We are using spring-security-saml2-core 1.0.1.RELEASE to authenticate with our ADFS running in the Azure cloud.
The authentication is failing as Azure is pre-pending 'spn:' to the start of the EntityId in the <AudienceRestriction> part of the auth response. This then causes the class org.springframework.security.saml.websso.WebSSOProfileConsumerImpl to fail the request as it expects the audience string to match the EntityId exactly.
For example, if the SP EntityId is ca58424a-3338-4ac2-81ec-fe4a822f7fcd and the auth request is successful, Azure returns this in the EntityId in the audience restriction response:
<Conditions NotBefore="2015-10-21T14:24:41.745Z" NotOnOrAfter="2015-10-21T15:24:41.745Z">
<AudienceRestriction>
<Audience>spn:ca58424a-3338-4ac2-81ec-fe4a822f7fcd</Audience>
</AudienceRestriction>
</Conditions>
Not sure why Azure does this but this Azure blog does mention Azure using the SPN format.
Is this a known issue, and is there any fix for it?
I got this working by pre-pending spn: to the beginning of the EntityID in the web app config. When this passed to Azure it must check for and remove the string before comparing the EntityID.
Related
I'm building an API gateway using Spring Cloud Gateway and I'd like to secure it.
In our current architecture the API gateway will be hidden behind a portal which authenticates using a client certificate (issued for a system user) and sends the name of the real user calling the service in an HTTP header.
I'm looking for a way to configure Spring Security to both verify the certificate (so that nobody else can call the GW) but at the same time construct the principal from the provided header (after the cert check succeeds).
If I use the standard x509 from Spring Security (with provided subjectPrincipalRegex) the user service receives just the matching part as the user ID so I can construct the Principal from the username in the cert (which is still the same).
I.e. I'm looking for something like this
No client cert or invalid client cert => anonymous user (still can have access to some routes)
Valid certificate => obtain UserDetails based on the HTTP header (which can still result in user not found in the DB, i.e. anonymous access).
Note: Since Spring Cloud Gateway is reactive I'm looking for solution applicable to Spring WebFlux Security but I believe that the concepts are the same as in "standard non-WebFlux" security
I have set up a new B2C Tenant in Azure and I'm using oauth2_proxy (more specific: docker-oauth2_proxy) to authenticate against it.
There was a need to configure custom login URLs, but the login process itself is working:
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_LOGIN_URL
value: https://login.microsoftonline.com/tfp/<my-tenant-name>.onmicrosoft.com/b2c_1_policy/oauth2/v2.0/authorize
- name: OAUTH2_PROXY_REDEEM_URL
value: https://login.microsoftonline.com/tfp/<my-tenant-name>.onmicrosoft.com/b2c_1_policy/oauth2/v2.0/token
However, I get an error after I'm redirected back to https://my-app.example.com:
oauthproxy.go:527: error redeeming code missing email
I tried to have a look at the token that I get back, but could not decode it via https://jwt.ms.
As I don't know what exactly is contained in there, I am reluctant to post it here, but it does start with eyJraWQi..., which can be base-64-decoded to {"kid":"cpimcore_09252015","ver":"1.0","zip":"Deflate","ser":"1.0"}
The full format of the reply is:
/oauth2/callback?state=a0d367fd2d7337b8fbae8d72052022c7%3a%2f&code=eyJraWQiOiJjcGltY29yZV8wOTI1MjAxNSIsInZlciI6IjEuMCIsInppcCI6IkRlZmxhdGUiLCJzZXIiOiIxLjAifQ..[base64*16].[base64*568].[base64*22]
where [base64*n] indicates a string of n characters that look like base 64 encoded data.
Any ideas on how to decode that token?
You can't decode the authorization code that is issued to /oauth2/callback because it is encrypted.
oauth2_proxy's Azure AD provider expects a mail or otherMails claim to be issued. Azure AD issues this but Azure AD B2C doesn't issue it. Azure AD B2C issues the emails claim.
You might have to modify this Azure AD provider to match the emails claim.
No idea if this is still relevant to you, Azure AD B2C essentially uses standard OpenID Connect, however with the addition that you need to supply a policy as additional parameter.
We also had the need to use Azure AD B2C with oauth2_proxy, so we modified the oauth2_proxy generic oidc provider so it can take a B2C policy as additional config option.
If you want, give it a try: https://github.com/karrieretutor/oauth2_proxy#microsoft-azure-ad-b2c
If you're building from source, be aware that you also need to use our forked 'go-oidc' package (on which oauth2_proxy relies, but has part of the issuer URL hardcoded, so we had to change this, too, for including the B2C policy). Take a look at the Dockerfile, this can properly build it.
I am writing an SSO provider for MS Graph APIs Azure AD v2 endpoint leveraging Spring OAuth2.
