How to use (?) and (!) in Swift - ios

I'm new to swift and I'm having some difficulties understanding on how to use (!) and (?)
As far as I know, we can use (?) when there are instances that a variable can be nil.
And use (!) when you are 100% sure that item is not nil.
1. Working Fine - Optionals
var john:String?
john = "Is my name"
println(john!)
2. Crashes on Runtime - ! must not be nil - means this is correct
var john:String?
println(john!)
3. Works Fine
var dict: [String:AnyObject] = Dictionary()
dict["name"] = "John"
var str: String = dict["name"]! as String <--- Taking away the (!) says it's not convertible to String
4. Cannot Run/Build - for me it's similar to 1.
var dict: [String:AnyObject]? = Dictionary() ---error says does not have a member named 'subscript'
dict["name"] = "John"
var str: String = dict["name"]! as String
5. Unexpectedly found nil while unwrapping an optional value
var dict: [String:AnyObject] = Dictionary()
dict["name"]? = "John"
var str: String = dict["name"]! as String
Would be great if someone can help me understand these things. Thanks!

it is a bit misleading interpretation believing when an ! 'marks' an ivar then that 100% cannot be nil. it can be. you can say only, you got the value as already unwrapped, so you don't need to force unwrapping it again – but it can be nil.
try this example for instance:
var text: String! = "hello"
text = nil;
println(text)
it prints a nil for you.
the reason why your app can crash is you force unwrapping an optional which is nil, that is invalid operand.
#4
line-by-line:
var dict: [String:AnyObject]? = Dictionary() // from OP
your dict is an optional, let us see what you are doing here:
dict["name"] = "John" // from OP
var str: String = dict["name"]! as String // from OP
you have an optional dict and you'd like to use it somehow, you have two possible ways to do it:
(A) via optional chaining;
(B) via forced unwrapping;
(A)
dict?["name"] = "John" // optional chaining
it is quite straightforward, it assigns the new value for the key name if the dictionary is not nil, otherwise the chain generously falls and nothing happens in runtime.
in perspective of this line:
var str: String = dict!["name"]! as String // forcibly unwrapped
it crashes in runtime if either the dictionary or the value for the key was nil (as per the first paragraph says: invalid operand to force unwrapping a nil), but the str would be John if the dictionary and the key both do valid objects.
(B)
dict!["name"] = "John" // forcibly unwrapped
it works like a charm and assigns the new value for the key name if the dict exists; but if the dict was nil, that is a termination point in runtime (aka crash), because nil cannot be unwrapped forcibly (see above).
#5
line-by-line:
var dict: [String:AnyObject] = Dictionary() // from OP
your dict is not optional and not even nil, but the dictionary is literally empty, so no key does exist in it, including the name.
dict["name"]? = "John" // from OP
var str: String = dict["name"]! as String // from OP
the optional chaining always falls when any of the element of the chain falls – therefore no new value will be assigned in your code, but the falling happens gracefully, so you bypass the first line about assigning the new value, but the app crashes in the second line because the value does not exists and you try to force unwrapping it (see above about invalid operand).
so, you need to drop the optional chaining from the first line, if you want to assign a new value for a non-existing key:
dict["name"] = "John"
the optional chaining is useful if you would not like to change the original dictionary with adding a new key/value, but you would like to override an existing one only:
dict["name"] = "John"
dict["name"]? = "Jack"
in that case the new value will be Jack, because the optional chaining won't fall as the key name is already existing with a different value, so it can be and will be overridden; but:
dict["name"] = nil
dict["name"]? = "Jack"
the optional chaining will falls and no new value is assigned here for the key.
NOTE: there would be many other things and ideas which can be told about the concept. the original documentation is available on Apple site under section Swift Resources.

