I am trying to do:
function objects:add(namespace, x, y, w, h, mode, density, r)
then make a new table. objects.namespace = {}
then return the table by:
return objects.namespace
but i want the 'namespace' to actually be defined in the function... how would I go about doing that?
and when i try to call something inside the table I.E: print(objects.newBox.x)
it gives me 'NIL'
Even if I try:
function test(name)
print(name)
[name] = {"yo"}
end
test(doit)
It gives me an error: 'attempt to index a nil value'
I must be doing something wrong...
table = {}
function table:add(name, x, y)
table.[name] = {}
table.[name].x = x
table.[name].y = y
return table.[name]
end
table:add(box1, 300, 100)
print("table.box1.x: " ..table.box1.x)
print("table.box1.y: " ..table.box1.y)
-- [name] is to be defined in the function arg.
-- then i want to return the table and use it's contents for other uses I.E line 10 and 11
-- gets the following error: '<name>' expected near '['
Here is a working version:
t = {}
function t:add(name, x, y)
t[name] = {} -- or use t[name] = {x=x, y=y} and remove the next 2 lines
t[name].x = x
t[name].y = y
return t[name] -- necessary?
end
t:add('box1', 300, 100)
print("t.box1.x: " ..t.box1.x)
print("t.box1.y: " ..t.box1.y)
Naming a variable table will hide the table library so I have changed it to t
When you call t:add(box1, 300, 100) box1 is not defined so it's value is nil, which isn't a valid key for a table
you want to use "box1" as the key since t.box1 is just sugar for t["box1"]
In your function t:add you want to index t with the value of name, the syntax is t[name]
You also aren't using the return value and you can get to it from t with t.box1. it seems unnecessary
using : suggests you want to implement objects? If that is the case, see PIL Object Oriented Programming for an introduction on how to implement that
Related
I'm currently starting work on a text adventure game in Lua--no addons, just pure Lua for my first project. In essence, here is my problem; I'm trying to find out how I can do a "reverse lookup" of a table using one of its variables. Here's an example of what I've tried to do:
print("What are you trying to take?")
bag = {}
gold = {name="Gold",ap=3}
x = io.read("*l")
if x == "Gold" then
table.insert(bag,gold)
print("You took the " .. gold.name .. ".")
end
Obviously, writing a line like this with every single object in the game would be very... exhausting--especially since I think I'll be able to use this solution for not just taking items but movement from room to room using a reverse lookup with each room's (x,y) coordinates. Anyone have any ideas on how to make a more flexible system that can find a table by the player typing in one of its variables? Thanks in advance!
-blockchainporter
This doesn't directly answer your question as you asked it, but I think it would serve the purpose of what you are trying to do. I create a table called 'loot' which can hold many objects, and the player can place any of these in their 'bag' by typing the name.
bag = {}
loot = {
{name="Gold", qty=3},
{name="Axe", qty=1},
}
print("What are you trying to take?")
x = io.read("*l")
i = 1
while loot[i] do
if (x == loot[i].name) then
table.insert(bag, table.remove(loot,i))
else
i = i + 1
end
end
For bonus points, you could check 'bag' to see if the player has some of that item already and then just update the quantity...
while loot[i] do
if (x == loot[i].name) then
j, found = 1, nil
while bag[j] do
if (x == bag[j].name) then
found = true
bag[j].qty = bag[j].qty + loot[i].qty
table.remove(loot,i)
end
j = j + 1
end
if (not found) then
table.insert(bag, table.remove(loot,i))
end
else
i = i + 1
end
end
Again, this isn't a 'reverse lookup' solution like you asked for... but I think it is closer to what you are trying to do by letting a user choose to loot something.
My disclaimer is that I don't use IO functions in my own lua usage, so I have to assume that your x = io.read("*l") is correct.
PS. If you only ever want objects to have a name and qty, and never any other properties (like condition, enchantment, or whatever) then you could also simplify my solution by using key/val pairs:
bag = {}
loot = { ["Gold"] = 3, ["Axe"] = 1 }
print("What are you trying to take?")
x = io.read("*l")
for name, qty in pairs(loot) do
if x == name then
bag.name = (bag.name or 0) + qty
loot.name = nil
end
end
I have a few notes to start before I specifically address your question. (I just want to do this before I forget, so please bear with me!)
