iOS - How to increase variable in block using cycle - ios

I need to create an entity on the server and then upload few images to the server.
So first block display success creating entity on the server then I starting upload 10 images one by one in cycle, but the app send the notification not after last 10 image was uploaded, so 'i' variable can be 10 even not be a 10 in the order. I am not sure but seems iteration in the block is not right. So I just want to be sure that the 10 images was uploaded and just then invoke sending notification.
So I skip some blocks parameters and failure options, array that I use for getting images to upload and etc. Just think about my blocks as an example that display success invocation after '{'.
// success first block
block1
{
// cycle from 0 to 10
for (NSInteger i = 0; i <=10; i++)
{
// success upload image to the server block
block2
{
// if I did 10 uploads I need to send notification.
if (i == 10)
{
// send notification here when last block returned success....
}
}
}
}

If you're creating a bunch of AFHTTPRequestOperation objects, then the most logical approach would be to create a completion operation and make it dependent upon the request operations:
NSOperation *completionOperation = [NSBlockOperation blockOperationWithBlock:^{
// code to be run when the operations are all done should go here
}];
for (...) {
// create `operation` AFHTTPRequestOperation however you want and add it to some queue
// but just make sure to designate the completion operation dependency
[completionOperation addDependency:operation];
}
// now that all the other operations have been queued, you can now add the completion operation to whatever queue you want
[[NSOperationQueue mainQueue] addOperation:completionOperation];

You can use Dispatch Group as the following.
// success first block
block1
{
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
// cycle from 0 to 10
__block NSUInteger successCount = 0;
for (NSInteger i = 0; i <=10; i++)
{
dispatch_group_enter(group);
// upload image to the server block
successOrErrorBlock
{
if (success)
successCount++;
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}
}
dispatch_group_notify(group, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
if (successCount == 10) {
// send notification here when last block returned success....
}
});
}

The pattern I follow when invoking more than a couple blocks asynchronously is to create a to-do list (array) and perform that list recursively, like this:
// say this is our asynch operation. presume that someParameter fully
// describes the operation, like a file to be uploaded
- (void)performSomeAsynchOperationDefinedBy:(id)someParameter completion:(void (^)(BOOL, NSError *))completion {
// this could wrap any operation, like anything from AFNetworking
}
- (void)doOperationsWithParameters:(NSArray *)parameters completion:(void (^)(BOOL, NSError *))completion {
if (!parameters.count) return completion(YES, nil);
id nextParameter = someParameters[0];
NSArray *remainingParameters = [parameters subarrayWithRange:NSMakeRange(1, parameters.count-1)];
[self performSomeAsynchOperationDefinedBy:nextParameter completion:^(BOOL success, NSError *error)) {
if (!error) {
[self doManyOperations:remainingParameters completion:completion];
} else {
completion(NO, error);
}
}];
}
Now, to do several operations, place the parameters in an array, like:
NSArray *parameters = #[#"filename0", #"filename1", ...];
[self doOperationsWithParameters:parameters completion:(BOOL success, NSError *error) {
NSLog(#"ta-da!");
}];
A variant on the above with a progress block invoked up front and after each recursion (with a progress percentage initialCount/remainingCount) should be straight forward from the example provided.
Another variation would be to wrap both the param array and the completion block in a single NSObject, so the recursive call could be made with performSelector:, the benefit of doing this would be to not wind up the stack on a long recursion.

Related

Core Data Performing Fetch Request with Completion Handler or execute in some other thread other than Main thread

