We're building a platform where the client is an ASP .Net MVC one, using ASP Net Identity 2.0 for authentication and authorization (using Claims), which works great on the web side.
We also have a WCF service which allows CRUD operations on the database (for multiple client applications), which gets requests from this ASP .Net MVC client.
As we want to validate (authenticate & authorize) the user before making specific CRUD actions in the WCF side, we need to get the claims of the user from the client, and perform the validations (preferably in a very clean manner using headers or any binding that WCF will be able to support for this matter).
I've been searching the different forums but with no simple answer\tutorial to this specific scenario. Can anyone assist on this matter?
Thanks,
Nir.
I love this:
in your IEndpointBehavior implementation do this on the client end:
public object BeforeSendRequest(ref Message request, IClientChannel channel)
{
request.Headers.Add(MessageHeader.CreateHeader("token", "http://myurl.com/service/token", _theToken));
return null;
}
then on the service end add this to your ServiceAuthenticationManager
public override ReadOnlyCollection<IAuthorizationPolicy> Authenticate(
ReadOnlyCollection<IAuthorizationPolicy> authPolicy, Uri listenUri, ref Message message)
{
IPrincipal user = new MyUserPrincipal(null);
if(_currentServiceContractType.GetInterfaces()
.Any(x => x == typeof(IMySecuredService)))
{
var tokenPosition = message.Headers.FindHeader("token", "http://myurl.com/service/token");
if (tokenPosition >= 0 && tokenPosition <= 5)
{
var encryptedToken = message.Headers.GetHeader<string>(tokenPosition);
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(encryptedToken))
{
var serializedToken = new MyEncryptionUtility().Decrypt(encryptedToken);
var token = MyTokenSerializer.Deserialize(serializedToken);
var expire = new DateTime(token.ValidToTicks);
if (expire > DateTime.Now)
{
user = new MyUserPrincipal(token);
}
}
}
}
message.Properties["Principal"] = user;
Thread.CurrentPrincipal = user;
return authPolicy;
}
This gives you then the ability to use the built in claims or WIF claims authentication. Eitherway, this is very simple. The token is created by the service and sent to the client (web) and stored in the cookie. then when there are any requests, the token is grabbed from a cookie and then sent along to the service, where, inevitably you can start adding permissions service side, versus doing them on the web/mvc side, making a much cleaner code base using everyone's favorite friend, SOA >= :)
Related
I am trying to migrate OAuth server code written for .Net Framework 4.5 to .Net Core 3.1. The original code pretty much looks like this. It implements the IAuthorizationServerHost interface. It makes sense to me that it has some functions that the server should implement (like CreateAccessToken that generates and returns a token).
But for .Net Core 3.1, DotNetOpenAuth is not available. So I searched around and found apparently the best solution IdentityServer4 along with many other tutorials (Tut1 Tut2 etc.). But all those looked to me as if they have just implemented the Identity Server (basically just login, logout and register). I don't see how is the token been issued.
My controller class in .Net Framework 4.5 looks like this. A successful login is usually followed by oauth/authorize route that provisions the token and redirects back to the third party.
public class OAuthController : Controller
{
// OAuth2AuthorizationServer is an implementation if IAuthorizationServerHost
private readonly AuthorizationServer authorizationServer = new AuthorizationServer(new OAuth2AuthorizationServer());
public ActionResult Token()
{
var result = this.authorizationServer.HandleTokenRequest(this.Request).AsActionResult();
return result;
}
[Authorize, AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Get | HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult Authorize()
{
var request = this.authorizationServer.ReadAuthorizationRequest(this.Request);
if (request == null)
{
throw new HttpException((int)HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "Bad request");
}
var response = authorizationServer.PrepareApproveAuthorizationRequest(request, User.Identity.Name);
return authorizationServer.Channel.PrepareResponse(response).AsActionResult();
}
}
I am new to this authentication stuff - have a quite hollow understanding of the concepts. I am struggling to understand the OAuth server related code flow in these tutorials.
So how can I use those packages to create an OAuth server in .Net Core 3.1?
