How to strip off the line information from a Location? - rascal

Assume I have a location:
loc originalLocation = |project://proj/src/Test.java|(15,536,<3,0>,<41,1>),5,11,39)
How do I strip off the line info, so I get:
|project://proj/src/Test.java|
I tried:
loc l= ||+originalLocation.uri;
and:
loc l = |originalLocation.uri|
but in the last case it is off course handled as text.

You can get it using the top field in locations.
rascal> originalLocation.top
loc: |project://proj/src/Test.java|

Related

Using a single pattern to capture multiple values containing in a file in lua script

i have a text file that contains data in the format YEAR, CITY, COUNTRY. data is written as one YEAR, CITY, COUNTRY per line. eg -:
1896, Athens, Greece
1900, Paris, France
Previously i was using the data hard coded like this
local data = {}
data[1] = { year = 1896, city = "Athens", country = "Greece" }
data[2] = { year = 1900, city = "Paris", country = "France" }
data[3] = { year = 1904, city = "St Louis", country = "USA" }
data[4] = { year = 1908, city = "London", country = "UK" }
data[5] = { year = 1912, city = "Stockholm", country = "Sweden" }
data[6] = { year = 1920, city = "Antwerp", country = "Netherlands" }
Now i need to read the lines from the file and get the values in to the private knowledge base "local data = {} "
Cant figure out how to capture multiple values using a single pattern from the data in the file.
My code so far is
local path = system.pathForFile( "olympicData.txt", system.ResourceDirectory )
-- Open the file handle
local file, errorString = io.open( path, "r" )
if not file then
-- Error occurred; output the cause
print( "File error: " .. errorString )
else
-- Read each line of the file
for line in file:lines() do
local i, value = line:match("%d")
table.insert(data, i)
-- Close the file
io.close(file)
end
file = nil
Given that you read a line like
1896, Athens, Greece
You can simply obtain the desired values using captures.
https://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/manual.html#6.4.1
Captures: A pattern can contain sub-patterns enclosed in parentheses; they describe captures. When a match succeeds, the
substrings of the subject string that match captures are stored
(captured) for future use. Captures are numbered according to their
left parentheses. For instance, in the pattern "(a*(.)%w(%s*))", the
part of the string matching "a*(.)%w(%s*)" is stored as the first
capture (and therefore has number 1); the character matching "." is
captured with number 2, and the part matching "%s*" has number 3.
As a special case, the empty capture () captures the current string
position (a number). For instance, if we apply the pattern "()aa()" on
the string "flaaap", there will be two captures: 3 and 5.
local example = "1896, Athens, Greece"
local year, city, country = example:match("(%d+), (%w+), (%w+)")
print(year, city, country)

Are these two lines written in swift 4 the same?

I got a deprecation warning on this line:
components.append("-b \"\(string.substring(to: string.index(before: string.endIndex)))\"")
So I changed it to:
components.append("-b \"\(String(string[..<string.endIndex]) )\"")
Is the second line okay?, because my code otherwise seems to be working fine.
Let's see
let string = "12345"
var components = [String]()
var components2 = [String]()
components.append("-b \"\(string.substring(to: string.index(before: string.endIndex)))\"")
components2.append("-b \"\(String(string[..<string.endIndex]) )\"")
print(components)
print(components2)
print(components == components2)
gives us
["-b \"1234\""]
["-b \"12345\""]
false
so the answer is, no they are not...
If your intention is to remove the last character, then you can just use dropLast:
components.append("-b \"\(string.dropLast())\"")
note that you can pass a param for the number of elements you want to drop (dropLast(2) for example)
Finally, the equivalent expression after using the partial range would be:
string[..<string.index(before: string.endIndex)]
and that is because the first expression translates to:
The index up to but not including the index before the endIndex
while the second one translates to:
The index up to but not including the endIndex
where endIndex refers to the "past the end" position