In my iOS application I am using Core Data.
For table View listing I use NSFetchedResultsController and
Connecting to Remote store I use NSIncrementalStore.
My FetchedResultsController Context is having MainQueue Cuncurrency type.(I couldn't do it with a PrivateQueueCurrencyTYpe).
For resolving Fault, for a many relationship, the executeFetchResultsCall:withContext:error method is executed from my IncrementalStore subclass.
Inside the executeFetchResults method, I will invoke the API (connecting to remote server) if it is not available in my local database.
myarray = [object representationsForRelationship:#"manyconnection" withParams:nil];
Now I need the results array in return synchronously to be returned to the ExecuteFetchResultsMethod. Also this operation should be executed on Main thread.
So I am having only one option to fetch the results from server which causes the UI to unresponsive for the specified sleep time.
-(RequestResult*)makeSyncJsonRequest{
__block RequestResult *retResult = [[RequestResult alloc] init];
__block BOOL block = YES;
dispatch_queue_t queue = dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0);
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
void (^resultBlock)(RequestResult*) = ^(RequestResult* result){
if(!retResult.error)
retResult = result;
block = NO;
dispatch_group_leave(group);
};
// Add a task to the group
dispatch_group_async(group, queue, ^{
// Some asynchronous work
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self makeAsyncJsonRequestWithBlock:resultBlock];
});
// Do some other work while the tasks execute.
// When you cannot make any more forward progress,
// wait on the group to block the current thread.
dispatch_group_wait(group, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
return retResult;
}
As the above operation is being executed on main thread,the UI hangs.
Inorder to make the UI smoother, I need to carry out the executeFetchrequest in some other thread which is not possible.
It also expects the results array in return.
Is there any option to carry out this something like in a completion handler manner?
or
Any alternate methods or design to work this proper.
Any Help is highly appreciated.
This is a skeleton, using a dispatch_group, assuming you are using an NSFetchedResultsController to update your UITableView:
#implementation ViewController
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// do your setup (FetchedResultsController and such)
[self syncData];
}
- (void)syncData
{
NSArray<Entity*> *results = [self fetchData];
BOOL needsUpdateFromServer = YES; // check your results and set this bool accordingly
if (!needsUpdateFromServer) {
return;
}
__block ServerResponse *fromServer = nil;
__block dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self loadDataFromServer:^(ServerResponse *response) {
fromServer = response;
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}];
dispatch_group_notify(group,dispatch_get_main_queue(),^{
[self persistData:fromServer];
/*
According to our discussion, you are using an NSFetchedResultsController.
So your tableView should update automatically after persisting the data.
*/
});
}
- (void)loadDataFromServer:(void (^)(ServerResponse *response))completion
{
// [someDownloadService downloadDataFromServerInBackgroundWithCompletion:^(ServerResponse* response){
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
completion(response);
});
// }];
}
- (NSArray<Entity*>*)fetchData
{
NSArray<Entity*> *results = nil;
// fetch from core data and return it
return results;
}
- (void)persistData:(NSArray<ServerResponse*> *)serverResponses
{
// parse whatever you get from server
// ... and persist it using Core Data
}
#end

