I'm using data binding with parent/child relationships in Grails 2.3.7 and am having trouble with deletes. The form has many optional children, and to keep the database tidy I'd like to purge blank (null) values. I've found some nice articles which suggest using removeAll to filter my entries but I can't get remove or removeAll to work!
For example... (Parent has 10 children, 5 are blank)
def update(Parent parent) {
parent.children.getClass() // returns org.hibernate.collection.PersistentSet
parent.children.size() // returns 10
parent.children.findAll{ it.value == null }.size() // returns 5
parent.children.removeAll{ it.value == null } // returns TRUE
parent.children.size() // Still returns 10!!!
}
I've read PersistentSet is finicky about equals() and hashCode() being implemented manually, which I've done in every domain class. What baffles me is how removeAll can return true, indicating the Collection has changed, yet it hasn't. I've been stuck on this for a couple days now so any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.
Update:
I've been experimenting with the Child hashcode and that seems to be the culprit. If I make a bare-bones hashcode based on the id (bad practice) then removeAll works, but if I include the value it stops working again. For example...
// Sample 1: Works with removeAll
int hashCode() {
int hash1 = id.hashCode()
return hash1
}
// Sample 2: Doesn't work with removeAll
int hashCode() {
int hash1 = id.hashCode()
int hash2 = value == null ? 0 : value.hashCode()
return hash1 + hash2
}
// Sample Domain classes (thanks Burt)
class Parent {
static hasMany = [children: Child]
}
class Child {
String name
String value
static constraints = {
value nullable: true
}
}
This behavior is explained by the data binding step updating data, making it dirty. (ie: child.value.isDirty() == true) Here's how I understand it.
First Grails data binding fetches the Parent and children, and the hashcode of each Child is calculated. Next, data updates are applied which makes child.value dirty (if it changed) but the Set's hashcodes remain unchanged. When removeAll finds a match it builds a hashCode with the dirty data, but that hashcode is NOT found in the Set so it can't remove it. Essentially removeAll will only work if ALL of my hashCode variables are clean.
So if the data must be clean to remove it, one solution is to save it twice. Like this...
// Parent Controller
def update(Parent parent) {
parent.children.removeAll{ it.value == null } // Removes CLEAN children with no value
parent.save(flush:true)
parent.refresh() // parent.children is now clean
parent.children.removeAll{ it.value == null } // Removes (formerly dirty) children
parent.save(flush:true) // Success!
}
This works though it's not ideal. First I must allow null values in the database, though they only exist briefly and I don't want them. And second it's kinda inefficient to do two saves. Surely there must be a better way?
hashCode and equals weirdness aren't an issue here - there are no contains calls or something similar that would use the hashCode value and potentially miss the actual data. If you look at the implementation of removeAll you can see that it uses an Iterator to call your closure on every instance and remove any where the closure result is truthy, and return true if at least one was removed. Using this Parent class
class Parent {
static hasMany = [children: Child]
}
and this Child
class Child {
String name
String value
static constraints = {
value nullable: true
}
}
and this code to create test instances:
def parent = new Parent()
5.times {
parent.addToChildren(name: 'c' + it)
}
5.times {
parent.addToChildren(name: 'c2' + it, value: 'asd')
}
parent.save()
it prints 5 for the final size(). So there's probably something else affecting this. You shouldn't have to, but you can create your own removeAll that does the same thing, and if you throw in some println calls you might figure out what's up:
boolean removeAll(collection, Closure remove) {
boolean atLeastOne = false
Iterator iter = collection.iterator()
while (iter.hasNext()) {
def c = iter.next()
if (remove(c)) {
iter.remove()
atLeastOne = true
}
}
atLeastOne
}
Invoke this as
println removeAll(parent.children) { it.value == null }
Related
I have a map that has a complex object as a key
Map<TimeseriesNode , MyObject> myMap = {};
TimeseriesNode class has implemented hashCode and == operator
class TimeseriesNode {
String product;
String model;
String element;
String locationName;
String locationSuffix;
TimeseriesNode.create(this.product, this.model, this.element, this.locationName, this.locationSuffix);
int get hashCode {
return hashObjects([product, model, element, locationName, locationSuffix]);
}
bool operator ==(other) {
if (other is! TimeseriesNode) return false;
TimeseriesNode key = other;
return (key.element == element
&& key.locationName == locationName
&& key.locationSuffix == locationSuffix
&& key.model == model
&& key.product == product);
}
}
(method hashObjects comes from import "package:quiver/core.dart";)
One part of my application creates the keys and adds them to the map.
Another part of the application creates a new TimeseriesNode (which is equal to the original key) and then uses this instance to query the map.
MyObject obj = myMap[ node];
Oddly the map returns null. I have done some debugging and found that myMap[node] calls the following code in the dart:collection-patch_compact_hash code
V operator [](Object key) {
var v = _getValueOrData(key);
return identical(_data, v) ? null : v;
}
When I inspect v, I can see 'v' is the object that was originally added to the map, but the code returns null.
