I have some HDF5 files those header fields are less than explicit. So, I would like to edit those to replace them with something else. For example, using h5dump --header file.h5 I get this:
GROUP "/" {
DATASET "log" {
DATATYPE H5T_COMPOUND {
H5T_COMPOUND {
H5T_STD_U32LE "sec";
H5T_STD_U32LE "usec";
} "time";
H5T_IEEE_F32LE "ook";
...
In this instance, I want to rename "ook" to "eek" -- say, this is a silly example.
How can I do it?
This is impossible as it is forbidden by the specification.
Related
I googled so far and tried to find out the solution but not yet.
I know require() works only with static path, so I want alternative ways to solve my problem. I found this answer here but it doesnt make sense for thousands of resources.
Please advise me the best approach to handle such case.
Background
I have thousand of json files that containing app data, and declared all the file path dynamically like below:
export var SRC_PATH = {
bible_version_inv: {
"kjv-ot": "data/bibles/Bible_KJV_OT_%s.txt",
"kjv-nt": "data/bibles/Bible_KJV_NT_%s.txt",
"lct-ot": "data/bibles/Bible_LCT_OT_%s.txt",
"lct-nt": "data/bibles/Bible_LCT_NT_%s.txt",
"leb": "data/bibles/leb_%s.txt",
"net": "data/bibles/net_%s.txt",
"bhs": "data/bibles/bhs_%s.txt",
"n1904": "data/bibles/na_%s.txt",
.....
"esv": "data/bibles/esv_%s.txt",
.....
},
....
As you can see, file path contains '%s' and that should be replace with right string depends on what the user selected.
For example if user select the bible (abbreviation: "kjv-ot") and the chapter 1 then the file named "data/bibles/Bible_KJV_OT_01.txt" should be imported.
I'm not good enough in react-native, just wondering if there is other alternative way to handle those thousands of resource files and require only one at a time by dynamically following the user's selection.
Any suggestions please.
Instead of exporting a flat file, you could export a function that took a parameter which would help build out the paths like this:
// fileInclude.js
export const generateSourcePath = (sub) => {
return {
bible_version_inv: {
"kjv-ot": `data/bibles/Bible_KJV_OT_${sub}.txt`
}
}
}
//usingFile.js
const generation = require('./fileInclude.js');
const myFile = generation.generateSourcePath('mySub');
const requiredFile = require(myFile);
then you would import (or require) this item into your project, execute generateSourcePath('mysub') to get all your paths.
When I try regexner it works as expected with the following settings and data;
props.setProperty("annotators", "tokenize, cleanxml, ssplit, pos, lemma, regexner");
Bachelor of Laws DEGREE
Bachelor of (Arts|Laws|Science|Engineering|Divinity) DEGREE
What I would like to do is that using TokenRegex. For example
Bachelor of Laws DEGREE
Bachelor of ([{tag:NNS}] [{tag:NNP}]) DEGREE
I read that to do this, I should use TokensregexNERAnnotator.
I tried to use it as follows, but it did not work.
Pipeline.addAnnotator(new TokensRegexNERAnnotator("expressions.txt", true));
Or I tried setting annotator in another way,
props.setProperty("annotators", "tokenize, cleanxml, ssplit, pos, lemma, tokenregexner");
props.setProperty("customAnnotatorClass.tokenregexner", "edu.stanford.nlp.pipeline.TokensRegexNERAnnotator");
I tried to different TokenRegex formats but either annotator could not find the expression or I got SyntaxException.
What is the proper way to use TokenRegex (query on tokens with tags) on NER data file ?
BTW I just see a comment in TokensRegexNERAnnotator.java file. Not sure if it is related pos tags does not work with RegexNerAnnotator.
if (entry.tokensRegex != null) {
// TODO: posTagPatterns...
pattern = TokenSequencePattern.compile(env, entry.tokensRegex);
}
First you need to make a TokensRegex rule file (sample_degree.rules). Here is an example:
ner = { type: "CLASS", value: "edu.stanford.nlp.ling.CoreAnnotations$NamedEntityTagAnnotation" }
{ pattern: (/Bachelor/ /of/ [{tag:NNP}]), action: Annotate($0, ner, "DEGREE") }
To explain the rule a bit, the pattern field is specifying what type of pattern to match. The action field is saying to annotate every token in the overall match (that is what $0 represents), annotate the ner field (note that we specified ner = ... in the rule file as well, and the third parameter is saying set the field to the String "DEGREE").
Then make this .props file (degree_example.props) for the command:
customAnnotatorClass.tokensregex = edu.stanford.nlp.pipeline.TokensRegexAnnotator
tokensregex.rules = sample_degree.rules
annotators = tokenize,ssplit,pos,lemma,ner,tokensregex
Then run this command:
java -Xmx8g edu.stanford.nlp.pipeline.StanfordCoreNLP -props degree_example.props -file sample-degree-sentence.txt -outputFormat text
You should see that the three tokens you wanted tagged as "DEGREE" will be tagged.
