Ruby on rails implementing "repost" action for Post's model - ruby-on-rails

I have a Userand Post model with the association one-to-many. I tried to implement a repost action, add a link has_and_belongs_to_many through a table reposts.
But I was faced with the following challenges:
1) Post to feed loaded as follows:
followed_users="SELECT followed_id FROM relationships WHERE follower_id = :user ";
replics_posts="SELECT micropost_id FROM replics_users WHERE user_id = (:user)"
reposts="SELECT post_id FROM reposts WHERE user_id = (:user)"
where("user_id IN(#{followed_users}) OR user_id= (:user) OR id IN(#{replics_posts}) OR id in (#{reposts})", user: user);
and sorted by date modified. Repost similarly sorted, from which there is a situation that is repost in the middle feed.
2) No additional effort, followers do not see reposts user.
These problems can be solved through the auxiliary array with the need to fast, but it looks ridiculous and non-optimal solution.
How can I get out of the situation?
P.S. I think the solution can be found by reference in the field "Content" in the Post model on the same field, another object. Then repost action will not need a separate table and will consist only of a new Post object with a pointer to the contents of the original post. But I do not know how to do this in Ruby on Rails.
Thank you for your help!

I corrected as follows:
1) In the Post model added a new field repost_id and reference to yourself:
has_many: reposts, class_name: "Post", foreign_key: "repost_id", dependent:: destroy;
(relation to the model User not changed)
2) Added to Post's controller method repost
def repost
orig_post=Micropost.find(params[:id]);
if(orig_post)
Micropost.create(user_id:current_user.id,
content: orig_post.content,
repost_id:orig_post.id);
respond_to do |format|
format.js
end
end
end
(Do not forget to realize meets both the route and validations creation of the post)
The result is a correct model of behavior actions repost with dependencies and correct display in the feed. But sadly, this approach involves storing duplicate data in the table Posts in the "Content" field.

Related

Updating 'through' model's attributes when creating new association

I have three models Post, Product, Mention
Product has many Posts through Mentions
When I create new association like:
product.posts << post
I'd like corresponding Mention record to have created_at value the same as post's created_at.
How can I do this?
I would do it with a callback on the Mention model
after_create :set_created_at
def set_created_at
self.created_at = self.post.created_at
self.update
end

customize save in nested attributes

I have two classes:
class Post
has_and_belongs_to_many :receivers
accepts_nested_attributes_for :receivers
end
class Receiver
has_and_belongs_to_many :posts
table schema is like:
posts: id, xxx
receivers: id, email, name, xxxx
posts_receivers: post_id, receiver_id
I pretty much follows the guide here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html#the-has-and-belongs-to-many-association
So in my post form, each one could contain several receivers, which are just several email text fields. New receiver records get created automatically from those emails. It would happen that different post form has some existing emails, then I dont want to create new records in receivers table for existing emails. Rather, I would like to find the receiver id with existing email and save the id with post id into posts_receivers table.
Now it just creates new receiver record every time for new posts, no matter the email is an existing one or a new one.
Any suggestion on how to implement this? Thanks a lot!
Nested attributes don't handle this case for you - they're more intended for when the nested objects belong to the parent object.
You can do this manually by loading up each of your existing receivers in your controller, creating the rest, then assigning them to the post:
def create
post = Post.new(params[:post])
post.receivers = params[:receivers].map do |receiver_params|
Receiver.first_or_create(receiver_params)
end
post.save!
end

