How can i do this:
I have 5 incentive images. I need to display each image if my bool variable is true.
Here's What I did:
BOOL var1 = true;
BOOL var2 = true;
BOOL var3 = false;
BOOL var4 = true;
BOOL var5 = false;
if(var1)
{
cell.incentive1.hidden = false;
}
if(var2)
{
cell.incentive2.hidden = false;
}
if(var3)
{
cell.incentive3.hidden = false;
}
if(var4)
{
cell.incentive4.hidden = false;
}
if(var5)
{
cell.incentive5.hidden = false;
}
this is working..
I have a follow up question,
how will i be able to display the var4's uiimageview var2's uiimageview. I need the uiimageview to be dynamically created. That when the app detects the bool variables that are true there will be no gaps.
thanks..
When you use if..else if condition, if any one condition passes then the remaining will not be evaluated.
So for fixing the issue, you need to change all to if conditions.
But I'll suggest using like following is a better approach (There is no need of if else conditions):
cell.incentive1.hidden = !var1;
cell.incentive2.hidden = !var2;
cell.incentive3.hidden = !var3;
cell.incentive4.hidden = !var4;
cell.incentive5.hidden = !var5;
You should not use if...else as all images are independent. You should:
if(var1)
{
cell.incentive1.hidden = false;
}
if(var2)
{
cell.incentive2.hidden = false;
}
if(var3)
{
cell.incentive3.hidden = false;
}
if(var4)
{
cell.incentive4.hidden = false;
}
if(var5)
{
cell.incentive5.hidden = false;
}
You've got chained if..else if statements going on there. This means that once one of the conditions is satisfied, the entire evaluation is done and it jumps to the next bit of code. Remove the else everywhere, so that every condition is evaluated in isolation.
Try this.
cell.incentive1.hidden = (var1 == true)?true:false;
cell.incentive2.hidden = (var2 == true)?true:false;
cell.incentive3.hidden = (var3 == true)?true:false;
cell.incentive4.hidden = (var4 == true)?true:false;
cell.incentive5.hidden = (var5 == true)?true:false;
As given code if var 1 is true then it will goes to 1st block other wise it goes to next.
and best way to hide and display images you can set alpha 0 for hide and 1 for display.
Related
I am facing a problem on PrimeNG TurboTable.
I started from the following example: https://www.primefaces.org/primeng/#/table/selection and more particularly from the Checkbox Selection example.
The only difference is that on some p-tableCheckbox I added a [disabled]="true"
This works very well if I select a disabled line it does not activate and can not be selected, but when I click on p-tableHeaderCheckbox all the lines are selected even the lines in disabled.
In addition, the selection also counts the lines in status disabled or it should only take lines with no status disabled
I made an example on stackblitz : https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-gnbsml?file=src%2Fapp%2Fapp.component.html
How to prevent tableHeaderCheckbox from also selecting disable lines?
Thank you in advance for your answers
You can prevent selection in (selectionChange) callback on table. Split [(selection)] on two part:
[selection]="selectedRowData" (selectionChange)="onSelectionChange($event)"
Add onSelectionChange method to component:
onSelectionChange(selection: any[]) {
for (let i = selection.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
let data = selection[i];
if (this.isRowDisabled(data)) {
selection.splice(i, 1);
}
}
this.selectedRowData = selection;
}
Also add isRowDisabled method:
isRowDisabled(data: any): boolean {
return data.color === 'orange'
}
and change template for tableCheckbox to use isRowDisabled (it's only for check in one place)
<p-tableCheckbox [value]="rowData" [disabled]="isRowDisabled(rowData)"></p-tableCheckbox>
See example on https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hnzxs2 (I am also add logic to exclude disabled rows from process of calculating state of headerCheckBox)
It's failing when we have only disabled rows after filter. I have fixed it by checking active rows.
ngAfterViewInit(): void {
const orig_updateCheckedState = this._headerCheckBox.updateCheckedState;
const me = this;
this._headerCheckBox.updateCheckedState = function() {
const cars: any[] = me._table.filteredValue || me._table.value;
const selection: any[] = me._table.selection;
let actRows: boolean = false;
for (const car of cars) {
if (!me.isRowDisabled(car)) {
actRows = true;
const selected = selection && selection.indexOf(car) >= 0;
if (!selected) return false;
}
}
if (actRows) {
return true
} else {
return false;
}
};
}
I am using ARKit plugin for Unity leveraging the UnityARHitTestExample.cs.