Related

strange optional behaviour in Swift

I have created my own class in Swift as below.
class Product: NSObject {
var product_id:Int?
var product_number:String?
var product_price:Float?
var product_descrption:String?
}
Now i am setting value in each property like this
let p=Product()
p.product_id=1
p.product_price=220.22
p.productdescrption="Some description"
p.product_number="W2_23_233"
But when i get the value from price then for price i get value like "Optional 220.22" But i don't get appended word "Optional" in description".So to resolve this i added "!" for unwrapping the value of float but i did not have to do this for String please tell why this is happening?
If you are printing any of these values should say Optional(...). If you are assigning the values to a label, that will not include the Optional(...), The reason that it shows Optional(...) when you print the value using print(), is just to show you its an optional. For safety, instead of using the !, try using if lets.
An example with your code,
if let id = p.product_id {
print(id) //Does not contain Optional()
}
You can also combine them, to do them all at one time. (Only do this if you don't want to print unless all values are non-nil)
if let id = p.product_id,
let price = p.product_price,
let description = p.productdescrption,
let productNumber = p.product_number {
//Enter code here that does something with these values
}
Note, if you aren't on swift 3, I believe you only have to write let on the first condition.
If you print any optional variable without unwrapping no matter what type it is, Optional will be appended to the variable's value.
print(p.product_price) will print Optional(220.220001)
print(p.product_descrption) will print Optional("Some description")
To print only value you need to unwrap the optional variables.
print(p.product_price!) will print 220.22
print(p.product_descrption!) will print Some description
This forced unwrapping will only work if the optionals does not contain nil. Otherwise it will give you a runtime error.
So to check for nil you can use if let statement.
No matter what type of variable. If you assign a value to an optional variable, It always enclosed with Optional(...)
Optional without forced unwrapping:
print("product_price = \(p.product_price) \n product_descrption = \(p.product_descrption)")
Output:
product_price = Optional(220.22)
product_descrption = Optional(Some description)
Optional with forced unwrapping:
print("product_price = \(p.product_price!) \n product_descrption = \(p.product_descrption!)")
Output:
product_price = 220.22
product_descrption = Some description

Why print() is printing my String as an optional?

I have a dictionary and I want to use some of its values as a key for another dictionary:
let key: String = String(dictionary["anotherKey"])
here, dictionary["anotherKey"] is 42 but when I print key in the debugger I see the following:
(lldb) expression print(key)
Optional(42)
How is that possible? To my understanding, the String() constructor does not return an optional (and the compiler does not complain when I write let key: String instead of let key: String?). Can someone explain what's going on here?
As a sidenote, I am currently solving this using the description() method.
This is by design - it is how Swift's Dictionary is implemented:
Swift’s Dictionary type implements its key-value subscripting as a subscript that takes and returns an optional type. [...] The Dictionary type uses an optional subscript type to model the fact that not every key will have a value, and to give a way to delete a value for a key by assigning a nil value for that key. (link to documentation)
You can unwrap the result in an if let construct to get rid of optional, like this:
if let val = dictionary["anotherKey"] {
... // Here, val is not optional
}
If you are certain that the value is there, for example, because you put it into the dictionary a few steps before, you could force unwrapping with the ! operator as well:
let key: String = String(dictionary["anotherKey"]!)
You are misunderstanding the result. The String initializer does not return an optional. It returns the string representation of an optional. It is an non-optional String with value "Optional(42)".
A Swift dictionary always return an Optional.
dictionary["anotherKey"] gives Optional(42), so String(dictionary["anotherKey"]) gives "Optional(42)" exactly as expected (because the Optional type conforms to StringLiteralConvertible, so you get a String representation of the Optional).
You have to unwrap, with if let for example.
if let key = dictionary["anotherKey"] {
// use `key` here
}
This is when the compiler already knows the type of the dictionary value.
If not, for example if the type is AnyObject, you can use as? String:
if let key = dictionary["anotherKey"] as? String {
// use `key` here
}
or as an Int if the AnyObject is actually an Int:
if let key = dictionary["anotherKey"] as? Int {
// use `key` here
}
or use Int() to convert the string number into an integer:
if let stringKey = dictionary["anotherKey"], intKey = Int(stringKey) {
// use `intKey` here
}
You can also avoid force unwrapping by using default for the case that there is no such key in dictionary
var dictionary = ["anotherkey" : 42]
let key: String =
String(dictionary["anotherkey", default: 0])
print(key)

