I am using the following call
expect(element(by.css('MyTableCssIdentifier')).element(by.cssContainingText("td", RowName)).getText()).toEqual(RowValue, ' Row value does not match expected')
it is giving the following error on a table with 250+ entries in it. I a getting the following error:
FATAL ERROR: CALL_AND_RETRY_LAST Allocation failed - process out of memory
It does not appear I can break the table down further (i.e. no other identifier to only use half of the table at a time or some such). I am able to return just the entire table without any issues. I have also tried wrapping in a function with the filter option:
this.getElementFromTable = function(RowName) {
return element.all(by.repeater('MyRepeaterID')).filter(function (row) {
return row.$$('td').get(1).getText().then(function (rowName) {
return rowName == RowName;
});
}).then(function (rows) {
try {
return rows[0].getText().then(function (RowValue) {
return RowValue;
});
}
catch (err) {
return Error(' element not found ')
}
});
};
This also seems to give me the same allocation error. Any suggestions?
Related
I have a block of code that I found online and it seems to be working and not working at the same time. I think its probably my lack of understanding but I cant seem to get it to work the way I want it.
selectPicture() {
let context = imagepicker.create({
mode: "single" // use "multiple" for multiple selection
});
var imageBase64
context
.authorize()
.then(function() {
return context.present();
})
.then(function(selection) {
selection.forEach(function(selected) {
imageSourceModule.fromAsset(selected).then((imageSource) => {
imageBase64 = imageSource.toBase64String("jpg",60);
console.log("Image saved successfully!")
console.log(imageBase64)
console.log("test test") //runs fine
this.image = "~/assets/images/account/camera.png" //cant seem to run
console.log("test test 2")
}).catch(function (e) {
// process error
console.log("got error 1")
});
})
}).catch(function (e) {
// process error
console.log("got error 2")
});
},
Within the imageSourceModule.fromAsset(selected).then((imageSource), I was trying to save the base64 info in another variable but cant seem to do anything within other than console log a string. When I run this.image = "~/assets/images/account/camera.png" (just a placeholder, even calling a method does not work too) for example it catches an error.
What could the problem be? thank you!
UPDATE
I changed console.log("got error 1") to log the actual update and what i got was:
undefined is not an object (evaluating 'this.image = "~/assets/images/account/camera.png"')*
I now think that theres a problem with my understanding calling variable outside. My variable 'image' is within the script at
data() {
return {
image : ""
}
}
first of all check what this variable is, because you do not use es6 arrow functions, so this is probably not the vue instance.
the second thing: when you change vue-variables asynchronously use the $set method, like: this.$set(this, 'image', '~/assets/images/account/camera.png')
I'm trying to test to see if an update query was successful with Zend Framework 2. I'm using the getAdapter()->query() methods but I'm unsure of how to actually test to see if anything was returned or if it actually executed. I know it is executing (as I can see the update working via mysql workbench) but I'm not sure on how to actually count or verify. Here is the code I have in place (which I know is wrong but I don't know what else to do):
$update = $this->update->table('stores')
->set(array('number_of_items' => $number))->where(array('store_name' => $this->store_name));
$query = $this->sql->getAdapter()->query($this->sql->buildSqlString($update), Adapter::QUERY_MODE_EXECUTE);
if ($query->count() > 0) {
// insert the items into the items table
$insert = $this->insert->into('items')
->columns(array('store_id', 'price', 'description'))
->values(array($row['store_id'], $price, $item_desc));
$query = $this->sql->getAdapter()->query(
$this->sql->buildSqlString($insert),
Adapter::QUERY_MODE_EXECUTE
);
if ($query->count() > 0) {
return true;
} else {
throw new \Exception("Error adding your item to the items table, please try again.");
}
} else {
// this is the exception being thrown
throw new \Exception("An error occurred while adding your item(s) to the store, please try again");
}
Now I know most likely count() will only work on select queries but I am unsure of how to test to see if the update and insert were successful.
Any help would be appreciated
Thanks
To test if update and insert were successful.
As per your code
try {
$affetedRows = $this->insert->into('items')
->columns(array('store_id', 'price', 'description'))
->values(array($row['store_id'], $price, $item_desc));
}catch (\Exception $e) {
var_dump($e->getMessage());exit; // see if any exaption Or error in query
}
}
var_dump($affetedRows ) // it will return number of affected rows.
Same for delete and update, after successfull execution delete and updateare also returns number of affected rows.
so if there is successfull exceution, you can check success of your query.
Thanks.
This code works:
firebase.database().ref($scope.language).orderByChild('word').equalTo($scope.word).once('value')
.then(function(snapshot) {
console.log(snapshot.val());
})
It logs the object and its key.
This code doesn't work:
firebase.database().ref($scope.language).orderByChild('word').equalTo($scope.word).remove()
.then(function(snapshot) {
console.log("Removed!");
})
The error message is:
TypeError: firebase.database(...).ref(...).orderByChild(...).equalTo(...).remove is not a function
The documentation makes remove() look simple. What am I missing?
