If I have the following input
test = 3; //first
test = test + 3; //second
parsed with a grammar that looks like this (for example)
Declaration:
name=ID "=" DeclarationContent
;
DeclarationContent:
number=INT ("+" DeclarationContent)?
| reference=[Declaration] ("+" DeclarationContent)?
;
to which declaration does the reference refer (looking at the second declaration in my example)? Or in other words does the reference "test" (second Declaration) refer to the first Declaration ("test = 3;") or directly to itself ("test = test+ 3") and would therefor be a cycle in hierarchy.
Greeting Krzmbrzl
Xtext will always link a cross reference [Declaration] to the first elemenent which is identified by the given ID. In your example hello + 3, the cross reference behind hello will resolved to the declaration hello in line 1. But if you have more then one element with the same (qualified) name within the same scope (container of visibility) Xtext will throw an Exception. You should
implement your own ScopeProvider (Use the generated stub in your.dsl.scoping.YourDslScopeProvider) to resolve this problem or
Use the composed check to automatically validate names.
fragment = validation.JavaValidatorFragment auto-inject {
composedCheck = "org.eclipse.xtext.validation.NamesAreUniqueValidator"
}
Related
I have a matcher that works perfectly for matching operator() calls on instances of a class or classes derived from that class. For example, it matches the final line of:
class MyBase { void operator()(...) {} };
MyBase b;
b(parameters);
using a matcher like:
const auto MyBaseExpr =
expr(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("::MyBase"))));
Finder->addMatcher(traverse(
TK_AsIs, cxxOperatorCallExpr(
hasOverloadedOperatorName("()"),
hasArgument(0, anyOf(MyBaseExpr, MyOtherBaseExpr)),
hasAnyArgument(...),
this);
But I'd also like to be able to match such calls on instances of typedefs for the base or derived types like in the last line below:
typedef MyBase MyTypedef;
MyTypedef t;
t(parameters);
and I can't seem to fathom the correct way to specify this match. Attempting to use hasUnqualifiedDesugaredType rather than hasType doesn't work since it works on a type rather than a Decl and if I try to do more matching with the type then I can't use isSameOrDerived which returns a Matcher<CXXRecordDecl>. A similar problem occurs when trying to use hasCanonicalType:
.../RedundantStringCStrCheck.cpp:193:40: error: invalid initialization of reference of type ‘const clang::ast_matchers:
:internal::Matcher<clang::QualType>&’ from expression of type ‘clang::ast_matchers::internal::BindableMatcher<clang::Decl>’
193 | expr(hasCanonicalType(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("::MyBase"))));
MyTypedef is defined from MyBase so its Canonical Type should be MyBase. More information about canonical type: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#canonical-types
This is the example from LibASTMatchersReference , it uses hasType().
Thien Tran provided the pointer which led me to the right answer. Here's my original expression
const auto MyBaseExpr =
expr(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("::MyBase"))));
I was trying to use:
const auto MyBaseExpr =
expr(hasCanonicalType(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("::MyBase"))));
but the description of hasCanonicalType in LibASTMatchersReference shows that it takes and returns Matcher<QualType> yet cxxRecordDecl has type Matcher<Decl>, so this did not compile.
The mismatch of types can be corrected by inserting a call to hasDeclaration. It's then also necessary to keep the call to hasType in order to turn the Matcher<QualType> result of hasCanonicalType back into something that can be passed to expr.
After all that I ended up with:
const auto MyBaseExpr =
expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(hasDeclaration(cxxRecordDecl(isSameOrDerivedFrom("::MyBase"))))));
which seems to work perfectly.
I'm trying to get Fable to compile the following code correctly but am unable to do so:
module AppView
#r "../../../node_modules/fable-core/Fable.Core.dll"
open Fable.Core
open Fable.Import.Browser
open Fable.Core.JsInterop
[<Import("default", from="../../../js/3rd/riot.js")>]
module riot_js =
let mount:((string*obj)->array<obj>) = jsNative
type App
(
tagName:string
,state
,store
) =
member public x.AppTag =
(riot_js?mount ("app", state))
// does not compile: The value or constructor 'riot_js' is not defined.
