I am developing a Sitecore solution locally using TDS. Our source control and build server is Visual Studio Team Services (in the cloud). I would like to figure out a way to implement Continuous Integration and get builds to be automatically installed on an Integration server that is an Amazon VM (or it could be some other externally located server). I have the TDS build configuration set up to create a Sitecore Update Package. The build process works great. At the end of the build process I have the Sitecore Update Package sitting in a Drops folder in source control (TFS in the cloud). Now I can't figure out how to automate the process of getting that update package out of source control and downloading it to the Integration server and running the Sitecore command to install it.
In a perfect world you would use something along the lines of a fancy Microsoft Release Management to deploy it to the environment of choice. However, if you are like the majority of us mere mortals without the fancy tools - this should help: https://github.com/adoprog/Sitecore-Deployment-Helpers
With these pages you could just send a get request from TFS or use the logic to write a custom PowerShell post-build script. Hope this helps!
As you are using TFS you get to use Release Management for Visual Studio out of the box. This is a simple install but at this time is separate. I have an instance of RM running in a VM and attached to my VSO instance for running deployments.
I would expect this tool, which was bought by MS last year, would become more integrated in vNext.
Related
We have just installed TFS 2015 (Update 1) on-premise and are trying to create a Continuous Integration/Build system using the new TFS Build system. The build works fine, and gives me a green light, but when I look at the default build it has only built the binaries from the bin directory, and there seems to be no easy way to deploy the app on-premise to a local server.
There are two deploy options for a filesystem copy, and a powershell script, and it would certainly be easy enough to use them to copy files to a new server, but since the build only built the binaries, I don't see a tool to gather up the Web artifacts (cshtml, images, scripts, css, etc..) for this.
After an exhaustive google search, I've only found one article which talks about this at:
http://www.deliveron.com/blog/building-websites-team-foundation-build-2015/
However, this uses WebDeploy and creates a rather messy deploy package.
How can I deploy the site (standard MVC web application, in fact my tests are using the default boilerplate site created by the create project wizard) complete with artifacts to a local server in the easiest possible way? I don't want to have to install WebDeploy on the servers, and would rather use PowerShell or something to deploy the final artifacts.
The build is just the standard Visual Studio build template, with 4 steps (Build, Test, Index & Publish, Publish Build Artifacts).
We use "Visual Studio Build" step and as Arguments for MSBuild we use following line:
/p:DeployOnBuild=True /p:PublishProfile=$(DeploymentConfiguration)
On Variables tab page DeploymentConfiguration has to be configured. It must be the Name of the publish Profile (filename of the pubxml file). If the file Name is Build.pubxml the publish profile is Build.
for example:
/p:DeployOnBuild=True /p:PublishProfile=Build
I wanted to add that Ben Day has an excellent write-up that helped us package quickly and then release to multiple environments through Release Manager.
His msbuild arguments look like this:
/p:DeployOnBuild=True /p:DeployDefaultTarget=WebPublish /p:WebPublishMethod=FileSystem /p:DeleteExistingFiles=True /p:publishUrl=$(build.artifactstagingdirectory)\for-deploy\website
The difference between this and the accepted answer is that this parameter set stages everything in an artifacts folder, and then saves it as part of the build. We can then deploy exactly the same code repeatedly.
We capture the web.env.config files alongside the for-deploy folder and then use xdt transforms in the release process to ensure everything gets updated for whichever environment we're deploying to. It works well for all our web projects.
We use WebDeploy/MSDeploy for 40+ applications and love it. We do install WebDeploy on all our servers so we can deploy more easily but you could also use the Web Deploy On Demand feature which doesn't require WebDeploy be pre-installed.
We use TFS 2012 as our Source Control Repository and we also use it to deploy our Web Applications (primarily ASP .NET MVC applications with Entity Framework Code First Databases) using TFS Build and Deploy from Team Explorer within Visual Studio.
Our's is a fairly small and new setup, so up until now, we developers have been deploying code to the production servers. But from an Audit point of view, it has been decided that code installation will be handed to a separate group. At the moment, before we deploy code using TFS Automated Deploy we do a couple of steps which are manual steps
- Log on the production server, backup the individual application within IIS using IIS --> Export to export it to a zip file.
- Stop application pool for the IIS application where new code is being installed
- Install new code from Visual Studio --> Queue new Build
- Get back on the server to restart the application pool and do tests to see if the application is working as expected.
I wondering, if anyone can guide me, if there is any way to change the Automated Build and Deploy template / process / workflow to do these manual steps before it does these steps before and after it deploys the code? Basically, the new team doing the code install to the Production Server and they will still click and install code automatically but the buid templace / process / workflow will do these steps as a part of the Build / Deploy process.
thanks
if you can code it, Powershell, bat etc. then you can add it to the template.
Identify where in the workflow you need to add your new steps. you can then add an invoke process activity to call out to your scripts, that will do the currently manual steps.
