Segment.io `analytics.page` not sending to Google Analytics in Rails - ruby-on-rails

I'm following Segment's quickstart guide at: https://segment.com/docs/libraries/analytics.js/quickstart/
Basically, Google Analytics is not receiving any page views from Segment and I can't figure out why...
In my layouts/application file, I have:
:javascript
!function(){var analytics=window.analytics=window.analytics||[];if(!analytics.initialize)if(analytics.invoked)window.console&&console.error&&console.error("Segment snippet included twice.");else{analytics.invoked=!0;analytics.methods=["trackSubmit","trackClick","trackLink","trackForm","pageview","identify","reset","group","track","ready","alias","page","once","off","on"];analytics.factory=function(t){return function(){var e=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);e.unshift(t);analytics.push(e);return analytics}};for(var t=0;t<analytics.methods.length;t++){var e=analytics.methods[t];analytics[e]=analytics.factory(e)}analytics.load=function(t){var e=document.createElement("script");e.type="text/javascript";e.async=!0;e.src=("https:"===document.location.protocol?"https://":"http://")+"cdn.segment.com/analytics.js/v1/"+t+"/analytics.min.js";var n=document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0];n.parentNode.insertBefore(e,n)};analytics.SNIPPET_VERSION="3.1.0";
analytics.load('#{ENV["SEGMENT_WRITE_KEY"]}');
analytics.page();
}}();
Other notes:
It is properly pulling in my write key environment variable
The integration is set up on my Segment dashboard (enabled, with the correct website tracking id supplied)
The analytics.load integration seems to be working because, in my debugger console, analytics.Integrations["Google Analytics"] is properly initialized
Page views are showing up in the Segment dashboard's Debugger page (with the path, title, etc default properties all set), but views are not being transmitted to Google Analytics.
I don't believe it's because any arguments are missing, because Google's pageview only requires either a page or location property, both of which are supplied by default through Segment's page() method.

As it turns out, we had another script that was loading the same google analytics javascript file. I have no idea why having a duplicate script tag created the issue, but there it is. Removing the duplicate fixed the problem.
<script type="text/javascript" async="" src="https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" async="" src="https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js"></script>

Related

Changing youtube player parameters on already existing iframe

I want to manipulate a youtube video to autoplay and loop using js/jquery. It seems my issues stem from the from the fact that my site is on a CMS (Drupal), and it already spits out the iframe. So it's not an empty div that gets replaced as per the documentation.
The first thing I did was to change some settings on my site to ensure that "enablejsapi=1" and an ID was included in the output for whatever spits out the iframe.
I thought that would suffice and I'd only need to reference that ID in the onYouTubeIframeAPIReady(); function. But it wasn't working.
I looked at these solutions as well:
Listening for Youtube Event with this http://jsfiddle.net/YzvXa/197 - It didn't quite work for me. The state change did seem to be working in the fiddle, but when I tried to add parameters it didn't. (I'm assuming parameters only work when applied on load/ready?)
Already embedded iframe not working with api with this http://jsfiddle.net/y89je0k8/ - I feel like this got me closer, as I was able to atleast autoplay and mute using event.target.playVideo().mute(); for the ready event. How ever setting parameters like controls: 0 etc didn't.
What confuses me is in the second solution, it only works when the js is "inline". In the fiddle it's actually written in the html box in a script tag, but if you move the script in the js box, it doesn't.
Still I do feel like the points stated in the second solution might point me in the right direction, but I'm stuck in how to move forward with it.
onPlayerReady will not fire the ready check on localhost.
Also when linking your youtube.js file it has to come after the iframe.
add ?enablejsapi=1
sometimes double linking in both player_api and iframe_api will also help
//< before www. not https://
placment is key.
Here's what I've tried:
I've addressed #1 by actually adding my js in the server
My script is linked just before the closing body tag (so it is after the iframe)
I have adjusted my cms' youtube handler (Media: Youtube for Drupal) to add this parameter on output
I have tried this but it didn't seem to make a difference
I am limited by this as I am bound to using https. Is this the deal breaker?
I do notice that when I add the standard code to load the the iframe api asynchronously in my js, the <script src="https://www.youtube.com/iframe_api"></script> and <script type="text/javascript" id="www-widgetapi-script" src="https://s.ytimg.com/yts/jsbin/www-widgetapi-vflC6bXIS/www-widgetapi.js" async=""></script> appears as the first items in <head>, instead of just directly after the iframe as it normally would. I'm unsure why this is happening, but what can I do to ensure it's in the correct place? Perhaps this is the source of the issue, if placement is the key?
What I want to achieve is this behaviour: https://codepen.io/cee-r/pen/PMaRJR, where the video accepts parameters set in js when the html markup is already:
<iframe id="player" title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="360" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ApXoWvfEYVU?enablejsapi=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="1" ></iframe>
instead of:
<div id="player"></div>

