I need SDK iso for sles 11 sp3, or way to bypass that without mounting, I need some rpms that are included to that dvd, i.e libqt4-devel which need more devel dependencies. Any idea where I can find it for download or way to bypass it ?
(official website and novell website doesn't host it anymore.)
Thanks
Related
I'm working on a Linux system (a based of OpenWRT version) that has not much storage (<3MB) and no active internet connection, however I need to be able to publish to a MQTT-Broker some outputs. Is there a way for me to install just the publisher part of Mosquitto to save space or another way to solve this issue?
Without a LOT more information about the system this question is basically impossible to answer. e.g. we have no idea about what OS is being used...
But for a system with such tightly constrained storage your best option will probably to build the components you need from scratch that way you have complete control over what gets installed.
You could build the mosquitto tools and then strip them before copying just the binary you want (and any require libraries) to the system.
If you install from pretty much any Linux package management system you are likely to get all the tools plus man pages which will inflate the install footprint.
EDIT -
But all that said, a quick look at the available packages for OpenWRT implies that the existing packages that include both the broker and the command line tools would use 129kb (99 + 30 and is less if you don't need SSL 85 + 28) when installed (this assumes the pre-requisites are already installed)
https://openwrt.org/packages/table/start?dataflt%5BDescription_wiki*%7E%5D=mosquitto
Docker EE installation followed here: https://docs.docker.com/install/windows/docker-ee/#install-docker-ee
for the script install. The uri seems to be broken. looking at download.docker.com it seems you dont have any of the new docker ee releases there (specifically 1809 that I’m looking to upgrade to) our network policies on our docker machines dont allow us to use PSGallery so I can’t follow the Install-Module approach…
Is there anything I can do to update to the latest docker ee?
You can get the direct download urls from this json file.
At the time of writing, the 1809 package zip is here and seems to be the same version that the OneGet provider installs.
The link is actually included under section "Update Docker Engine - Enterprise" on the Docker docs page, but the offline installation should ideally include a method for discovering the url.
The goal is to upload to Amazon S3 from QNX software.
Is it possible to target QNX as the build for the aws-sdk-cpp?
Initial attempts seem to default to Windows.
We don't know, but you should try. Since QNX is unix like system, most probably it's okay to build on QNX. But make sure you have openssl/curl/cmake stuff installed.
I'm experimenting with the new Windows Subsystem for Linux as a way to develop Rails applications in Windows. I have WSL installed and I have Ruby in it but how do I use that Ruby from a Windows GUI application, specifically, RubyMine:
This is so I can easily start rails, run tests, etc.
If anyone is wondering how this can be done at this time with the latest version of Ruby, there is a WSL connector for the remote repo of ruby.
[Update 2020-10-30]
Updating the response below as a lot has changed and improved since my initial reply in 2017 😜
The awesome team at JetBrains have enabled RubyMine to talk to WSL via SSH and to use the "remote" Ruby interpreter, and even debug Ruby code running in WSL! :)
Also, in Windows 10 1903, WSL provides the ability to access Linux distros' filesystems from Windows via the \\wsl$\ pseudo-UNC path.
In Windows 10 2004, WSL added a Linux icon to File Explorer making it easier to discover this pseudo-UNC path.
So, in Windows 10 >= 1903, Windows apps, editors, IDEs, etc. can also access files stored in, for example, \\wsl$\Ubuntu\...!
👉 Notes:
Accessing files in Linux via \\wsl$\... will be slower than accessing files locally because file IO requests have to be marshalled back and forth via a 9P fileserver. If you intend on accessing files intensively, we recommend storing the files in the filesystem closest to whatever you'll be using to access those files most intensively.
Thus ... while you can access files directly via the pseudo-path, using WSL integrations built-in to tools like RubyMine, VSCode, Visual Studio, etc. should be preferred if available.
I'm running a business where we are creating email stationeries for people. We have some Mac users that currently have to download a zip file and manually copy that to their mail stationeries directory.
I want to automate that process and allow Mac users to download directly a package that will copy those files automatically.
I've build a sample package with PackageMaker, created script that will replace Archive.pax.gz with client's stationeries but go an error. I have realized I did not provide a mandatory BOM file. How can I create it on a non-mac platform? Or if I can't, is there any other way to create a Mac installer on a non-mac platform?
It is now possible to create BOM (bill-of-materials) files on linux. Someone created an open-source version of mkbom at:
http://hogliux.github.io/bomutils
The website also has an easy to follow step-by-step tutorial on creating a Mac OS X installer on Linux ( http://hogliux.github.io/bomutils/tutorial.html ).
My company regularly build Mac OS X installers on linux with this method and so far we haven't had any major problems.
Either you can find a package of this utility for your Linux: http://www.unix.com/man-page/All/8/mkbom/ or you can try to write it yourself, given the information available at Apple's website on BOM.
Finally I've created a postflight hook that is doing all the installation process