Given
Dim postviewmodel As IEnumerable(Of be_PostsViewModel)
postviewmodel = _postRepository.SelectAll.Select(Function(S) New
be_PostsViewModel With {.PostIsPublished = S.PostIsPublished, .Id =
S.PostId, .PostSummary = S.PostSummary, .PostDateCreated =
S.PostDateCreated,
.PostCategory = S.PostCategory, .PostTitle =
S.PostTitle}).Where(Function(p)
p.PostIsPublished = True).Where(Function(a) Not
a.PostCategory.FirstOrDefault.CategoryName = "Lead Story")
.Skip((Page - 1) * PageSize).Take(PageSize)
How would I use Automapper so I don't do all thmapping of properties by hand? I am completely new to it and have been doing a lot of reading but don't quite understand how to actually do it. I know I have to create the map and then call Mapper.map. But what goes where in Mapper.map?
I would do this:
Mapper.CreateMap<Post, be_postsViewModel>();
Do that in your application startup (App_Start etc). Then in your code above:
postViewModel = _postRepository.SelectAll.Project.To(Of be_PostsViewModel)
However, I'd put the "Project.To" AFTER all of your Where/Skip/Take pieces. The projection is the last thing you want to do. Project.To creates that exact Select expression, passes it to the query provider to modify the SQL at its base.
Unless SelectAll doesn't return IQueryable, then you have other, larger problems.
Related
I saw this code work with LINQ to SQL but when I use Entity Framework, it throws this error:
LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'System.Linq.IQueryable'1[MyProject.Models.CommunityFeatures] GetCommunityFeatures()' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.`
The repository code is this:
public IQueryable<Models.Estate> GetEstates()
{
return from e in entity.Estates
let AllCommFeat = GetCommunityFeatures()
let AllHomeFeat = GetHomeFeatures()
select new Models.Estate
{
EstateId = e.EstateId,
AllHomeFeatures = new LazyList<HomeFeatures>(AllHomeFeat),
AllCommunityFeatures = new LazyList<CommunityFeatures>(AllCommFeat)
};
}
public IQueryable<Models.CommunityFeatures> GetCommunityFeatures()
{
return from f in entity.CommunityFeatures
select new CommunityFeatures
{
Name = f.CommunityFeature1,
CommunityFeatureId = f.CommunityFeatureId
};
}
public IQueryable<Models.HomeFeatures> GetHomeFeatures()
{
return from f in entity.HomeFeatures
select new HomeFeatures()
{
Name = f.HomeFeature1,
HomeFeatureId = f.HomeFeatureId
};
}
LazyList is a List that extends the power of IQueryable.
Could someone explain why this error occurs?
Reason:
By design, LINQ to Entities requires the whole LINQ query expression to be translated to a server query. Only a few uncorrelated subexpressions (expressions in the query that do not depend on the results from the server) are evaluated on the client before the query is translated. Arbitrary method invocations that do not have a known translation, like GetHomeFeatures() in this case, are not supported.
To be more specific, LINQ to Entities only support Parameterless constructors and Initializers.
Solution:
Therefore, to get over this exception you need to merge your sub query into the main one for GetCommunityFeatures() and GetHomeFeatures() instead of directly invoking methods from within the LINQ query. Also, there is an issue on the lines that you were trying to instantiate a new instance of LazyList using its parameterized constructors, just as you might have been doing in LINQ to SQL. For that the solution would be to switch to client evaluation of LINQ queries (LINQ to Objects). This will require you to invoke the AsEnumerable method for your LINQ to Entities queries prior to calling the LazyList constructor.