How to access variables in model

I am trying to get access to a property contained inside my user object.
My user model has_many: posts. In the controller how would i gain access to these posts? Would i create a method in the model?
def posts
#posts = Post.find(User_id: params[:id])
end
or can i directly access the posts for the user. User.posts Since i am currently residing in the controller, is the controller aware of the currently selected model? Or do i have to pull the information again?
You can query the database for all the posts with a specific user_id, like this:
#posts = Post.where(user_id: params[:id])
Alternatively, you can find the user first and then fetch all posts associated with that user, like this:
user = User.find(params[:id])
#posts = user.posts
Assuming your id in params is the id of your user, you can use user = User.find(params[:id]) to get the user and #posts = user.posts to get all the posts of this user.
So, it is not about where you are, It is about what you are calling.
I'm sure you are familiar with relationships...
When you have relationships, it means that you can get to one relation from the other through whatever association exists between them.
If I am my father's son, then you can get me directly by checking my father's children. ( you don't necessarily have to get all children in the village first )
So, bringing all my story above together, with the association between your Post and User, you can always call user.posts (user being an instance of User) and post.user ( with post being an instance of Post)
The Ruby on Rails guides have a section on associations, which is what you want. It's here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html
In a nutshell, because you have added an association in your user model to a number of post records, Rails will build a helper method in your user model called posts. You can use that to access all the posts associated with that user.
When you create a post, the post record needs to have a column called user_id. This will provide the 'physical' link between the user and post models. You can access the posts from a user like so:
user.posts each do |post|
# do something with post.content
end
To get posts that match some criteria in the posts collection you can query like this:
posts = user.posts.where(:something => 'matches criteria')
If you know there's only one post that matches the criteria, you can do this:
post = user.posts.where(:something => 'matches criteria').first
The post model also needs a belongs_to :user association. (The belongs_to will generate a helper method called user in the post model which you can then use to access the user record from the post.) For example:
user_email = post.user.email
The user record does not require a post_id column since Rails knows that user.post refers to the post table and automagically generates a query using user_id.
Anyway, the guide I linked to above will give you all the information you need and more too.

Display first record in rails

Assuming I have a comments model and a posts model,
What code can I use in a view to display the first comment of the post being linked?
assuming:
post = Post.find(params[:id])
and post model contains:
has_many :comments
then you can:
comments = post.comments
first_comment = comments.first
Post.find(123).comments.first
Where 123 is your post ID.
#post.comments.first will normally work. (#post should be set up in your controller method)
However it is good to realise that 'first' means first in the association, which is normally ordered by id. Since ids autoincrement, this happens to be the same as 'first added' or 'earliest comment'. But it doesn't have to be.
If your association for comments specified a different ordering, then first will use this, e.g. if your association looked like this:
has_many :comments, :order=>'rating desc'
Then (assuming the 'rating' field is set up somehow to be some value that represents the average rating) post.comments.first would give you the highest rated comment, not the first to be added.
In that case, assuming your comments model has timestamps, then you'd need to do something like
#post.comments.find(:first, :order=>'created_at asc')

Why doesn't this associated create call work?

I've got a User model that has many Items. A Rating belongs to a User and an Item.
In the DB, I have set ratings.user_id to be not NULL.
when I am creating an Item, I would like to do this:
def create
current_user.items.create(params[:item]).ratings.create(params[:rating]
redirect_to items_path
end
However, this balks with an SQL error "user_id cannot be nil"
so I rewrote the create method as
def create
current_user.items.create(params[:item]).ratings.create(params[:rating].merge({:user_id => current_user}))
redirect_to items_path
end
which works fine.
However, I had thought that chaining the create methods off the current user's receiver would have populated the rating's user_id. Anyone know why not?
TIA.
I'd recommend you normalize this if possible in the database. Maybe take out the user_id attribute from the ratings table and if you need it in your model get it through a join using a :through method
class Rating
has_many :items
has_one :user, :through=>:items
If you created and saved the Item, then made a Rating from that item, it wouldn't pass the user along to the Rating, right? You'd just refer to it as #rating.item.user, right?
When you think about it like that, you wouldn't expect the Item created via the current_user to pass the user information along to the rating.
Make me wonder if you really need the user has_many ratings relationship.
Because Item has many Ratings and that association does not know about the user id. Given that association chain Item would have a user id because it belongs to a user. And Rating would have an item id because it belongs to an item. But the Item to Rating assocation doesn't know anything about a user unless you tell it.

Resources