I wanted to know exactly what is meant by neo4j server and the embedded mode. Even i gone through the post Neo4j Server vs. Embedded. But i dint get clearly those concepts. I have installed neo4j 2.1.1 on windows 64bit machine which is a neo4j server. So when neo4j embedded mode will come into picture?
Also how can we switch between embedded mode to server mode or vice-versa?
When i was working with mysql to neo4j migration(using batch-import), after importing the nodes and relationships into neo4j getting a message in a messages.log file as below:
Clean shutdown on BatchInserter(EmbeddedBatchInserter[C:\Users\Neo4j\t2.db])
How embedded is appearing here if i have installed neo4j server ? So please clarify these queries.
Thanks
Embedded databases run inside of your application, meaning they're in the same JVM as your application. In general, with embedded databases you'll do direct database access or cypher queries. There are a lot of pros and cons here - one of the cons is that your JVM process locks the database; you can't have a bunch of different applications in different JVMs accessing the same embedded database at the same time. The pro is direct access.
When you're running a server, usually that means you're using the web admin components which also provide a set of RESTful services. The pro of this is that it's in a different JVM. Meaning you could access it more easily from other programming languages, over the network, and so on. You could have many applications in many JVMs all talking to a server instance via RESTful services. Generally access isn't as fast, but it's more flexible. When you run it this way though, direct access to the graph inside of a java application (using the Neo4J API) is off limits.
If you want to run the web admin/GUI stuff and RESTful services from within an embedded database, you can do that. See these instructions for how.
Here's a code snippet: what you need is the WrappingNeoServerBootstrapper.
AbstractGraphDatabase graphdb = getGraphDb();
WrappingNeoServerBootstrapper srv;
srv = new WrappingNeoServerBootstrapper( graphdb );
srv.start();
// The server is now running
// until we stop it:
srv.stop();
Related
In which mode neo4j database should be used embedded or rest server?
My main concerns are :
Performance
Horizontal scaling (HA,Clustering) - essential as application is very big.
Transactional support(in frameworks like SDN,Grails Plugin,structr etc.)
Deployment server support like amazon,GrapheneDB etc.
Easiness of switching from one to another
Scaling(size of database)
Disclaimer: I'm one of the founders of GrapheneDB.
I'm not an expert in embedded mode so my answer might be biased but I will try my best:
Embedded is more performant at this time than server
Clustering is supported in embedded as well as in server
Transactional support is available in both modes AFAIK. Spring Data, however has currently bad performance over Rest/server.
From my POV embedded has the disadvantage of being coupled to your app/server deployment.
There is one more option which you haven't brought up, which is using unmanaged server extensions.
Using extensions you can get the best of both modes:
You write your code on top of the Java API and it's executed locally, so you get extremely good performance.
You can run the server in server mode, making operations easier and also enabling you to host on a separate remote host, on any cloud environment.
GrapheneDB supports unmanaged extensions and it's the option we currently recommend for scenarios where extra performance is needed.
How can I run multiple Neo4j databases simultaneously on a single server? I would like to have separate data directories and ports if this is possible.
Has anyone done this successfully and if so explain how to do this
I have tried something like:
bin\neo4j start
To set up Neo4j with multiple instances on a single server, you essentially configure a cluster, with each node having its own set of configuration properties. You then run the cluster in single-instance (non-HA) mode (otherwise you'll just end up with a replication cluster, which doesn't meet your requirement).
Full instructions are in the Neo4j docs online and in your local doc\manual folder.
Note: The folks at Neo Technology call this out for dev/test purposes. I can't offer guidance on running this in production, other than the fact you'd have multiple instances competing for the same resources (cpu, disk, memory, network).
It's possible to setup Rexster to serve up multiple neo4j database directories. This is great if you're using the Gremlin query language. Other access forms may not be available (beyond my knowledge). Check out this question/answer: possible to connect to multiple neo4j databases via bulbs/Rexster?
I have a general question about the embedded driver for neo4j. What exactly does it mean to be embedded, besides it being lower level and higher performance. Is it an actual instance of the database service or just a driver for connecting to an existing database process or service. For instance
Does using the embedded driver libraries acquire an exclusive lock on the database files?
Can multiple clients use the embedded driver to use the same database at the same time?
Can it run against a database that already has a database service(along with the REST api) running? Initial tests seem to indicate no since it throws a file lock exception.
Does the embedded driver have to be on the same machine or process as the database service? For instance if the db data files are on a shared SAN that multiple machines can access, and there is another server that is running the REST api and the neo4j service. The configuration on the driver seems to point to the data files directly rather than a service or port.