Something like this should work:
public IQueryable<Models.Estate> GetEstates()
{
return from e in entity.Estates.AsEnumerable()
let AllCommFeat = from f in entity.CommunityFeatures
select new CommunityFeatures {
Name = f.CommunityFeature1,
CommunityFeatureId = f.CommunityFeatureId
},
let AllHomeFeat = from f in entity.HomeFeatures
select new HomeFeatures() {
Name = f.HomeFeature1,
HomeFeatureId = f.HomeFeatureId
},
select new Models.Estate {
EstateId = e.EstateId,
AllHomeFeatures = new LazyList<HomeFeatures>(AllHomeFeat),
AllCommunityFeatures = new LazyList<CommunityFeatures>(AllCommFeat)
};
}
More Info: Please take a look at LINQ to Entities, what is not supported? for more info.
Also check out LINQ to Entities, Workarounds on what is not supported for a detailed discussion on the possible solutions.
(Both links are the cached versions because the original website is down)
Some background
I'm wanting to bind a list of objects (my model-view) to a grid. The model-view contains fields for both an specific entity and fields from a joined entity.
I was getting an error when I would try to bind due to the dbContext being out of scope. I realized I needed to use the .Include() method in order to eager load my navigation property. However, I suspect that since I'm using Linq to Entities, that I'm now generating another error:
"Unable to cast the type 'System.Linq.IQueryable1' to type 'System.Data.Objects.ObjectQuery1'. LINQ to Entities only supports casting EDM primitive or enumeration types."
My code is shown below, any ideas of what I need to do here?
Thanks in advance!
public static List<PlanViewModel> GetPlans()
{
using (var context = new RepEntities())
{
var query = (from p in context.Plans
join r in context.RealEstateDetails on p.ReId equals r.ReId
select new PlanViewModel
{
PlanName = p.PlanName,
TargetCompletionDate = p.TargetCompletionDate,
ActualCompletionDate = p.ActualCompletionDate,
Provision = p.Provision,
StatusTypeId = p.StatusTypeId,
StatusCommon = p.StatusCommon,
Building = r.BuildingName,
City = r.City,
Country = r.Country
}).Include("StatusCommon");
return query.ToList();
}
}
You are almost there, just put Include("StatusCommon") right after context.Plans. Because you need to include StatusCommon before the iteration, this way you can set StatusCommon value for every iteration.
public static List<PlanViewModel> GetPlans()
{
using (var context = new RepEntities())
{
var query = (from p in context.Plans.Include("StatusCommon")
join r in context.RealEstateDetails on p.ReId equals r.ReId
select new PlanViewModel
{
PlanName = p.PlanName,
TargetCompletionDate = p.TargetCompletionDate,
ActualCompletionDate = p.ActualCompletionDate,
Provision = p.Provision,
StatusTypeId = p.StatusTypeId,
StatusCommon = p.StatusCommon,
Building = r.BuildingName,
City = r.City,
Country = r.Country
}).toList();
return query;
}
}
Hi this is the SP I have :
USE [Tracker_Entities]
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[uspHub]
#id int
AS
BEGIN
SELECT DISTINCT table1.UID, table1.url, Scope.ID
FROM table1 INNER JOIN
Scope ON table1.UID = Scope.newBrand
WHERE (table1.value = 0) AND (Scope.ID = #id)
ORDER BY table1.url
END
GO
When i run this SP in sql server by passing ID as parameter i am getting expected result. Now I need to check this SP in mvc. This is the way I am calling this SP in my MVC :
using (var ctx = new database_Entities())
{
int ID = 122;
ctx.uspHub(ID);
ctx.SaveChanges();
}
But when I put breakpoint in using statement and check for results, it is not displaying any results. I am struggling here for long time and i am not getting proper solution for this. So what are the steps in MVC to check results for SP which has select statements??
Update :
I got solution for this after using tolist. Now i am getting three results in list and i need to grab one result that is URL and pass it as input parameter.
My code :
int ID = 413;
var x = ctx.uspdHub(ID).ToList();
Here x has 3 results. I need to take one result from it.I tried doing x. but it doesn't show results after i type dot. How can i achieve this??
You have to Get the result into proper model/object.
