What's the difference between bower bootstrap-sass and bootstrap-sass-official - bower

What is the difference between bootstrap-sass and bootstrap-sass-official in the bower registry?
The bower registry lists both, although they both point to https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap-sass.

bootstrap-sass-official used to place source files under
bootstrap-sass-official/vendor/...
now that its just pointing at bootstrap-sass, the paths are all different
ie. installing bootstrap-sass-official now means you have to reference
bootstrap-sass/assets
instead of
bootstrap-sass-official/vendor/assets
(if you never used the OLD bootstrap-sass-official - that won't affect you)

Looking at the update meta and ownership of both, I'd say, nothing. No diff.

Related

What's the current way of including JS assets and their dependencies in Engines for Rails 5+?

I don't have much experience with new npm/yarn/webpacker crazyness in Rails 5. So what's the correct way to bundle assets plus their dependencies (like bootstrap 4, for example).
Before it was just a matter of moving entire downloaded js library in /assets and calling it a day.
Let's assume I want to include this datepicker in my Engine: https://github.com/chmln/flatpickr
How do I set it up? Thanks.
Did you get anywhere with this?
It seems there needs to be a solution where the host application can pull dependancies from an engines or gems YARN package.json.
That way it could merge all YARN dependancies together with its own and check if there are no conflicts, if not - Happy days.
A possible workaround is to copy the dependancies over from node_modules into the asset pipeline. This is pretty much the same as what was done previously apart from now rather than looking through each file to find the dependancies and there versions you can just look in package.json.

Asciidoctor Slides without Ruby (but with jRuby)

I know that there are asciidoctor backends for reveal.js and deck.js but it seems that both are only available as ruby gems and not .jar packages.
While I know how to use the Gems from within a java build, I would like to use these backends without a reference to the ruby gem repository.
So are there already .jar packages available for those backends?
Maybe you could use gradle or maven to generate your slide-deck.
A third option might be to use asciidocctorj. At least the first two options are easy to use.

Edit bower packages

I've recently started using Bower and something I cannot figure out is what would be the correct way of editing a package? For example I use SwiperJS but a lot of the CSS that it comes with just isn't relevant for my output so I've been commenting it out so when it's compiled with SASS it gets removed. I've been doing this without Bower.
If I was to install SwiperJS using Bower instead, what would be the best way to do the same thing? I assume just ending the files in the bower_components directory isn't best.
Also I'm just using SwiperJS as an example here.

Is Bower only about automatically installing dependencies?