I am progressing with the implementation and constant testing but I stumbled upon an error returned by AAD which is puzzling me. After all, this should all be plain standard OAuth 2 flow.
I successfully configured my application on MS dev portal, providing a localhost redirect URL (which, for the record, is the only supporting the http scheme. Kudos to MS). So when I invoke http://localhost/myapp/auth/office365 Spring security successfully intercepts the invocation, provides a correct redirect to my browser with client ID to https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/authorize with expected parameters.
Microsoft shows a consent screen to me, after which I get redirected back to my Spring Security application via HTTP GET with expected authorization code parameter.
The problem is that when the application tries to negotiate the given authorization code for a bearer token headaches start. Spring Security invokes a POST to https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/token but ends in 401 error.
Here is the stack trace
error="invalid_request", error_description="AADSTS90014: The request body must contain the following parameter: 'client_id'.
Trace ID: 9acd2a10-1cfb-443f-9c57-78d608c00c00
Correlation ID: bf063914-8926-4e8f-b102-7522d0e3b0af
Timestamp: 2017-10-09 15:51:44Z", correlation_id="bf063914-8926-4e8f-b102-7522d0e3b0af", error_codes="[90014]", timestamp="2017-10-09 15:51:44Z", trace_id="9acd2a10-1cfb-443f-9c57-78d608c00c00"
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.common.exceptions.OAuth2ExceptionJackson2Deserializer.deserialize(OAuth2ExceptionJackson2Deserializer.java:100)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.common.exceptions.OAuth2ExceptionJackson2Deserializer.deserialize(OAuth2ExceptionJackson2Deserializer.java:33)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper._readMapAndClose(ObjectMapper.java:4001)
at com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper.readValue(ObjectMapper.java:3072)
at org.springframework.http.converter.json.AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.readJavaType(AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.java:235)
at org.springframework.http.converter.json.AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.readInternal(AbstractJackson2HttpMessageConverter.java:215)
at org.springframework.http.converter.AbstractHttpMessageConverter.read(AbstractHttpMessageConverter.java:193)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.token.OAuth2AccessTokenSupport$AccessTokenErrorHandler.handleError(OAuth2AccessTokenSupport.java:235)
at org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.handleResponse(RestTemplate.java:700)
at org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.doExecute(RestTemplate.java:653)
at org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.execute(RestTemplate.java:621)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.token.OAuth2AccessTokenSupport.retrieveToken(OAuth2AccessTokenSupport.java:137)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.token.grant.code.AuthorizationCodeAccessTokenProvider.obtainAccessToken(AuthorizationCodeAccessTokenProvider.java:209)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.token.AccessTokenProviderChain.obtainNewAccessTokenInternal(AccessTokenProviderChain.java:148)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.token.AccessTokenProviderChain.obtainAccessToken(AccessTokenProviderChain.java:121)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.OAuth2RestTemplate.acquireAccessToken(OAuth2RestTemplate.java:221)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.OAuth2RestTemplate.getAccessToken(OAuth2RestTemplate.java:173)
at org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.filter.OAuth2ClientAuthenticationProcessingFilter.attemptAuthentication(OAuth2ClientAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:105)
at org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:212)
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:331)
at org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter.java:200)
at org.springframework.security.web.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:331)
I have looked into Spring security implementation to find the cause,.
It happens that the error message error="invalid_request", error_description="AADSTS90014: The request body must contain the following parameter: 'client_id'. is self explanatory: MS Graph wants the client ID (which is still supplied by the basic authentication header) in the request body. Stop for a moment. I want to use plain old Spring Security and not third-party specific jars in order not to pollute my classpath.
Looking into Java source code of Spring OAuth 2 the problem is damn clear. Spring uses the client ID only in getParametersForAuthorizeRequest, which is used to generate the redirect URL. When it comes to getParametersForTokenRequest the client ID is not specified in the form.
Question: who is right here? How do I tell Spring that MS wants the client id in the token request after an authorization code has been obtained?
Just to clarify, you're not actually authenticating with or against Microsoft Graph. You're actually authenticating against Azure Active Directory. The Microsoft Graph API accepts the bearer token you'll end up with but it doesn't issue the access token itself.
It isn't clear which endpoint you're using for the Authorization Code flow, AAD has two of them: v1 and v2. The primary difference being that v2 uses a central registration and can authenticate both work/school and personal accounts.
Regardless of the endpoint, you do need to supply the clientid in the request body when you're requesting an access token. There are actually several values you need to provide in the body. Also note that these need to be provided as application/x-www-form-urlencoded.