I recommend printing to the terminal using stderr instead of stdout--the Lua function print uses the latter. When I am writing a Lua script, I often create a C-style function called eprintf to print formatted output to stderr. I implement it like this:
local function eprintf(fmt, ...)
io.stderr:write(string.format(fmt, ...))
return
end
Just be aware that, unlike print, this function does not automatically append a newline character to the output string; to do so, remember to put \n at the end of your fmt string.
Next, it may be useful to define a helper function that calls io.read("*l") to get an entire line of input. In writing some example code to help answer your question, I called my function getline--like the C++ function that has similar behavior--and defined it like this:
local function getline()
local read = tostring(io.read("*l"))
return read
end
If I correctly understand what it is you are trying to do, the player will have an inventory--which you have called bag--and he can put items into it by entering item names into stdin. So, for instance, if the player found a treasure chest with gold, a sword, and a potion in it and he wanted to take the gold, he would type Gold into stdin and it would be placed in his inventory.
Based on what you have so far, it looks like you are using Lua tables to create these items: each table has a name index and another called ap; and, if a player's text input matches an item's name, the player picks that up item.
I would recommend creating an Item class, which you could abstract nicely by placing it in its own script and then loading it as needed with require. This is a very basic Item class module I wrote:
----------------
-- Item class --
----------------
local Item = {__name = "Item"}
Item.__metatable = "metatable"
Item.__index = Item
-- __newindex metamethod.
function Item.__newindex(self, k, v)
local err = string.format(
"type `Item` does not have member `%s`",
tostring(k)
)
return error(err, 2)
end
-- Item constructor
function Item.new(name_in, ap_in)
assert((name_in ~= nil) and (ap_in ~= nil))
local self = {
name = name_in,
ap = ap_in
}
return setmetatable(self, Item)
end
return Item
From there, I wrote a main driver to encapsulate some of the behavior you described in your question. (Yes, I know my Lua code looks more like C.)
#!/usr/bin/lua
-------------
-- Modules --
-------------
local Item = assert(require("Item"))
local function eprintf(fmt, ...)
io.stderr:write(string.format(fmt, ...))
return
end
local function printf(fmt, ...)
io.stdout:write(string.format(fmt, ...))
return
end
local function getline()
local read = tostring(io.read("*l"))
return read
end
local function main(argc, argv)
local gold = Item.new("Gold", 3)
printf("gold.name = %s\ngold.ap = %i\n", gold.name, gold.ap)
return 0
end
main(#arg, arg)
Now, as for the reverse search which you described, at this point all you should have to do is check the user's input against an Item's name. Here it is in the main function:
local function main(argc, argv)
local gold = Item.new("Gold", 3)
local bag = {}
eprintf("What are you trying to take? ")
local input = getline()
if (input == gold.name) then
table.insert(bag, gold)
eprintf("You took the %s.\n", gold.name)
else
eprintf("Unrecognized item `%s`.\n", input)
end
return 0
end
I hope this helps!
I'm creating a simple matrix like follows:
for x = 0, 50 do
current_level[x] = {}
for y = 0, 50 do
current_level[x][y] = grabTile();
end
end
After that i try to read it, but somehow the x is now a object not a number, while y seems perfectly fine!
How i try reading it:
for x,value in pairs(self.map) do
if value == ni then print("none"); return;end;
for y,object in pairs(value) do
if object == ni then print("none"); return;end;
object:render(x,y); -- Here x is an object
end
end
I'm new to working with lua, so i might be doing something obvious terribly wrong.
How would i make this work?
What i get for x is something like: table: 0x07c8d530
This value stays the same along the complete iteration
object:render(x,y); -- Here x is an object
This line is using colon syntax. It is a syntactic sugar for object.render(object,x,y) call.
So your render() function must have the first self argument declared either explicitly as function render(self, x, y) or implicitly with another syntactic sugar for definition: function object:render(x,y).
