I'm trying to install Umbraco on an ASP.NET environment. After I downloaded the umbraco nuget package I tried to run the installation wizard, by building and running the project. All is fine and good, if i take the default database configuration, but if I want to customize my configuration, it fails and says :
"Could not connect to database"
I'm trying to configure it to use my local SQLExpress database, but I just cannot get it working. I have both tried putting in the server information and connecting via. a connection string, via. the wizard. It produces the same error every time.
I have made a database called umbracoblog and created an admin user, with credentials. He has dbowner etc. for the database. Besides that, I have also given full permissions to IIS_IUSRS and Network Service accounts for the project and all subdirectories, and it still doesn't work.
These are some of the connection strings I have tried:
datalayer=SqlServer;Data Source=.\SQLExpress;Initial Catalog=umbracoblog;User Id=admin;Password=********;
datalayer=SqlServer;Data Source=127.0.0.1\SQLExpress;Initial Catalog=umbracoblog;User Id=admin;Password=*******;
I have also tried putting in the connectionstring into the web.config, manually, but that just makes the project load infinitely in the browser, when I run it.
It's starting to get frustrating, that I cannot even get past the configuration of Umbraco, because it look very cool. I have tried everything I was able to found online. Have anyone gone through this and know what I need to do ?
Start again - clear out and remove the umbracoDbDSN connection string entirely from your web.config and reset the umbracoConfigurationStatus AppSetting back to empty if it has been populated.
Use the Wizard to configure the database - if it's still having problems connecting then here's a few things to check:
Check the Log file here: ~/App_Settings/Logs/UmbracoTraceLog.txt - does that show up any errors?
Make sure you can connect to the database using other clients - if Umbraco can't connect to it, chances are something else won't be able to as well.
What happens if you use Integrated Authentication? If that works, then it's most likely an issue with the username and password you specified.
The password I had for the SQL Server user had a character that the installation UI didn't accept. I changed the password to remove special characters and it was able to connect to the server again. I could successfully log in through SSMS with the previous password.
Related
I am trying to have SCM Manager accept users from my organization so they can log in using their Windows username and password. I have installed the LDAP plugin, but it still doesn't recognize my own windows username and password from my organization
I don't really understand - I think I shouldn't even need LDAP and some kind of basic authentication should be able to figure out my username password on windows active directory etc type of thing...
Do I need the SSL to do this? It says various things about a binding problem.
I am using the custom LDAP profile. I put wsproxy in the proxy server area and enabled. I have no idea what that means but it was the same configuration that I saw in a previous installation of SCM-server that worked with organizational credentials on windows server.
This problem occurred after upgrading from version 1.6 to 2.9.
Though I was not the person who set it up on v1.6.
UPDATE: what's needed is not LDAP plugin, but rather understanding how to configure active directory for SCM - previously, in 1.X versions active directory plugin worked under the hood - now it needs to be configured and I have no idea how -- also the active directory plugin for 1.X is no longer available - if you could provide me with that code I might be able to see how it connects to AD and then go from there on version 2.X - any chance you can get me access to the code of https://bitbucket.org/sdorra/scm-manager/wiki/active-directory-plugin??
We have an issue for the LDAP plugin saying that the migration of the ldap password may fail (though I cannot reproduce this), so maybe this happened with your migration, too. Proxy settings should not play any part in this game, because as far as I know company ldaps aren't behind a proxy.
The configuration for 2.x should be the same as for 1.60. We haven't changed anything here. So first I would try to reenter the "Connection Password". If this still fails, please use the "Test connection" feature. Enter a valid authentication here. This tells you, on what level the connection fails and may show you an exception with further information.
Feel free to post your results here for further investigation.
I'm using Umbraco CMS v7.4 with SQL Server 2014, the project was working fine until a few hours ago, when an error started showing up:
Umbraco cannot start. A connection string is configured but the Umbraco cannot connect to the database
The error occurs when I tried to open the website, see the image below:
I tried the following:
Checked to see if SQL Server is running
Checked the connection string credentials in web.config
Any help is appreciated.