Wait for an async methods to finish in a for loop

I have a for loop containing three asynchronous methods, and I want to make some treatment after this 3 async methods are finished.
-(void)getAllUsersInformations{
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
for(User *user in users){
[self getUserInfo:user];
}
//Here, I want to reload the table view for example, after finishing the for loop (executing the whole three methods).
});
}
-(void)getUserInfo:(User*)user{
[self getInformations:user];
[self getExperiences:user];
[self getEducation:user];
}
Do you have any technic to have this result?
Thank you very much.
One GCD approach is to use dispatch_group. So, before you start an asynchronous task, call dispatch_group_enter, and then when the asynchronous task finishes, call dispatch_group_leave, and you can then create a dispatch_group_notify which will be called when the asynchronous tasks finish. You can marry this with a completion block pattern (which is a good idea for asynchronous methods, anyway):
If getInformations, getExperiences and getEducation are, themselves, all asynchronous methods, the first thing you need is some mechanism to know when they're done. A common solution is to implement a completion block pattern for each. For example:
// added completionHandler parameter which will be called when the retrieval
// of the "informations" is done.
- (void)getInformations:(User*)user completionHandler:(void (^)(void))completionHandler {
// do whatever you were before, but in the asynchronous task's completion block, call this
// completionHandler()
//
// for example
NSURLRequest *request;
[NSURLConnection sendAsynchronousRequest:request queue:nil completionHandler:^(NSURLResponse *response, NSData *data, NSError *connectionError) {
// handle the request here
// the important thing is that the completion handler should
// be called _inside_ the this block
if (completionHandler) {
completionHandler();
}
}];
}
Repeat this process for getExperiences and getEducation, too.
Then, you can use a dispatch group to notify you of when each of these three requests are done done, calling a completion block in getUserInfo when that takes place:
// added completion handler that will be called only when `getInformations`,
// `getExperiences` and `getEducation` are all done.
//
// this takes advantage of the completion block we added to those three
// methods above
- (void)getUserInfo:(User*)user completionHandler:(void (^)(void))completionHandler {
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
// start the three requests
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self getInformations:user completionHandler:^{
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}];
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self getExperiences:user completionHandler:^{
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}];
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self getEducation:user completionHandler:^{
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}];
// this block will be called asynchronously only when the above three are done
dispatch_group_notify(group, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
if (completionHandler) {
completionHandler();
}
});
}
And you then repeat this process at the getAllUsersInformations:
// call new getUserInfo, using dispatch group to keep track of whether
// all the requests are done
-(void)getAllUsersInformations {
dispatch_group_t group = dispatch_group_create();
for(User *user in users){
dispatch_group_enter(group);
[self getUserInfo:user completionHandler:^{
dispatch_group_leave(group);
}];
}
dispatch_group_notify(group, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[self.tableView reloadData];
});
}
Two final thoughts:
Having outlined all of that, I must confess that I would probably wrap these requests in concurrent/asynchronous custom NSOperation subclasses instead of using dispatch groups. See the "Configuring Operations for Concurrent Execution" section of the Concurrency Programming Guide. This is a more radical refactoring of the code, so I won't tackle that here, but it lets you constrain the number of these requests that will run concurrently, mitigating potential timeout issues.
I don't know how many of these user requests are going on, but you might want to consider updating the UI as user information comes in, rather than waiting for everything to finish. This is, again, a more radical refactoring of the code, but might lead to something that feels more responsive.
Try to do a block with completion, you can't do this with a for loop if the methods are async. you have to call getUserInfo one by one after the completion of the previous. I think this gonna be solved your problem.
-(void)getAllUsersInformations{
[self registerUserAtIndex:0];
}
- (void) registerUserAtIndex: (NSInteger ) userIndex
{
RegisterOperation *op = [[RegisterOperation alloc] initWithUser:[users objectAtIndex:userIndex]];
[RegisterOperation setResultCompletionBlock:^(BOOL *finished, NSInteger userIndex) {
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
if (userIndex++ < [users count] {
[self registerUserAtIndex:userIndex++];
} else {
[myTableView reloadData];
}
}];
[[NSOperationQueue mainQueue] addOperation:op];
}
Hope this will help you.
Rop Answer with swift:
func processData()
{
let group: dispatch_group_t = dispatch_group_create()
for item in data as! Object {
dispatch_group_enter(group)
item.process(completion: {() -> (Void) in
dispatch_group_leave(group)
})
}
dispatch_group_notify(group, dispatch_get_main_queue(), {
//Do whatever you want
})
}
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
// Background work
for(User *user in users){
[self getUserInfo:user];
}
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
//reload tableview , this is on main thread.
});
});