I wrote a web application using ASP .NET MVC and authorization system by default. I configured IdentityRole and input through external providers. Using the current database I have created my data context. Now I want to write a Xamarin.Android app and connect to my database, I want a simple API. But the feature that you want to access this API was only available to user with a certain role. The API is really very simple and therefore do not want to add to the draft WCF or WebAPI project. How to do it best?
First, you don't need a separate project to use Web Api; you can use both MVC and Web Api in the same project. For one off endpoints for things like in-site AJAX requests, just creating MVC actions that return JSON or XML would be fine, but if you're talking about a true API, even if it's fairly simplistic, I'd say go Web Api.
You'd protect your Web Api actions much the same as you would your MVC actions, using the [Authorize] attribute. If you need to restrict by role, you just pass a role(s) to that. However, the big difference here, especially if you're serving a mobile app, is that you'll need pass the authorization along with the request. That's generally accomplished using the Authorization header along with a bearer token. Basically, you would need to set up an endpoint that signs a user in and returns a token. Then, each subsequent request that needs authorization includes that token in the header.
I want to finish and to fully answer this question and close this topic. I've been searching for how to add the ability for a mobile client to connect to an existing site on ASP.NET MVC. In my search, I came across a great article Justin Hyland on March 2, 2014
In principle, everything in this article is well and clearly written, but I want to make a tiny contribution for clarity.
Under Setup WebAPIConfig stated that the need
added in the following code to the WebApiConfig Register method
But if we consider the case ASP.NET MVC we don't have such file. It's all very simple, you just need such a file to create the folder App_Start. The contents of the file can be left exactly as it is in the article.
To get rid of the bugs which will inevitably appear we need to install two nuget package: Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi and Microsoft.AspNet.WebApi.Owin.
Excellent! Now we can turn to the method to obtain the token and then adding the token to the query we can get the needed data closed by the attribute [Authorize].
A small remark. If You need to access a method which is closed for a specific role that to the Authenticate method from the article should add a few lines of code. Immediately after the line:
identity.AddClaim(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Name, user));
add the line:
identity.AddClaim(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, role));
where role you can get the following, for example:
var userIdentity = UserManager.FindAsync(user, password).Result;
var role = RoleManager.FindById(userIdentity.Roles.First().RoleId).Name;
User and password you have to send a request.
I also want to give an example of code which will send request and receive response. To not have to look for and immediately start coding.
async Task<string> GetToken(string userName, string password)
{
var content = new FormUrlEncodedContent(new[]
{
new KeyValuePair<string, string>( "user", userName ),
new KeyValuePair<string, string> ( "password", password )
}
);
using (var client = new HttpClient())
{
HttpResponseMessage response = await client.PostAsync(APP_PATH + "/Authenticate", content);
var result = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
return result;
}
}
async Task<string> GetUserInfo(string token)
{
using (var client = CreateClient(token))
{
var response = await client.GetAsync(APP_PATH + "/ValidateToken");
return await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
}
}
HttpClient CreateClient(string accessToken = "")
{
var client = new HttpClient();
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(accessToken))
{
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue("Bearer", accessToken);
}
return client;
}
All have only to call the appropriate methods in the correct order. I hope that is useful to someone.
P.S.
If You create a new project in Visual Studio to get this functionality you just need to tick:
My current services are using MVC to render forms, WebApi to move my viewModels back and forth and signalR for push notifications etc.
If the users are browsing the website they will be using forms auth, but we're introducing some mobile apps and I would like to be able to consume webapi and signalr from the mobile apps using basic auth, without having to maintain two separate sets of controllers.
I have two IPrincipals, a SessionPrincipal and a BasicPrincipal (where Session Principal inherits BasicPrincipal and has some additional contextual data). The idea is that some controllers will require to be on the website (SessionPrincipal), but everything else can be accessed by both web and mobile users (Basic Principal). Some won't require any authorisation at all, so can't just deny the request.
My current approach does the following steps to achieve this (some code omitted for brevity)
Global.asax Application_AuthenticateRequest
var cultureCookie = Request.Cookies["Culture"];
// Set culture ...
var authHeader = Request.Headers["Authorization"];
if (authHeader != null && authHeader.StartsWith("Basic"))
{
//Check Username / Password. If okay...
HttpContext.Current.User = new BasicAuthPrincipal(user);
}
else
{
var authCookie = Request.Cookies[FormsAuthentication.FormsCookieName];
if (authCookie != null)
{
// Try and resolve Session from encrypted forms auth data. If okay...
