Even after changing a domain slightly and publishing the domain and changelog file to remote server, the following error(attached image) is shown upon accessing the dev or remote server
I changed the Race domain by adding a new property
String testing
and then added this line to changelog file
changeSet(author:"user (generated)", id:"1431922413415-1"){
addColumn(tableName:"race"){
column(name:"testing", type:"varchar(255)"){
constraints(nullable:"false")
}
}
}
and after committing and pushing the change to remote server I get the error as attached in this email.
Related
I'm using Serverless for working with our aws lambda / appsync.
For Error Handling, we are keep erro code with message in a json file. The Codes will be unique. Something like this:
//error-code.json
{
"1"": { code: 1, message: "Invalid User Input"},
"2"": { code: 2, message: "Invalid Input"},
//... so on
}
This wil lbe deploy as layer and all the lambda will use it. Issue is we cannot use it in the resolve template. There are some of the resolver will be only template file. These template files cannot access the json file nor can access the layer. How can I use the error-code.json here?
Solution 1:
Manually write the error code in templates and make sure there are alway unique. Something like this:
#set(#errorInfo = {
"erroCode": "1",
"errorMessage": "Invalid Input"
})
$util.error("Invalid Input", "errorType", $ctx.arguments,#errorInfo)
Rejected: Becasue we have to manually check everytime for the unique of error code. In case of lot of template file, we cannot rely on it.
Solution 2:
Create a table with error code (unique) and error message. Use this table to send error from template.
Rejected: Because we use multiple app sync instance and they all connect to dirferent database. So we have to make this table in all database, and thus unique across the app-sync is not maintained.
Solution 3:
Write the placeholder in vtl where we want to send the error. Before Deploy, replace the placeholder with the actual code using pre-hook script, but not in the actual vtl file but in the generated package that serverless deploy. Does Serverless even such thing?
if your errors are all static, there is one more option for consideration.
You create one more file that holds all errors defined in Velocity.
$util.qr( $ctx.stash.put("errors", {}) ) $util.qr(
$util.qr( $ctx.stash.errors.put("ONE", { "code": 1, "message": "Invalid User
Input"} )
...
$util.qr( $ctx.stash.errors.put("TWENTY", { "code": 20, "message": "20th error description"} )
For every velocity resolver that throws errors, you inject pre-defined errors at the beginning of its request mapping's file. Whenever you want to throw an error, it's done by retrieving a pre-defined error from $ctx.stash
$util.error ( $ctx.stash.errors.ONE.message, $ctx.stash.errors.ONE.code )
The error file is generated from error-code.json, or manually typed again for simplicity. $ctx.stash is used because stash is accessible from everywhere in a resolver, including pipeline ones.
I am using Azure API Management to host three versions of an API - dev, qa, stage. These are basically three different build configurations of the api, so when imported to APIM - "MyAPI-dev", "MyAPI-qa", "MyAPI-stage".
I am using swagger for documentation. When I trigger a revision in Terraform to build/re-create the API definitions, i am getting error:
"my-ApiM-dev" / Resource Group "rg-myApim"): apimanagement.APIClient#CreateOrUpdate: Failure sending
request: StatusCode=409 -- Original Error: Code="IdentifierAlreadyInUse" Message="Resource already exists."
I am 99% sure this is due to the "title" in SwaggerConfig.cs file, it is the same value for all configurations. Thus deploying two of the APIs with the same title is throwing the error.
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration
.EnableSwagger(c =>
{
c.SingleApiVersion("v1", "MyApiTitle");
}
How can I get the title to be unique based on the configuration?
I tried creating config values in web.config value for each configuration and referencing the key in the config file, but it didn't work, SwaggerUi picked up the default value in web.config file only.
web.dev.config:
<add key="BuildConfig" value="dev" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(key)"/>
SwaggerConfig.cs:
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration
.EnableSwagger(c =>
{
c.SingleApiVersion("v1", "MyApiTitle-" + ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["BuildConfig"]);
}
Another option is to script deleting the API, import the API and rename the title, but I would do that as a last resort.