After a few tries, even I loaded the backed up DB, I found that it caused by the DB login, the user in the connection string was having a password expiration enabled (the password had expired).
So, this is what I did:
Open the SQL server
Logged in as the user used in the connection string
Created a new password
Updated the web.config connection string "Password"
Hope this will help
So, in my case I tried to get started with the existing project. I got all the files, restored DB backup locally, made sure all permissions are set for IIS AppPool user etc. But I kept getting the error in question. It turns out that I cannot use server=localhost;database=... in connection string. After I replaced it with server=.\;database=..., it started to work right away.
Also note that if you're running it in Azure with an Azure SQL database you'll have to go to the Azure SQL Server settings and under "Firewalls and virtual networks" you'll need to tick "Yes" for "Allow Azure services and resources to access this server".
I was getting this error when running an Umbraco project locally, with the DB pointing to an instance on Azure. In that case, this problem happens if you haven't allowed the IP access within the Server Firewall of the DB in Azure.
You can fix this by finding out your IP and then adding it to the DB:
Click All Resources within your Azure portal, then click on the SQL Database your project points to.
Click Set Server Firewall on the right-side window.
Add in your IP as the start and end points, and call it something memorable.
Click Save and once you get the confirmation message that It has been applied, refresh your site locally.
I experienced the same problem and here is how I fixed it.
Right-click on your localhost in SSMS and select Properties
Got to the Security page and select "Select authentication" as "SQL Server and Windows Authentication mode"
Hit OK.
Go to Services and find your SQL Server service and restart it.
Check your local umbraco website now, you should be able to see it without any issues. If you still have problems, then you might need to check your local setup and permissions.
Further details are below and on this blog post.
I am a python developer by day, but I have some java experience as well (mostly with struts). At work I was handed a grails app to install, which was ok, but the owners of the app didn't supply any credentials, and the app loads to a login page.
I unpacked the war, but I think the DB config has been packaged into a jar somewhere, because I can't seem to find any connection URL. There's an h2 db file that's been created after I deployed the App, so I'm wondering:
how can I connect to the db like you normally would with SQLite or mysql client, browse tables, and create an admin user so I can login?
Go with decompilation. You need not only a user and password, but at least a database JDBC URL. That may include DBMS name, host, port, database name - depending on Java driver specifics. Then connect as you would normally in Python or whatever, or with DBVisualizer.
But if the database is in H2/hsql (URL is like jdbc:h2:mem:XXX), you've got a problem: it is a Java in-process DBMS. In order to gain external access to it, you'll need to change the decompiled code, compile and pack it back with some additions. Hope it's not your case.
Another way in hsql/H2 case is to find and decompile database bootstrap code - as it's an in-process DB, it should be filled at every application startup, so there should be a code creating that superuser.
In Grails, the DB configuration, including authentication settings, are declared in a file called Datasource.groovy which is then compiled into the WAR. You'll need the source code to find the username and password for the H2 DB.
I don't know if Python can connect to a java datasource but it may be a solution.
An other solution may be to provide some REST webservice from Grails side to make it possible for the python program to access the database. This is the way I prefer and I often choose.
By the way, you have the configuration of the databases used by Grails in the conf directory (grails-app/conf/DataSource.groovy) and you'll get the jdbc URL to the database which could be convert to a classical URL. For example : jdbc:mysql://localhost/my_app refers to the database my_app on localhost and default port for a mysql database.
Feel free to ask if you need more information.
Cheers
I'm working to try and get a migrated Umbraco/YAF installation working, but I'm having issues with connectivity.
I've already asked for help with the Connection Strings, so this bit is sorted.
However, I still get a 404 error when I try and navigate to mysite/forums, as it redirects to mysite/install
This site tells me that this could be because of a few issues:
It will connect you to install\default.aspx if
: its connect to a db but thinks there isn't a YAF version present in its data, or
: database version doesn't match and thinks it needs updating.
I know it's connecting to the DB, because the CMS connection string works, and it's connecting to the same database.