After I place my object into the world scene I want to disable the ARKit from trying to place the object again every time I touch the screen. Can someone please help?
There are a number of ways you can achieve this, although perhaps the simplest is creating a boolean to determine whether or not your model has been placed.
First off all you would create a boolean as noted above e.g:
private bool modelPlaced = false;
Then you would set this to true within the HitTestResultType function once your model has been placed:
bool HitTestWithResultType (ARPoint point, ARHitTestResultType resultTypes)
{
List<ARHitTestResult> hitResults = UnityARSessionNativeInterface.GetARSessionNativeInterface ().HitTest (point, resultTypes);
if (hitResults.Count > 0) {
foreach (var hitResult in hitResults) {
//1. If Our Model Hasnt Been Placed Then Set Its Transform From The HitTest WorldTransform
if (!modelPlaced){
m_HitTransform.position = UnityARMatrixOps.GetPosition (hitResult.worldTransform);
m_HitTransform.rotation = UnityARMatrixOps.GetRotation (hitResult.worldTransform);
Debug.Log (string.Format ("x:{0:0.######} y:{1:0.######} z:{2:0.######}", m_HitTransform.position.x, m_HitTransform.position.y, m_HitTransform.position.z));
//2. Prevent Our Model From Being Positioned Again
modelPlaced = true;
}
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
And then in the Update() function:
void Update () {
//Only Run The HitTest If We Havent Placed Our Model
if (!modelPlaced){
if (Input.touchCount > 0 && m_HitTransform != null)
{
var touch = Input.GetTouch(0);
if (touch.phase == TouchPhase.Began || touch.phase == TouchPhase.Moved)
{
var screenPosition = Camera.main.ScreenToViewportPoint(touch.position);
ARPoint point = new ARPoint {
x = screenPosition.x,
y = screenPosition.y
};
ARHitTestResultType[] resultTypes = {
ARHitTestResultType.ARHitTestResultTypeExistingPlaneUsingExtent,
};
foreach (ARHitTestResultType resultType in resultTypes)
{
if (HitTestWithResultType (point, resultType))
{
return;
}
}
}
}
}
}
Hope it helps...
I have a huge problem with editing controls for my game.. I have an ingame button and when you click it. The "Choose your key.." text appears, but I don't know how to actually set it up..
I have made a "waiting for input" bool.. THIS IS NOT THE REAL CODE IT'S HOW I IMAGINE IT TO BE
if (buttonIsClicked) waitinForInput = true;
while(waitingForInput)
{
kbState = Keyboard.GetState();
somehow convert it to Keys.(STH);
if (Keys.STH != defaultKeys)
{
defaultKeys = Keys.STH;
waitingForInput = false;
}
}
Is there a way to do this.. Simpliest as I can? And sorry for my bad english.. Made this in a hurry and not my native language..
Thanks for any help.. :-)
Something like this:
KeyboardState currentKeyboardState = new KeyBoardState();
KeyboardState previousKeyboardState = new KeyBoardState();
Keys jumpKey = Keys.Space;
public void handleInput()
{
lastKeyboardState = currentKeyboardState;
currentKeyboardState = Keyboard.GetState(PlayerIndex.One);
bool waitingForKey = false;
if(currentKeyboardState.IsKeyDown(Keys.A) && waitingForKey == false)
{
waitingForKey = true;
}
if(waitingForKey == true)
{
//currentKeyboardState.GetPressedKeys() returns a list of pressed keys,
//So, currentKeyboardState.GetPressedKeys()[0] returns the first pressed key
if(currentKeyboardState.GetPressedKeys().Count() > 0)
{
jumpKey = currentKeyboardState.GetPressedKeys()[0];
waitingForKey = false;
}
}
}
I'm trying to use isVisible() within a loop to create a waitForElement type of a function for my iOS UIAutomation. When I try to use the following code, it fails while waiting for an element when a new screen pops up. The element is clearly there because if I do a delay(2) before tapping the element it works perfectly fine. How is everyone else accomplishing this, because I am at a loss...