React Component not rendered properly with Turbolinks in Rails 5.1

I have a very simple Rails app with a react component that just displays "Hello" in an existing div element in a particular page (let's say the show page).
When I load the related page using its URL, it works. I see Hello on the page.
However, when I'm previously on another page (let's say the index page and then I go to the show page using Turbolinks, well, the component is not rendered, unless I go back and forth again. (going back to the index Page and coming back to the show page)
From here every time I go back and forth, I can say that the view is rendered twice more time.Not only twice but twice more time! (i.e. 2 times then 4, then 6 etc..)
I know that since in the same time I set the content of the div I output a message to the console.
In fact I guess that going back to the index page should still run the component code without the display since the div element is not on the index page. But why in a cumulative manner?
The problems I want to solve are:
To get the code run on the first request of the show page
To block the code from running in other pages (including the index page)
To get the code run once on subsequent requests of the show page
Here the exact steps and code I used (I'll try to be as concise as possible.)
I have a Rails 5.1 app with react installed with:
rails new myapp --webpack=react
I then create a simple Item scaffold to get some pages to play with:
rails generate scaffold Item name
I just add the following div element in the Show page (app/views/items/show.html.erb):
<div id=hello></div>
Webpacker already generated a Hello component (hello_react.jsx) that I modified as following in ordered to use the above div element. I changed the original 'DOMContentLoaded' event:
document.addEventListener('turbolinks:load', () => {
console.log("DOM loaded..");
var element = document.getElementById("hello");
if(element) {
ReactDOM.render(<Hello name="React" />, element)
}
})
I then added the following webpack script tag at the bottom of the previous view (app/views/items/show.html.erb):
<%= javascript_pack_tag("hello_react") %>
I then run the rails server and the webpack-dev-server using foreman start (installed by adding gem 'foreman' in the Gemfile) . Here is the content of the Procfile I used:
web: bin/rails server -b 0.0.0.0 -p 3000
webpack: bin/webpack-dev-server --port 8080 --hot
And here are the steps to follow to reproduce the described behavior:
Load the index page using the URL http://localhost:3000/items
Click New Item to add a new item. Rails redirects to the item's show page at the URL localhost:3000/items/1. Here we can see the Hello React! message. It works well!
Reload the index page using the URL http://localhost:3000/items. The item is displayed as expected.
Reload the show page using the URL http://localhost:3000/items/1. The Hello message is displayed as expected with one console message.
Reload the index page using the URL http://localhost:3000/items
Click to the Show link (should be performed via turbolink). The message is not shown neither the console message.
Click the Back link (should be performed via turbolink) to go to the index page.
Click again to the Show link (should be performed via turbolink). This time the message is well displayed. The console message for its part is shown twice.
From there each time I go back to the index and come back again to the show page displays two more messages at the console each time.
Note: Instead of using (and replacing) a particular div element, if I let the original hello_react file that append a div element, this behavior is even more noticeable.
Edit: Also, if I change the link_to links by including data: {turbolinks: false}. It works well. Just as we loaded the pages using the URLs in the browser address bar.
I don't know what I'm doing wrong..
Any ideas?
Edit: I put the code in the following repo if interested to try this:
https://github.com/sanjibukai/react-turbolinks-test
This is quite a complex issue, and I am afraid I don't think it has a straightforward answer. I will explain as best I can!
To get the code run on the first request of the show page
Your turbolinks:load event handler is not running because your code is run after the turbolinks:load event is triggered. Here is the flow:
User navigates to show page
turbolinks:load triggered
Script in body evaluated
So the turbolinks:load event handler won't be called (and therefore your React component won't be rendered) until the next page load.
To (partly) solve this you could remove the turbolinks:load event listener, and call render directly:
ReactDOM.render(
<Hello name="React" />,
document.body.appendChild(document.createElement('div'))
)
Alternatively you could use <%= content_for … %>/<%= yield %> to insert the script tag in the head. e.g. in your application.html.erb layout
…
<head>
…
<%= yield :javascript_pack %>
…
</head>
…
then in your show.html.erb:
<%= content_for :javascript_pack, javascript_pack_tag('hello_react') %>
In both cases, it is worth nothing that for any HTML you add to the page with JavaScript in a turbolinks:load block, you should remove it on turbolinks:before-cache to prevent duplication issues when revisiting pages. In your case, you might do something like:
var div = document.createElement('div')
ReactDOM.render(
<Hello name="React" />,
document.body.appendChild(div)
