Inpainting depth map, still a black image border - opencv

Question

I'm trying to inpaint missing depth values of a depth map using the method described here. To summarize the method:
Downsize depth map to 20% of the original size
Inpaint all black (unknown) pixels in the downsized image
Upsize to original size
Replace all black pixels in the original image with corresponding values from the upsized image
Super simple and everything works well. A video showing the results can be found here.
However, I wonder why the left and top image border are still black although they should be inpainted (can be seen in the video). My first thought was that this could have to do something with the border interpolation (black pixels outside the image boundary), but than I would expect this also to happen on the other image borders. My second thought was that it is something specific to the used inpainting method (method by Alexandru Telea), but changing it to the Navier-Stokes based method didn't change the results.
Can somebody explain to me why this happens and how to tell OpenCV to also inpaint these regions, if possible?
Thanks in advance.

Answer 1

After asked by #theodore in http://answers.opencv.org/question/86569/inpainting-depth-map-still-black-image-borders/?comment=86587#comment-86587 I've used the sample images to test the inpaint behavious. It looks like it does not handle the border correctly, so creating a border with cv::copyMakeBorder can be used.
Here's the extended version with some kind of unit testing:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
cv::Mat input = cv::imread("C:/StackOverflow/Input/depthInpaint.png");
cv::Mat img;
cv::cvtColor(input, img, CV_BGR2GRAY);
cv::Mat inpainted;
const unsigned char noDepth = 0; // change to 255, if values no depth uses max value or use the mask image
//cv::inpaint(img, (img == noDepth), depth, 5.0, cv::INPAINT_TELEA); // img is the 8-bit input image (depth map with blank spots)
double inpaintRadius = 5;
int makeBorder = 1;
cv::Mat borderimg;
cv::copyMakeBorder(img, borderimg, makeBorder, makeBorder, makeBorder, makeBorder, cv::BORDER_REPLICATE);
cv::imshow("border", borderimg);
cv::inpaint(borderimg, (borderimg == noDepth), inpainted, inpaintRadius, cv::INPAINT_TELEA); // img is the 8-bit input image (depth map with blank spots)
cv::Mat originalEmbedded = borderimg(cv::Rect(makeBorder, makeBorder, img.cols, img.rows));
cv::Mat inpaintedEmbedded = inpainted(cv::Rect(makeBorder, makeBorder, img.cols, img.rows));
cv::Mat diffImage;
cv::absdiff(img, originalEmbedded, diffImage);
cv::imshow("embedding correct?", diffImage > 0);
cv::Mat mask = img == noDepth;
cv::imshow("mask", mask);
cv::imshow("input", input);
cv::imshow("inpainted", inpainted);
cv::imshow("inpainted from border", inpaintedEmbedded);
cv::waitKey(0);
return 0;
}
Here's the reduced version if you believe it to be correct:
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
cv::Mat input = cv::imread("C:/StackOverflow/Input/depthInpaint.png");
cv::Mat img;
cv::cvtColor(input, img, CV_BGR2GRAY);
cv::Mat inpainted;
const unsigned char noDepth = 0; // change to 255, if values no depth uses max value or use the mask image
//cv::inpaint(img, (img == noDepth), depth, 5.0, cv::INPAINT_TELEA); // img is the 8-bit input image (depth map with blank spots)
double inpaintRadius = 5;
int makeBorderSize = 1;
cv::Mat borderimg;
//cv::copyMakeBorder(img, borderimg, borderSize, borderSize, borderSize, borderSize, cv::BORDER_REPLICATE);
cv::copyMakeBorder(img, borderimg, makeBorderSize, makeBorderSize, makeBorderSize, makeBorderSize, cv::BORDER_REPLICATE);
//cv::imshow("border", borderimg);
cv::inpaint(borderimg, (borderimg == noDepth), inpainted, inpaintRadius, cv::INPAINT_TELEA); // img is the 8-bit input image (depth map with blank spots)
// extract the original area without border:
cv::Mat inpaintedEmbedded = inpainted(cv::Rect(makeBorderSize, makeBorderSize, img.cols, img.rows));
cv::imshow("input", input);
cv::imshow("inpainted from border", inpaintedEmbedded);
cv::waitKey(0);
return 0;
}
Here's Input:
Here's the input with border (bordersize 5 to visualize the effect better):
Here's the output: