Inheritance of an image is normally done using docker's from command, for example.
from centos7:centos7
In my case, I have a Dockerfile which I want to use as a base image builder, and I have two sub dockerfiles which customize that file.
I do not want to commit the original dockerfile as a container to dockerhub, so for example, I would like to do:
Dockerfile
slave/Dockerfile
master/Dockerfile
Where slave/Dockerfile looks something like this:
from ../Dockerfile
Is this (or anything similar) possible ? Or do I have to actually convert the top level Dockerfile to a container, and commit it as a dockerhub image, before I can leverage it using the docker FROM directive.
You don't have to push your images to dockerhub to be able to use them as base images. But you need to build them locally so that they are stored in your local docker repository. You can not use an image as a base image based on a relative path such as ../Dockerfile- you must base your own images on other image files that exists in your local repository.
Let's say that your base image uses the following (in the Dockerfile):
FROM centos7:centos7
// More stuff...
And when you build it you use the following:
docker build -t my/base .
What happens here is that the image centos7:centos7 is downloaded from dockerhub. Then your image my/base is built and stored (without versioning) in your local repository. You can also provide versioning to your docker container by simply providing version information like this:
docker build -t my/base:2.0 .
When an image has been built as in the example above it can then be used as a FROM-image to build other sub-images, at least on the same machine (the same local repository). So, in your sub-image you can use the following:
FROM my/base
Basically you don't have to push anything anywhere. All images lives locally on your machine. However, if you attempt to build your sub-image without a previously built base image you get an error.
For more information about building and tagging, check out the docs:
docker build
docker tag
create your own image
Related
I just started working with docker this week and came across a 'dockerfile'. I was reading up on what this file does, and the official documentation basically mentions that the FROM keyword is needed to build a "base image". These base images are pulled from Docker hub, or downloaded from there.
Silly question - Are base images always pulled from docker hub?
If so and if I understand correctly I am assuming that running the dockerfile to create an image is not done very often (only when needing to create an image) and once the image is created then the image is whats run all the time?
So the dockerfile then can be migrated to which ever enviroment and things can be set up all over again quickly?
Pardon the silly question I am just trying to understand the over all flow and how dockerfile fits into things.
If the local (on your host) Docker daemon (already) has a copy of the container image (i.e. it's been docker pull'd) specified by FROM in a Dockerfile then it's cached and won't be repulled.
Container images include a tag (be wary of ever using latest) and the image name e.g. foo combined with the tag (which defaults to latest if not specified) is the full name of the image that's checked i.e. if you have foo:v0.0.1 locally and FROM:v0.0.1 then the local copy is used but FROM foo:v0.0.2 will pull foo:v0.0.2.
There's an implicit docker.io prefix i.e. docker.io/foo:v0.0.1 that references the Docker registry that's being used.
You could repeatedly docker build container images on the machines where the container is run but this is inefficient and the more common mechanism is that, once a container image is built, it is pushed to a registry (e.g. DockerHub) and then pulled from there by whatever machines need it.
There are many container registries: DockerHub, Google Artifact Registry, Quay etc.
There are tools other than docker that can be used to interact with containers e.g. (Red Hat's) Podman.
I have a Git repo with a simple Dockerfile. First row goes like this:
FROM python:3.7
My company has an internal registry with the base images. Because of this, the DevOps guys want me to change the Dockerfile to:
FROM registry.company.com:5000/python:3.7
I don't want this infrastructure detail baked in my code. URLs may change, I may want to build this image in another environment, etc. If possible, I would rather indicate the server in the pipeline, but the documentation regarding docker build has no parameter for this.
Is there a way to avoid editing the Dockerfile in this situation?
You would use a build arg for this:
ARG registry=docker.io/library
FROM ${registry}/python:3.7
Then for the build process:
docker build --build-arg registry=registry.company.com:5000 ...
Use docker.io for the registry name for the default Docker Hub, and library is the repository for official docker images, both of which you normally don't see when using the short format. Note that I usually include the library part in the local mirror so that official docker images and other repos that are mirrored can all use the same registry variable:
ARG registry=docker.io
FROM ${registry}/library/python:3.7
That means your local registry would need to have registry.company.com:5000/library/python:3.7.
To force users to specify the registry as part of the build, then don't provide a default value to the arg (or you could default the value of registry to something internal if that's preferred):
ARG registry
FROM ${registry}/python:3.7
You can work around the situation by manually pulling and re-tagging the image. docker build (and docker run) won't try to pull an image that already appears to be present locally, but that also means there's no verification that it actually matches what Docker Hub has. That means you can pull the image from your mirror, then docker tag it to look like a Docker Hub image:
docker pull registry.company.com:5000/python:3.7
docker tag registry.company.com:5000/python:3.7 python:3.7
I have to take a Docker image from a vendor site and then push the image into the private repository (Artifactory). This way the CI/CD pipeline can retrieve the image from the private repository and deploy the image.
What is the best way to achieve it, do I need to recreate the image?
steps:
take a pull of the base docker image from vendor.
create new folder for your new docker image.
create a Dockerfile.
write your base docker image.
do the changes inside this folder.
build new docker image using cmd.
push the image into docker hub.
refer this (not exactly according to your need, but this helps): https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/how-to-create-docker-images-with-dockerfile/
for cmd and Dockerfile changes, refer docker office doc site
I believe its a tar or zip file that they have given you by docker save and docker export.
You can perform below operations.
1. Perform docker load < file.tar - You will get the image name that's loaded. Note down the name.
1. Download the tar or zip file to your local.
2. Perform cat file.tar | docker import image_name_that_you_noted_above
3. You are good to use the image now. tag it to your repo and push, or directly run using docker run
When we run a docker container if the relevant image is not in the local repo it is being downloaded but in a specific sequence i.e parent images etc.
If I don’t know anything about the image how could I find from which images is being based on based on the layers pulled as displayed in a docker run?
The output only shows the SHA1s on any docker run etc
AFAIK, you can't, there is no reverse function for a hash.
Docker just tries to get the image from local, when its not available tries to fetch it from the registry. The default registry is DockerHub.
When you don't specify any tag when running the container ie: docker run ubuntu instead of docker run ubuntu:16.04 the default latest is used. You'll have to visit the registry and search which version the latest tag is pointing to.
Usually in DockerHub there is a link pointing the GitHub repo where you can find the Dockerfile, in the Dockerfile you can find how its built, including the root image.
You also can get some extra info with docker image inspect image:tag, but you'll find more hashes in the layers.
Take a look to dockerfile-from-image
"Similar to how the docker history command works, the dockerfile-from-image script is able to re-create the Dockerfile (approximately) that was used to generate an image using the metadata that Docker stores alongside each image layer."
With this, maybe you can get the source of the image.
If I want to build a docker image,
I need to base on a docker base image.
All the example I found are based on top of official images.
Can I base my image on other docker user images ?
The FROM line in your Dockerfile can point to any image. It may be an upstream image from the Docker hub, one on any other registry server including one you self host, or it may be another image you've built locally on your own docker build host. Lastly, it may be FROM scratch which starts without any base image, and is used by other base images at some point in their history.