You can only load data once you know its specific location in the JSON tree. To determine that location, you need to execute the query and loop through the matching results:
firebase.database().ref($scope.language).orderByChild('word').equalTo($scope.word).once("value").then(function(snapshot) {
snapshot.forEach(function(child) {
child.ref.remove();
console.log("Removed!");
})
});
If you only want to log after all have been removed, you can use Promise.all():
firebase.database().ref($scope.language).orderByChild('word').equalTo($scope.word).once("value").then(function(snapshot) {
var promises = [];
snapshot.forEach(function(child) {
promises.push(child.ref.remove());
})
Promise.all(promises).then(function() {
console.log("All removed!");
})
});
This is Frank's first code block with another closure. Without the closure the record is removed from the database but then there's an error message:
Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: snapshot.forEach(...).then is not a function
Adding a closure fixes the error message.
firebase.database().ref($scope.language).orderByChild('word').equalTo($scope.word).once("value").then(function(snapshot) {
snapshot.forEach(function(child) {
child.ref.remove();
}); // a closure is needed here
}).then(function() {
console.log("Removed!");
});
I'm currently trying the Neo4j 2.0.0 M3 and see some strange behaviour. In my unit tests, everything works as expected (using an newImpermanentDatabase) but in the real thing, I do not get results from the graphDatabaseService.findNodesByLabelAndProperty.
Here is the code in question:
ResourceIterator<Node> iterator = graphDB
.findNodesByLabelAndProperty(Labels.User, "EMAIL_ADDRESS", emailAddress)
.iterator();
try {
if (iterator.hasNext()) { // => returns false**
return iterator.next();
}
} finally {
iterator.close();
}
return null;
This returns no results. However, when running the following code, I see my node is there (The MATCH!!!!!!!!! is printed) and I also have an index setup via the schema (although that if I read the API, this seems not necessary but is important for performance):
ResourceIterator<Node> iterator1 = GlobalGraphOperations.at(graphDB).getAllNodesWithLabel(Labels.User).iterator();
while (iterator1.hasNext()) {
Node result = iterator1.next();
UserDao.printoutNode(emailAddress, result);
}
And UserDao.printoutNode
public static void printoutNode(String emailAddress, Node next) {
System.out.print(next);
ResourceIterator<Label> iterator1 = next.getLabels().iterator();
System.out.print("(");
while (iterator1.hasNext()) {
System.out.print(iterator1.next().name());
}
System.out.print("): ");
for(String key : next.getPropertyKeys()) {
System.out.print(key + ": " + next.getProperty(key).toString() + "; ");
if(emailAddress.equals( next.getProperty(key).toString())) {
System.out.print("MATCH!!!!!!!!!");
}
}
System.out.println();
}
I already debugged through the code and what I already found out is that I pass via the InternalAbstractGraphDatabase.map2Nodes to a DelegatingIndexProxy.getDelegate and end up in IndexReader.Empty class which returns the IteratorUtil.EMPTY_ITERATOR thus getting false for iterator.hasNext()
Any idea's what I am doing wrong?
Found it:
I only included neo4j-kernel:2.0.0-M03 in the classpath. The moment I added neo4j-cypher:2.0.0-M03 all was working well.
Hope this answer helps save some time for other users.
#Neo4j: would be nice if an exception would be thrown instead of just returning nothing.
#Ricardo: I wanted to but I was not allowed yet as my reputation wasn't good enough as a new SO user.
var display_message="";
$('input:checked').each(function(index) {
var profile_id=$(this).val();
$.ajax({
type: 'post',
url: 'myUrl',
data: data,
success: function(data) {
if(data=="ok")
display_message = display_message + data +", ";
}
});
});
alert(display_message);
alert(display_message);
if($.trim(display_message)!=""){
jAlert("Your birthdate already exits in "+display_message.substring(0, display_message.length - 2)+".", "Bdate");
return false;
}
in this code, i use two alert-box for display display_message variable value.
when i run successfully this code, in 1st alert-box i get blank value and second alert-box i get value which i needed, then it will go in if condition.
if i doesn't use alert box then it will always take null value in display_message variable and never enters into the if condition. so what i need to change to run this code without alert box?
You are making an asynchronous call via AJAX, but your code is executing synchronously. So it is returning before the AJAX call completes. The first alert box just gives the function time to catch up. You need to handle all this code in your success callback.
var display_message="";
$('input:checked').each(function(index) {
var profile_id=$(this).val();
$.ajax({
type: 'post',
url: 'myUrl',
data: data,
success: function(data) {
if(data=="ok")
display_message = display_message + data +", ";
if($.trim(display_message)!=""){
jAlert("Your birthdate already exits in "+display_message.substring(0, display_message.length - 2)+".", "Bdate");
return false;
}
});
});
You want all your ajax queries to finish and return results, right?
Then this is a synchronization problem.
I would suggest this approach (code is simplified for clarity).
var inputs_processed = -1;
var inputs_to_process = -1;
function queryData() {
inputs_to_process = $('input:checked').length;
$('input:checked').each(function() {
$.ajax({success: function(data) {
inputs_processed += 1;
// build up that message
}});
});
}
function displayResult() {
if (inputs_processed == inputs_to_process) {
// display result
} else {
// not all queries finished yet. Wait.
setTimeout(displayResult, 500);
}
}
queryData();
displayResult();
Basically, you know how many requests should be made and you don't display result until that number of requests returns.
Why your data is "data"? I cant see any variable called data is declared here. You should pass in the value you want to use as the parameter into the data options.
Edit: This is why u getting the null value. data is not initialize into anything. Only after the success function, your "data" will have the value since you declare the return value with the same name