Unrelated hint. The first loop will be faster/smaller if transformed to:
for x = 0, 50 do
local row = {}
for y = 0, 50 do
row[y] = grabTile();
end
current_level[x] = row
end
Assume I have a function that returns multiple values. I happen to be working with LÖVE's (Image):getDimensions. This returns two values, which I know to be width,height. I want to assign them to a new table, as an array. I would like named (string) keys. So for instance, I would like to assign the return values of the getDimensions() function to a new table with keys width and height, respectively.
I know the following works...
image = {}
image.data = love.graphics.newImage('myimage.png')
image.size = {}
image.size.width, image.size.height = image.data:getDimensions()
I'm wondering if there is any sort of syntactic sugar I can use, or any use of standard library functions that will allow a syntax more along the lines of...
image.size = { width, height = image.data:getDimensions() }
I know the above line does not work, along with many variations I've tried, including various attempts to use unpack(). I'm new to Lua (~2 days in now), so maybe there is another standard function or best practice that I'm unaware of that will associate a table of keys to an array-like table. Thanks!
You can write your own functions:
local function set_fields(tab, fields, ...)
-- fields is an array of field names
-- (use empty string to skip value at corresponging position)
local values = {...}
for k, field in ipairs(fields) do
if field ~= "" then
tab[field] = values[k]
end
end
return tab
end
local function get_fields(tab, fields)
local values = {}
for k, field in ipairs(fields) do
values[k] = tab[field]
end
return (table.unpack or unpack)(values, 1, #fields)
end
Usage example #1:
image.size = set_fields({}, {"width", "height"}, image.data:getDimensions())
Usage example #2:
Swap the values on-the-fly!
local function get_weekdays()
return "Sun", "Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat"
end
-- we want to save returned values in different order
local weekdays = set_fields({}, {7,1,2,3,4,5,6}, get_weekdays())
-- now weekdays contains {"Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat", "Sun"}
Usage example #3:
local function get_coords_x_y_z()
return 111, 222, 333 -- x, y, z of the point
end
-- we want to get the projection of the point on the ground plane
local projection = {y = 0}
-- projection.y will be preserved, projection.x and projection.z will be modified
set_fields(projection, {"x", "", "z"}, get_coords_x_y_z())
-- now projection contains {x = 111, y = 0, z = 333}
Usage example #4:
If require("some_module") returns a module with plenty of functions inside, but you need only a few of them:
local bnot, band, bor = get_fields(require("bit"), {"bnot", "band", "bor"})
Using a class construct, I have come up with the following...
Size = {}
Size.mt = {}
Size.prototype = { width = 0, height = 0 }
function Size.new (dimensions)
local size = setmetatable({}, Size.mt)
if dimensions ~= nil and type(dimensions) == 'table' then
for k,v in pairs(dimensions) do
size[k] = v
end
end
return size
end
Size.mt.__index = function (t, k)
if k == 'width' or k == 'height' then
rawset(t, k, Size.prototype[k])
return t[k]
else
return nil
end
end
Size.mt.__newindex = function (t, k, v)
if k == 1 or k == 'width' then
rawset(t, 'width', v)
elseif k == 2 or k == 'height' then
rawset(t, 'height', v)
end
end
Then I can initialize a Size object in a number of ways
Using multiple return values:
image.size = Size.new{image.data:getDimensions()}
image.size = Size.new(table.pack(image.data:getDimensions())
Using default values:
image.size = Size.new()
image.size = Size.new{}
image.size = Size.new({})
Using mixed array and hash tables:
image.size = Size.new({height=20, width=30})
image.size = Size.new({height=20, 30})
There are pros and cons to this approach vs. Egor's (utility function), which is what I was considering doing if there wasn't a simple syntax trick or an existing function that I was unaware of.
Pros:
(personal) learning experience with OO constructs in Lua
I can limit the number of actual keys on the table, while allowing 'synonyms' for those keys to be added by expanding the accepted values in the if/else logic of __index and __newindex
Explicit definition of fields in the table, without needing to worry about syncing a table of keys with a table of values (as with a general purpose utility function)
Cons
would need to repeat this pattern for each data structure where I wanted this behavior
costly, a lot of overhead for what amounts to a very small difference to the consumer
I'm sure I can make this approach more robust in time, but I would appreciate any feedback.