Would like to do this dynamically in the project code though.
I am able to achieve this with PowerShell, please check if that helps to you
https://medium.com/#rakesh.suryawanshi/deploy-azure-web-api-into-azure-api-management-with-powershell-3d14d1610b07
also, check if you are able to deploy it manually with your approach.
I installed ERP "Openbravo" following the custom approach:
So I followed the steps from the tutorial.I set "localhost" for the parameter "Web URL" in the configuration file. After that I ran the servers, Apache and Tomcat.
When accessing the application via browser using http://localhost/openbravo
The problem I am facing is that,the browser doesn't find some components.
I got this log in console of Google-chrome like this:
Login_F1.html:11 GET http://localhost/openbravo/security/localhost/js/ajax.js 404 (Not Found)
When i try to accede to the previous url in a new tab i got "not found",
but when i change by this URL "http://localhost/openbravo/web/js/utils.js" works well.
My question is that how i can make Openbravo generate "/web/" instead "/security/localhost/".
If you look at Openbravo.properties file
.....
//Static content URL. Use the default value to make it dynamic.
//Don't change this unless you know what you are doing
web.url=#actual_url_context#/web
// Full URL of the context, *only* used by the Web Services installation
and diagnostic task
context.url=http://localhost:8080/openbravo
.....
#actual_url_context# will get replaced by domain name with port number and application context name (for example: mydomain:8989/openbravo)
404 is due to application is not able to locate ajax.js under
../web/ajax.js
1 ==> To fix the issue you can just restore to #actual_url_context# and perform smartbuild.
or do an install.source
2 ==> To add any client side customization or to support static content under web folder you can follow
an example: http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/How_to_add_a_button_to_the_toolbar
http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/How_to_create_a_Manual_UI_Process
We implement Solr search in a document manager we use. When a user requests to search for all the documents in a given directory, we are forced to aggregate the docids of the user's selected documents into an array and send a
SolrQueryInList("docid", arrFileNames)
If the number of files in the user's directory is very large, so is the resulting http request. Ergo, we decided to use SolrPostConnection. In our site we implement the PostSolrConnection decorator within the Windsor container, as per M. Scheeffer's instructions:
public SolrSearchRepository(int caseID, string solrServer)
{
this.facility = new SolrNetFacility(solrServer);
this.facility.AddCore(caseID.ToString(), typeof(SolrDocument),
string.Format("{0}/{1}", solrServer, caseID));
this.container = new WindsorContainer();
this.container.Register(Component.For<ISolrConnection>()
.ImplementedBy<PostSolrConnection>()
.DependsOn(Parameter.ForKey("serverUrl").Eq(solrServer)));
this.container.AddFacility(this.facility);
solrOperation = this.container
.Resolve<ISolrOperations<SolrDocument>>(caseID.ToString());
}
However, we are still getting the following error:
{"Message":"An error has occurred.","ExceptionMessage":"The remote server returned an
error: (400) Bad Request.","ExceptionType":"System.Net.WebException","StackTrace":"
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()\r\n at
HttpWebAdapters.Adapters.HttpWebRequestAdapter.GetResponse()\r\n at
SolrNet.Impl.SolrConnection.GetResponse(IHttpWebRequest request)\r\n at
SolrNet.Impl.SolrConnection.Get(String relativeUrl, IEnumerable`1 parameters)"}
We use Tomcat 7.0 server. The logs are pretty uniformative. Here's the pastebin of what seems to happen around the time I launch a search:
Solr Log
I noticed that the command never reaches the server. Is the PostSolrConnection not implementing post? Note that this query works perfectly with small number of files (i.e. docid's)
My JMS client connects to WMQ through JNDI. The initial context factory used is com.ibm.mq.jms.context.WMQInitialContextFactory.
Currently, at WMQ side, there's a queue manager called TestMgr. Under this queue manager I created two channels. One is PLAIN.CHL which does not specify an SSL Cipher Spec, the other one is SSL.CHL which configured SSL Cipher Spec with RC4_MD5_US and SSL Authentication with Optional.
