Missing yo.rc.json file - yeoman

I generated a mean stack template using the mean generator
yo mean
I am trying to create submodules but it always creates the entire app again because there is no .yo.rc.json file in the folder.
yo doctor says everything is ok
Where should this .yo.rc.json be and is there a way to generate one based on the files I have in my app?

Looks like this is a bug in the generator itself. I've tried other generators and they create the .yo-rc.json file. The angular full stack generator provides a similar structure if anyone encounters the same problem.

Related

What is the process for locating any given gem's built-in scaffolding templates?

I'm tweaking some scaffold templates for an app so I mostly just want to copy the built-in/default templates. My question is what is the process I can follow to locate the templates?
For example, thanks to the helpful answers of Tim Krins I now know to look in:
cd $(bundle show railties)/lib/rails/generators/rails/scaffold_controller/templates/ for controller templates (reference)
cd $(bundle show activerecord)/lib/rails/generators/active_record/model/templates/ for model templates (reference)
I also managed to combine his bundle show <gem> tip with spelunking through Github issues in haml-rails to figure out the path for HAML templates is:
cd $(bundle show haml-rails)/lib/generators/haml/scaffold/templates
I haven't yet been able to use that knowledge to figure out the general solution though so next time I'll have to search StackOverflow again.
How would I go about figuring out for myself the template locations for various test files (without telling you which testing framework I'm using)? How would I locate the templates used for the invoke resource_route step?
How do I figure out which gem to look in? (e.g. How could I have figured out railties vs activerecord above?)
How do I figure out what path to look in? (e.g. How would I know to look in activerecord/.../activerecord but railties/.../rails?)
Which gem are you trying to change?
What is needed in the case of the Devise or Spree gems is to recreate the filepath within the app directory, then copy/clone the erb/haml file from the gem's github repo, and make your changes in the local file.
There is a gem called Deface which can allow you to edit specific html components in views without recreating the entire view. This is a more complex but ultimately more maintainable path - depending on the extent of your changes.

How can I change the default path to the `rails` script in my project, or remove that dependency?

In another question (Why does the Rails command force a help message for the new command?), I found that Rails needs the rails script to be in the script folder, in the root of my project, in order for it to be properly detected as an existing Rails projects, and allow me to use the various rails commands other then new.
I did this because I felt that the more popular moniker for including executable content in a repository to highlight available use cases is by using the name scripts. At least the pluralism in English should be appreciated!
Is there anyway to change which folder the main Rails executable looks for the project-included one?
I actually think it's a bit silly to include this rails executable in the project, and can be redundant. Maybe it's for customization, but I feel that could better be done in the configuration, environment, other .rb files. So also, could this just be removed somehow, and still have a functioning project through varied use of the main rails command.

How to replace a Template using Deface

I'm new to rails and I've set up a standard spree e commerce solution. I now want to customize the default templates and styles. According to the spree documentation [1], the best way to do so is using Deface. Unfortunately, I can't figure out the location of the existing views/layouts.
For example, while the document suggests:
For example, to override the main layout, create the file YOUR_SITE_OR_EXTENSION/app/views/spree/layouts/spree_application.html.erb
my app/views folder doesn't contain a folder called spree
Can anybody tell me, how to change the view templates?
Thank you.
[1] https://guides.spreecommerce.com/developer/view.html
You have to actually create that directory and every directory along the way until you reach the file you wish to override. If you run these commands from your root directory you should be good to go.
mkdir app/views/spree
mkdir app/views/spree/layouts
touch app/views/spree/layouts/application.html.erb
Then copy the content from here: https://github.com/spree/spree/blob/master/frontend/app/views/spree/layouts/spree_application.html.erb into the file you've just created.
If you restart your web server you should be able to make changes to the local application.html.erb file and see them locally.
Any time you want to override a template completely, you can find the template you need to override on Github: https://github.com/spree/spree and recreate the necessary files/directories. Spree will look for templates in on localhost before the gem, so as long as you override the right template in the right directory, you can customize any view you like.
Alternatively, you can try running the rails generate spree:frontend:copy_views command to pull all the views you need from gems, and anything that is missing can be added manually, in strict accordance with the gems folder hierarchy. For example, in gems is parsl in the following spree_backend/views/spree/admin/users/_lifetime_stats.html.erb. To enter the desired code, I have to make a folder on the following path - the name of the project/app/views/spree/admin/users/_lifetime_stats.html.the erb and all the changes I will make here will fall into the main view code. This is an alternative to Deface::override

Why is there Rails.rb files all over the place?

Was digging around my Rails applications and noticed that there are rails.rb files all over the place. In my ruby gems directories like:
...gems\devise-2.0.4\lib\devise\rails.rb
...gems\cucumber-rails-1.3.0\lib\cucumber\rails.rb
...gems\railties-3.2.3\lib\rails.rb
I am assuming that there are executed whenever you issue some command like "rails xxx". So all these extra rails.rb files combine with the original rails.rb file to essentially make one big rails.rb file. Essentially, when we type in "rails xxx" it goes thru all them all?
Just looking for some confirmation PLUS a little more knowledge about this. Thanks.
The best way to understand what these rails.rb files are doing, is to read the source code.
ralties
devise
cucumber-rails
As you can see, in any library the file assumes a different scope. The common behaviour is that the file rails.rb normally contains the code required to initialize the library when loaded from a Rails project.
BTW, this has nothing to do with the script/rails command and there is no "big rails.rb" file.
The files are not generated but are simply source files of these libraries you are using.
In this case they are probably rails-related classes that either extend Rails in some way or modify it or make the library interact with Rails.
Rails is a very common framework in Ruby land so most if not all libraries will have some sort of integration with Rails.
By no means are all of those loaded when you run rails XXX but rather when your application loads these libraries their rails.rb files may be executed to provide some sort of integration with Rails.

Change Rails Scaffold Naming Scheme

I'm a happy user of RoR but have one complaint. When I do script/generate scaffold it automatically generates all my files and places them in their proper folders. However, all the different scaffolds I've created name their view files the same.
I have a bunch of index.html.erb view files and when I have them open in my text editor, it's almost impossible to tell what controller they're related to.
I'd like to change the default naming scheme of the scaffold command to name the individual files to contain their view folder name. So, instead of index.html.erb, use index.home.html.
Is there a way to do this, or am I stuck? What solutions to the multiple files with the same name problem have you Rails developers discovered?
Thanks!
You're going to be fighting the Rails' conventions by going down that path and Rails works best when you work with it rather than against it. A core part of the philosophy of Rails is that there are a set of conventions that once learned make it easy to find your way around any Rails application.
Instead of trying to redefine how Rails works, I would recommend taking advantage of the features offered by your text editor or IDE for quickly navigating to the correct view template. For example, the Rails bundle within TextMate on the Mac lets you quickly open the view file associated with a particular model and there's a plugin for Vim that provides an equivalent feature.

Resources