A textbox in a report I am trying to show properly is hiding multiples, even though the second field is different.
For example: "=[Client] & " " & [Invoice]".
If there is a Bob with multiple invoices, the report will only show one Bob and the lowest invoice number.
How can I make the textbox show every client and invoice individually?
Thanks.
Edit: The SQL requested
"SELECT [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].Firm, [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].[Firm Type], IIf([ReportID] Is Null,0,Val([ReportID])) AS [Report #], [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].SumOfFeesBilled, [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].[SumOfRecommended Reduction], [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].[SumOfCosts Billed], [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].[SumOfCost Reduction], [SumOfFeesBilled]+[SumOfCosts Billed]+[SumOfRecommended Reduction]+[SumOfCost Reduction] AS Reimbursement, [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].Plaintiff, [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].ReportID, [SumOfRecommended Reduction]+[SumOfCost Reduction] AS ReductionSum, [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].Invoice, ([SumOfFeesBilled]+[SumOfRecommended Reduction]) AS FeeReimbursement, ([SumOfCosts Billed]+[SumOfCost Reduction]) AS CostReimbursement, -[SumOfRecommended Reduction] AS PositivefeeReduction, IIf([positivefeereduction]>[sumoffeesbilled] Or [sumofcost reduction]>[sumofcosts billed],"E"," ") AS ErrorNote, -[sumofcost reduction] AS PositveCostReduction
FROM [SUMFCRR&Plaintiff]
WHERE ((([SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].Firm) Like [which firm?] & "*") AND (([SUMFCRR&Plaintiff].ReportID)=[which report?]))
ORDER BY IIf([ReportID] Is Null,0,Val([ReportID]));"
Edit2: The two fields of concern here are [Plaintiff] and [Invoice], and all information is shown when I run the query itself.
Fixed it. It was originally in the [Plaintiff] grouping. I changed the group to [Invoice], and the multiple invoice numbers started showing.
Related
I am trying to create a customization to add the PO Nbr associated in the PO Link graph to a column in the SO Line. I know the link is made in the SOLineSplit table, but I am struggling with how to actually show that field in the SO Line. I have made a custom Usr field for PO Nbr, but not sure what I should be entering in the attributes (or DAC extension, whatever is the best way) in order to show the PO Nbr data from the SOLineSplit table.
I remember struggling with this early on, so it's an excellent question. The challenge is that you mention getting to the PO from the SO LINE, but an SO Line can be split across multiple PO's. That's why you end up having to dig into the SOLineSplit for the link. Let's take a look at the link from SOLineSplit to PO...
There are a couple of possibilities when you look into the SOOrderEntry graph. The following code snippets show relationships. Your SOLineSplit may have a direct reference to the PO/POLine as shown here:
PXSelectBase<POLine> selectlinkedDropShips = new PXSelectJoin<POLine,
InnerJoin<SOLineSplit, On<SOLineSplit.pOType, Equal<POLine.orderType>,
And<SOLineSplit.pONbr, Equal<POLine.orderNbr>,
And<SOLineSplit.pOLineNbr, Equal<POLine.lineNbr>>>>>,
Where<SOLineSplit.orderType, Equal<Current<SOOrder.orderType>>,
And<SOLineSplit.orderNbr, Equal<Current<SOOrder.orderNbr>>,
And<POLine.orderType, Equal<POOrderType.dropShip>>>>>(this);
If that simple path doesn't get you there, the more detailed path of an SO to a PO lies in the INItemPlan reflecting the demand of the SOLineSplit (via the PlanID) and then tied to POLine via POLine.PlanID = INItemPlan.SupplyPlanID as shown in the following snippet.