)
document.addEventListener('turbolinks:before-cache', function () {
ReactDOM.unmountComponentAtNode(div)
})
Even with all this, you may still encounter duplication issues when revisiting pages. I believe this is to do with the way in which previews are rendered, but I have not been able to fix it without disabling previews.
To get the code run once on subsequent requests of the show page
To block the code from running in other pages (including the index page)
As I have mentioned above, including page-specific scripts dynamically can create difficulties when using Turbolinks. Event listeners in a Turbolinks app behave very differently to that without Turbolinks, where each page gets a new document and therefore the event listeners are removed automatically. Unless you manually remove the event listener (e.g. on turbolinks:before-cache), every visit to that page will add yet another listener. What's more, if Turbolinks has cached that page, a turbolinks:load event will fire twice: once for the cached version, and another for the fresh copy. This is probably why you were seeing it rendered 2, 4, 6 times.
With this in mind, my best advice is to avoid adding page-specific scripts to run page-specific code. Instead, include all your scripts in your application.js manifest file, and use the elements on your page to determine whether a component gets mounted. Your example does something like this in the comments:
document.addEventListener('turbolinks:load', () => {
var element = document.getElementById("hello");
if(element) {
ReactDOM.render(<Hello name="React" />, element)
}
})
If this is included in your application.js, then any page with a #hello element will get the component.
Hope that helps!
I was struggling with similar problem (link_to helper method was changing URL but react content was not loaded; had to refresh page manually to load it properly). After some googling I've found simple workaround on this page.
<%= link_to "Foo", new_rabbit_path(#rabbit), data: { turbolinks: false } %>
Since this causes a full page refresh when the link is clicked, now my react pages are loaded properly. Maybe you will find it useful in your project as well :)
Upon what you said I tested some code.
First, I simply pull out the ReactDOM.render method from the listener as you suggested in your first snippet.
This provide a big step forward since the message is no longer displayed elsewhere (like in the index page) but only in the show page as wanted.
But something interesting happen in the show page. There is no more accumulation of the message as appended div element, which is good. In fact it's even displayed once as wanted. But.. The console message is displayed twice!?
I guess that something related to the caching mechanism is going on here, but since the message is supposed to be appended why it isn't displayed twice as the console message?
Putting aside this issue, this seems to work and I wonder why it's necessary in the first place to put the React rendering after the page is loaded (without Turbolinks there was the DOMContentLoaded event listener)?
I guess that this has do with unexpected rendering by javascript code executed when some DOM elements are yet to be loaded.
Then, I tried your alternative way using <%= content_for … %>/<%= yield %>.
And as you expected this give mitigate results ans some weird behavior.
When I load via the URL the index page and then go to the show page using the Turbolink, it works!
The div message as well as the console message are shown once.
Then if I go back (using Turbolink), the div message is gone and I got the ".. unmounted.." console message as wanted.
But from then on, whenever I go back to the show page, the div and the console message are both never displayed at all.
The only message that's displayed is the ".. unmounted.." console message whenever I go back to the index page.
Worse, if I load the show page using the URL, the div message is not displayed anymore!? The console message is displayed but I got an error regarding the div element (Cannot read property 'appenChild' of null).
I will not deny that I completely ignore what's happening here..
Lastly, I tried your last best advice and simply put the last code snippet in the HTML head.
Since this is jsx code, I don't know how to handle it within the Rails asset pipeline / file structure, so I put my javascript_pack_tag in the html head.
And indeed, this works well.
This time the code is executed everywhere so it makes sense to use page-specific element (as previously intended in the commented code).
The downside, is that this time the code could be messy unless I put all page-specific code inside if statements that test for the presence of the page-specific element.
However since Rails/Webpack has a good code structure, it should be easily manageable to put page-specific code into page-specific jsxfiles.
Nevertheless the benefit is that this time all the page-specific parts are rendered at the same time as the whole page, thus avoiding a display glitch that occurs otherwise.
I didn't address this issue at the first place, but indeed, I would like to know how to get page specific contents rendered at the same time as the whole page.
I don't know if this is possible when combining Turbolink with React (or any other framework).
But in conclusion I leave this question for later on.
Thank you for your contribution Dom..