If I put a break point on my equals method, it is never called.
What is going on?
The fields you use to calculate the hashcode should be immutable (final). I guess you change one of these fields after you inserted the element into the map. This results in the map not finding the instance by hashcode and therefore doesn't reach the state where it does the equals check.
I need to compare several domain class objects while they are still unsaved, however, I always keep getting a false result from the comparison. Turns out even the following comparison will return false:
new DomainClass().equals(new DomainClass())
Since both are brand new objects they should both have identical data and should be equal to each other. Unfortunately the equals method (or the == operator) returns false. Is there another correct way of performing this comparison?
Your code same with this:
a = new DomainClass();
b = new DomainClass();
a.equals(b)
So clearly the test must return false as far as a and b are not referencing same object.
If you want value based comparing:
Iterate over the fields and compare them one by one
Or check here for a more formal way of doing it.
you can use 'spaceship operator' (<=>) which work like compareTo()
or you can override equals() method in your DomainClass that make able to use this code
new DomainClass().equals(new DomainClass())
to override equals() you can use #EqualsAndHashCode annotation
this annotation automatically generate equals() and hashcode() methods
So, you class will look like this:
#EqualsAndHashCode
class DomainClass(){
String field1
String filed2
etc
}
and your generated equals method will look like this:
public boolean equals(java.lang.Object other)
if (other == null) return false
if (this.is(other)) return true
if (!(other instanceof DomainClass)) return false
if (!other.canEqual(this)) return false
if (field1 != other.field1) return false
if (field2 != other.field2) return false
// etc
return true
}
For more details look at this http://groovy.codehaus.org/api/groovy/transform/EqualsAndHashCode.html
Using ASP MVC5 and EF6.
I had a curious case the other day when I was looking to have different behaviour when a foreach-loop got to the last element.
The loop wouldn't enter if-condition comparing the object with the result from .Last()-method on the collection.
The collection I was iterating over was something like:
public class CollectionClass{
IEnumerable<TestClass1> CollectionA
IEnumerable<TestClass2> CollectionB
}
My code was something like:
DbContext db = new DbContext(); //just for illustration, not actual code
CollectionClass cc = new CollectionClass {
CollectionA = db.TestClasses1,
CollectionB = db.TestClasses2
};
//(TestClasses1 and TestClasses2 are DbSet<T> properties of my DbContext.
foreach(TestClass1 tc1 in cc.CollectionA)
{
if (tc1 == cc.CollectionA.Last()){ //<---NEVER enters in here!!
//doStuff
}
else{
//doOtherStuff
}
}
With the code above, the loop never entered into the if-condition, even for the last element, which one would expect.
But when changed my CollectionClass to:
public class CollectionClass{
List<TestClass1> CollectionA
List<TestClass2> CollectionB
}
and instantiated the CollectionClass-object like this:
CollectionClass cc = new CollectionClass {
CollectionA = db.TestClasses1.ToList(),
CollectionB = db.TestClasses2.ToList()
}; //Added .ToList()
the loop entered into the first if-condition at the last iteration as I expected.
Why this difference? Why did the equals-operator (==) evaluate to TRUE when the object had been stored in a List and FALSE when the object was stored in an IEnumerable?
I know that IEnumerable is an interface -- is that what makes the difference?
I even did an explicit test in the sorts of:
var obj1 = cc.CollectionA.Last();
var obj2 cc.CollectionA.Last();
bool result = obj1 == obj2; //result = FALSE
and the result was FALSE.
I think it's because in first example you get two objects from database. First from iteration and second from call to Last().
In second example all objects are created at the time you assign collections to CollectionA and CollectionB (you call ToList()).
It is because you are not allowed to use Last and LastOrDefault on DbSet objects. Instead you should use OrderByDescending(t=>t.ID).First()
I'm working on speed issues with a currently working method that finds a specific attribute collection within an ArrayList. Depending on the size, it can take longer than 7 seconds to find the value in the list.
I need to speed up this process, so I can deal with larger volumes of data. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Here is my example;
Method:
public ArrayList getIntegrationTag(String attribute) {
return crmMapping?.findAll { it.get("ATTRIBUTE") == attribute }?.collect{
it.INTEGRATION_TAG
}?.unique()
}//end getIntegrationTag(String attribute)
crmMapping content
"[{ATTRIBUTE=AcademicIndex, INTEGRATION_TAG=Contact~nAcademic_Index},
{ATTRIBUTE=AcademicInterest,
INTEGRATION_TAG=Contact~msplAcademic_Interest},........]"
the findAll loops over each record, then the collect loops over each record, then unique loops over each record again.
Try...