Testing background save of Core Data entity with Kiwi

I'm struggling to figure out the best method to test interacting with Core Data in a background thread. I have the following class method:
+ (void)fetchSomeJSON
{
// Download some json then parse it in the block
[[AFHTTPClient sharedClient] fetchAllThingsWithCompletion:^(id results, NSError *error) {
if ([results count] > 0) {
NSManagedObjectContext *backgroundContext = //... create a new context for background insertion
dispatch_queue_t background = dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_BACKGROUND, 0);
dispatch_async(background, ^{ // If I comment this out, my test runs just fine
//... insert and update some entities
for (NSString *str in results) {
NSManagedObject *object = //...
}
});
}
}];
}
I'm currently testing this method with the following Kiwi code:
describe(#"MyAction", ^{
__block void (^completionBlock)(NSArray *array, NSError *error);
beforeEach(^{
// Stub the http client
id mockClient = [AFHTTPClient mock];
[WRNAPIClient stub:#selector(sharedClient) andReturn:mockClient];
// capture the block argument
KWCaptureSpy *spy = [mockClient captureArgument:#selector(fetchAllThingsWithCompletion:) atIndex:0];
[MyClass fetchSomeJSON]; // Call the method so we can capture the block
completionBlock = spy.argument;
// run the completion block
completionBlock(#[#"blah"], nil);
})
// If I remove the dispatch_async block, this test passes fine.
// If I add it in again the test fails, probably because its not waiting
it(#"should return the right count", ^{
// entityCount is a block that performs a fetch request count
NSInteger count = entityCount(moc, #"Task");
[[theValue(count) should] equal:theValue(4)];
})
// This works fine, but obviously I don't want to wait a second
it(#"should return the right count after waiting for a second", ^{
sleep(1);
NSInteger count = entityCount(moc, #"Task");
[[theValue(count) should] equal:theValue(4)];
});
};
If I remove the dispatch_async line, then I can get my test to run quickly. The only way I can get my test suite to run when using dispatch_async is to sleep(1) after calling the completion block. Using sleep() makes me think that I'm not approaching it in the right way. I have tried using shouldEventually but this doesn't seem to re-fetch my count value.
Have you tried these asynchronous block macros?
#define TestNeedsToWaitForBlock() __block BOOL blockFinished = NO
#define BlockFinished() blockFinished = YES
#define WaitForBlock() while (CFRunLoopRunInMode(kCFRunLoopDefaultMode, 0, true) && !blockFinished)
I have tried several approaches to solving this, none feel right.
1) Move the dispatch_async to its own class
+ (void)dispatchOnMainQueue:(Block)block
{
if ([NSThread currentThread] == [NSThread mainThread]) {
block();
} else {
dispatch_sync(dispatch_get_main_queue(), block);
}
}
+ (void)dispatchOnBackgroundQueue:(Block)block
{
dispatch_queue_t background = dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_BACKGROUND, 0);
dispatch_async(background, block);
}
Then during test execution, swizzle the background dispatch to occur on the main queue. This worked, but was unpredictable. It also felt so wrong!
2) Move the setup code to Kiwi's beforeAll block, then sleep the main thread. This works as the Kiwi tests are run on the main thread, so we're effectively saying "let the background operations happen before carrying on with the tests". I think this is what I'm going to use. Yes it makes my unit tests run slower, but they pass when they should do, and fail when they should
describe(#"MyAction", ^{
__block void (^completionBlock)(NSArray *array, NSError *error);
beforeAll(^{
// Stub the http client
id mockClient = [AFHTTPClient mock];
[WRNAPIClient stub:#selector(sharedClient) andReturn:mockClient];
// capture the block argument
KWCaptureSpy *spy = [mockClient captureArgument:#selector(fetchAllThingsWithCompletion:) atIndex:0];
[WRNTaskImporter importAllTasksFromAPI];
completionBlock = spy.argument;
// run the completion block
completionBlock(#[#"blah"], nil);
// Wait for background import to complete
[NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:0.1];
})
// This works
it(#"should return the right count", ^{
// entityCount is a block that performs a fetch request count
NSInteger count = entityCount(moc, #"Task");
[[theValue(count) should] equal:theValue(4)];
})
};
The caveat of this approach is that it only works when you aren't changing any data before a test. Say for example I insert 4 entities, and want to check each entity was inserted as expected. This option would work here. If I needed to re-run the import method and check that the count hadn't increased, I would need to add another [NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:0.1] after calling the insertion code.
For normal block based Kiwi tests you should probably use either the expectFutureValue shouldEventually method, or KWCaptureSpy to test your code, but this may not help when calling nested blocks.
If anyone has a more appropriate method for testing cases like these I'm happy to hear it!