List<YourEntity> model;
using (var ctx = new database_Entities())
{
int ID = 122;
model = ctx.uspHub(ID).toList();
//ctx.SaveChanges(); - no need to call SaveChanges
// - as you are not updating anything
}
Go through this article if you need more info. Call Stored Procedure From Entity Framework (The code above will work anyways...)
use...
using (var ctx = new database_Entities())
{
int ID = 122;
var result = ctx.uspHub(ID);
}
and add a break after the result to see whats in the result variable. Obviously, the sope of result will need to be moved, but I'm only showing here how you can see the data returned.
Try to use something like this:
using (var dataContext= new database_Entities())
{
int ID = 122;
SomeEntity[] result = dataContext.Database.SqlQuery<SomeEntity>("[dbo].[uspHub] #id",new SqlParameter("#id", ID)).ToArray();
}
It is good for me. I have used ORM EntityFramework to connect with DB.
This query produces an error No value given for one or more required parameters:
using (var conn = new OleDbConnection("Provider=..."))
{
conn.Open();
var result = conn.Query(
"select code, name from mytable where id = ? order by name",
new { id = 1 });
}
If I change the query string to: ... where id = #id ..., I will get an error: Must declare the scalar variable "#id".
How do I construct the query string and how do I pass the parameter?
The following should work:
var result = conn.Query(
"select code, name from mytable where id = ?id? order by name",
new { id = 1 });
Important: see newer answer
In the current build, the answer to that would be "no", for two reasons:
the code attempts to filter unused parameters - and is currently removing all of them because it can't find anything like #id, :id or ?id in the sql
the code for adding values from types uses an arbitrary (well, ok: alphabetical) order for the parameters (because reflection does not make any guarantees about the order of members), making positional anonymous arguments unstable
The good news is that both of these are fixable
we can make the filtering behaviour conditional
we can detect the category of types that has a constructor that matches all the property names, and use the constructor argument positions to determine the synthetic order of the properties - anonymous types fall into this category
Making those changes to my local clone, the following now passes:
// see https://stackoverflow.com/q/18847510/23354
public void TestOleDbParameters()
{
using (var conn = new System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection(
Program.OleDbConnectionString))
{
var row = conn.Query("select Id = ?, Age = ?", new DynamicParameters(
new { foo = 12, bar = 23 } // these names DO NOT MATTER!!!
) { RemoveUnused = false } ).Single();
int age = row.Age;
int id = row.Id;
age.IsEqualTo(23);
id.IsEqualTo(12);
}
}
Note that I'm currently using DynamicParameters here to avoid adding even more overloads to Query / Query<T> - because this would need to be added to a considerable number of methods. Adding it to DynamicParameters solves it in one place.
I'm open to feedback before I push this - does that look usable to you?
Edit: with the addition of a funky smellsLikeOleDb (no, not a joke), we can now do this even more directly:
// see https://stackoverflow.com/q/18847510/23354
public void TestOleDbParameters()
{
using (var conn = new System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection(
Program.OleDbConnectionString))
{
var row = conn.Query("select Id = ?, Age = ?",
new { foo = 12, bar = 23 } // these names DO NOT MATTER!!!
).Single();
int age = row.Age;
int id = row.Id;
age.IsEqualTo(23);
id.IsEqualTo(12);
}
}
I've trialing use of Dapper within my software product which is using odbc connections (at the moment). However one day I intend to move away from odbc and use a different pattern for supporting different RDBMS products. However, my problem with solution implementation is 2 fold:
I want to write SQL code with parameters that conform to different back-ends, and so I want to be writing named parameters in my SQL now so that I don't have go back and re-do it later.
I don't want to rely on getting the order of my properties in line with my ?. This is bad. So my suggestion is to please add support for Named Parameters for odbc.
In the mean time I have hacked together a solution that allows me to do this with Dapper. Essentially I have a routine that replaces the named parameters with ? and also rebuilds the parameter object making sure the parameters are in the correct order.
However looking at the Dapper code, I can see that I've repeated some of what dapper is doing anyway, effectively it each parameter value is now visited once more than what would be necessary. This becomes more of an issue for bulk updates/inserts.
