I am working on a web application which retrieves fitness data from the Google Fit REST API.
Everything worked fine until a few weeks ago. Now, Google Fit responds with a empty response body. So, the response contains absolute nothing. Google Fit returns a status code 200. I have changed nothing in my code which could have affected this.
I use this HTTP GET URL to request steps data:
https://www.googleapis.com/fitness/v1/users/me/dataSources/derived:com.google.step_count.delta:com.google.android.gms:merge_step_deltas/datasets/1443869895588000000-1446465495589000000
When I use this URL to request fitness data in the OAuth Playground everything works fine.
I would be very thankful if someone has an idea how to fix this! :)
I did not use Rest api But I Used History API and Session API. Google respond error most of the time when the time interval you gave is wrong, or the data-type you are requesting are mismatched. Try checking it one more time which are the parameters you are sending in post.
Related
I am having issues running a GET against both the schedules and shifts v1.0 API. The documentation on the MS KB doesn't indicate that this is in preview any more, so I'm unsure what we're doing wrong here. The API is running with an app-only auth token
Postman screenshot
Currently we are doing prelim testing via postman to ensure we can use the API correctly.
The app in question has been given the following permissions:
Schedule.Read.All
Schedule.ReadWrite.All
We can view the teamId information correctly at https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/teams/{{TeamId}}, but schedules or schedules/shifts returns the error
Based on a previous answer I saw, I added the MS-APP-ACT-AS header with a UserId to act as, but it returned the same error
Thanks
Try to use this header instead:
MS-APP-ACTS-AS
In your question you wrote:
MS-APP-ACT-AS
(Missing the 'S')
In Postman, I am able to successfully request a new token using the GUI. I'm wondering how to do this programatically. Or at least see the HTTP request that Postman is making. I've tried viewing it by monitoring the network traffic in Chrome, and with Wireshark, but without success. Thank you
well, OAuth2 is quite a big subject and you are not really providing a lot of details.
Postman is just a client, it creates requests based on the data you gave it so you don't need to monitor anything, you should know how you set it up and then simply mirror that in whatever language you want. Look at headers and post data specifically.
All I can do is point you to an extensive article I wrote on OAuth2, it shows a complete implementation, how to use Postman to create the correct requests and then how to write code which makes it all work.
If you don't use dot net, you can still understand all the concepts and it should be trivial to do the same thing using a different language.
https://eidand.com/2015/03/28/authorization-system-with-owin-web-api-json-web-tokens/
I know this question may be so simple but still posting here.
I have a WebService/Restful API written in RAILS which gives response in JSON format. According to the RAILS developer, it works fine under his development but not in my case.
My problem is,
Now, I want to test that Request/Response in Browser Rest Client (like
mozilla, chrome). However, when I hit the API there it gives me 401.
So I have 2 questions,
1] How to test it in Rest Client? if I make any mistake while passing header parameter in wrong way.
2] Is there anything other approach to do this?
API Details are,
URL : http://rails4.xxxxx.com/xx/xxxxx/{id}.json
//{id} can be any integer value
header
X-xxxxxx-Client:
487txxxxhu34hfixxxxxu3hfcfxxxxx4f3f3f
For more details, please refer below snaps.
Thanks is advance.
There are a lot of ways to test rest api:
cURL (CLI)
RestConsole (for Chrome)
RestAssured (java test framework)
Frisby (javascript test framework)
Problem was due to wrong credentials.
I am making Google API request through application using RestClient library to get address.
Sample request code-
require 'rest-client'
require 'json'
gmaps_api_href = "https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/geocode/json?latlng=18.56227673,73.76804232&language=ar"
response = RestClient.get gmaps_api_href
result = JSON.parse(response)['results']
This request works fine on my local machine and it completes within 1-2secs. But on production instance it takes 20secs to finish one request.
Due to some security measures, we can not access production instance directly. So I am unable to find pin point for this delay.
After doing trial and error, we found that
If we make request using CURL, it takes 1 sec on server
If we make request using Net::HTTP, it takes 20sec to complete same as we were observed for RestClient.
If we make request using WebRequest in small .net app, that request complete within 1 secs.
Its difficult for me to get difference between above observations.
Please let me know why it is so? and what changes I have to do to make it work in my Rails App?
Are you using a Google API key? Your example does not show use of an API key. if not, I'd guess you are getting rate-limited by Google. On your server, you've probably already deployed a version of this app, which made lots of requests to Google without an API key in the fairly recent past, and Google noticed and it's rate-limiting software may be slowing down your requests made from that server. While your local machine hasn't in the past made an enormous amount of requests to the google api, so is not being rate-limited by google's servers.