Best way to manage many block calls

I am developing an app and when it starts its execution it has to get some data from the webService, categories, Image of loading(it changes sometimes), info "how to use" ( also can change in the server, client specifications..). To get this data I call some methods like this one (I have four similar methods, one for each thing I need) :
-(void) loadAppInfo
{
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
completionBlock = ^(BOOL error, NSError* aError) {
if (error) {
// Lo que sea si falla..
}
[weakSelf.view hideToastActivity];
};
[self.view makeToastActivity];
[wpNetManager getApplicationInfoWithCompletionBlock:completionBlock];
}
In my Network manager I have methods like this one :
- (void)getApplicationInfoWithCompletionBlock:(CompletionBlock)completionBlock
{
NSString * lang = #"es";//[[NSLocale preferredLanguages] objectAtIndex:0];
NSString *urlWithString = [kAPIInfoScreens stringByAppendingString:lang];
NSMutableURLRequest *request = nil;
request = [self requestWithMethod:#"GET" path:urlWithString parameters:nil];
AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation = [[AFHTTPRequestOperation alloc] initWithRequest:request];
[self registerHTTPOperationClass:[AFHTTPRequestOperation class]];
[operation setCompletionBlockWithSuccess:^(AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation, id responseObject) {
// Print the response body in text
NSDictionary* json = [NSJSONSerialization JSONObjectWithData:responseObject options:kNilOptions error:nil];
NSDictionary *informations = [json objectForKey:kTagInfoSplash];
if([json count]!= 0){
for (NSDictionary *infoDic in informations) {
Info *info = [Info getInfoByTitle:[infoDic objectForKey:kTagInfoTitle]];
if (info) {
// [User updateUserWithDictionary:dic];
} else {
[Info insertInfoWithDictionary:infoDic];
}
}
[wpCoreDataManager saveContext];
}
if (completionBlock) {
completionBlock(NO, nil);
}
} failure:^(AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation, NSError *error) {
NSLog(#"Error Registro: %#", error);
if (completionBlock) {
completionBlock(YES, error);
}
}];
[self enqueueHTTPRequestOperation:operation];
}
So what I do is call this methods in the viewDidLoad:
[self loadAppInfo];
[self loadCountriesFromJson];
[self loadCategoriesFromWS];
[self loadSplashFromWS];
So, instead of call this methods one by one. I think I can use GCD to manage this while a load image is called until everything is done and then call the next ViewController. It is a good solution what I believe? if it is the problem is that I do not know how to add some blocks to a gcd.
I am trying to do this instead of calling he last four methods in ViewDidLoad. But it works weird:
-(void)myBackGroundTask
{
[self.view makeToastActivity];
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
[self loadAppInfo];
[self loadCountriesFromJson];
[self loadCategoriesFromWS];
[self loadSplashDataFromWS ];
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
[self.view hideToastActivity];
[self nextController];
});
});
}
[self nextController] method is called before I had everything save in Core Data and I have errors..
Since all your four methods
[self loadAppInfo];
[self loadCountriesFromJson];
[self loadCategoriesFromWS];
[self loadSplashFromWS];
are asynchronous, it should be clear why the statement
[self nextController];
is executed before those four methods finish. Right?
Thus, there are completion handlers which get invoked when the asynchronous method finished. Too bad, none of your asynchronous methods have completion handlers. ;)
The key to approach the problem seems to have completion handlers for your asynchronous methods:
typedef void (^completion_t)(id result, NSError* error);
- (void) loadAppInfo:(completion_t)completionHandler;
- (void) loadCountriesFromJson:(completion_t)completionHandler;
- (void) loadCategoriesFromWS:(completion_t)completionHandler;
- (void) loadSplashFromWS:(completion_t)completionHandler;
It seems, you want to start ALL four asynchronous methods concurrently.
How and when you have to invoke the statement [self nextController] depends on whether there are any dependencies for this call to the eventual result of the above four asynchronous methods.
For example, you may state:
A. [self nextController] shall be executed when loadAppInfo: finishes successfully. All other asynchronous methods are irrelevant.
The solution looks like this:
[self loadAppInfo:^(id result, NSError*error){
if (error == nil) {
[self nextController];
}
}];
[self loadCountriesFromJson:nil];
[self loadCategoriesFromWS:nil];
[self loadSplashFromWS:nil];
If the above statement depends only on one of those methods, the solution is quite obvious and simple. It will get immediately more complex when you have a requirement like this:
B. [self nextController] shall be executed when ALL four asynchronous methods finished successfully (or more than one, and all other methods are irrelevant).
There are a few approaches how one can solve that. One would be to use a dispatch group, or a semaphore and a few state variables and dispatch queues to ensure concurrency. However, this is quite elaborate, would ultimately cause to block a thread, cannot be cancelled, and is also quite suboptimal (besides that it also looks hackish). Thus, I will not discuss that solution.