foreach (PXResult<POLine, POOrder, INItemPlan, SOLineSplit> res in PXSelectJoin<POLine,
InnerJoin<POOrder, On<POLine.FK.Order>,
InnerJoin<INItemPlan, On<INItemPlan.supplyPlanID, Equal<POLine.planID>>,
InnerJoin<SOLineSplit, On<SOLineSplit.planID, Equal<INItemPlan.planID>,
And<SOLineSplit.pOType, Equal<POLine.orderType>,
And<SOLineSplit.pONbr, Equal<POLine.orderNbr>,
And<SOLineSplit.pOLineNbr, Equal<POLine.lineNbr>>>>>>>>,
Where<POLine.orderType, Equal<Required<POLine.orderType>>,
And<POLine.orderNbr, Equal<Required<POLine.orderNbr>>,
And2<Where<POLine.cancelled, Equal<boolTrue>,
Or<POLine.completed, Equal<boolTrue>>>,
And2<Where<POOrder.orderType, NotEqual<POOrderType.dropShip>,
Or<POOrder.isLegacyDropShip, Equal<True>>>,
And<SOLineSplit.receivedQty, Less<SOLineSplit.qty>,
And<SOLineSplit.pOCancelled, NotEqual<boolTrue>,
And<SOLineSplit.completed, NotEqual<boolTrue>>>>>>>>>
.Select(graph, poOrder.OrderType, poOrder.OrderNbr))
{...
As you can imagine, you would have to set some rules around restricting an SO Line to a single PO, but that honestly would be more trouble than it's worth as the standard functionality is valuable in being more robust. I would suggest either putting your link in the Allocations list (or Line Details in more recent versions of Acumatica ERP) or produce a smart panel popup to show all the PO links per splits of the current SO Line.
I am creating a SAPUI5 application. This application is connected to a backend SAP system via OData. In the SAPUI5 application I use a smart chart control. Out of the box the smart chart lets the user create filters for the underlying data. This works fine - except if you try to use multiple 'not equals' for one property. Is there a way to accomplish this?
I found out that all properties within an 'and_expression' (including nested or_expressions) must have unique name.
The reason why two parameters with the same property don't get parsed into the select options:
/IWCOR/CL_ODATA_EXPR_UTILS=>GET_FILTER_SELECT_OPTIONS takes the expression you pass and parses it into a table of select options.
The select option table returned is of type /IWCOR/IF_ODATA_TYPES=>EDM_SELECT_OPTION_T which is a HASHED TABLE .. WITH UNIQUE KEY property.
From: https://archive.sap.com/discussions/thread/3170195
The problem is that you cannot combine NE terms with OR. Because both parameters after the NE should not be shown in the result set.
So at the end the it_filter_select_options is empty and only the iv_filter_string is filled.
Is there a manual way of facing this problem (evaluation of the iv_filter_string) to handle multiple NE terms?
This would be an example request:
XYZ/SmartChartSet?$filter=(Category%20ne%20%27Smartphone%27%20and%20Category%20ne%20%27Notebook%27)%20and%20Purchaser%20eq%20%27CompanyABC%27%20and%20BuyDate%20eq%20datetime%272018-10-12T02%3a00%3a00%27&$inlinecount=allpages
Normally I want this to exclude items with the category 'Notebook' and 'Smartphone' from my result set that I retrieve from the backend.
If there is a bug inside /iwcor/cl_odata_expr_utils=>get_filter_select_options which makes it unable to treat multiple NE filters of the same component, and you cannot wait for an OSS. I would suggest to wrap it inside a new static method that will make the following logic (if you will be stuck with the ABAP implementation i would try to at least partially implement it when i get time):
Get all instances of <COMPONENT> ne '<VALUE>' inside a () (using REGEX).
Replace each <COMPONENT> with <COMPONENT>_<i> so there will be ( <COMPONENT>_1 ne '<VALUE_1>' and <COMPONENT>_2 ne '<VALUE_2>' and... <COMPONENT>_<n> ne '<VALUE_n>' ).
Call /iwcor/cl_odata_expr_utils=>get_filter_select_options with the modified query.
Modify the rt_select_options result by changing COMPONENT_<i> to <COMPONENT> again.
I can't find the source but I recall that multiple "ne" isn't supported. Isn't that the same thing that happens when you do multiple negatives in SE16, some warning is displayed?
I found this extract for Business ByDesign:
Excluding two values using the OR operator (for example: $filter=CACCDOCTYPE ne ‘1000’ or CACCDOCTYPE ne ‘4000’) is not possible.
The workaround I see is to select the Categories you actively want, not the ones you don't in the UI5 app.
I can also confirm that my code snippet I've used a long time for filtering also has the same problem...