HttpContext.Current.User = new SessionAuthPrincipal(Id, User, Agent);
}
}
Individual Authorize Filters (SessionMVC, SessionApi, BasicApi) that basically boil down to:
return HttpContext.Current.User as SessionPrincipal != null;
// Or
return HttpContext.Current.User as BasicPrincipal != null;
So if they were successfully set in global.asax then proceed to the controller.
Now, I have a working implementation of this, so why am I asking for help?
I'm not sure of certain fringe scenarios that may upset this. Am I asking for trouble for implementing it this way?
I read about HttpContext not being thread safe, but Application_AuthenticateRequest should run before everything else and no further changes are made to that data so I think it should be okay.
I've created an OAuth2 authorization server using DotNetOpenAuth, which is working fine - I'm using the resource owner password flow, and successfully exchanging user credentials for an access token.
I now want to use that access token to retrieve data from secure endpoints in a ServiceStack API, and I can't work out how to do so. I've examined the Facebook, Google, etc. providers included with ServiceStack but it's not clear whether I should be following the same pattern or not.
What I'm trying to achieve (I think!) is
OAuth client (my app) asks resource owner ('Catherine Smith') for credentials
Client submits request to authorization server, receives an access token
Client requests a secure resource from the resource server (GET /users/csmith/photos)
The access token is included in an HTTP header, e.g. Authorization: Bearer 1234abcd...
The resource server decrypts the access token to verify the identity of the resource owner
The resource server checks that the resource owner has access to the requested resource
The resource server returns the resource to the client
Steps 1 and 2 are working, but I can't work out how to integrate the DotNetOpenAuth resource server code with the ServiceStack authorization framework.
Is there an example somewhere of how I would achieve this? I've found a similar StackOverflow post at How to build secured api using ServiceStack as resource server with OAuth2.0? but it isn't a complete solution and doesn't seem to use the ServiceStack authorization provider model.
EDIT: A little more detail. There's two different web apps in play here. One is the authentication/authorisation server - this doesn't host any customer data (i.e. no data API), but exposes the /oauth/token method that will accept a username/password and return an OAuth2 access token and refresh token, and also provides token-refresh capability. This is built on ASP.NET MVC because it's almost identical to the AuthorizationServer sample included with DotNetOpenAuth. This might be replaced later, but for now it's ASP.NET MVC.
For the actual data API, I'm using ServiceStack because I find it much better than WebAPI or MVC for exposing ReSTful data services.
So in the following example:
the Client is a desktop application running on a user's local machine, the Auth server is ASP.NET MVC + DotNetOpenAuth, and the Resource server is ServiceStack
The particular snippet of DotNetOpenAuth code that's required is:
// scopes is the specific OAuth2 scope associated with the current API call.
var scopes = new string[] { "some_scope", "some_other_scope" }
var analyzer = new StandardAccessTokenAnalyzer(authServerPublicKey, resourceServerPrivateKey);
var resourceServer = new DotNetOpenAuth.OAuth2.ResourceServer(analyzer);
var wrappedRequest = System.Web.HttpRequestWrapper(HttpContext.Current.Request);
var principal = resourceServer.GetPrincipal(wrappedRequest, scopes);
if (principal != null) {
// We've verified that the OAuth2 access token grants this principal
// access to the requested scope.
}
So, assuming I'm on the right track, what I need to do is to run that code somewhere in the ServiceStack request pipeline, to verify that the Authorization header in the API request represents a valid principal who has granted access to the requested scope.
I'm starting to think the most logical place to implement this is in a custom attribute that I use to decorate my ServiceStack service implementations:
using ServiceStack.ServiceInterface;
using SpotAuth.Common.ServiceModel;
namespace SpotAuth.ResourceServer.Services {
[RequireScope("hello")]
public class HelloService : Service {
public object Any(Hello request) {
return new HelloResponse { Result = "Hello, " + request.Name };
}
}
}
This approach would also allow specifying the scope(s) required for each service method. However, that seems to run rather contrary to the 'pluggable' principle behind OAuth2, and to the extensibility hooks built in to ServiceStack's AuthProvider model.