Set result = [] as Set
for(element in crmMapping) {
if(element.get("ATTRIBUTE") == attribute) {
result << element.INTEGRATION_TAG
}
}
return (result as ArrayList)
This will only loop once it it will be unique as it was added to a Set
Do the following once
def crmMappingMap = crmMapping.groupBy({ it.ATTRIBUTE })
Then you have a map of all same attribute instances and can access it using crmMappingMap[attribute].INTEGRATION_TAG, which will return the desired array, like this:
public ArrayList getIntegrationTag(String attribute) {
crmMappingMap[attribute].INTEGRATION_TAG.unique()
}
Always keep a map, then speed of access will be fast enough.
I have a listview that I fill from an Adapter. My original code the data was being returned from a table, but now I need to get the code from a query with a join so the examples I used will no longer work and I haven't been able to find out how to use a query for this. I'm using an ORMrepository.
In my ORMrepository I have this function
public IList<Coe> GetmyCoe()
{
using (var database = new SQLiteConnection(_helper.WritableDatabase.Path))
{
string query = "SELECT Coe.Id, Adult.LName + ', ' + Adult.MName AS Name, Coe.Createdt FROM Adult INNER JOIN Coe ON Adult.CoeMID = Coe.Id";
return database.Query<Coe>(query);
}
}
which actually returns the data I want.
then in my Activity page I have this.
_list = FindViewById<ListView>(Resource.Id.List);
FindViewById<ListView>(Resource.Id.List).ItemClick += new System.EventHandler<ItemEventArgs>(CoeList_ItemClick);
var Coe = ((OmsisMobileApplication)Application).OmsisRepository.GetmyCoe();
_list.Adapter = new CoeListAdapter(this, Coe);
My Adapter page is where I have the problem, I know it is set up to to looking at a table which I'm not doing anymore. But I don't know how to change it for what I'm passing into it now. Current CoeListAdapter is:
public class CoeListAdapter : BaseAdapter
{
private IEnumerable<Coe> _Coe;
private Activity _context;
public CoeListAdapter(Activity context, IEnumerable<Coe> Coe)
{
_context = context;
_Coe = Coe;
}
public override View GetView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent)
{
var view = (convertView
?? _context.LayoutInflater.Inflate(
Resource.Layout.CoeListItem, parent, false)
) as LinearLayout;
var Coe = _Coe.ElementAt(position);
view.FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.CoeMID).Text = Coe.Id.ToString();
//view.FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.GrdnMaleName).Text = Coe.Name;
view.FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.CreateDt).Text = Coe.CreateDt;
return view;
}
public override int Count
{
get { return _Coe.Count(); }
}
public Coe GetCoe(int position)
{
return _Coe.ElementAt(position);
}
public override Java.Lang.Object GetItem(int position)
{
return null;
}
public override long GetItemId(int position)
{
return position;
}
}
How do I set up the CoeListAdapter.cs page so that it can use the passed in data. As you can see I have a commented out lines where I fill a TextView which error because Coe.Name is not in the table model for Coe. but it is returned in the query. I believe my problem is IEnumerable but what do I change it to. I'm new to Mobile developement and suing VS2010 for Mono
The problem probably lies with the binding/mapping of the object not the creation of the view.
Or probably more specifically, the query.
Adult.LName + ', ' + Adult.MName AS Name
this should be:
Adult.LName || ', ' || Adult.MName AS Name
See also: String concatenation does not work in SQLite
From the sqlite docs: http://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html under the Operators heading:
The unary operator + is a no-op. It can be applied to strings,
numbers, blobs or NULL and it always returns a result with the same
value as the operand.
Note that there are two variations of the equals and not equals
operators. Equals can be either = or ==. The non-equals operator can
be either != or <>. The || operator is "concatenate" - it joins
together the two strings of its operands. The operator % outputs the
value of its left operand modulo its right operand.
The result of any binary operator is either a numeric value or NULL,
except for the || concatenation operator which always evaluates to
either NULL or a text value.
This shows that the + will evaluate to zero. If you use ||, the value will either be the correct value or NULL (if either of Adult.LName or Adult.MName is NULL).
This can be fixed by:
coalesce(first, '') || ', ' || coalesce(second, '')
but this may result in , LastName or FirstName,.
Another way would be to create another two properties in Coe called LName and MName.
Then bind the values to those properties and use the Name property like this:
public string Name
{
get { return string.Join(", ", LName, MName); }
}
This will probably be better as you can change how the Name appears especially if there are different combinations of First, Middle and Last names in different places.
And off topic:
I believe my problem is IEnumerable...
This is probably not too true as it returns the correct values. A better way would be to use IList as IEnumerable will iterate through the list each time to get the item as it does not know that the collection is actually a list. (I think)
thanks for the help on the concantination, I did find that was wrong, I did fix my problem, I was using an example by Greg Shackles on how to set up using a data base. what I had to do was create a new model with the elements I was wanting. So I created a new Model and called it CoeList, then everywhere I had List or IEnumerable I changed it to List or IEnumerable and it worked.