Blogspot Latex equation

I want to write Latex equation in Blogspot so I have chosen a dynamic template and pasted the HTML code after the <head> tag.
<script type="text/x-mathjax-config">
// <![CDATA[
MathJax.Hub.Config({tex2jax: {inlineMath: [['$','$'], ['\\(','\\)']],
displayMath: [['\\[','\\]'], ['$$','$$']]}});
blogger.ui().viewType_.prototype.onRenderComplete=function(){MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Typeset',MathJax.Hub])};
// ]]>
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js?config=TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML">
</script>
After inserting some input I am not getting the Latex output. I have used another method but it is not working. How to fix it explicitly?
Forget the &quot and stuff. The latex output is not appearing in the Preview mode but it will appear properly when you publish that post.
Reason: the preview url is an https url and looks something like https://blogname.blogspot.com/b/post-preview?token=fsdbkdsbkjsdfnkjsdnf&postId=32798437243279&type=POST. Since the page is https your browser tries to load the script http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/MathJax.js also as https which generates a certificate error.
Since the viewers of your blog will never open it in https they won't ever face this problem. If you want to see the preview with correct latex output just click on Preview button. When the page loads replace https with http in the url and Bingo!!
Instead of playing with the blogger template, my solution is to use a plugin http://markdown-here.com/
Just write your equation like $sum_2^n{\pi}$
Note that there's no space between dollar sign and the equation.
Alternatively, another online markdown tool is https://stackedit.io/ . It's free and provides a direct output to Blogger. The pitfall is what you write is cached in the browser. When you have 10+ documents in the caches, there's a severe time lag in display.
For people who is not familiar with Latex equation, here is a reference: http://www.hostmath.com/

tweet button inside jquery template

I want to integrate tweet button inside a jquery template. Am trying the 'tweet button with javascript' (link). But my html template shows only link, it does not show the button. I tried the anchor tag outside the jquery-templ script. Then it is working fine. I am confused why this is not working inside jquery-tmpl.
code look like follows:
<script type="text/x-jquery-tmpl">
Tweet
</script>
<script>!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s) [0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");</script>
Any suggestions?
Because the closing </script> tag is not parsed correctly by the browser.
You could write </scr{{= ""}}ipt> instead...
The point is, that browsers don't understand nesting of <script> tags, so whenever it parses a </script>, it closes the outermost script tag. Therefore, the closing </script> tag is matched to the template script.
You can trick the browser into ignoring the script tag, by adding the {{= ""}}, which will be used by the template engine to generate an empty string. </scr{{= ""}}ipt> will result in </script>, after templating.

How to separate javascript libraries and calls in the Rails 3.1 asset pipeline

I'm trying to get the hang of the whole asset pipeline thing, and read the guide and several tutorials about them. But one thing that doesn't become quite clear is wether I should view my javascript asset files as a library or a place to put code that is actually run i.e. $(document).ready. Because by default all the javascript files are included, and it would be weird to have several $(document).ready's in there, not to mention that you don't want the $(document).ready function for every page to be run in the first place. What would be the way to go at this? Use my asset files as a library and put actual calls in my views (ugly)? Or is there a better way to do this?
I too ran into this issue. In a large project you can have somebody put code into document ready to, for example, add a click function to each li within a div with class container.
Now we could all argue that the above code would be too generic and of course may affect li tags in other parts of the application, but the bigger the project, the more likely it is that you will run into a conflict like this leading to unexpected behaviour.
I for one am uncomfortable with a whole bunch of document ready functions running for each and every page loaded. My solution is not necessarily the perfect one, but it's one that I have taken up and will share with you.
In the body tag of each page I add data elements signifying the controller and the action. I then have one document ready script that looks for a class named after the controller with the name Ready appended e.g. HomeReady. It will then call a method on this class (presuming it exists) named after the action. So in your asset coffee file you could write:
class #HomeReady
#index: ->
alert("Hello")
#show: ->
alert("Goodbye")
This allows control right down to the action level. When I came across your question I decided to package this solution into a gem as I have already used it in several projects. You can find it at: https://github.com/intrica/rails_document_ready
If you absolutely don't want a certain piece of initialization code to be run unless the current page is a specific controller/action, then you can try adding an empty element on the page with an id built from that info like "posts_index" using these two helpers:
"#{controller_name}_#{action_name}"
Then in your javascript you can wrap the code inside an if statement that checks for the existence of an element with the appropriate id.
edit: Here's an example of the js partial that I mentioned in the comments.
show.html.haml
= render 'map'
map.html.erb (I normally use haml but it's easier to write js in erb)
<script src='http://www.google.com/jsapi' type='text/javascript'></script>
<script type='text/javascript'>
...
</script>
It's probably not as clean as it could be and it doesn't get the benefits of being part of the asset pipeline but I don't mind because it's only something that gets included on a specific page.

Resources