docker deploy image on multiple servers - docker

I have developed an app image using docker.I am able to run the image but now i need to deploy it on multiple servers.I came across fig which can deploy app on multiple servers.But they are all in development stage and do not know how well they work.How can i deploy my docker image on multiple servers.Is there any tool that can be used along with docker to deploy on multiple servers.I need some suggestions.

The simplest way is to save the image as a tarfile:
docker save [my-image-name] > my-tarfile
and load it on each target:
ssh target1 docker load < my-tarfile
ssh target2 docker load < my-tarfile
...
(adjusting for sudo, ssh credentials, etc)
You could also enable remote access for Docker and use docker -H target instead of ssh.

Related

How can I docker commit azure container instance to azure container registry

We have ansible configured to deploy our various applications on IIS environment. I am trying to create a docker image of deployed applications so that I can just start up containers as we need for testing and otherwise.
I am planning to build on the Windows IIS image, start the container on azure, run our ansible to install everything on the server, then save the image on container.
I cannot find any documentation on how I can docker commit the container image into our private azure container registry.
Is it possible?
If you have an existing Docker registry in azure you should be able to use the az acr login --name myregistry command to authenticate to it https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/container-registry/container-registry-get-started-docker-cli. Make sure you have a registry created for the container image you want to push up.
Next, you can run the container in azure and do all the installation you want. SSH or RDP into the instance in Azure that is running this container. Now run docker ps and find the container id for the correct container. Next, use docker commit <container id> myregistry.azurecr.io/samples/nginx.
Then, just docker push myregistry.azurecr.io/samples/nginx
Also not sure what your use case is, but starting a container in order to modify and commit it in that way seems like an atypical use case for Docker since the build isn't reproducible via the Dockerfile. Looks like there are ways to replace Dockerfiles using Ansible playbooks with something like ansible-containers https://docs.ansible.com/ansible-container/ so you might want to take a look at that(I've never used this tool).

How to run container in a remote docker host with Jenkins

I have two servers:
Server A: Build server with Jenkins and Docker installed.
Server B: Production server with Docker installed.
I want to build a Docker image in Server A, and then run the corresponding container in Server B. The question is then:
What's the recommended way of running a container in Server B from Server A, once Jenkins is done with the docker build? Do I have to push the image to Docker hub to pull it in Server B, or can I somehow transfer the image directly?
I'm really not looking for specific Jenkins plugins or stuff, but rather, from a security and architecture standpoint, what's the best approach to accomplish this?
I've read a ton of posts and SO answers about this and have come to realize that there are plenty of ways to do it, but I'm still unsure what's the ultimate, most common way to do this. I've seen these alternatives:
Using docker-machine
Using Docker Restful Remote API
Using plain ssh root#server.b "docker run ..."
Using Docker Swarm (I'm super noob so I'm still unsure if this is even an option for my use case)
Edit:
I run Servers A and B in Digital Ocean.
Docker image can be saved to a regular tar archive:
docker image save -o <FILE> <IMAGE>
Docs here: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/image_save/
Then scp this tar archive to another host, and run docker load to load the image:
docker image load -i <FILE>
Docs here: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/image_load/
This save-scp-load method is rarely used. The common approach is to set up a private Docker registry behind your firewall. And push images to or pull from that private registry. This doc describes how to deploy a container registry. Or you can choose registry service provided by a third party, such as Gitlab's container registry.
When using Docker repositories, you only push/pull the layers which have been changed.
You can use Docker REST API. Jenkins HTTP Request plugin can be used to make HTTP requests. You can run Docker commands directly on a remote Docker host setting the DOCKER_HOST environment variable. To export an the environment variable to the current shell:
export DOCKER_HOST="tcp://your-remote-server.org:2375"
Please be aware of the security concerns when allowing TCP traffic. More info.
Another method is to use SSH Agent Plugin in Jenkins.

Is git pull, docker-compose build and docker-compose up -d a good way to deploy complete solution on an empty machine