* <SIGNATURE>---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
* | Instance Public Method ZCL_MGW_ABS_DATA->FILTERING
* +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
* | [--->] IO_TECH_REQUEST_CONTEXT TYPE REF TO /IWBEP/IF_MGW_REQ_ENTITYSET
* | [<-->] CR_ENTITYSET TYPE REF TO DATA
* | [!CX!] /IWBEP/CX_MGW_BUSI_EXCEPTION
* | [!CX!] /IWBEP/CX_MGW_TECH_EXCEPTION
* +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SIGNATURE>
METHOD FILTERING.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <lt_entityset> TYPE STANDARD TABLE.
ASSIGN cr_entityset->* TO <lt_entityset>.
CHECK: cr_entityset IS BOUND,
<lt_entityset> IS ASSIGNED.
DATA(lo_filter) = io_tech_request_context->get_filter( ).
/iwbep/cl_mgw_data_util=>filtering(
exporting it_select_options = lo_filter->get_filter_select_options( )
changing ct_data = <lt_entityset> ).
ENDMETHOD.
The situation is as follows: I have a table in my database that recieves about 3 million rows each day. We want to archive this table on a regular base, so that only the 8 most recents weeks are in the table. The rest of the data can be archived tot AZure Data lake.
I allready found out how to do this by one day at a time. But now I want to run this pipeline each week for the first seven days in the table. I assume I should do this with the "For Each" component. It should itterate along the seven distinct dates that are present in the dataset I want to backup. This dataset is copied from the source table to an archive table on forehand.
It's not difficult to get the distinct dates with a SQL query, but how to get the result of this query into an array that is used for the "For Each" component?
The issue is solved thanks to a co-worker.
What we have to do is assign a parameter to the dataset of the sink. Does not matter how you name this and you do not have to assign a value to it. But let's assume this parameter is called "date"
After that you can use this parameter in the filename of the sink (also in dataset) with by using "#dataset().Date".
After that you go back to the copyactivity and in the sink you assign a dataset property to #item().DateSelect. (DateSelect is the field name from the array that is passed to the For Each activity)
See also the answer from Bo Xioa as part of the answer
This way it works perfectly. It's just a shame that this is not well documented
You can use lookup activity to fetch the column content, and the output will be like
{
"count": "2",
"value": [
{
"Id": "1",
"TableName" : "Table1"
},
{
"Id": "2",
"TableName" : "Table2"
}
]
}
Then you can pass the value array to the Foreach activity items field by using the pattern of #activity('MyLookupActivity').output.value
ref doc: Use the Lookup activity result in a subsequent activity
I post this as an answer, because the error does not fit into a comment :D
have seen antoher option to accomplish this. That is by executing a pipeline from another pipeline. And in that way I can define the dates that I should iterate over as a parameter in the second pipeline (learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/…). But unformtunately this leads to the same rsult as when just using the foreach parameter. Because in the filename of my data lake file I have to use: #{item().columname}. I can see in the monitoring view that the right values are passed in the iteration steps, but I keep getting an error:
{
"errorCode": "2200",
"message": "Failure happened on 'Sink' side. ErrorCode=UserErrorFailedFileOperation,'Type=Microsoft.DataTransfer.Common.Shared.HybridDeliveryException,Message=The request to 'Unknown' failed and the status code is 'BadRequest', request id is ''. {\"error\":{\"code\":\"BadRequest\",\"message\":\"A potentially dangerous Request.Path value was detected from the client (:). Trace: cf3b4c3f-1681-4073-b225-17e1c07ec76d Time: 2018-08-02T05:16:13.2141897-07:00\"}} ,Source=Microsoft.DataTransfer.ClientLibrary,''Type=System.Net.WebException,Message=The remote server returned an error: (400) Bad Request.,Source=System,'",
"failureType": "UserError",
"target": "CopyDancerDatatoADL"
}
What is the right way to update employee bank details ( database 96:02 ) using the edpimport.sh.
The difficulty that I am facing is that I want to use the employee ID as the key attribute to reference the required change in ABAS , not the bank details ID( num96 ).
Sorry for the late answer. I usually build a loop in my FOP with a select statement to get the id's i need and then build the edpimport.sh script to run
#!ACTION=UPDATE
#!DATABASE=96
#!GROUP=2
id;field1
(1,2,3);somethinghere
The follow example from the help to use selection statements inside your script manual might work, but I haven't done anything like it.