There are YAF_* tables in the database, so I know it's content is there.
By process of elimination, it might be a version issue, but I'm not sure how to compare the DB version to the ASP files version.
I'm running Umbraco 4.6.1
I never quite worked out what version I was running, but I did find out this issue was fixed by:
Assign yaf database user db-owner privileges.
And there you have it.
check that you have the following line in web.config
<add key="umbracoConfigurationStatus" value="4.6.1" />
I've been experimenting with ASP.Net MVC, and have come across a problem that is probably not specifically MVC related. But I cannot get the authentication in the default MVC application (the one created by the wizard when you create a new MVC project) to work properly under IIS 7 on Windows 7.
If I run under the Visual Studio environment, it works, but if I switch the settings to run under IIS instead, I get the following exception trying to submit the login or registration:
Failed to generate a user instance of
SQL Server due to failure in
retrieving the user's local
application data path. Please make
sure the user has a local user profile
on the computer. The connection will
be closed.
I believe that this is because the website runs under my own account in Visual Studio, but under the IUSR account in IIS. Google searches on the exception message have been unhelpful so far.
So, can one create a local user profile for the IUSR account? If so, how? Is there something else I should be doing to get the SQLExpress engine to work under the anonymous account in IIS 7?
I also tried configuring the IIS website to use my account, but since this is my home machine, my account doesn't have a password, and it appears that IIS won't let a website be configured to use an account without a password. Or, since this is my first experience with IIS 7, and configuration feels very different than IIS 5/6, I am just missing the right setting that will let me configure the account to use for anonymous access.
EDIT: Some additional information. If I empty the App_Data folder and try again from IIS, SQLExpress attempts to create my database and fails, but the exception message has further information with the following suggestions.
SQLExpress database file auto-creation
error:
The connection string specifies a
local Sql Server Express instance
using a database location within the
applications App_Data directory. The
provider attempted to automatically
create the application services
database because the provider
determined that the database does not
exist. The following configuration
requirements are necessary to
successfully check for existence of
the application services database and
automatically create the application
services database:
If the applications App_Data directory does not already exist, the
web server account must have read and
write access to the applications
directory. This is necessary because
the web server account will
automatically create the App_Data
directory if it does not already
exist.
If the applications App_Data directory already exists, the web
server account only requires read and
write access to the applications
App_Data directory. This is necessary
because the web server account will
attempt to verify that the Sql Server
Express database already exists within
the applications App_Data directory.
Revoking read access on the App_Data
directory from the web server account
will prevent the provider from
correctly determining if the Sql
Server Express database already
exists. This will cause an error when
the provider attempts to create a
duplicate of an already existing
database. Write access is required
because the web server accounts
credentials are used when creating the
new database.
Sql Server Express must be installed on the machine.
The process identity for the web server account must have a local user
profile. See the readme document for
details on how to create a local user
profile for both machine and domain
accounts.
I've pretty extensively confirmed that the first three suggestions have been satisfied. The fourth seems to be the cause of my problems, but I can't figure out how to do that. And although the suggestion claims there is a readme document that describes it, I have not been able to find that document.
I got this problem as well running under medium trust. The process that creates the database requires at least High trust. You can check this by looking in your Web.Config for
<trust level="TrustLevel" />
If there is no trust specified in your Web.Config, try adding it and set it to either Full or High. If this doesn't work, there is a machine.config in your IIS which you would need to modify.
That being said, the best route I have found to solve this is to just use aspnet_regsql.exe to create the necessary tables and then change the connection string in your Web.Config to look at it directly.
I solved "The directory 'LocalApplicationData' does not exist." error when running an SSIS package through an SQL Job by ensuring the SQL SSIS service and SQL Server Agent service were running under the same account as the swql job was set to use!
This in my case was a domain account.
Solution: Try UNINSTALLING any updates before you started experiencing the issue. I spent countless hours - wasted hours that I will never get back in my life - reading and following every solution possible without success. I uninstalled all SQL Server updates and now everything works fine.