ObjectiveC waiting on for loop blocks with semaphore - ios

Question

I have to run a method with block, several times inside a for loop.
I also have to wait until all the blocks execution completes.
My problem is that I can't understand what I do wrong, that causes my entire app to freeze. Here is the code:
dispatch_semaphore_t semaphore = dispatch_semaphore_create(0);//1 - creating semaphore
for(int i = 0; i< myObj.count; i++){
[[DataManager shared] verifyObjectId:myObj[i].id
completionBlock:^(BOOL found) {
if(found){
//code here
dispatch_semaphore_signal(semaphore);//3 - signaling semaphore to continue
}
}];
dispatch_semaphore_wait(semaphore, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);//2 - getting semaphore to wait
}
//I want to continue once all DB checks complete
Now, I don't understand, why the semaphore won't release, and the for loop won't continue.
What I actually need, is for the semaphore to release after all the DB checks complete. Ideally, I would want the semaphore to wait outside the for loop. Any suggestions on how to accomplish this?
EDIT: SOLUTION: (based on the accepted answer)
// create a group
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
for(int i = 0; i< myObj.count; i++){
// pair a dispatch_group_enter for each dispatch_group_leave
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[[DataManager shared] verifyObjectId:myObj[i].id
completionBlock:^(BOOL found) {
if(found){
//code here
}
dispatch_group_leave(group); //1 leave
}];
//Get a notification on a block that will be scheduled on the specified queue
dispatch_group_notify(group, dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_HIGH, 0), ^{
NSLog(#"-all done!-");
//code here
});
}

Answer 1

Without access to verifyObjectid:completiongBlock:, there are a couple of issues. First, you only call dispatch_semaphore_signal if found is true. If found is every false, you'll deadlock. That may just be a transcription error and your real code might not do that.
Another guess is that the completion block is being submitted to the queue that you're currently running on (the main queue?) If that's true, then that would definitely be a deadlock, because you'll never run dispatch_semaphore_signal since it's waiting on dispatch_semaphore_wait. I can't tell without information about DataManager.
Your approach also serializes the calls, whereas I think you wanted them to be in parallel. Each call has to wait for the former one to finish in your code.
The better tools to use here are dispatch_apply and dispatch_group. Something like this (untested):
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
dispatch_apply(myObj.count, dispatch_get_global_queue(0, 0), ^(size_t i){
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[[DataManager shared] verifyObjectId:myObj[i].id
completionBlock:^(BOOL found) {
if(found){
//code here
}
dispatch_group_leave(group));
}];
});
dispatch_group_wait(group, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
dispatch_apply won't return until all the blocks have completed running, which means that dispatch_group_enter has run "count" times. You then use dispatch_group_wait to wait for all the calls to dispatch_group_leave.