Here's the waitForElement code that I am using:
function waitForElement(element, timeout, step) {
if (step == null) {
step = 0.5;
}
if (timeout == null) {
timeout = 10;
}
var stop = timeout/step;
for (var i = 0; i < stop; i++) {
if (element.isVisible()) {
return;
}
target.delay(step);
}
element.logElement();
throw("Not visible");
}
Here is a simple wait_for_element method that could be used:
this.wait_for_element = function(element, preDelay) {
if (!preDelay) {
target.delay(0);
}
else {
target.delay(preDelay);
}
var found = false;
var counter = 0;
while ((!found) && (counter < 60)) {
if (!element.isValid()) {
target.delay(0.5);
counter++;
}
else {
found = true;
target.delay(1);
}
}
}
I tend to stay away from my wait_for_element and look for any activityIndicator objects on screen. I use this method to actual wait for the page to load.
this.wait_for_page_load = function(preDelay) {
if (!preDelay) {
target.delay(0);
}
else {
target.delay(preDelay);
}
var done = false;
var counter = 0;
while ((!done) && (counter < 60)) {
var progressIndicator = UIATarget.localTarget().frontMostApp().windows()[0].activityIndicators()[0];
if (progressIndicator != "[object UIAElementNil]") {
target.delay(0.25);
counter++;
}
else {
done = true;
}
}
target.delay(0.25);
}
Here is a simple and better one using recursion. "return true" is not needed but incase u want it.
waitForElementToDismiss:function(elementToWait,waitTime){ //Using recursion to wait for an element. pass in 0 for waitTime
if(elementToWait && elementToWait.isValid() && elementToWait.isVisible() && (waitTime < 30)){
this.log("Waiting for element to invisible");
target.delay(1);
this.waitForElementToDismiss(elementToWait, waitTime++);
}
if(waitTime >=30){
fail("Possible login failed or too long to login. Took more than "+waitTime +" seconds")
}
return true;
}
Solution
I know this is an old question but here is my solution for a situation where I have to perform a repetitive task against a variable timed event. Since UIAutomation runs on javascript I use a recursive function with an empty while loop that checks the critical control state required before proceeding to the next screen. This way one never has to hard code a delay.
// Local target is the running simulator
var target = UIATarget.localTarget();
// Get the frontmost app running in the target
var app = target.frontMostApp();
// Grab the main window of the application
var window = app.mainWindow();
//Get the array of images on the screen
var allImages = window.images();
var helpButton = window.buttons()[0];
var nextButton = window.buttons()[2];
doSomething();
function doSomething ()
{
//only need to tap button for half the items in array
for (var i=0; i<(allImages.length/2); i++){
helpButton.tap();
}
//loop while my control is NOT enabled
while (!nextButton.isEnabled())
{
//wait
}
//proceed to next screen
nextButton.tap();
//go again
doSomething();
}
I have a Flash slideshow that plays SWFs listed in an XML file. I would like to have the upcoming SWF load while the current one displays. I've tried all sorts of combinations of LoadMovie and LoadMovieNum, including creating an empty movie clip, but there's something I'm just not getting.
Right now, after making the first round through all the files, it transitions smoothly from slide to slide, but I'd like for it to preload so that it transitions without the "Loading..." screen the first time around.
It can be viewed here: slideshow
Where should I put the LoadMovie line to load the next file (image[p+1]), and how should it look?
function loadXML(loaded) {
if (loaded) {
xmlNode = this.firstChild;
image = [];
description = [];
total = xmlNode.childNodes.length;
for (i=0; i<total; i++) {
image[i] = xmlNode.childNodes[i].childNodes[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
description[i] = xmlNode.childNodes[i].childNodes[1].firstChild.nodeValue;
}
firstImage();
} else {
content = "file not loaded!";
}
}
xmlData = new XML();
xmlData.ignoreWhite = true;
xmlData.onLoad = loadXML;
xmlData.load("xmlfile.xml");
/////////////////////////////////////
back_btn.onRelease = function ()
{
backImage();
};
next_btn.onRelease = function ()
{
nextImage();
};
p = 0;
function nextImage() {
if (p<(total-1)) {
p++;
trace(this);
_root.mc_loadfile.loadMovie (image[p]);
_root.movie_name.text = image[p];
next_btn._visible = true;
back_btn._visible = true;
if (getBytesLoaded() == getBytesTotal())
slideshow();
}
else if (p == (total-1)) {
p = 0;
firstImage();
}
}
function backImage() {
clearInterval(myInterval);
if (p>0) {
--p;
_root.mc_loadfile.loadMovie (image[p]);
_root.movie_name.text = image[p];
next_btn._visible = true;
if (p != 0) {
back_btn._visible = true;
}
else {
back_btn._visible = false;
}
slideshow();
}
}
I'd appreciate any help.
You can do it with the MovieClipLoader class. A brief tutorial can be found at actionscript.org, or you can check the docs on it.