Using NSOperation and Dependencies
Another approach is to utilize NSOperation's dependencies. This requires to wrap each asynchronous method into a NSOperation subclass. Your methods are already asynchronous, this means that you need to take this into account when designing your subclasses.
Since one can only establish a dependency from one to another NSOperation, you also need to create a NSOperation subclass for your statement
[self nextController]
which needs to be wrapped into its own NSOperation subclass.
Well assuming you correctly subclassed NSOperation, at the end of the day, you get five modules and five header files:
LoadAppInfoOperation.h, LoadAppInfoOperation.m,
LoadCountriesFromJsonOperation.h, LoadCountriesFromJsonOperation.m,
LoadCategoriesFromWSOperation.h, LoadCategoriesFromWSOperation.m,
LoadSplashFromWSOperation.h, LoadSplashFromWSOperation.m
NextControllerOperation.h, NextControllerOperation.m
B. NextControllerOperation shall be started when ALL four Operations finished successfully:
In code this looks as follows:
LoadAppInfoOperation* op1 = ...;
LoadCountriesFromJsonOperation* op2 = ...;
LoadCategoriesFromWSOperation* op3 = ...;
LoadSplashFromWSOperation* op4 = ...;
NextControllerOperation* controllerOp = ...;
[controllerOp addDependency:op1];
[controllerOp addDependency:op2];
[controllerOp addDependency:op3];
[controllerOp addDependency:op4];
NSOperationQueue *queue = [NSOperationQueue new];
[queue addOperation: op1];
[queue addOperation: op2];
[queue addOperation: op3];
[queue addOperation: op4];
[queue addOperation: controllerOp];
Looks nice? No?
A more appealing approach: Promises
If this solution with NSOperations doesn't look nice, is too elaborated (five NSOperation subclasses!) or whatever, here is a more appealing approach which uses a third party library which implements Promises.
Before I explain how Promises work and what they are for (see wiki for a more general description), I would like to show the final code right now here, and explain how to get there later.
Disclosure: The example code here utilizes a third party library RXPromise which implements a Promise according the Promise/A+ specification. I'm the author of the RXPromise library.
There are a few more Promise libraries implemented in Objective-C, but you may take a look into RXPromise anyway ;) (see below for a link)
The key is to create asynchronous methods which return a promise. Assuming ALL your methods are now asynchronous and have a signature like below:
- (RXPromise*) doSomethingAsync;
Then, your final code will look as follows:
// Create an array of promises, representing the eventual result of each task:
NSArray* allTasks = #[
[self loadAppInfo],
[self loadCountriesFromJson],
[self loadCategoriesFromWS],
[self loadSplashFromWS]
];
...
This above statement is a quite a short form of starting a number of tasks and holding their result objects (a promise) in an array. In other words, the array allTasks contains promises whose task has been started and which now run all concurrently.
Now, we continue and define what shall happen when all tasks within this array finished successfully, or when any tasks fails. Here we use the helper class method all::
...
[RXPromise all: allTasks]
.then(^id(id results){
// Success handler block
// Parameter results is an array of the eventual result
// of each task - in the same order
... // do something with the results
return nil;
},^id(NSError*error){
// Error handler block
// error is the error of the failed task
NSLog(#"Error: %#, error");
return nil;
});
See the comments in the code above to get an idea how the success and the error handler - which get called when all tasks have been finished - is defined with the "obscure" then.
The explanation follows:
Explanation:
The code below uses the RXPromise library. You can obtain the source code of RXPromise Library which is available at GitHub.
There are a few other implementations (SHXPromise, OMPromises and more) and with a little effort it should be possible to port the code below to other promise libraries as well.
First, you need a variant of your asynchronous methods which looks as follows:
- (RXPromise*) loadAppInfo;
- (RXPromise*) loadCountriesFromJson;
- (RXPromise*) loadCategoriesFromWS;
- (RXPromise*) loadSplashFromWS;
Here, note that the asynchronous methods don't have a completion handler. We don't need this since the returned object -- a Promise -- represents the eventual result of the asynchronous task. This result may also be an error when the task fails.
I've refactored your original methods in order to better utilize the power of promises:
An asynchronous task will create the promise, and it must eventually "resolve" it either with the eventual result via fulfillWithValue:, or when it fails, with an error via rejectWithReason:. See below how a RXPromise is created, immediately returned from the asynchronous method, and "resolved" later when the task finished or failed.
Here, your method getApplicationInfo returns a promise whose eventual value will be the HTTP response data, that is a NSData containing JSON (or possibly an error):
- (RXPromise*)getApplicationInfo
{
RXPromise* promise = [[RXPromise alloc] init];
NSString * lang = #"es";//[[NSLocale preferredLanguages] objectAtIndex:0];
NSString *urlWithString = [kAPIInfoScreens stringByAppendingString:lang];