Why isn't this working? I'm trying to put all my object tables in a single table and use a forloop to iterate through each of them and draw. It shows an error message saying: "}" expected near "=" at line 5
function love.load()
solidstatic = {
ground = {x = 0,y = 160,width = 1000,height = 1000},
box = {x = 80,y = 100,width = 15,height = 15}
}
end
function love.draw()
for i,obj in ipairs(solidstatic) do
love.graphics.rectangle("fill",obj[x],obj[y],obj[width],obj[height])
end
end
(edit) solved the error problem, I was running the wrong .lua file. But still, it doesn't draw anything on the screen
Two things.
Firstly, you must use pairs instead of ipairs to list keys that are not numbers.
for i, v in pairs(table) do
...
end
You must also index the variables as a string.
t = {
x = 1
}
t['x'] = 1
-- or
t.x = 1
This is because doing it without quotes would be indexing with the global variable x, which doesn't exist.
You need to use pairs instead of ipairs to iterate over elements in solidstatic as there are no array keys in that table.
I am starting to learn Lua from Programming in Lua (2nd edition)
I didn't understand the following in the book. Its very vaguely explained.
a.) w={x=0,y=0,label="console"}
b.) x={math.sin(0),math.sin(1),math.sin(2)}
c.) w[1]="another field"
d.) x.f=w
e.) print (w["x"])
f.) print (w[1])
g.) print x.f[1]
When I do print(w[1]) after a.), why doesn't it print x=0
What does c.) do?
What is the difference between e.) and print (w.x)?
What is the role of b.) and g.)?
You have to realize that this:
t = {3, 4, "eggplant"}
is the same as this:
t = {}
t[1] = 3
t[2] = 4
t[3] = "eggplant"
And that this:
t = {x = 0, y = 2}
is the same as this:
t = {}
t["x"] = 0
t["y"] = 2
Or this:
t = {}
t.x = 0
t.y = 2
In Lua, tables are not just lists, they are associative arrays.
When you print w[1], then what really matters is line c.) In fact, w[1] is not defined at all until line c.).
There is no difference between e.) and print (w.x).
b.) creates a new table named x which is separate from w.
d.) places a reference to w inside of x. (NOTE: It does not actually make a copy of w, just a reference. If you've ever worked with pointers, it's similar.)
g.) Can be broken up in two parts. First we get x.f which is just another way to refer to w because of line d.). Then we look up the first element of that table, which is "another field" because of line c.)
There's another way of creating keys in in-line table declarations.
x = {["1st key has spaces!"] = 1}
The advantage here is that you can have keys with spaces and any extended ASCII character.
In fact, a key can be literally anything, even an instanced object.
function Example()
--example function
end
x = {[Example] = "A function."}
Any variable or value or data can go into the square brackets to work as a key. The same goes with the value.
Practically, this can replace features like the in keyword in python, as you can index the table by values to check if they are there.
Getting a value at an undefined part of the table will not cause an error. It will just give you nil. The same goes for using undefined variables.
local w = {
--[1] = "another field"; -- will be set this value
--["1"] = nil; -- not save to this place, different with some other language
x = 0;
y = 0;
label = "console";
}
local x = {
math.sin(0);
math.sin(1);
math.sin(2);
}
w[1] = "another field" --
x.f = w
print (w["x"])
-- because x.f = w
-- x.f and w point one talbe address
-- so value of (x.f)[1] and w[1] and x.f[1] is equal
print (w[1])
print ((x.f)[1])
print (x.f[1])
-- print (x.f)[1] this not follows lua syntax
-- only a function's has one param and type of is a string
-- you can use print "xxxx"
-- so you print x.f[1] will occuur error
-- in table you can use any lua internal type 's value to be a key
-- just like
local t_key = {v=123}
local f_key = function () print("f123") end
local t = {}
t[t_key] = 1
t[f_key] = 2
-- then t' key actualy like use t_key/f_key 's handle
-- when you user t[{}] = 123,
-- value 123 related to this no name table {} 's handle