#!ACTION=STORE
#!DATABASE=20
#!GROUP=1
#!LINESEPARATOR=#
#!FLDDELIMITER=|
#!CHARSET=ISO8859
recordid|such|name|yfeld1|yfeld2\
rowid|ytfeld1|ytfeld2
$,,name=BMW 323;yfeld2=München|BMW|BMW 323|BMW Werke|München\
$,,tfeld2=M-MW 323|ja|M-MW 323\
$,,tfeld2=M-MW 324|ja|M-MW 324
$,,name=Ford Fiesta;yfeld2=Köln|FORD|Ford Fiesta|Ford Werke|Köln\
$,,tfeld2=K-FF 99|ja|K-FF 99\
$,,tfeld2=K-FF 98|nein|K-FF 98\
$,,tfeld2=K-FF-97|ja|K-FF 97
$,,name=Opel Astra;yfeld2=Eisenach|OPEL|Opel Astra|Opel Werk|Eisenach\
$,,tfeld2=GG-OA 123|ja|GG-OA 123\
$,,tfeld2=GG-OA 123|ja|GG-OA 234\
$,,tfeld2=GG-OA 345|nein|GG-OA 345
$,,name=VW Golf;yfeld2=Wolfsburg|VW|VW Golf IV|Volkswagen Werk|Wolfsburg\
$,,tfeld2=WOB-G 999|ja|WOB-G 999
...
I don't see the Unit Price attribute available in the Item Class when it comes to QBD. Its available in QBO. I am trying to download and fill a database using the items entered via Quickbooks desktop version. Can someone help please?
How can I get the Unit Price for an item in Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.Item?
Extra Information Added after comment by Shivan Raptor (7-Nov-2013)
I am having a Quickbooks Pro Trial 2014 UK version installed in my computer. I have created a company file and items for the company. When I create an item I can enter a Price to that item. Quickbooks must be saving it somewhere. I need to access it using the Quickbooks API from my .Net application.
I am interested on the stock items here. I am using Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.Item class to access it. Am I using the right class? If you go to the API documentation the Item class has a field called Unit Price but its not listed when you actually check from the .Net application.
Shivan Raptor wanted the code (8-Nov-2013)
Given below is the code snippet. If you understand the question properly you would realize it cannot give a run time error because you cannot compile a code if you write it with object attributes that are not exposed. And the compiler error is kind of obvious too:
ATTRIBUTE_NAME not present in CLASS_NAME
In this case, ATTRIBUTE_NAME = UnitPrice and CLASS_NAME = Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.Item (this is already there in the first post itself)
The relevant code sample is given below. Its the code behind of an ASP.Net page.
Try
Dim varItemBL As New BL.ItemManagement
'Preparing Query
Dim qbdItemQuery As New Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.ItemQuery
qbdItemQuery.ItemElementName = Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.ItemChoiceType4.StartPage
qbdItemQuery.Item = "1"
qbdItemQuery.ChunkSize = "10"
'Quering Quickbooks Desktop
Dim qbdItems = qbdItemQuery.ExecuteQuery(Of Intuit.Ipp.Data.Qbd.Item)(context).ToList
'Synchronising Items from Quickbooks to MyDigiRep
For i As Integer = 0 To qbdItems.Count - 1
Dim varUnitPrice As Decimal
'Checking whether Unit Price is entered
If qbdItems(i).UnitPrice Is Nothing Then
varUnitPrice = 0
Else
varUnitPrice = qbdItems(i).UnitPrice.Amount
End If
'Synchronising Item with the MyDigiRep database
varItemBL.fnAddItemsAPI(qbdItems(i).Name, "NS", varUnitPrice, _
qbdItems(i).UOMAbbrv, HttpContext.Current.Session("companyID"), _
qbdItems(i).Id.Value)
Next
'Updating UI to display synchronisation results
lblItemSycnStatus.Text = qbdItems.Count & " Item Records Synchronised."
Catch ex As Exception
lblItemSycnStatus.Text = "Item Records Synchronisation Failed."
End Try
The version of the Intuit.Ipp.Data.dll is 2.1.12.0