In other words - I'm worried I'm banging in a nail with a shoe because I can't find a hammer...
OK, after a lot of stepping through the various libraries with a debugger, I think you do it like this: https://github.com/dylanbeattie/OAuthStack
There's two key integration points. First, a custom filter attribute that's used on the server to decorate the resource endpoints that should be secured with OAuth2 authorization:
/// <summary>Restrict this service to clients with a valid OAuth2 access
/// token granting access to the specified scopes.</summary>
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method, Inherited = true)]
public class RequireOAuth2ScopeAttribute : RequestFilterAttribute {
private readonly string[] oauth2Scopes;
public RequireOAuth2ScopeAttribute(params string[] oauth2Scopes) {
this.oauth2Scopes = oauth2Scopes;
}
public override void Execute(IHttpRequest request, IHttpResponse response, object requestDto) {
try {
var authServerKeys = AppHostBase.Instance.Container.ResolveNamed<ICryptoKeyPair>("authServer");
var dataServerKeys = AppHostBase.Instance.Container.ResolveNamed<ICryptoKeyPair>("dataServer");
var tokenAnalyzer = new StandardAccessTokenAnalyzer(authServerKeys.PublicSigningKey, dataServerKeys.PrivateEncryptionKey);
var oauth2ResourceServer = new DotNetOpenAuth.OAuth2.ResourceServer(tokenAnalyzer);
var wrappedRequest = new HttpRequestWrapper((HttpRequest)request.OriginalRequest);
HttpContext.Current.User = oauth2ResourceServer.GetPrincipal(wrappedRequest, oauth2Scopes);
} catch (ProtocolFaultResponseException x) {
// see the GitHub project for detailed error-handling code
throw;
}
}
}
Second, this is how you hook into the ServiceStack HTTP client pipeline and use DotNetOpenAuth to add the OAuth2 Authorization: Bearer {key} token to the outgoing request:
// Create the ServiceStack API client and the request DTO
var apiClient = new JsonServiceClient("http://api.mysite.com/");
var apiRequestDto = new Shortlists { Name = "dylan" };
// Wire up the ServiceStack client filter so that DotNetOpenAuth can
// add the authorization header before the request is sent
// to the API server
apiClient.LocalHttpWebRequestFilter = request => {
// This is the magic line that makes all the client-side magic work :)
ClientBase.AuthorizeRequest(request, accessTokenTextBox.Text);
}
// Send the API request and dump the response to our output TextBox
var helloResponseDto = apiClient.Get(apiRequestDto);
Console.WriteLine(helloResponseDto.Result);
Authorized requests will succeed; requests with a missing token, expired token or insufficient scope will raise a WebServiceException
This is still very much proof-of-concept stuff, but seems to work pretty well. I'd welcome feedback from anyone who knows ServiceStack or DotNetOpenAuth better than I do.
Update
On further reflection, your initial thought, to create a RequiredScope attribute would be a cleaner way to go. Adding it to the ServiceStack pipeline is as easy as adding the IHasRequestFilter interface, implementing a custom request filter, as documented here: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/wiki/Filter-attributes
public class RequireScopeAttribute : Attribute, IHasRequestFilter {
public void RequireScope(IHttpRequest req, IHttpResponse res, object requestDto)
{
//This code is executed before the service
//Close the request if user lacks required scope
}
...
}
Then decorate your DTO's or Services as you've outlined:
using ServiceStack.ServiceInterface;
using SpotAuth.Common.ServiceModel;
namespace SpotAuth.ResourceServer.Services {
[RequireScope("hello")]
public class HelloService : Service {
public object Any(Hello request) {
return new HelloResponse { Result = "Hello, " + request.Name };
}
}
}
Your RequireScope custom filter would be almost identical to ServiceStack's RequiredRoleAttribute implementation., so use it as a starting point to code from.
Alternately, you could map scope to permission. Then decorate your DTO or service accordingly (see SS wiki for details) for example:
[Authenticate]
[RequiredPermission("Hello")]
public class HelloService : Service {
public object Any(Hello request) {
return new HelloResponse { Result = "Hello, " + request.Name };
}
}
Normally ServiceStack calls the method bool HasPermission(string permission) in IAuthSession. This method checks if the list List Permissions in IAuthSession contains the required permission, so, in a custom IAuthSession you could override HasPermission and put your OAuth2 scopes checking there.