NSMutableURLRequest *request = nil;
request = [self requestWithMethod:#"GET" path:urlWithString parameters:nil];
AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation = [[AFHTTPRequestOperation alloc] initWithRequest:request];
[self registerHTTPOperationClass:[AFHTTPRequestOperation class]];
[operation setCompletionBlockWithSuccess:^(AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation, id responseObject) {
[promise fulfillWithValue:responseObject]
} failure:^(AFHTTPRequestOperation *operation, NSError *error) {
[promise rejectWithReason:error];
}];
[self enqueueHTTPRequestOperation:operation];
return promise;
}
A few further notes about promises:
A client can obtain the eventual result respectively the error through registering handler blocks through using the property then:
promise.then(<success_handler>, <error_handler>);
Handlers or optional, but you usually set either one or both which handle the result.
Note: With RXPromise you can register handler blocks when and where you want, and as many as you want! RXPromise is fully thread safe. You just need to keep a strong reference to the promise somewhere or as long as needed. You don't need to keep a reference, even when you setup handlers, though.
The handler block will be executed on a private queue. This means, you don't know the execution context aka thread where the handler will be executed, except you use this variant:
promise.thenOn(dispatch_queue, <success_handler>, <error_handler>);
Here, dispatch_queue specifies the queue where the handler (either the success OR the error handler) will be executed.
Two or more asynchronous tasks can be executed subsequently (aka chained), where each task produces a result which becomes the input of the subsequent task.
A short form of "chaining" of two async methods looks like this:
RXPromise* finalResult = [self asyncA]
.then(^id(id result){
return [self asyncBWithResult:result]
}, nil);
Here, asyncBWithResult: will be executed only until after asyncA has been finished successfully. The above expression returns a Promise finalResult which represents the final result of what asyncBWithResult: "returns" as its result when it finishes, or it contains an error from any task that fails in the chain.
Back to your problem:
Your method loadAppInfo now invokes asynchronous method getApplicationInfo in order to obtain the JSON data. When that succeeded, it parsers it, creates managed objects from it and saves the managed object context.
It returns a promise whose value is the managed object context where the objects have been saved:
- (RXPromise*) loadAppInfo {
RXPromise* promise = [[RXPromise alloc] init];
[self getApplicationInfo]
.then(^(id responseObject){
NSError* err;
NSDictionary* json = [NSJSONSerialization JSONObjectWithData:responseObject options:kNilOptions error:&err];
if (json == nil) {
return err;
}
else {
[wpCoreDataManager.managedObjectContext performBlock:^{
NSDictionary *informations = [json objectForKey:kTagInfoSplash];
if([json count]!= 0){
for (NSDictionary *infoDic in informations) {
Info *info = [Info getInfoByTitle:[infoDic objectForKey:kTagInfoTitle]];
if (info) {
// [User updateUserWithDictionary:dic];
} else {
[Info insertInfoWithDictionary:infoDic];
}
}
[wpCoreDataManager saveContext]; // check error here!
[promise fulfillWithValue:wpCoreDataManager.managedObjectContext];
}
else {
[promise fulfillWithValue:nil]; // nothing saved
}
}];
}
}, nil);
return promise;
}
Notice how performBlock has been utilized to ensure the managed objects are properly associated to the execution context of its managed object context. Additionally, the asynchronous version is used, which fits nicely into the solution utilizing promises.
Having refactored these two methods, which merely perform what you intend to accomplish, and also having refactored the other asynchronous methods which now return a promise like the refactored above methods, you can now finish your task as shown at the start.
GCD to manage this while a load image is called until everything is done and then call the next ViewController. It is a good solution what I believe?
The general rule of thumb is to operate on the highest level of abstraction available.
In this case it means using NSOperation subclasses. You can create a private queue, and schedule you operations in such a way that turning off the loading image will happen only after all operations are complete, e.g. by
NSOperation *goForward = [MyGoForwardOperation new]; // you define this subclass
NSOperation *loadSomething = [MyLoadSomethingOperation new];
NSOperation *loadAnother = [MyLoadAnotherThingOperation new];
[goForward addDependency: loadOperation];
[goForward addDependency: loadAnother];
NSOperationQueue *queue = [NSOperationQueue new];
[queue addOperation: loadSomething];
[queue addOperation: loadAnother];
[[NSOperationQueue mainQueue] addOperation: goForward];
Note that in this example goForward will run on main thread, but after background operations finish.
You'll need to carefully program your MyLoadSomethingOperation for this to work, read up on subclassing NSOperation or subclass AFHTTPRequestOperation since you're using it anyway.
[self nextController] method is called before I had everything
Yes, you should search on saving to Core Data on background thread; this is a big topic in itself.

