I am running standalone neo4j database server at localhost:7474 on a linode instance.
Is there any way to view this in the browser?
If you have SSH access to the Linode instance then you can run ssh -L 7474:localhost:7474 youruser#123.123.123.123 which will tunnel the remote port 7474 to localhost 7474. In your browser you can now use http://localhost:7474 to see the remote server without opening anything to the world.
You want what's called a "reverse proxy". Outside of your box, you can't talk about localhost:7474 as a hostname. So you want an external facing web server that "proxies" requests and sends them to localhost:7474.
One such option is Apache mod_proxy used as a reverse proxy. Examples on how to use it are behind the link. In general it's going to boil down to a configuration directive that looks something like:
ProxyPassReverse /neo4j http://localhost:7474
You also really want to read the documentation on securing the neo4j server.
WARNING - neo4j's web interface will let you do just about anything without authentication, including delete all of your data, change it, put new data in, and so on. It is a very bad idea to expose that functionality to the entire internet. So if you use a reverse proxy as suggested above, make sure you add some authentication layer (again you can do this with apache and mod_proxy) to permit just any random person from connecting to your instance and optionally deciding to trash it.
Related
I created the 3 necessary containers for NuoDB using the NuoDB instructions.
My Docker environment runs on a virtual Ubuntu Linux environment (VMware).
Afterwards I tried to access the database using a console application (C# .Net Framework 4.8) and the Ado.Net technology. For this I used the Nuget "NuoDb.Data.Client" from Nuget.org.
Unfortunately the connection does not work.
If I choose port 8888, my thread disappears to infinity when I open the connection.
For this reason I tried to open the port 48004 to get to the admin container.
On this way I get an error message.
"System.IO.IOException: A connection attempt failed because the remote peer did not respond properly after a certain period of time, or the established connection was faulty because the connected host did not respond 172.18.0.4:48006, 172.18.0.4"
Interestingly, if I specify a wrong database name, it throws an error:
No suitable transaction engine found for database.
This tells me that it connects to the admin container.
Does anyone have any idea what I am doing wrong?
The connection works when I establish a connection with the tool "dbvisualizer".
This tool accesses the transaction engine directly. For this reason I have opened the port 48006 in the corresponding container.
But even with these settings it does not work with my console application.
Thanks in advance.
Port 8888 is the REST port that you would use from the administration tool such as nuocmd: it allows you to start/stop engines and perform other administrative commands. You would not use this port for SQL clients (as you discovered). The correct port to use for SQL clients is 48004.
Port 48004 allows a SQL client to connect to a "load balancer" facility that will redirect it to one of the running TEs. It's not the case that the SQL traffic is routed through this load balancer: instead, the load balancer replies to the client with the address/port of one of the TEs then the client will disconnect from the load balancer and re-connect directly to the TE at that address/port. For this reason, all the ports that TEs are listening on must also be open to the client, not just 48004.
You did suggest you opened these ports but it's not clear from your post whether you followed all the instructions on the doc page you listed. In particular, were you able to connect to the database using the nuosql command line tool as described here? I strongly recommend that you ensure that simple access like this works correctly, before you attempt to try more sophisticated client access such as using Ado.Net.
I've created a service inside minikube (expressjs API) running on my local machine,
so when I launch the service using minikube service wedeliverapi --url I can access it from my browser with localhost:port/api
But I also want to access that service from another device so I can use my API from a flutter mobile application. How can I achieve this goal?
Due to small amount of information and to clarify everything- I am posting a general Community wiki answer.
The solution to solve this problem was to use reverse proxy server. In this documentation is definiton what exactly is reverse proxy server .
A proxy server is a go‑between or intermediary server that forwards requests for content from multiple clients to different servers across the Internet. A reverse proxy server is a type of proxy server that typically sits behind the firewall in a private network and directs client requests to the appropriate backend server. A reverse proxy provides an additional level of abstraction and control to ensure the smooth flow of network traffic between clients and servers
Common uses for a reverse proxy server include:
Load balancing
Web acceleration
Security and anonymity
This is the guide where one can find basic configuration of a proxy server.
See also this article.
I have ssh'd into my rasberry pi and built a rails application.
Now how do I load the rails app from another machine?
I have tried IP:port in a web browser, but this fails.
Can I use ssh from a web browser to load the rails server process?
Are there gems I need to install to do this?
Is there any good documentation that I have missed?
SOLUTION
use ngrok to tunnel https://medium.com/#karimbutt/using-ngrok-to-create-a-publicly-accessible-web-facing-raspberry-pi-server-35deef8c816a#.sraso7zar
Maybe the problem is with the IP address you're trying to use. Servers don't necessarily forward their public IP traffic to localhost automatically.
Perhaps you could configure the IP address somehow, I don't know (others might?). Alternatively, you have a use a "local tunnel" service like ngrok or localtunnel. What these do is create a public URL for your localhost (i.e. your "loopback" address), so anyone can access it.
I spoke with a Ngrok author via email. He ensured me that I shouldn't need to expect any downtime from the service or to have to manually restart it. Although keep in mind that if you're on the free plan, whenever you restart Ngrok you're going to get a different URL. He also described it as kind of like a "souped up SSH -R"
I am trying to set up an internal Jenkins server for our QA team and facing some issues with the server URL. This is inside a corporate network and all sort of firewall and proxy settings are in place, however we need to access the server only with in our internal network. This server runs from a Mac Mini. I was able to install and access the server without any issues using localhost:8080.
I tried to set a custom URL (something like testjenkins.local:8080)under the Manage Jenkins option and never was able to access the server. The only option worked for me is with the IP address (IP:8080). I was able to access the server from other machines in the network using this URL.
The real problem with the above setup is that the machine IP changes(I am not able to make it static), and hence wont be able to get an always working URL.
Highly appreciate if any one guide me in the wright direction.
Given you have a dynamic IP on your server, a good alternative would be using ngrok. Ngrok can expose the port 8080 of that server to the internet via secure tunnels, and you can access it via an URL, so changes in the IP won't affect it.
However, ngrok exposes the server to the whole Internet. To make it accessible only for your team you can add authentication in both ngrok tunnel and Jenkins server (would it work for you?).
(This is a follow up to rails app fast on server, but slow when accessed from another machine.)
I have a Rails web app that's incredibly slow when I access via its hostname, but runs at normal speeds when I access via its IP address (or via localhost, if I access it on the same server machine it's running on). This makes me think the problem is with the DNS. (Also, all these machines are running on the same corporate intranet.)
However, when I ping the hostname from a terminal, the ping seems to run fine. Does the fact that pinging works suggest that the problem is not with the DNS? (I don't really know much about DNS or servers and networking, so I'm kind of floundering around a bit here.)
Update to add: I also ran a simple "Hello world" Sinatra app, and this also runs super slowly when accessed via hostname (but not when accessed via IP address).
Fast ping from your terminal suggests that DNS between you and DNS server was fine and that network between you and server is fine.
This still does not help with the DNS on your server. Do you have any network operations that your server performs? If so, you need to make sure the network is reachable.
I suggest you get a simple "hello world" Rails application deployed there and see if it is Rails issue related (server wide) or your application related (very easy to do).
The other suggestion is to profile your Rails app and see which operation is taking the time to complete.
Your ping command is probably using cached DNS instead of hitting the server every time. Google for "flushdns" to find the right syntax to purge your cache for your particular operating system, then try it. You'll need to do this every time if you want to use ping to see about DNS response.