Using Jmeter GUI, I recorded a test scenario (placing an order) and the script ran successfully. But when I replay the test scripts it doesn't function as it was recorded to do, it did not make an order.
After query the dev, found that with each item selected, the server generate a CSRF token, and put the token in the URL path (Like: /cart/add/type/product_id/7245985/_csrf_token/b46c0aec2e5891808ec42141b1956943204ae8f8) when the item is added to the shopping cart. This is all recorded in the script. This path with the token is used to add the item to cart.
My question is how to test this dynamic token when it is concatenated in the path of URL?
Any help are appreciated.
If you have not already added Tree View Listener to your Test Plan, then add it now. You can use it to view the details of requests & responses. JMeter considers a request successful if it gets "some" response from Server-side. It does not matter if the response is functionally valid or not. So, in order to make sure that JMeter is sending valid parameters and receiving expected response, you will have to check the details of requests / responses in Tree view listener.
You can also add Response Assertions to requests so JMeter itself verifies that it is getting expected responses.
Important Tips:
Use TreeView Listener for debugging only. In real load test keep it disabled as it consumes lot of memory.
Do not use response assertions excessively as they consume lot of memory as well.
JMeter is not a browser-based tool. It just deals with back-end requests. Hence it is expected to be very fast. So nothing wrong with that. You should remove un-necessary timers as there is nothing wrong with it being fast.
If your requests involve some kind of login authorization then have a look at this question for further details Load testing using jmeter with basic authentication
Recording doesn't guarantee working script, it gives you only a "skeleton" and usually you need to perform some correlation (the process of extracting mandatory dynamic parameter from previous response and adding it to the next request).
Reference material:
Building a Web Test Plan
Building an Advanced Web Test Plan
How to use JMeter for Login Authentication?
How to make JMeter behave more like a real browser
Related
I have a Jmeter script where during replay, Post request is displaying as Get request and the parameters in the request are not sent to the server. Due to this, correlations are failing at this request.
One of the parameters in the request is ViewState with so many characters. Is this large parameter value causing the above issue? How to proceed now?
Most probably you're sending a malformed request therefore instead of properly responding to a POST request you're being redirected somewhere (most probably to Login page)
Use View Results Tree listener in HTML or Browser mode to see what page you're hitting in the reality
With regards to the ViewState, "so many characters" is not a problem, the problem is that these are not random characters. ViewState is being used for client-side state management and if you fail to provide the proper value you won't be able to move further so you need to design your test as follows:
Open first page
Extract ViewState using a suitable Post-Processor
Open second page
here you need to pass viewstate from the step 1 along with other parameters
More information: ASP.NET Login Testing with JMeter
Also don't forget to add HTTP Cookie Manager to your Test Plan
What I'm able to understand is the request may be getting redirected. This happens usually when the server expects a unique request. If you recorded the request, you may be possibly using older headers that carry old cookie information. Check your headers and then reconstruct the request.
Make sure you are not using old cookies anywhere. remove that cookie part from HTTP Header Manager everywhere.
I am trying to load test my mobile application using jmeter, I have given authorization token in HTTP header manager and recorded the mobile app operations. But when I run this recorded script and view the result in result tree, all of the operations appear as failed and for some i see 401 un-authorization error. Please help me in solving this problem.
This image shows the result I get after running the recorded
HTTP 401 status code means that you failed to provide correct credentials or token, you need either to login somehow or to pass a "good" token which your system expects.
In the majority of cases you cannot just replay recorded script without prior correlation - the process of extracting dynamic data from the previous response using a suitable Post-Processor, converting it into a JMeter Variable and adding it to the next request.
You can determine which parts of request are dynamic by recording the same actions once again and comparing the scripts. If there will be differences - you will need to handle the corresponding parameters.
Alternative option is using cloud-based proxy service for recording, it can export recorded requests in SmartJMX mode assuming automatic detection and correlation of any dynamic parameters. See How to Cut Your JMeter Scripting Time by 80% article for more information.
I have an internal requirement to stress gitlab to evaluate its performance serving requests for large sized repos with concurrent commits by many engineers. I am using JMeter to record a flow of committing a file from the UI. On replay, I get a 403 because the csrf token validation fails. I have tried extracting the authenticity_token via Regex but the value getting used as part of the X-CSRF_Token header is different and there is no way for me to extract that value from the preceding response.
For the purposes of my load testing, I want to disable this check in gitlab-rails. Where and how should I go about doing this?
I've been trying to use Gatling to load-test our Orbeon servers. More specifically we want to know how many concurrent users the server can handle submitting forms.
I've already captured the requests using Gatling (one request per form field that is filled in). However, the requests are not working when I replay them. My first thought upon inspecting the requests is that it should contain a valid UUID. But where can I generate this ID, or parse it from the initial request? Is it even possible to manually generate these requests?
Any other suggestion for a load-testing tool for Orbeon would also be helpful.
We often do something similar here, using JMeter, but the idea is the same whatever tool you're using. Indeed, Ajax requests:
Need to have to be "in" the same session used to generate the page to which they are related, i.e. typically carry the correct JESSSIONID cookie.
Need to refer to the proper UUID. You can find the UUID in the HTML of the page, in the <input type="hidden" name="$uuid" value="…">.
Need to have the correct <xxf:sequence>1</xxf:sequence> number. I.e. 1 for the first request made after the page is loaded, then 2, and so on.
Is there a way to mock requests when writing automated UI tests in Swift 2.0. As far as I am aware the UI tests should be independent of other functionality. Is there a way to mock the response from server requests in order to test the behaviour of the UI dependant on the response. For example, if the server is down, the UI tests should still run. Quick example, for login, mock if password failed then UI should show alert, however, if the login is successful the next page should be shown.
In its current implementation, this is not directly possible with UI Testing. The only interface the framework has directly to the code is through it's launch arguments/environment.
You can have the app look for a specific key or value in this context and switch up some functionality. For example, if the MOCK_REQUESTS key is set, inject a MockableHTTPClient instead of the real HTTPClient in your networking layer. I wrote about setting the parameters and NSHipster has an article on how to read them.
While not ideal, it is technically possible to accomplish what you are looking for with some legwork.
Here's a tutorial on stubbing network data for UI Testing I put together. It walks you through all of the steps you need to get this up and running.
If you are worried about the idea of mocks making it into a production environment for any reason, you can consider using a 3rd party solution like Charles Proxy.
Using the map local tool you can route calls from a specific endpoint to a local file on your machine. You can past plain text in your local file containing the response you want it to return. Per your example:
Your login hits endpoint yoursite.com/login
in Charles you using the map local tool you can route the calls hitting that endpoint to a file saved on your computer i.e mappedlocal.txt
mappedlocal.txt contains the following text
HTTP/1.1 404 Failed
When Charles is running and you hit this endpoint your response will come back with a 404 error.
You can also use another option in Charles called "map remote" and build an entire mock server which can handle calls and responses as you wish. This may not be exactly what you are looking for, but its an option that may help others, and its one I use myself.