AFNetworking background JSON parsing avoid block nesting

I have some networking code with heavy JSON parsing going on. It needs to be done in the background to not block the main thread. The code looks like this :
-(void) getSomeDataWithParameters:(...)parameters completion:(void (^)(NSArray *data))completion
{
NSURLRequest *req = ...
AFJSONRequestOperation *op = [[AFJSONRequestOperation alloc] initWithRequest:req];
// sometimes I have more requests
// startOperations is a wrapper on AFHTTPClient enqueueBatchOfHTTPRequestOperations:progressBlock:completionBlock:
// that handles errors and loading views
[self startOperations:#[op] completionBlock:^(NSArray *operations) {
// getBgQueue = return dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0);
dispatch_async(getBgQueue(), ^{
NSArray *data = [MyParserClass parseJSON:op.responseJSON inContext:self.localContext];
[self.localContext MR_saveToPersistentStoreWithCompletion:^(BOOL success, NSError *error) {
// this is executed on main thread
if(completion) completion(...);
}];
});
}];
}
(AFNetworking 1.x)
The above code works very fine, but it's a pain to setup and write. And often the whole method content is wrapped inside another block to fetch some required data first... basically the blocks just pile up and makes ugly code
I'm using enqueueBatchOfHTTPRequestOperations and not individual completion blocks on AFJSONRequestOperation because batch completion block would sometimes fire before all individual operations completion blocks... (I also read somewhere that Mattt discouraged doing this)
Any pointers on how to do better than this?
I'm not sure what you want here, but just like "longcat is long", it's somewhat inherent in the pattern: 'continuation-passing style is continuation-passing style'. If you want to flatten things out a bit, you could make local block variables, but to a certain degree, you're stuck because you need the completion for -MR_saveToPersistentStoreWithCompletion to close over data in order to pass it to the -getSomeDataWithParameters... completion, but data won't exist until the -startOperations completion is executed.
You could probably achieve a less-nested appearance by using a bunch of __block variables, and splitting the code into several local blocks, but to me that feels kind of like cutting off your nose to spite your face. This code is readily understandable the way it is.
By the way... I notice that you're closing over op in the -startOperations completion block. This is fine because you're enqueuing op by doing -startOperations: #[op] ... but it would arguably be cleaner to get op from the operations parameter to the completion. I tightened this up as much as seemed reasonable:
- (void)getSomeDataWithParameters:(...)parameters completion:(void (^)(NSArray *data))completion
{
NSURLRequest *req = ...;
AFJSONRequestOperation *op = [[AFJSONRequestOperation alloc] initWithRequest:req];
[self startOperations:#[op] completionBlock:^(NSArray *operations) {
for (AFJSONRequestOperation *op in operations) {
dispatch_async(getBgQueue(), ^{
NSArray *data = [MyParserClass parseJSON:op.responseJSON inContext:self.localContext];
void (^mrSaveCompletion)(BOOL, NSError*) = completion ? ^(BOOL success, NSError *error) { completion(data); } : nil;
[self.localContext MR_saveToPersistentStoreWithCompletion: mrSaveCompletion];
});
}
}];
}
This will fan out each response potentially to a different thread. If you want all responses to execute on a single background thread, just swap the nesting of the for loop and the dispatch_async.
From there, the only really "superfluous" code is the dispatch_async. You could eliminate that by making -startOperations:... take a queue parameter where you would pass in the queue you wanted the completion to be called. Maybe like this:
- (void)startOperations: (NSArray*)ops completionQueue: (dispatch_queue_t)queue completionBlock: (void (^)(NSArray*))completion
{
void (^completionWrapper)(NSArray*) = !completion ? nil : ^(NSArray* ops) {
if (queue)
dispatch_async(queue, ^{ completion(ops); });
else
completion(ops);
};
[self startOperations: ops completionBlock: completionWrapper];
}
- (void)getSomeDataWithParameters:(...)parameters completion:(void (^)(NSArray *data))completion
{
NSURLRequest *req = ...;
AFJSONRequestOperation *op = [[AFJSONRequestOperation alloc] initWithRequest:req];
[self startOperations:#[op] completionQueue: getBgQueue() completionBlock:^(NSArray *operations) {
for (AFJSONRequestOperation *op in operations) {
NSArray *data = [MyParserClass parseJSON:op.responseJSON inContext:self.localContext];
void (^mrSaveCompletion)(BOOL, NSError*) = !completion ? nil : ^(BOOL success, NSError *error) { completion(data); };
[self.localContext MR_saveToPersistentStoreWithCompletion: mrSaveCompletion];
});
}];
}

Resources