But at least it seems to work for me o.k...
I borrowed a bit of code from here to form part of my solution...
The ? for parameters was part of the solution for me, but it only works with integers, like ID. It still fails for strings because the parameter length isn't specifed.
OdbcException: ERROR [HY104] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]Invalid precision value
System.Data.Odbc. OdbcParameter.Bind(OdbcStatementHandle hstmt,
OdbcCommand command, short ordinal, CNativeBuffer parameterBuffer, bool allowReentrance)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcParameterCollection.Bind(OdbcCommand command, CMDWrapper cmdWrapper, CNativeBuffer parameterBuffer)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteReaderObject(CommandBehavior behavior, string method, bool needReader, object[] methodArguments, SQL_API odbcApiMethod)
System.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteReaderObject(CommandBehavior behavior, string method, bool needReader)
System.Data.Common.DbCommand.ExecuteDbDataReaderAsync(CommandBehavior behavior, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
Dapper.SqlMapper.QueryAsync(IDbConnection cnn, Type effectiveType, CommandDefinition command) in SqlMapper.Async.cs
WebAPI.DataAccess.CustomerRepository.GetByState(string state) in Repository.cs
var result = await conn.QueryAsync(sQuery, new { State = state });
WebAPI.Controllers.CustomerController.GetByState(string state) in CustomerController .cs
return await _customerRepo.GetByState(state);
For Dapper to pass string parameters to ODBC I had to specify the length.
var result = await conn.QueryAsync<Customer>(sQuery, new { State = new DbString { Value = state, IsFixedLength = true, Length = 4} });
I'm rewriting a C# library in F# in which most of the classes map one-to-one with database tables (similar to ActiveRecord). I'm considering whether to use records or classes (maybe even DUs?). There's a fair amount of validation in the property setters to maintain invariants. What would be the best way to model this in F#? I don't want an object that violates business logic to be persisted to the database. Any ideas are welcome.
A few additional thoughts...
Is it better to move the invariants to an external 'controller' class? Coming from C# it feels wrong to allow an object that corresponds to a database record to contain anything that can't be saved to the database. I suppose because failing earlier seems better than failing later.
You can have your data in a record, and still keep the validation logic with the data type, by attaching methods to the record:
type Person =
{ First : string;
Last : string; } with
member x.IsValid () =
let hasValue = System.String.IsNullOrEmpty >> not
hasValue x.First && hasValue x.Last
let jeff = { First = "Jeff"; Last = "Goldblum" }
let jerry = { jeff with First = "Jerry" }
let broken = { jerry with Last = "" }
let valid = [jeff; jerry; broken]
|> List.filter (fun x -> x.IsValid())
The copy semantics for records are almost as convenient as setting a property. The validation doesn't happen on property set, but it's easy to filter a list of records down to only the valid ones.
This should actually be a good way for you to handle it. Having your validation logic in the constructor will give you piece of mind later on in your code because the object is immutable. This also opens up multi-threading possibilities.
Immutable Version
type Customer (id, name) =
do // Constructor
if id <= 0 then
raise(new ArgumentException("Invalid ID.", "id"))
elif String.IsNullOrEmpty(name) then
raise(new ArgumentException("Invalid Name.", "name"))
member this.ID
with get() = id
member this.Name
with get() = name
member this.ModifyName value =
new Customer(id, value)
Mutable Version
type Customer (id) =
let mutable name = ""
do // Constructor
if id <= 0 then
raise(new ArgumentException("Invalid ID.", "id"))
member this.ID
with get() = id
member this.Name
with get() = name
and set value =
if String.IsNullOrEmpty(name) then
raise(new ArgumentException("Invalid Name.", "value"))
name <- value
Have you taken a look at my FunctionalNHibernate project? It's designed as a layer on top of nhibernate to let you declaratively map records to a database. It's early days, but it's just about usable:
http://bitbucket.org/robertpi/functionalnhibernate/