I am trying to set up a proxy server on my iPhone. I am doing this manual by looking up a proxy server Ip and port from Google and use this as proxy settings on my iPhone.
But when I do this and I try to connect to a random url, it is taking too long and at the end it says: can't open this page because the network is disconnected.
I have tried like 30 different IPs and ports from multiple websites and got none of them worked.
What am I doing wrong?
You're setting up non-working proxy servers.
Almost all "best 100 free public proxy servers" lists are fake or outdated.
The only option to guarantee that proxy is working is to make your own proxy.
I used Amazon free tier instance with Linux and installed proxy on it. It is free for one year.
Related
I have a Red Hat server running tiger-vncserver.
This is a hardened system and security doesn't like having so many ports open for VNC users so currently we have 15 (5901-5915). We are getting more users onboarded and anticipate more users after, not sure how many though.
Is there a way to make every user have a stateful VNC connection available but share ports? From security's perspective, we would only use like port 5900 or something.
If it matters, I am using Apache Guacamole in lieu of a VNC Viewer client due to our configuration requirements.
The issue with VNC and multiple users is missing connection manager for VNC that could be able to handle user authentication and start a separate VNC server for each user.
We had similar issues with Guacamole and remote VNC session and it was possible to handle this with several scripts that we had to integrate into our solution. However, the script had to grow over time and needed to include more and more logic for all specific situations that might happen.
In the end, it turns out that installing XRDP server on a remote Linux is a much easier and quite consistent solution. It opens only one port, 3389 can manage connections and user and Guacamole work well with it, just you have to use RDP protocol.
I "own" a URL www.example.com which is currently hosted by One.com. I recently built my own server running a LAMP stack and it serves pages to the internet from /html as it should, but is only accessible via numeric IP address. In the past I've re-assigned the name servers for URL's but only using a hosting company's "dashboard" or GUI. I've read about changing the DNS settings in Ubuntu (my server is running 18.04) and also I've researched what I can into Google's public DNS and DynDNS services.
So I have two sets of questions. First, is it possible to "connect" or "bind" a URL to the static IP address of my own server without using a DNS service? Can it be done through any kind of public registry and if not, what are the least expensive but still reliable options?
Second, is basically "Why bother?" I do understand the value of a human-readable address but also, the address bar isn't realistically used anymore. Most of the security value of having human readable addresses depends on users actually looking at the address bar so that's becoming a moot argument. People only navigate the web now through links and Google searches, and the address bar is essentially a developer tool. It seems like I can pretty much replace the need for DNS with masked links and meta titles?
You need to set your domain's "A Record" in DNS to point to your server's IP address. While not neccessary, you can configure Apache to respond to the correct domain with virtualhosts [https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/vhosts/name-based.html ], but you will need the DNS configured correctly first.
It is not possible to bind a domain to an IP address without DNS - DNS or Domain Name System is THE authoritative system for doing so. It's how the world wide web functions.
Here is some additional reading on what DNS does and why it's important: https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-dns/
I developed a NodeJS web application meant to be accessed on a private wifi network.
My goal is to have users connect to my server hosted on Ubuntu 14.04LTS, on which I setted up a Wifi hotspot.
The users connect to the wifi network with mobile devices, and then go with their browser to
http://my.server.local.ip/
What is the easiest way to set up a DNS (or something else) so that they are able to browse to a human readable URL instead of my IP ?
Sorry if the question has been answered before, I am a beginner in network configuration and I may not search the good keywords.
Thanks for reading
EDIT:
I forgot to mention that my network provides no access to Internet. I already own a domain for this app, but for the online-version of it. My goal is to build a portable server machine which can serve the application to mobiles on bad Internet coverage areas.
This depends on which machine acts as the DNS-server for your network. Does your Server/WiFi-AP just redirect/bridge the traffic to an ethernet-port and the DHCP-requests from the mobile devices are answered by another device (router-box?) in your network? In that case, that box will also be the DNS-server the mobile devices will be querying for hostname resolution. Maybe you can configure a static IP and hostname for your Ubuntu-server in the router's web interface.
Otherwise, you can set up a DHCP and/or DNS-server on the Ubuntu-machine. A lightweight tool for this job is DNSmasq (http://www.thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/doc.html). This seems to be what you want, reading your latest comment. Configure a static IP address for the server-machine's WiFi-Interface and configure your DNS-server running on the Ubuntu-machine to map the hostname/domain of your choice to that IP. Then the mobile devices can access the website delivered by the Ubuntu machine by using that domain name.
I need to connect to an API with my Heroku/Rails app where I need to have a static IP.
I know about the add-on proximo - https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/proximo - but it is insanely priced, so that's out of the question.
Most people in my situation ends up deploying to EC2 instead and using a an Elastic IP as their static IP. I've also tried this and it works, but I find the whole flow of playing around with EC2 really cumbersome.
I've read in some answers that it is possible to set up an EC2 server and use it as a proxy for your Heroku/Rails app - Heroku Static IP for SFTP - but it sounds very cryptic for a person who is not very server-savvy.
Can someone give a step-to-step tutorial on how to set up your Heroku/Rails app to use your EC2 instance as a proxy?
In short: I would just switch to AWS. There is a little bit of a learning curve but it's not too difficult. Here is a presentation I gave on it geared toward front-end devs:
https://speakerdeck.com/krunkosaurus/intro-to-scaling-your-web-app-on-the-cloud-with-aws-for-frontend-developers-part-1
Amazon has 9 regions each with 3-5 "Availability Zones". I know that Heroku uses AWS but am not sure if you get to decide (or know) which AWS region and AZ your actual server is hosted.
Whatever it is, you should host your proxy server in the same Region (better yet, even the same Availability Zone). Setting up an EC2 there is easy just use the web console and be sure to give it an Elastic IP so the adress doesn't ever change. Then point your DNS away from your Heroku instance (dyno?) to this EC2 instance. From there you can either install Nginx or HAProxy.
I've just setup QuotaGuard Static as a more robust, better value static IP service that can be used by Heroku apps.
It's hosted on EC2 so you get the low latency benefits without having to start managing servers.
Hello you can use this answer to see how to use NGINX as a reverse proxy.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/27874505/1345865
http://blog.talenox.com/post/107675614745/how-to-setup-static-ip-on-heroku
Fixie is very affordable option for getting static IP address on Heroku. The documentation section has a lot of examples for different languages and frameworks, including Ruby.
Is it possible to access smtp4dev from a remote computer. I am using smtp4dev locally for development so that I can view emails as my ASP.NET MVC 3 application sends them out. It would nice to be able to do the same one a testing server with the ability for me or a colleage to view messages being generated on that remote testing server.
If smtp4dev can't do it are there any other tools that can? I know it is possible to output files to a share via ASP.NET configuration, but I find smtp4dev to be a much more user friendly experience...
It sounds like you need to access you local smtp4dev service from a hosted instance of your project. You have several options:
Personally, I use a gmail account for doing this - you're limited to 100 emails per day.
Port forward your local smtp4dev service - find the IP address of the computer it's runnning on, the port the service operates on (SMTP port), go to your router and add the port forwarding rule / Virtual Server. It's possible that smtp4dev only bind to the loopback interface, in which case port forwarding won't work. You should also make sure the firewall exception is added for the port or program.
Your hosting might already have an SMTP server you can use
You could use a public SMTP server - mail.{someisp}.com
In any case, if you're a bit more specific, we will be able to help you further.