I have created a key store for the queue manager using IBM Key Management tool. The path of key db is [wmq_home]\qmgrs\TestMgr\ssl\key.
For channel PLAIN.CHL, I defined a queue connection factory like:
DEF QCF(PlainQCF) QMANAGER(TestMgr) CHANNEL(PLAIN.CHL) HOST(192.168.66.23) PORT(1414) TRANSPORT(client)
And under the SSL channel SSL.CHL, I defined a queue connection factory like:
DEF QCF(SSLQCF) QMANAGER(TestMgr) CHANNEL(SSL.CHL) HOST(192.168.66.23) PORT(1414) TRANSPORT(client) SSLCIPHERSUITE(SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5)
Now I only can create connection using the PlainQCF. But failed to look up the SSL queue connection factory. My code looks like:
Hashtable environment = new Hashtable();
environment.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.ibm.mq.jms.context.WMQInitialContextFactory");
environment.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "192.168.66.23:1414/SSL.CHL");
Context ctx = new InitialContext( environment );
QueueConnectionFactory qcf = (QueueConnectionFactory) ctx.lookup("SSLQCF");
qcf.createConnection();
....
Am I missing some context properties when looking up the SSL factory? connection And then I found the code is hanging on the line new InitialContext( environment ) for a long time, almost 5 minutes, and I got CC=2;RC=2009;AMQ9208... error.
Any suggestion would be appreciated. Is it true that SSL channel can't be connected by JNDI?
#T.Rob, thanks for your reply very much. But we still want to use WMQInitialContextFactory, so I'm afraid I still need to find solution for this.
I just defined the connection factory one time. The displayed info for the SSL queue connection factory like:
InitCtx> DISPLAY QCF(SSLQCF)
ASYNCEXCEPTION(ALL)
CCSID(819)
CHANNEL(SSL.CHL)
CLIENTRECONNECTOPTIONS(ASDEF)
CLIENTRECONNECTTIMEOUT(1800)
COMPHDR(NONE )
COMPMSG(NONE )
CONNECTIONNAMELIST(192.168.66.23(1414))
CONNOPT(STANDARD)
FAILIFQUIESCE(YES)
HOSTNAME(192.168.66.23)
LOCALADDRESS()
MAPNAMESTYLE(STANDARD)
MSGBATCHSZ(10)
MSGRETENTION(YES)
POLLINGINT(5000)
PORT(1414)
PROVIDERVERSION(UNSPECIFIED)
QMANAGER(TestMgr)
RESCANINT(5000)
SENDCHECKCOUNT(0)
SHARECONVALLOWED(YES)
SSLCIPHERSUITE(SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5)
SSLFIPSREQUIRED(NO)
SSLRESETCOUNT(0)
SYNCPOINTALLGETS(NO)
TARGCLIENTMATCHING(YES)
TEMPMODEL(SYSTEM.DEFAULT.MODEL.QUEUE)
TEMPQPREFIX()
TRANSPORT(CLIENT)
USECONNPOOLING(YES)
VERSION(7)
WILDCARDFORMAT(TOPIC_ONLY)
The JNDI Provider should be fine because I can look up the plain connection factory successfully. Also, for my client app, I extracted the cert from the key store which created for MQ server and imported it to the trust store(cacerts) of my JRE with alias name ibmwebspheremqtestmgr.
You are correct, with 2009 error there are some log entries:
=================================================================
4/20/2012 20:24:27 - Process(13768.3) User(MUSR_MQADMIN) Program(amqzmur0.exe)
Host(xxxx_host of my MQ) Installation(mqenv)
VRMF(7.1.0.0) QMgr(TestMgr)
AMQ6287: WebSphere MQ V7.1.0.0 (p000-L111019).
EXPLANATION:
WebSphere MQ system information:
Host Info :- Windows Server 2003, Build 3790: SP2 (MQ Windows 32-bit)
Installation :- C:\IBM\WebSphereMQ (mqenv)
Version :- 7.1.0.0 (p000-L111019)
ACTION:
None.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/20/2012 20:24:27 - Process(7348.116) User(MUSR_MQADMIN) Program(amqrmppa.exe)
Host(xxxx_host of my MQ) Installation(mqenv)
VRMF(7.1.0.0) QMgr(TestMgr)
AMQ9639: Remote channel 'SSL.CHL' did not specify a CipherSpec.