Optional Type 'String??' Not Unwrapped

"Value of optional type 'String??' not unwrapped; did you mean to use '!' or '?'?" -
I got this weird compiler error today, which was entirely confusing due to the two question marks after String.
I have a dictionary s, of type [String : String?], and a function which accepts all arguments as String?s. Specifically (from 5813's method of copying user-selected information into a dictionary), I have an elaborated version of the following:
func combine(firstname: String?, lastname: String?) {...}
var text = combine(s["kABPersonFirstNameProperty"], lastname: s["kABPersonLastNameProperty"])
I'm getting the error on the second line, and I'm wondering why it's so. If the values in s are of type String?, shouldn't that be accepted by combine(), since it's arguments are supposed to be of the same type? Why, then, would I get this error and how can I fix it?
Dictionary<T1, T2>[key] returns T2?. This is to return nil in case key doesn't exist.
So if T2 is String?, s[key] returns String??
You cannot pass String?? as String?
You can call like this to unwrap and prepare for non-existing key as well
var text = combine(s["kABPersonFirstNameProperty"] ?? nil, lastname: s["kABPersonLastNameProperty"] ?? nil)
By the way, code below will not set value to nil but remove the entire entry from the dictionary
s[key] = nil
If you want the value to be nil instead of removing entry, you will have to do this
s[key] = nil as String?
It is once optional because your dictionary value is optional. And it is optional again, because dictionary[key] returns optional. So you need to unwrap it twice.
Try this in a playground to understand the problem (and see possible solution):
let oos: String?? = "Hello"
print(oos)
if let os = oos { // Make String?
print(os)
if let s = os { // Make ordinary String
print(s)
}
}
Prints:
Optional(Optional("Hello"))
Optional("Hello")
Hello
But you could use other ways than if let to unwrap, too. For example:
print(oos! ?? "n/a")
Will force unwrap it once and then print either the inner String or n/a in case of nil...
Maybe the easiest solution would be to make the dictionary hold String instead of String?. Then you don't have the unwrapping problems which are described in other solutions.
Or do you really have to store String? types?
Do you want to differentiate between 'key exists but holds nil' and 'key does not exist'?

Difference between optional and normal String

Difference between String?,String! and String
I am using this code :
var myString:String? = nil
var myString1:String = ""
var myString2:String! = nil
println(myString2)
Here it's giving nil in myString2 instead of run-time error.
There are better explanations out there, but the simple version is:
String is a String. It holds a String value.
String? is an Optional String. It can hold a String value or nil. You can unwrap the optional and immediately try to access the String value by using ! like this:
var str: String? = nil
str!.length
That code will result in a runtime error because str is nil. A safer way to get the value of the optional is to use an if let:
var str: String? = nil
if let myStr = str{
myStr.length
}
That has the same functionality as the above code, but won't crash on nil values.
String! is an implicitly unwrapped optional. It works that same way as a regular optional but it is assumed to be non-nil, so when you call it it tries to access the value like it was a regular optional with ! after.
The reason println works on all these types is because it can take Strings, String Optionals, and nil values and handles them all.
var str: String? = "hello world"
println(str)
println(str!)
println(nil)
All should work.
#connor's answer is correct.
var Amy:Wife? // Amy is your girlfriend, she may or may not be your wife.
var Amy:Wife // Amy is your wife.
var Amy:Wife! // Amy will be your wife, no matter you like it or not.

No need to unwrap optionals in Swift?

I think I'm confused about the concept of 'unwrapping' an optional value, and any guidance would be much appreciated!
According to the Swift Programming Language Guide, an optional requires unwrapping before it can be used, unless it is implicitly unwrapped using an !.
From: Apple Inc. “The Swift Programming Language.” iBooks. https://itun.es/gb/jEUH0.l:
let possibleString: String? = "An optional string."
println(possibleString!) // requires an exclamation mark to access its value
whereas
let assumedString: String! = "An implicitly unwrapped optional string."
println(assumedString) // no exclamation mark is needed to access its value
However, in Xcode, I can do the following and still print the value of an optional string:
let teamname: String? = "Liverpool!"
println("Come on \(teamname)")
What am I missing?
First of all, an optional requires unwrapping only if you are using it somewhere that does not allow an optional. (e.g. assigning a String? to a String)
var optionalString: String? = "Some string"
var absolutelyAString: String = "Another string"
// absolutelyAString = optionalString // Error. Needs to unwrap
absolutelyAString = optionalString! // OK.
"Unwrap" basically means to "guarantee that the value is not nil". Just think of it as casting to a non-nullable type.
Second, println() accepts optionals just fine but because it checks your variable for you. If the value of your variable is nil, it prints "nil"; otherwise it prints the string implemented by the Streamable, Printable, or DebugPrintable protocols.
An optional requires unwrapping, but you don't always have to do it yourself.
var teamname: String? = "Liverpool"
println("Come on \(teamname)")
In this case, the string interpolation will check the optional then unwrap it and add its value to the String. If the Optional is nil, it will add "nil" to the String instead.
In order to access the properties and methods of String you will have to explicitly unwrap it. If you don't know if it is nil or not, you should check with an if statement.
if teamname != nil {
var newName = teamname!.capitalizedString
}

Resources