// (riot_js.mount ("app", state))
// compiles wrongly to: riot_js.mount(["app", this.state]);
Trying riot_js?mount would magically cause riot_js to not exist any more and trying riot_js.mount compiles into riot_js.mount(["app", this.state]);.
Mount does not take one argument but 2 but it either won't transpile or transpile wrong.
For now I have one of the strangest looking solutions:
[<Emit("riot_js")>]
let riot_js (x: int): obj = jsNative
...
((riot_js 1)?mount ("app", state))
This returns an array but again Fable does not let me take the first element in a "normal" way:
((riot_js 1)?mount ("app", state))?[0]
Gives me red on [ with error Unexpected symbol '[' in expression. Expected identifier, '(' or other token.
And
((riot_js 1)?mount ("app", state)).[0]
Gives red on everything with error The field, constructor or member 'Item' is not defined.
The following "works"
((riot_js 1)?mount ("app", state))?``0``
And is compiled to:
riot_js.mount("app", this.state)["0"];
Not the best result someone can get. I'll let this question sit for a while and set a bounty on it for a week or so before opening 2 issues with Fable.
The following seems to compile to the right ES and does not need the ? so it'll be strongly typed.
open Fable.Core.JsInterop
type Riotjs =
{
mount:(System.Func<string,obj,string []>)
}
let riot = (importAll<obj> "../js/3rd/riot.js") :?> Riotjs
let app = riot.mount.Invoke("app",(createObj []))
I set initial state to type obj but can use a strong typed application state as well.
ES generated is:
export var app = riot.mount("app", {});
Is there a problem with calling an expression inside another expression ? Cause when I do:
create expression int js:hexToBin(hex) [
var bin = '';
for (var i = 0; i <= hex.length - 1; i += 1) {
bin += ('0000' + parseInt(hex.substr(i, 1), 16).toString(2)).slice(-4);
};
parseInt(bin, 2);
];
create expression int js:getTemperature(hex) [
hexToBin(hex.substring(4, 6));
];
I got an error \"hexToBin\" is not defined. (getTemperature#2). But when I put all of the code in getTemperature it works properly.
As already said in the expression you are in JavaScript and it has no idea of esper.
But an expression does not need to contain a single function. It is just some entry to a script so you can define multiple JavaScript functions within a single expression if you want to structure the code.
The JavaScript code is not aware of the EPL expressions. It would be interesting to research whether Rhino could be told of the EPL expressions.
If I write the following F# code, the compiler issues an error.
let a = 123
let a = 123
The error produced is:
error FS0037: Duplicate definition of value 'a'
If I write the same code in a function like this:
let fctn =
let a =123
let a =123
a
it doesn't produce any error.
I don't understand the difference. Can anyone please explain?
Edit : first code I write in module level.
I agree this is confusing. The problem is that let behaves differently when it is used as a local variable (within a function) and when it is used as a global definition (within a module).
Global definitions (in a module) are compiled as static members of a static class and so a name can be used only once. This means that top-level use of:
let a = 10
let a = 11
... is an error, because F# would have to produce two static members of the same name.
Local definitions (inside a function or some other nested scope) are compiled to Common IL and the variable name essentially disappears (the IL uses the stack instead). In this case, F# allows you to shadow variables, that is, you can hide a previous variable by re-using an existing name. This can be inside a function, or even just a do block inside a module, type or other function:
do
let a = 10
let a = 11
()
This is a bit confusing, because variable shadowing only works inside local scopes but not at the top level. It makes sense when you know how things are compiled though.
