want our vec3s to be multiplied:
GLKMatrix4MultiplyVector3 where
The input vector is treated as it were a 4-component vector with a w-component of 0.0.
and GLKMatrix4MultiplyVector3WithTranslation where
The input vector is treated as it were a 4-component vector with a w-component of 1.0.
What we want here is the former, just the rotation, not the translation.
So, we could roundtrip to GLKit. To convert for instance the local x axis (1,0,0), eg a pitch rotation, to the global axis needed for apply torque, would look like this:
let local = GLKMatrix4MultiplyVector3(SCNMatrix4ToGLKMatrix4(node.presentationNode.worldTransform), GLKVector3(v: (1,0,0)))
node.physicsBody?.applyTorque(SCNVector4(local.x, local.y, local.z, 10), impulse: false)
However, a more Swiftian approach would be to add a * operator for mat4 * vec3 which treats the vec3 like a vec4 with a 0.0 w component. Like this:
func * (left: SCNMatrix4, right: SCNVector3) -> SCNVector3 { //multiply mat4 by vec3 as if w is 0.0
return SCNVector3(
left.m11 * right.x + left.m21 * right.y + left.m31 * right.z,
left.m12 * right.x + left.m22 * right.y + left.m32 * right.z,
left.m13 * right.x + left.m23 * right.y + left.m33 * right.z
)
}
Although this operator makes an assumption about how we want our vec3s to be multiplied, my reasoning here is that as the convertPosition methods already treat w as 1, it would be redundant to have a * operator that also did this.
You could also add a mat4 * SCNVector4 operator that would let the user explicity choose whether or not they want w to be 0 or 1.
So, instead of having to roundtrip from SceneKit to GLKit, we can just write:
let local = node.presentationNode.worldTransform * SCNVector3(1,0,0)
node.physicsBody?.applyTorque(SCNVector4(local.x, local.y, local.z, 10), impulse: false)
You can use this method to apply rotation on multiple axes with one applyTorque call. So say if you have stick input where you want x on the stick to be yaw (local yUp-axis) and y on the stick to be pitch (local x-axis), but with flight-sim style "down to pull back/ up", then you could set it to SCNVector3(input.y, -input.x, 0)

Resources