Recently, we just finished web application solution using Docker.
https://github.com/yccheok/celery-hello-world/tree/nginx (The actual solution is hosted in private repository. This example just a quick glance on how our project structure looks like)
We plan to purchase 1 empty Linux machine on deploy on it. We might purchase more machines in the future but with current traffic right now, 1 machine will be sufficient.
My plan for deployment on the single empty machine is
git pull <from private code repository>
docker-compose build
docker-compose up -d
Since we are going to deploy to multiple machines in near future, I was wondering, is this a common practice to deploy docker application into a fresh empty machine?
Is there anything we can utilize from https://hub.docker.com/ , without requiring us to perform git pull during deployment stage?
You don't want to perform git pull in each machine - your intuition is correct.
Instead you want to use remote docker registry (as docker hub for example).
So the right flow, each time your source code (git repo) is changed:
git pull from all relevant repos.
docker-compose build to build all relevant images.
docker-compose push to push all images (diff) to remote registry.
docker-compose pull in your production machines, to get the latest updated images.
docker-compose up to start all containers.
First 3 steps should be done in your CI machine (for example, as a jenkins job). Steps 4-5 in your production machines.
EDIT: one thing to consider. I think build via docker-compose is bad. Consider building directly by docker build -f Dockerfile -t repo/image:tag . and in docker-compose just specify the image name.
My opinion is you should not BUILD images on production machines. Because the image might be different than you would expect and you should limit yourself what you do on production machines.. With that being said, i would recommend:
updating the code on your local computer (development)
when you push code to git, you should use some software to build
your images from your push. For example Gitlab-CI (Continuous
integration tool)
gitlab-ci will build the image, then it could run some tests on that
image, and then deploy it to production (this build image)
On you production machine just do docker-compose pull &&
docker-compose up -d and that is it.
I strongly recommend to build images on other machine than production machines, and use some CI tool to test your images before deploying. For example https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/ci/README.html
Deploying it on a fresh machine or the other way around would be fine.
The best way to go around is to make a private repo on https://hub.docker.com/ and push your images there.
Building and shipping the image
git pull
docker build
docker login
docker push repo/image
Pulling the shipped image and deploying
docker login on the server
docker pull repo/image
docker-compose up -d
Though i would recommend you to look at container scheduling using kubernetes and setting up your CI/CD stack with jenkins to automate this process, in case something bad happens it can be a life saver.

Docker - is it necessary to push images to remote server?

I have successfully built some Docker images:
Now I would like to start my microservices by docker-compose, unfortunatelly I am unable to pull those images i.e. repository callista/discovery-server not found: does not exist or no pull access I solved this error by logging into my DockerHub account and pushining those images to remote server. But it seems to me like a little overkill to send such larges images (which are likely to change pretty soon) over the Internet over and over again twice (push&pull).
Is it possible to configure Docker to install those images locally and not to pull from remote server?
I use Docker 1.8 and work on Windows 10.
Do you need to run this images in a server different from the one you build then?
If you need you have some alternatives:
As #engineer-dollery said, you can run a registry into your network, than you would not need to send it over the internet, only in your network. Docs: https://docs.docker.com/registry/deploying/
You could use the docker save and docker import to move then around too. Docs: https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/save/
But if the server you run the images is the same you build then...
...than you could just add the tag image to your docker-compose services, and do a docker-compose build, as #lauri said, but with the image docker-compose will create a image with that name after the build, and then you could do docker run using than. Or do a docker-compose up --build so it will always build than again if something changes into the Dockerfile
If you define build option in docker-compose.yml, you should be able to build images locally with Docker Compose and then it uses those images without pulling. By default Docker Compose builds images if they are not found locally. If you want to rebuild images just add --build option docker-compose up command docker-compose up --build
Docker Compose build reference:
https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/#build

Continuous Deployment Using Travis CI and Docker

What is the best way to automate the deployment of a Docker image in a CI environment?
After building a simple web project using Travis CI and using a Dockerfile to build the corresponding Docker image, is there a way to automatically cause that image to be deployed to a cloud provider?
Right now, the Dockerfile pulls down the base image to the Travis build machine and builds the image based on the instructions in the Dockerfile. At this point if the build is successful I can push it to the Docker Hub, though I have no need save this image to the Docker hub, what I envision is deploying the successfully built Docker image to a cloud provider (IE. DigitalOcean, Linode, or AWS) and starting/running the image.
While pushing directly to a host might seem ideal, I think it ignores the fact that hosts can fail, or may need to be replicated.
If you push directly to a prod host, and that host goes down, you don't have any way to start another one without re-running the entire CI pipeline.
If you push to an intermediary (the hub or a docker registry), you can create as many hosts as you want without having to re-run the build. You can also recover on a new host very easily (the initialize script can just pull the image and start).
If you wanted to, you could run your own registry on the cloud provider (instead of using the hub).
For a static website, you might want to look at Surge.
Otherwise, you might want to look at the AWS Elastic Beanstalk Command Line Interface (AWS EB CLI) in combination with using docker with AWS EB.
For using docker with AWS EB, read this AWS Blog post
For AWS EB CLI, here is an excerpt from the AWS EB dashboard sidebar
If you want to use a command line to create, manage, and scale your
Elastic Beanstalk applications, please use the Elastic Beanstalk
Command Line Interface (EB CLI). Get Started
$ mkdir HelloWorld
$ cd HelloWorld
$ eb init -p PHP
$ echo "Hello World" > index.html
$ eb create dev-env
$ eb open
To deploy updates to your applications, use ‘eb deploy’.
Further reading
Installing the AWS EB CLI
EB CLI Command Reference
I had this very same question.
There's a very cool docker image called Watchtower that checks the running version of a container with the same image tag on Docker hub. If there is an update on the hub, Watchtower pulls the newer image and restarts the running container (retaining all the env vars etc). Works really well for single containers that need updating.
NB: it really is as simple as running:
docker run -d \
--name watchtower \
-e REPO_USER="username" -e REPO_PASS="pass" -e REPO_EMAIL="email" \
-v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock \
drud/watchtower container_to_watch --debug
I'm looking for the same thing but for the containers running as part of a docker swarm...

Resources