I am using embedded Neo4j in a project.
Embedded Neo4j is a Neo4j server started and shutdown by your application. So it is not just a driver used to connect to some standalone server. For a standalone server you would use Neo4j over Rest (locally or remotely).
Because of it's implementation embedded neo4j can be used by only one application - the application that started the embedded instance. It retrieves a lock on the graph files, and you can't use any other application (e.g. neo4j-sh) to access those files as long the embedded server is running.
I'm a hobby programmer trying to build a client/server application suite, using Delphi XE.
I write stand-alone applications occasionally, for my personal use. The problem is I don't know ANYTHING when it comes to networking / multi-tier. I am willing to learn though.
I looked for ways to do this and DataSnap and IntraWeb jump out as the most likely candidates for the job. But, before I start using one or the other, I would like to know a few info I wasn't able to find on the web:
If I build an IW stand-alone app and deploy it on my site (as server) will I be able to connect to it/retrieve data with a client application? I need to do that within my Delphi written app, without using a browser and without using HTML (I know very little HTML and I'm not eager to learn). I know IntraWeb isn't meant for this, but will it work?
If I go with DataSnap and build a server app, will I be able to deploy it to my website? Or do I have to make a computer on the network the server?
In case anyone wants to know, I want to connect 5 computers(from different cities), to exchange information between them, if at all possible using ADO, as I'm very familiar with it.
Intraweb is a server based tool for building web sites, accessed via a browser. It is not "proper" multi-tier, and it sounds like it isn't what you need.
DataSnap is designed to do what you want I think. First, the ADO part would be on the server, and you would define an interface that the server offers to do tasks. Then your clients would call that interface over the internet to get data or do those tasks etc.
As for whether they will work on your web server, that depends on what your server is, and the access that is provided to it. A web server is just a PC, but typical hosting is fairly restricted to running "scripted" languages on that server, which reside in the hosting directory. A Delphi server would be a running executable (usually a Windows Service), listening on a port, and needs much more access to the computer than typical. You would need at least a virtual Windows server with administrator access to the desktop to allow it to work. In the first instance though, you could happily run the server on a DSL line or similar and make it work just fine. You can worry about hosting it on the net when you have customers paying for it.
What I want to do: My application has a full connection to a Derby DB, and I want to poke around in the DB (read-only) in parallel (using a different tool).
I'm not sure how Derby actually works internally, but I understand that I can have only 1 active connection to a Derby DB.
However, since the DB is only consisting of files on my HDD, shouldn't I be able to open additional connections to it, in read-only mode?
Are there any tools to do just that?
There are two possibilities how to run Apache Derby DB.
Embedded: You run DB within your application → only one connection possible
Client: You start DB as server in separate process → classic DB with many connections
You can recognize the type upon driver size. If the driver has more then 2MB that you use embedded version.
Update
When you startup the derby engine (server or embedded) it gets exclusive access to database files.
If you need to access a single database from more than one Java Virtual Machine (JVM), you will need to put a server solution in place. You can allow applications from multiple JVMs that need to access that database to connect to the server.
For details see Double-booting system behavior.
I realize this is an old question, but I thought I might add a little more detail on a solution since links in the currently accepted answer are broken.
It is possible to run the Derby Network Server within a JVM that is using the embedded database already. The code that is using the embedded Derby database doesn't need to change anything and can keep using the DB as is, but with the Derby Network Server started, other programs can connect to derby and access the database.
All you need to do is ensure that derbynet.jar is on the classpath
And then you can do one of the following
Include the following line in the derby.properties file: derby.drda.startNetworkServer=true
Specify the property as a system property at java start
java -Dderby.drda.startNetworkServer=true
You can use the NetworkServerControl API to start the Network Server from a separate thread within a Java application:
NetworkServerControl server = new NetworkServerControl();
server.start (new PrintWriter(System.out));
More details here: http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.9/adminguide/tadminconfig814963.html
Keep in mind that doing this does not enable any security on this connection, so it is not a good idea to do this on a production system. It is possible to add security though and that is documented here: http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.9/adminguide/cadminnetservsecurity.html
Two other ideas:
In your application, shut down the database and close the connection when the database is not actively in use. Then your application won't interfere with another tool which is trying to open the database.
Make a copy of your database, by taking a backup (you can do this while the database is open by your application), then restore that backup to a separate place on your disk. Then you can use another tool to access the copied database at your ease.
If you can afford the memory and do not need up-to-date data, then you can access read-only databases from multiple JVMs by creating in-memory copies:
ij> connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:memdb;restoreFrom=mydb';