I think I will push a change to the code to make tokensregex link to the TokensRegexAnnotator so you won't have to specify it as a custom annotator.
But for now you need to add that line in the .props file.
This example should help in implementing this. Here are some more resources if you want to learn more:
http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/tokensregex.shtml#TokensRegexRules
http://nlp.stanford.edu/nlp/javadoc/javanlp/edu/stanford/nlp/ling/tokensregex/SequenceMatchRules.html
http://nlp.stanford.edu/nlp/javadoc/javanlp/edu/stanford/nlp/ling/tokensregex/types/Expressions.html
I just studied Lua language. I am very confused about it.
I have two file
string.lua
STRINGS=
{
CHARACTER_NAMES =
{
web = "webby",
sac = "sacso",
}
}
STRINGS.BUNNYNAMES =
{
"Brassica",
"Bunium",
"Burdock",
"Carrot",
}
And I have generate.lua file for get value form table in string.lua.
Then print value.
But I don't know how to acess table form another file.
I want to use STRINGS and STRINGS.BUNNYNAMES too,
Please advise me.
string.lua defines one global variable named STRINGS which contains a table.
You need to execute string.lua before you can access STRINGS. Just do dofile("string.lua") for instance.
I am trying to do a syntax text corrector for my compilers' class. The idea is: I have some rules, which are inherent to the language (in my case, Portuguese), like "A valid phrase is SUBJECT VERB ADJECTIVE", as in "Ruby is great".
Ok, so first I have to tokenize the input "Ruby is great". So I have a text file "verbs", with a lot of verbs, one by line. Then I have one text "adjectives", one "pronouns", etc.
I am trying to use Ragel to create a parser, but I don't know how I could do something like:
%%{
machine test;
subject = <open-the-subjects-file-and-accept-each-one-of-them>;
verb = <open-the-verbs-file-and-accept-each-one-of-them>;
adjective = <open-the-adjective-file-and-accept-each-one-of-them>;
main = subject verb adjective # { print "Valid phrase!" } ;
}%%
I looked at ANTLR, Lex/Yacc, Ragel, etc. But couldn't find one that seemed to solve this problem. The only way to do this that I could think of was to preprocess Ragel's input file, so that my program reads the file and writes its contents at the right place. But I don't like this solution either.
Does anyone knows how I could do this? There's no problem if it isn't with Ragel, I just want to solve this problem. I would like to use Ruby or Python, but that's not really necessary either.
Thanks.
If you want to read the files at compile time .. make them be of the format:
subject = \
ruby|\
python|\
c++
then use ragel's 'include' or 'import' statement (I forget which .. must check the manual) to import it.
If you want to check the list of subjects at run time, maybe just make ragel read 3 words, then have an action associated with each word. The action can read the file and lookup if the word is good or not at runtime.
The action reads the text file and compares the word's contents.
%%{
machine test
action startWord {
lastWordStart = p;
}
action checkSubject {
word = input[lastWordStart:p+1]
for possible in open('subjects.txt'):
if possible == word:
fgoto verb
# If we get here do whatever ragel does to go to an error or just raise a python exception
raise Exception("Invalid subject '%s'" % word)
}
action checkVerb { .. exercise for reader .. ;) }
action checkAdjective { .. put adjective checking code here .. }
subject = ws*.(alnum*)>startWord%checkSubject
verb := : ws*.(alnum*)>startWord%checkVerb
adjective := ws*.)alnum*)>startWord%checkAdjective
main := subject;
}%%
With bison I would write the lexer by hand, which lookup the words in the predefined dictionary.
After trying several .bst files I am still mostly satisfied with the layout of the ChicagoReedWeb.bst file. However, I don't like the handling of entries by the same author, eg:
If have looked at the ChicagoReedWeb.bst file but only understand some of the basics.
So how can I edit the code of the ChicagoReedWeb.bst file in such a way that it will print the author's full reference instead of the "--------" ?
OK, this is well outside my previous experience with BibTeX, but looking at the file, I get the impression that the name.or.dash section is replacing the name with a dash if it's the same as the previous one. I suggest trying replacing this code:
FUNCTION {name.or.dash}
{ 's :=
oldname empty$
{ s 'oldname := s }
{ s oldname =
{ "\rule[.6ex]{3em}{.05ex}"}
{ s 'oldname := s }
if$
}
if$
}
with this:
FUNCTION {name.or.dash}
{
}
If my understanding of the syntax is correct, this should simply remove the comparison and optional change, and leave the name as you want it.
A slightly tidier approach might be to take out the calls to name.or.dash in the places which you don't want them. That will give you more flexibility about whether you want a dash in place of, for example, a repeated book name.