How do I even begin coding authentication using ASP.NET Web API so it is cross-platform to support desktop, mobile and web? I'd read of some methods of doing RESTful authentication, such as using tokens in the header.
Are there any example projects out there that utilizes this method?
Questions:
If not how do I fix the [Authorize] attribute to read the token?
How do I generate this token? I dont think i can use formsauthentication because that uses cookies.
How do I handle the actual authorization, do the client send raw password and username then I generate the token or is there some other way?
How do I handle when my website is using it? I heard this is handled differently than when an app is using it, such as getting the domain and authorizing it.
I think tokens would be a solid way to go. Forms authentication is based on cookies for the web. Not the most idea situation for all non browser clients though.
What I'd suggest is creating a custom AuthorizationFilterAttribute and overriding the OnAuthorization method. In that method, you could check for the existence of a token that you've issued to the client after they've supplied valid credentials. You can use this attribute on any method or controller you want validated. Here's a sample you might reference
public class AuthorizeTokenAttribute : AuthorizationFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnAuthorization(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
if (actionContext != null)
{
if (!AuthorizeRequest(actionContext.ControllerContext.Request))
{
actionContext.Response = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized) { RequestMessage = actionContext.ControllerContext.Request };
}
return;
}
}
private bool AuthorizeRequest(System.Net.Http.HttpRequestMessage request)
{
bool authorized = false;
if (request.Headers.Contains(Constants.TOKEN_HEADER))
{
var tokenValue = request.Headers.GetValues("TOKEN_HEADER");
if (tokenValue.Count() == 1) {
var value = tokenValue.FirstOrDefault();
//Token validation logic here
//set authorized variable accordingly
}
}
return authorized;
} }
TOKEN_HEADER is just a string representing an HTTP header that the client should pass back for authenticated requests.
So let's walk through it
Client requests secure data
Client is not authorized, return a response with an Unauthorized status code
Client sends credentials to authenticate, which should be secured via HTTPS
Once validated, client receives a token via an HTTP header, or whatever works for you
Client tries requesting secure data again, this time attached the token to the request
The AuthorizeTokenAttribute will validate the token and allow the action to execute.
Also, check this post by John Petersen. Making your ASP.NET Web API’s secure
There are lots of ways to authenticate users for a REST service. Using tokens is possible but just using Basic Authentication is even simpler and about as standard and cross platform as you can go.
Don't confuse authorization with authentication. The [Authorize] attribute is all about authorization but only after a user has been authenticated using some other mechanism. Authorization is completely useless without doing proper authentication first.
The best resource to check is Dominick Baier who is an expert on the subject.
I use a very simple approach:
define an access profile with its unique accessId and accessKey (e.g. MD5 hashed GUID value)
store such access profile in database
every request (GET/POST/etc.) must supply accessId, queryHash (MD5 hash value represents the query) and signature (MD5 hash value of queryHash + accessKey). Of course the client needs keep the accessKey in a secure place!!!
server gets the request will check the accessId and the signature using the same calculation algorithm to reject or grant the access (authenticate)
further authorization can be done on request type basis utilizing the access profile
the service with this approach using the new ASP.NET MVC web API can serve whatever type of client: browser/javascript and native(desktop or mobile) etc.
U can use ActionFilterAttribute and override the OnActionExecuting method.
Later on register this filter in global.cs to apply this filter for all the actions like this in Application Start method
var config = GlobalConfiguration.Configuration;
config.Filters.Add(new CustomAuthAttribute ());
{
namespace Customss
{
Public class CustomAuthAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
// To inforce HTTPS if desired , else comment out the code
if (!String.Equals(actionContext.Request.RequestUri.Scheme, "https", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
actionContext.Response = new HttpResponseMessage(System.Net.HttpStatusCode.BadRequest)
{
Content = new StringContent("HTTPS Required")
};
return;
}
// get toekn from the header
var userToken = actionContext.Request.Headers.GetValues("UserToken");
// Customer Logic to check the validity of the token.
// U can have some DB logic to check , custom STS behind or some loca cache used to compare the values
}
}
}
}