For the v1 endpoint you provide (line breaks for readability only):
grant_type=authorization_code
&client_id={client-id}
&code={authoization-code}
&redirect_uri={redirect-uri}
&client_secret={client-secret}
&resource={resource-uri}
The v2 endpoint is almost identical but uses scope instead of resource:
grant_type=authorization_code
&client_id={client-id}
&code={authoization-code}
&redirect_uri={redirect-uri}
&client_secret={client-secret}
&scope={scopes}
OP's edit
Now, back to Spring Security. Spring by default uses an HTTP basic authentication scheme against Azure AD. In that scheme, the client ID and secret are encoded into the HTTP Authorization header, then the form only contains the authorization code and state parameter, so here is why I (the OP, ndr) was puzzled about why AAD refused the authorization.
In order to pass client ID and secret into the form, we can tell Spring Security to use a different supported authentication scheme. The form authentication scheme will push the client ID and secret into the form.
The below code works and retrieves the access token.
<oauth2:resource
id="msAdAuthenticationSource"
client-id="${oauth.appId}"
client-secret="${oauth.appSecret}"
type="authorization_code"
authentication-scheme="form"
client-authentication-scheme="form"
use-current-uri="true"
user-authorization-uri="${oauth.authorizationUri}"
access-token-uri="${oauth.accessTokenUri}"
scope="${oauth.scopes}"
pre-established-redirect-uri="${oauth.redirectUri}" />
Please note the two
authentication-scheme="form"
client-authentication-scheme="form"
Problem solved, a lot more to come!
I am trying to integrate(SSO) multiple service providers using spring security and wso2 identity server 5.1.0 I have integrated spring security SAML sample with Wso2 IS as according to the blog for only one service provider and its running perfectly fine, but I am not able to do SSO for multiple service providers. I have checked everything but no luck.
Please find below what I think it should be but I am not sure how to achieve this.
WSO2 IS : created a service provider with unique SAML issuer id(ex. spring-security),which will be used from different service providers for SSO.
SP1 : Service provider should send Authn request having issue id(spring-security) and a assertion consumer url(ex. localhost:8080/...).
SP2 : Service provider should send Authn request having issue id(spring-security) and a assertion consumer url(ex. localhost:8181/...).
Issuer in Authn Request :
http://localhost:8080/spring-security-saml2-sample/saml/metadata
Even I am not sure how this issuer is being generated.
Please help.
You have to use different and unique entity ids for each service provider. And at Identity Server you need to create multiple service providers (2 in your case) accordingly in order to get SSO (and SLO) working.
So let's say you get the entity ids changed for two SPs as spring-security-1 and spring-security-2. You will need to create 2 service providers at IS as below.
SP1 -> issuer : spring-security-1 , ACS url : localhost:8080/...
SP2 -> issuer : spring-security-2 , ACS url : localhost:8081/...
Questions:
1) What's the best way to integrate OpenID Connect authentication into a webapp that uses Spring Security for authentication?
2) Is there any way - either from the MITREid side of things or the Google Accounts side of things - to get the MITREid OpenID Connect authentication filter to work with Google's OpenID Connect service?
I'm sure answers to these questions will be useful for any developer that uses the Spring Security OpenID module to authenticate with Google.
Detail:
My webapp uses Spring Security's OpenID module (<openid-login .../>) for authentication with Google Accounts as the Identity Provider. ie., users authenticate using their Google Apps or GMail email address.
Recently, whenever users authenticate, they receive this warning message from Google accounts:
Important notice: OpenID2 for Google accounts is going away on April
20, 2015.
So Google is dropping support for OpenID, will turn it off completely in April 2015, and states that you must switch to the OpenID Connect protocol if you want to authenticate with Google Accounts.
I was hoping Spring Security would have built-in support for OpenID Connect, just like it has built-in support for OpenID. e.g. something like an <openid-connect-login .../> element. But my searches have turned up no such support.
The best candidate I've found so far is MITREid Connect . It includes a Spring Security authentication filter named OIDCAuthenticationFilter for OpenID Connect. The problem is, it does not interoperate with Google's OpenID Connect implementation.
I tried cloning the MITREid simple-web-app and configured it to authenticate (using OpenID Connect) with Google Accounts. But it did not work because it depends on a nonce which Google's OpenID Connect implementation does not support. The error message from Google accounts was:
Parameter not allowed for this message type: nonce
Next I tried plugging my own implementation of MITREid's AuthRequestUrlBuilder interface into the MITREid configuration. The only difference between my implementation and MITREid's implementation was that I did not send the nonce.
Not sending the nonce made Google's OpenID Connect implementation happy but MITREid threw an exception when it couldn't find a nonce in the Google authentication response. The error message was:
Authentication Failed: ID token did not contain a nonce claim
I tracked the MITREid exception down to these lines in MITREID'S OIDCAuthenticationFilter:
// compare the nonce to our stored claim
String nonce = idClaims.getStringClaim("nonce");
if (Strings.isNullOrEmpty(nonce)) {
logger.error("ID token did not contain a nonce claim.");
throw new AuthenticationServiceException("ID token did not contain a nonce claim.");
}
But there is no way for me to extend MITREid's implementation to ignore the nonce. So close but yet so far! If Google Accounts would accept the nonce or MITREid could be configured to ignore the nonce then we'd have a solution.