Does Bower actually do anything else than resolve dependecies? I'm trying hard to understand how it is meant to be used, but I guess I'm missing some points...
Say, I have Bower package A, which depends on Bower package B. In my application I'm just interested in package A, since that's what I'm going to use. Of course, that means that somehow both packages must be loaded into the Browser, so that package A can work.
Using Bower I can just do bower install a and will then find both packages A & B in my bower_components. So far, awesome.
But now? Am I forced to find out myself (manually) which files from A and B need to be loaded in my HTML page? I don't think that the full bower_components directly shall be accessible via web, so I have to configure myself manually my Grunt (or whatever) build-file to copy the relevant files?
What am I missing here? If what I wrote above is true, what's the point using Bower when I still need to be aware of all implicit dependencies?
Bower manages dependencies, and it will add the correct files into your HTML if you use it with the --save (or -S) flag. You would need appPath set in your bower.json if your index.html isn't in the same directory.
$ bower help install
Usage:
bower install [<options>]
bower install <endpoint> [<endpoint> ..] [<options>]
Options:
-F, --force-latest Force latest version on conflict
-h, --help Show this help message
-p, --production Do not install project devDependencies
-S, --save Save installed packages into the project's bower.json dependencies
-D, --save-dev Save installed packages into the project's bower.json devDependencies
Additionally all global options listed in 'bower help' are available
Description:
Installs the project dependencies or a specific set of endpoints.
Endpoints can have multiple forms:
- <source>
- <source>#<target>
- <name>=<source>#<target>
Where:
- <source> is a package URL, physical location or registry name
- <target> is a valid range, commit, branch, etc.
- <name> is the name it should have locally.
```
You're actually not missing anything. Bower doesn't deal with loading your dependencies, just installing them. Loading them is something you have to do on your own. Also, there are a lot various ways in which people load there dependencies; the most common probably being Require.JS, Browserify (have too few credits to post links) and plain script includes in an index.html page. So, basically you have a few options here
You can just deal with load registrations manually. This would mean adding <script src="..."></script> tags to your index.html page, or adding registrations for dependencies and similar to your app.js if you're using Require.JS. Note that this step would mean that you'd manually have to look at each dependency, read documentation or bower.json files to figure out transitive dependencies and file paths.
If you're using plain script includes, you can use Wiredep to have that done automatically for you through Wiredep's inspection of the bower.json files of dependencies.
If you're using RequireJS (or similar) you can look at Yeoman's grunt-require-js to do this automatically for you.
Note that both 2 and 3 relies on library authors provide the correct output files. You might e.g. have to declare overrides or explicitly declare if you want minified or non-minified versions.
As for publicly allowing access to "bower_components", I find that this is the most common approach. What things there would you like to prevent access to?
I'm a recent bower user myself. And as far as I know the short answer is: YES, bower is meant to download dependencies, however, apart from being able to configure the bower_components directory to anything you like, the idea is that bower installed components won't be edited by you at all, if you want to include them manually, you type
bower list --paths
and this will list all the files you need to include from the dependencies (in relative urls).
You can also use bower-installer (npm install -g bower-installer) which allows you to copy the files you need to any path you like. With a fine grained controll, or choose the minified versions, for example.
Here's an example output.
C:\Users\german\test>bower install bootstrap
bower bootstrap#* not-cached git://github.com/twbs/bootstrap.git#*
bower bootstrap#* resolve git://github.com/twbs/bootstrap.git#*
bower bootstrap#* download https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/archive/v3.3.4.tar.gz
bower bootstrap#* extract archive.tar.gz
bower bootstrap#* resolved git://github.com/twbs/bootstrap.git#3.3.4
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 not-cached git://github.com/jquery/jquery.git#>= 1.9.1
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 resolve git://github.com/jquery/jquery.git#>= 1.9.1
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 download https://github.com/jquery/jquery/archive/2.1.4.tar.gz
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 extract archive.tar.gz
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 resolved git://github.com/jquery/jquery.git#2.1.4
bower bootstrap#~3.3.4 install bootstrap#3.3.4
bower jquery#>= 1.9.1 install jquery#2.1.4
bootstrap#3.3.4 bower_components\bootstrap
└── jquery#2.1.4
jquery#2.1.4 bower_components\jquery
C:\Users\german\test>bower list --paths
jquery: 'bower_components/jquery/dist/jquery.js',
bootstrap: [
'bower_components/bootstrap/less/bootstrap.less',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.css',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/js/bootstrap.js',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.eot',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.svg',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.ttf',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff',
'bower_components/bootstrap/dist/fonts/glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff2'
]
after
bower list --paths
bootstrap[] shows all the files I need to include according to bower_components/bootstrap/bower.json
main:[]
part
Hope this helps! cheers.

How to update plugins version (of a rails project) when old version had manual changes

How to update many plugins version when old plugin's version had manual changes in project?
Is there any tool available for doing this?
or tell proper method for updating ruby plugin version if some plugins may have manual changes done before in the older plugin's version.
Best method when a plugin is required or preferred *might be to copy out the old plugin to a dummy directory for reviewing later, then
uninstall the plugin, (script/plugin uninstall plugin_name)
install the old (but unmodified version) plugin (script/plugin install plugin_name_source_address) - likely either from rubyforge or github
review against the saved version you put in the dummy directory using an editor capable of differential display (that is, which allows you to compare two files for variations. Notepad++ is one freebie that will do this, but there are a ton of editors that allow diff views)
(this may or may not be something you can script. idk. I'm not that good, but I don't know of a tool that will do it all for you)
do another uninstall on the plugin to clear it out, since it's job is done,
install the new version of the plugin (script/plugin install plugin_name_source_address)
and finally edit the new plugin as necessary to accommodate any customization that was performed by you or some third party to the original utility.
I say as necessary because some of the customizations may not even be required in the newer version, although I can't say for sure...
finally, once all your patches are re-added to the new plugin and it's been tested and verified, either delete the dummy directory or archive it for future reference.
See, and I didn't even cop out with a bundler answer. You DID ask for assistance with a plugin, right? ;)
I'm not quite following you, but surely but that's what the Gemfile is for?
Take a look at Bundler
Try to run "$gem install rails"(it will install the newer version of rails) and then install watever the gem it asks finally run "$bundle install"

Resources