EXPLANATION:
Remote channel 'SSL.CHL' did not specify a CipherSpec when the local channel
expected one to be specified.
The remote host is 'xxx_host of my app (192.168.66.25)'.
The channel did not start.
ACTION:
Change the remote channel 'SSL.CHL' on host 'xxx_host of my app (192.168.66.25)' to
specify a CipherSpec so that both ends of the channel have matching
CipherSpecs.
----- amqcccxa.c : 3817 -------------------------------------------------------
4/20/2012 20:24:27 - Process(7348.116) User(MUSR_MQADMIN) Program(amqrmppa.exe)
Host(my app host) Installation(mqenv)
VRMF(7.1.0.0) QMgr(TestMgr)
AMQ9999: Channel 'SSL.CHL' to host 'xxx_host of my app (192.168.66.25)' ended
abnormally.
====================================================================
I also got some confusion with the error log. My app staged at at a machine which is different from my MQ. But the log says the Change the remote channel 'SSL.CHL' on host 'xxx_host of my app (192.168.66.25)' to
specify a CipherSpec so that both ends of the channel have matching
CipherSpecs. How can I change the channel cipher spec on my app host?
updates on MQEnvironment...
reply the comments.
The value of MQEnvironment.sslCipherSuite is null, so it throws out NullPointerExcetpion when i put it the the env hashtable. But i tried another one environment.put(MQC.SSL_CIPHER_SUITE_PROPERTY, "SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5") and it still failed with 2009 error.
For JMSAdmin tool, i had changed the config to use WMQInitialContextFactory. The configuration like(JMSAdmin.config):
INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY=com.ibm.mq.jms.context.WMQInitialContextFactory
PROVIDER_URL=192.168.66.23:1414/SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN
The rest configuration leaves as default.
Kindly note, here i use the default channel SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN so that i can logon to admin console. If I change the channel to the SSL oneSSL.CHL, I also can't logon to admin console. The error happened here is just like the one in my client app.
Another clarification, in my client, i use follow code can connect to connect qmgr(TestMgr) successfully through channel SSL.CHL.
MQConnectionFactory factory = new MQConnectionFactory();
factory.setTransportType(JMSC.MQJMS_TP_CLIENT_MQ_TCPIP);
factory.setQueueManager("TestMgr");
factory.setSSLCipherSuite("SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5");
factory.setPort(1414);
factory.setHostName("192.168.66.23");
factory.setChannel("SSL.CHL");
MQConnection connection = (MQConnection) factory.createConnection();
And now the problem is just like you said, that's the initial context failed connect to qmgr through SSL channel. The option(use plain channel for initial context and ssl channel for connection factory) you provided works too. But I still want to know how to get initial context with ssl channel work. Thanks for you patience very much. Your updates will be appreciated.
thanks
I never really liked com.ibm.mq.jms.context.WMQInitialContextFactory very much. It stores the managed objects on a queue. So in order to lookup the connectionFactory, which tells JMS how to connect to the QMgr, it is first necessary to connect to the QMgr to make the JNDI call. Therefore, before you can debug the SSL connection, you need to know whether the underlying JNDI provider is working.
If you want to skip the MQ-based JNDI provider and just use the filesystem, see the updated version of Bobby Woolf's article here. If you want to continue with com.ibm.mq.jms.context.WMQInitialContextFactory, read on but be prepared to provide more configuration info.
When you run the JMSAdmin tool, do you display the objects after creating them? For example, here is one of my JMSAdmin.bat scripts:
# Connection Factory for Client mode
# Delete the Connection Factory if it exists
DELETE CF(JMSDEMOCF)
# Define the Connection Factory
DEFINE CF(JMSDEMOCF) +
SYNCPOINTALLGETS(YES) +
SSLCIPHERSUITE(NULL_SHA) +
TRAN(client) +
HOST(127.0.0.1) CHAN(SSL.SVRCONN) PORT(1414) +
QMGR( )
# Display the resulting definition
DISPLAY CF(JMSDEMOCF)
This deletes the object (because JMSAdmin doesn't have a define with replace option) then defines the object, then displays it. Do you in fact see both objects defined? Can you connect and interactively display them both? Can you update your question with the contents displayed?