It's possible Google's rate-limiting is paying some attention (for now!) to User-Agent, and the different user-agent sent by Curl somehow evades Google's rate-limiting that was triggered by the requests sent by RestClient with it's User-Agent (and RestClient may use net-http under the hood, and have the same User-Agent as it).
While one would hope that if you were rate-limited you'd get a "429 Too Many Requests" error response instead of just a slow response, it's possible RestClient hides this from you (I haven't used RestClient), and I've also seen some unpredictable behavior from Google rate-limiting defenses, especially when not using an API key on a service that requires one for all but a few sample requests. I have seen things similar to what you report in that case.
My guess is you're being rate limited because you are not using an API key. Get and use an API key from Google. Google still has rate limits when you are using an API key, but they are clearly advertised (for free? 2500 per-day, and no more than 10 per second. more if you pay) and should give more clear and predictable error messages when exceeded. That's part of why Google requires the api key, so they can reliably rate-limit you in clear ways.
https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/usage-limits
https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/geocoding/intro#BYB
How do I play a track from a SoundCloud URL, which, for example, I got from the xml response from a query
<stream-url>https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/31164607/stream</stream-url>
I should have thought that it would have been as easy as:
https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/31164607/stream&client_id=my_client_id
yet I get
<error>401 - Unauthorized</error>
All I want to do is consume it in a Silverlight MediaElement, so all I need is set some url to the MediaElement's Source property.
I've checked an application that I wrote about 2 years ago, and THEN, accessing the stream url was as easy as this for a public track:
http://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/18163056/stream&consumer_key=MY_CONSUMER_KEY
however this no longer seems to work.
For example, all I had to do then in C# was:
MediaElement me = new MediaElement();
me.Source= new Url("http://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/18163056/stream&consumer_key=MY_CONSUMER_KEY");
me.Play();
Any hints would be appreciated.
I had a reply on a Microsoft forum that seems to imply that SoundCloud might not be possible to stream to Windows 8 Metro devices without consuming the whole stream before playback starts - which is quite worrying and would seem to imply that to make authentication possible, it would have to be done entirely in the url querystring insterad of using the header:
(The following reply is the answer to the following question: 'I am able to access an audio stream by http using the MediaElement, however I need to access it via https in which I need to add the oAuth info to the header of the initial request.
How is this done when using a MediaElement, and if it cannot be done, what is the workaround for consuming an audio feed in Metro 8 that requires header authentication to stream?')
"Direct access to the underlying network stream is not currently permitted by the MediaElement. Because of this there is currently no way to modify the header of the HTTP request to include any additional authentication information. That said, you do have control over the URL. You could theoretically setup an HTTP proxy service that translated the HTTP GET request parameters into the necessary oAuth credentials. Keep in mind that this is just a theoretical workaround. You may find different behavior in practice. Another theoretical workaround would be to handle the oAuth yourself via a raw stream socket and pass the retuned media data to the MediaElement via "Set Source" and a "Random Access Stream". Please keep in mind that this method has major limitations. in order to use a "Random Access Stream" with the ME you need to make sure all of the data is available before passing it to the ME."
The proxy service is not scalable for an application that is merely distributed for free as every stream would need to come via the proxy. And the raw stream socket, although getting around this, would mean that playback could not start until the whole file had downloaded - and this goes against all current UX (User Experience) guidelines.
So once again, if anyone has any tips, or info about how the whole authentication thing can be achieved in a querystring instead of using headers, I'd appreciate it!
I'm a little confused about whether you're referring to a public or a private track? If it's a public track, then you shouldn't need to send any authentication information, just your client id.
When I request https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/31164607/stream?client_id=YOUR_CLIENT_ID then I get a 302 redirect to the proper mp3 stream.
Remember, adding parameters to a URL must start with a ? not &. This could (more than likely) be the reason why you are getting a 401 (SC is not picking up the client_id).
After authentication the link like this
http://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/103229681/stream?consumer_key=d61f17a08f86bfb1dea28539908bc9bf
is working fine. I am using Action Script.
I'm following up on Tom's reply because he calls attention to url character specificity. My HTTP requests randomly started failing today, and I was prefacing my client_Id with a ?. As soon as I changed that single ? to &, it started working. So in my case, SC wasn't picking up my client_Id because I used the wrong character. I think depending on where in the request we're talking about specifically, it's worth noting that differences between ? and & do make a difference.