I would have thought most of the IIS steps can be automated using powershell and iis appcmd
Also it may well be worth looking at Release Management 2013 as your deployment pipeline, it will give a more Auditable stream and allow for sign off to approve deployments. http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/release-management-for-microsoft-visual-studio-vs.aspx
I am trying to get the most basic configuration of TFS 2012 up and running.
So far I installed the TFS server using the simplest option (the 1st option in the installer - the one that comes with a bundled SQL express),
I configured the build service (1 controller, 1 agent, both on the TFS machine).
My project consists of 2 parts: a C#/silverlight part, and a C++ part.
After adding the silverlight prerequisites the C# project builds correctly.
However I can't get the C++ project to build.
I guess I am missing a prerequisite since I am getting the following errors:
C:\Builds\1\proj1\Client\src\Code\Client\proj\main (VC11).vcxproj
(19): The imported project "C:\Program Files
(x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp\v4.0\v110\Microsoft.Cpp.Default.props" was
not found. Confirm that the path in the declaration is
correct, and that the file exists on disk.
Indeed, the TFS server does not have a "C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft.Cpp" folder (while my dev machine has one).
I installed the windows SDK, but that didn't help.
I saw on some posts that I need to install VS 2012 on the build machine. Is that correct? will VS express do?
I have been banging my head on this for the last 2 days, and any help would be appreciated.
Installing Visual Studio on your build server seems like a strange thing to do, but having been around the TFS block a bit, I have found it to be the simplest way to manage build servers.
You can copy the files manually from your dev machine to your build server, but if an update to visual studio comes out, you will need to figure out what has changed and make sure you update all those files too. These files typically include Targets files and associated dlls.
Also with all the extensions and packages that are available now, it is just easier to load Visual Studio on your build server and install the required packages than try to work out what is needed to replicate the functionality.
This was made very clear to me recently when Microsoft released ASP.Net and Web Tools 2012.2. This altered the publishing pipeline for Web Sites and Web Projects and I needed to use this in my TFS build. It was so much easier to just be able to log onto my build server, load Visual Studio and download the new update.
I would definitely support installing Visual Studio on your build server.
I have web site project hosted at TFS Cloud. And I have hosting account at Godaddy, which allows me to deploy sites via FTP only.
I create publishing profile in Visual Studio 2012 and can successfully execute publishing to FTP in Visual Studio.
The problem:
This the task cannot be done using any standard TFS Build template and neither its standard workflow activities, even though it should be a trivial thing people do with TFS Build server. There is no ready "copy-paste" solution (wpp.targets) on MSBuild for that:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Deploy\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Deploy.FTP.targets"
Clearly says that it is not supported through the command line, one should use VS for that.
Question:
Is there any implemented solutions of that task that I can just copy paste to my team project with few clicks?
I expected to see lots of articles about it in web, however I didn't find any simple existing solution. Articles like this require me to install some 3rd party software (which is not an option in most popular hosting like Godaddy), and it's not clear how to use it with TFS.
In the default Build template, go to the process section and choose Msbuild Arguments and give the publishing profile.
MSBuild Arguments : /p:DebugSymbols=false;DebugType=None;DeployOnBuild=true;PublishProfile=YourProfileName
when Build got succeeded, it will be deployed to the ftp location.
this link may help you more : http://www.hanselman.com/blog/TinyHappyFeatures3PublishingImprovementsChainedConfigTransformsAndDeployingASPNETAppsFromTheCommandLine.aspx
We recently moved to Team Foundation Server 2008 from Source Safe. We are setting up some automated builds and have run into some issues with the publish of click once apps that seem to require additional installs on the build server.
I've seen posts that indicate that the Visual Studio IDE needs to be installed. I've also seen posts that say that installing the .Net Framework SDK would fix the issue. We don't want to install more than we need on the build server, but we also don't want to have to make multiple requests to our server team to install different pieces at different times. So, I'd like to know what most teams end up installing.
If it's important, we don't have a dedicated build server at this point. We are a small team (6 devs, all local). Builds are happening on our main TFS box, the SQL Server piece is the only part that is on a separate server.
If you are just compiling applications in with Team Foundation Build, then the .NET Framework will do - however as soon as you start wanting to do anything more advanced (such as running unit tests and having their results published into TFS) then you will need to bite the bullet and install a Visual Studio Team Edition on your build server. I usually just install a copy of Team Suite on the build server so that people who are licensed to use the various features can have those features run as part of any automated build.
Having to have it installed on your server is not ideal, but gives you the best experience at the present time.
Regarding using your TFS server as your build server, this is not recommended for larger teams because builds tend to be pretty CPU and IO intensive beasts - however for a small team such as yours and assuming that you don't have too many build definitions that could run at once you should be able to get away with it.
According to this, Visual Studio shouldn't be required--just the .NET Framework. One other note to consider from the link is that they recommend against builds happening on the TFS box.
Yes, I installed VS on the build server. I followed their manual for setting up TFS.