As an aside, while IL allows overloads of members by the same name, such overloads cannot be defined at module level in F#. Instead, you'd need to define them specifically as static member on a class (type in F#).
on scope and shadowing
as CaringDev mentioned (but not explained) you will probably see what the shadowing is about when you make the scope a bit more obvious (using the let ... in ... construct #light let you shorten a bit - but you still can use it even without #light off)
Try this:
> let a = 233 in let a = 555 in a;;
val it : int = 555
as you can see the expression evaluates to the shadowed value of a - but the original is not lost:
> let a = 233 in (let a = 555 in a), a;;
val it : int * int = (555, 233)
it's just not in scope in the inner let ... in ...
btw: you can rewrite your example to:
let fctn =
let a = 123 in
(let a =123 in a)
(I added the parentheses just to make this more obvious)
the other on the module level really defines a value for the scope of the module and is not really an expression but a definition
The first snippet defines two public values with the same name.
The second hides (shadows) a value.
With the first you would have externally visible change of state (a behaves like mutable) whereas with the second you can't (you have two as in different scopes).
If you write your statements in #light off ML syntax it becomes obvious immediately.
So I have been doing research on interfaces on F#. I have found these 2 articles on it. The MSDN and F# for fun and profit But unfortunately they are only skin deep.
UPDATED
here is my module with my interfaces
//open statements omitted for brevity
module DrawingInterfaces =
///gets a string representation of the SVG code representation of the object
type IRepresentable_SVG =
abstract member getSVGRepresenation : unit -> string
//other interfaces omitted for brevity
Now within the same namespace and physical folder also I have this:
type lineSet (x1off,x2off,y1off,y2off,x1,x2,y1,y2,rot,rotOff,count) =
//tons of member vals omitted for brevity
member val x1Start = x1 with get, set
interface DrawingInterfaces.IRepresentable_SVG with
member __.getSVGRepresenation() =
let mutable svg = ""
let mutable currentx1 = x1Start
svg
This used to give me 2 errors, before I was using the __. notation for the member. The first error was on the interface line. And a second on the member line.
The errors were respectively:
The type 'IRepresentable_SVG' is not defined
This instance member needs a parameter to represent the object being invoked.
I was able to fix the first one by changing the file order. Thanks to John Palmer.
The second one is nearly fixed./
After using the __ . notation I was able to get rid of the second error. However, now a new error pops up when I try to use type members in my interface implementation.
let mutable currentx1 = x1Start
x1Start shows as not being defined. I need to be able to use values stored in my other members within my implementation.
Let's first make it work and then point to your problems. I define below 2 separate modules in 2 separate .fs files within the same namespace Example for interface definition in module Example.DrawingInterfacesand interface implementation in module Example.UseInterface and also a console app that will use the interface from third (implicit) module Program. In my project correspondent code files are in the following order: DefInterface.fs, UseInterface,fs, Program.fs (I also made few idiomatic styling changes and more brevity omissions)
File: DefInterface.fs
namespace Example
module DrawingInterfaces =
type IRepresentable_SVG =
abstract member GetSVGRepresenation : unit -> string
File: UseInterface.fs
namespace Example
module UseInterface =
type LineSet (x1) =
member val X1Start = x1 with get, set
interface DrawingInterfaces.IRepresentable_SVG with
member __.GetSVGRepresenation() = "test" + " " + __.X1Start.ToString()
File: Program.fs
open Example
open System
[<EntryPoint>]
let main argv =
let lineSet = UseInterface.LineSet(5)
let example : DrawingInterfaces.IRepresentable_SVG = lineSet :> _
example.GetSVGRepresenation() |> printfn "%A"
lineSet.X1Start <- 10
example.GetSVGRepresenation() |> printfn "%A"
0
Compile, run and make sure it works.
Now to problems in your code:
first error message stems from the need to refer to the full implemented interface name in UseInterface.fs, which is Example.DrawingInterfaces.IRepresentable_SVG although as both modules belong to the same namespace the Example prefix may be omitted
second error message points to the need of using instance method in implementation class UseInterface.LineSet, which is achieved by prepending self-identifier __. to the method signature
Finally, notice the usage of your interface in Program.fs that imports namespace, provides module names for definition and implementation respectively, and also explicitly casts implementation LineSet to IRepresentable_SVG.
EDIT: I've added X1Start property to the original LineSet to show how it can be used from interface implementation per question author's request. Now self-id __. is more involved and probably using self. or even this. instead would make more sense.