Biopython Genbank.Record : trying to understand source code

I am writing a csv reader to generate Genbank files to capture annotations with sequence.
First I used a Bio.SeqRecord and got correctly formatted output but the SeqRecord class lacks fields that I need.
Blockquote
FEATURES Location/Qualifiers
HCDR1 27..35
HCDR2 50..66
HCDR3 99..109
I switched to Bio.GenBank.Record and have the needed fields except now the annotation formatting is wrong. It can't have the extra "type:" "location:" and "qualifiers:" text and the information should all be on one line.
Blockquote
FEATURES Location/Qualifiers
type: HCDR1
location: [26:35]
qualifiers:
type: HCDR2
location: [49:66]
qualifiers:
type: HCDR3
location: [98:109]
qualifiers:
The code for pulling annotations is the same for both versions. Only the class changed.
# Read csv entries and create a container with the data
container = Record()
container.locus = row['Sample']
container.size = len(row['Seq'])
container.residue_type="PROTEIN"
container.data_file_division="PRI"
container.date = (datetime.date.today().strftime("%d-%b-%Y")) # today's date
container.definition = row['FullCloneName']
container.accession = [row['Vgene'],row['HCDR3']]
container.version = getpass.getuser()
container.keywords = [row['ProjectName']]
container.source = "test"
container.organism = "Homo Sapiens"
container.sequence = row['Seq']
annotations = []
CDRS = ["HCDR1", "HCDR2", "HCDR3"]
for CDR in CDRS:
start = row['Seq'].find(row[CDR])
end = start + len(row[CDR])
feature = SeqFeature(FeatureLocation(start=start, end=end), type=CDR)
container.features.append(feature)
I have looked at the source code for Bio.Genbank.Record but can't figure out why the SeqFeature class has different formatting output compared to Bio.SeqRecord.
Is there an elegant fix or do I write a separate tool to reformat the annotations in the Genbank file?
After reading the source code again, I discovered Bio.Genbank.Record has its own Features method that takes key and location as strings. These are formatted correctly in the output Genbank file.
CDRS = ["HCDR1", "HCDR2", "HCDR3"]
for CDR in CDRS:
start = row['Seq'].find(row[CDR])
end = start + len(row[CDR])
feature = Feature()
feature.key = "{}".format(CDR)
feature.location = "{}..{}".format(start, end)
container.features.append(feature)

box callback functions returning the same string in Rascal

I'm trying to draw some boxes in Rascal and trying to give each box its own callback function. On entering the box with the mouse the corresponding string should get displayed in the text element (so hovering box1 should display box1 etc.).
However, at the moment the text does pop up but just displays "box3" for each of the 3 boxes.
Any ideas?
strings = ["box1", "box2", "box3"];
boxes = [ box(
size(100, 100),
onMouseEnter(void() {
output = s;
})
) | s <- strings];
render(hcat([
vcat(boxes),
text(str () {return output;})
]));
Good question, classical problem. The essence of the problem is that Rascal uses "non-capturing closures": this means that functions that are returned from another function share the same context. In your case this is the variable s introduced by s <- strings. This nearly always happens when you create function values in a loop (as you do here). The solution is to wrap another function layer around the returned function.
Here is a simple example:
list[int()] makeClosures()
= [ int() {return i;} | i <- [0,1,2]];
void wrong(){
lst = makeClosures();
println(lst[0]());
println(lst[1]());
println(lst[2]());
}
which will print surprisingly the values 2,2and2`. The solution is, as said, to introduce another function level:
int() makeClosure(int i)
= int() { return i;};
list[int()] makeClosuresOK()
= [ makeClosure(i) | i <- [0,1,2]];
void right(){
lst = makeClosuresOK();
println(lst[0]());
println(lst[1]());
println(lst[2]());
}
now calling right() will print 1, 2, and 3 as expected.
I leave it as an exercise how this is done in your example, but I am prepared to give a solution when you ask for it. Good luck!

Incomplete structured construct

i am new with f# , will be great if some 1 can help , nearly half a day gone solving this problem Thank you
module Certificate =
type T = {
Id: int
IsECert: bool
IsPrintCert: bool
CertifiedBy: string
Categories: Category.T list
}
let createPending now toZonedDateTime toBeCertifiedByName (job: Models.Job.T) (certificateType: Models.CertificateType.T) (pendingCertificate: Models.PendingCertificate.T) visualization (categories: Category.T list) =
let forCompletion = Models.PendingCertificate.getCertificateForCompletion pendingCertificate
{
Id = forCompletion.Id |> CertificateId.toInt
IsECert = Models.PendingCertificate.isECertificate pendingCertificate
IsPrintCert = Models.PendingCertificate.isPrintCertificate pendingCertificate
CertifiedBy = toBeCertifiedByName
Categories = categories}
i am getting an error in "Incomplete structured construct at or before this point"
Your formatting is all off. I will assume here that this is just a result of posting to StackOverflow, and your actual code is well indented.
The error comes from the definition of createPending: this function does not have a result. All its body consists of defining a forCompletion value, but there is nothing after it. Here's a simpler example that has the same problem:
let f x =
let y = 5
This function will produce the same error, because it also doesn't have a result. In F#, every function has to return something. The body cannot contain only definitions of helper functions or values. For example, I could fix my broken function above like this:
let f x =
let y = 5
x + y
This function first defines a helper value y, then adds it to its argument x, and returns the result.
> f 2
> 7
>
> f 0
> 5
How exactly you need to fix your function depends on what exactly you want it to mean. I can't help you here, because you haven't provided that information.

Resources