Within the MITREid Connect issues list on github I've found others have run into these similar issues:
1) #726 - Documentation on using client with Google as authentication provider
2) #704 - Add a useNonce attribute into ServerConfiguration to indicate if the IdP accepts the nonce value into its requests.
So I am stuck. Come April 2015 Google will shutdown Open ID authentication.
Some relevant links:
1) https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6135882
2) https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2014/03/01/OpenID-Connect
3) https://github.com/mitreid-connect
4) https://github.com/mitreid-connect/OpenID-Connect-Java-Spring-Server/blob/master/openid-connect-client/src/main/java/org/mitre/openid/connect/client/OIDCAuthenticationFilter.java
5) https://github.com/mitreid-connect/simple-web-app
6) https://github.com/mitreid-connect/OpenID-Connect-Java-Spring-Server/blob/master/openid-connect-client/src/main/java/org/mitre/openid/connect/client/service/impl/PlainAuthRequestUrlBuilder.java
7) https://github.com/mitreid-connect/OpenID-Connect-Java-Spring-Server/issues/726
8) https://github.com/mitreid-connect/OpenID-Connect-Java-Spring-Server/pull/704
2015-02-18 Update
Functionality has recently been added to the development branch of mitreid-connect for disabling the nonce - therefore making Google's OIDC server happy. Thankfully, mitreid-connect has also provided some guidance on interoperating with Google .
Unfortunately the "nonceEnabled" change is not yet available in Maven central but hopefully that will change soon.
AFAIK, there is no clean and easy Spring Security migration from OpenID to OpenID Connect authentication. Implementing OpenID authentication with Spring Security is straight-forward using the well documented <openid-login/> but there exists no analog for OpenID Connect.
The MITREid alternative is still on a development branch and unavailable at Maven Central and therefore not a candidate.
In the comments, Chuck Mah points to How to implement Openid connect and Spring Security where Romain F. provides the sample code.
Romain's sample code pointed me in the right direction. Given time is running out, I went with romain's approach, which was to write a custom Spring Security AuthenticationFilter that uses spring-security-oauth2 to query the oauth2 api userinfo endpoint (for Google that's https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v2/userinfo). The assumption is that if we are able to successfully query the userinfo endpoint then the user has successfully authenticated so we can trust the information returned - eg the user's email address.
When i first started learning about OpenID Connect the “id token” seemed to be the central concept. However, browsing the spring-security-oauth2 source code, it appears to be ignored. This leads to the question, what’s the point of the ID token if we can authenticate without it (by simply querying oauth2 userinfo endpoint)?
A minimalist solution - which i would prefer - would simply return a validated ID token. There would be no need to query the userinfo endpoint. But no such solution exists in the form of a Spring Security authentication filter.
My webapp was not a spring-boot app like romain's. spring-boot does alot of configuration behind the scenes. Here are some of the problems/solutions I encountered along the way:
problem: HTTP Status 403 - Expected CSRF token not found. Has your session expired?
solution: java config: httpSecurity.csrf().disable()
problem: HTTP Status 500 - Error creating bean with name 'scopedTarget.googleOAuth2RestTemplate': Scope 'session' is not active for the current thread;
solution: java config: OAuth2RestTemplate does not need to be session scoped (OAuth2ClientContext is already session scoped and that's all that's necessary)
problem: HTTP Status 500 - Error creating bean with name 'scopedTarget.oauth2ClientContext': Scope 'session' is not active for the current thread;
solution: web.xml: add RequestContextListener
explanation: because the oauth2ClientContext session-scoped bean is accessed outside the scope of the Spring MVC DispatcherServlet (it is being accessed from OpenIdConnectAuthenticationFilter, which is part of the Spring Security filter chain).
<listener>
<listener-class>org.springframework.web.context.request.RequestContextListener</listener-class>
</listener>
problem: org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.resource.UserRedirectRequiredException: A redirect is required to get the users approval.
solution: web.xml: Add filter definition immediately PRECEEDING springSecurityFilterChain
<filter>
<filter-name>oauth2ClientContextFilter</filter-name>
<filter-class>org.springframework.web.filter.DelegatingFilterProxy</filter-class>
</filter>
<filter-mapping>
<filter-name>oauth2ClientContextFilter</filter-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
</filter-mapping>
Unfortunately, OpenID Connect does not allow us to request only email scope.
When our users authenticated using OpenID they would see a consent screen like "webapp would like to view your email address" with which they were comfortable. Now we must request scopes openid email resulting in a consent screen asking the user to share their entire public profile with us ... which we really don't need or want ... and users are less comfortable with this consent screen.