If so, then what does the JNDI provider configuration look like with each sample program? The 2009 indicates that there is at least a connection to the QMgr being made, so it is important to determine whether the thing that suffering the broken connection is your app or the JNDI provider. To diagnose that requires the config info you are using for the JNDI provider and whether it is the same in the working and failing cases. If not, how do they differ?
Once you know whether it's the app or the JNDI provider that is causing the problem (or switch to another JNDI provider that doesn't require an MQ connection such as the filesystem initial context) then it will be possible to determine the next steps.
The article linked above has samples of code and managed object scripts that use a filesystem JNDI provider. You may notice my scripts pasted in above use the same QMgr name. That's because I wrote that part of the article. When I want to switch to SSL using those same samples, I just update the connectionFactory to point to the SSL channel and it works.
Here are the other bits from the sample that I've modified:
java -Djavax.net.debug=ssl ^
-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=key2.jks ^
-Djavax.net.ssl.keyStore=key2.jks ^
-Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=???????? ^
-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=???????? ^
-cp "%CLASSPATH%" ^
com.ibm.examples.JMSDemo -pub -topic JMSDEMOPubTopic %*
Note: The ^ is Windows version of line continuation.
Then if there are problems, I follow the debugging scenario I described in this SO answer. Note that the app will require a truststore, even if you have SSLCAUTH(OPTIONAL) on your channel. This is because the app must always validate the QMgr's certificate, even if the app does not present its own certificate. In my case I was using SSLCAUTH(REQUIRED) so my app needed both a keystore and a truststore. Your question mentions that the QMgr has a keystore but does not say what you did for the application.
Finally, a 2009 will usually generate an entry in the QMgr error logs. If you continue to get the problem, please update your question with those log entries.
UPDATE:
Responding to the comments, the JMSAdmin tool is part of the WMQ package. However, WMQ it comes with jars for filesystem context and LDAP context. The WMQInitialContextFactory is optional and is delivered as SupportPac ME01. When using WMQInitialContextFactory with the JMSAdmin tool (or the JMSAdmin GUI or with WMQ Explorer) it is necessary to configure the PROVIDER_URL with the host, port and channel. For example:
PROVIDER_URL: <Hostname>:<port>/<SVRCONN Channel Name>
192.168.66.23:1414/SSL.SVRCONN
So after reviewing your post again, I realized that you did provide the config info for WMQInitialContextFactory. I was looking for a JMSADmin.config file but you have it in the environment hash table. And that is where the problem is. You are attempting to use the SSL channel for both the WMQInitialContextFactory and the connection factory. This is what is causing the lookup to fail. The WMQInitialContextFactory first makes a Java connection to the QMgre in order to look in the queue to obtain the administered objects such as QCF. In order to do that, it needs to know the ciphersuite that the channel is set up for in order to negotiate the handshake. Right now, the *only * place that ciphersuite is recorded is in the QCF definition.
Try adding the following line:
environment.put(MQEnvironment.sslCipherSuite, "SSL_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5");
As per this Infocenter page, that should tell the context factory classes what ciphersuite to use. Of course, they also need to know where the trust store is (and possibly keystore if the channel has SSLCAUTH(RQUIRED) set) so you still need to get those values in the environment. You can use the command-line variables or try loading them into the environment using code. You'll need both -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStore=key2.jks and -Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=????????.
The other option is to continue to use the plaintext channel for the WMQInitialContextFactory and the SSL channel for the application. If the plaintext channel has an MCAUSER for a non-privileged user ID, it can be restricted to only connect to the QMgr and access the queue that contains the administered objects. With those restrictions, anyone will be able to read the administered objects using that channel but not the application queues or administrative queues.