First off, thanks mottie for doing so much in terms of answering questions and providing demos, it's been great. I have a table with drop-down filters using the widget. There is an option for one of the drop-down selectors, called "Deprecated". I am trying to use a button external to the table to toggle whether or not any rows with this "Deprecated" value are being displayed. When these rows are being shown, I want them to behave like all other table rows.
I couldn't find a straightforward way to do this, after approaching it at several different angles. Any help would be much appreciated!
Related
I'm using GeoGebra Classic 5 and have a bigger project where I've encountered the problem that I can't find any way to change the order of elements in the list of the algebra view after the elements are created. Sure I could of course just delete the affected elements and create them in the right order but I'm sure there must be a better solution to such a simple problem.
Here you see what it looks like right now, and how I would like it to look
I've tried looking through the properties panel and all the navbar buttons but there seems to be no way to change the order of the list. The only thing I've found is the "sort by" setting that changes the order but doesn't let the user decide the order other than some predefined sortings. I also haven't been able to find anything about this on google or the geogebra documentation. Hope you can help
I have a spreadsheet in google sheets that has a lot of checkmarks:
I want to create another checkbox filtering system, either at the top, if possible, or on another tab if not. I've tried putting the filter at the top, but as I'm sure you know, it overwrites the data, so no bueno. I also tried this:
with this code:
=FILTER(Movies!A3:P1000,(IF(F2=0,Movies!F4:F1002=0,Movies!F4:F1002=1)))
Which doesn't seem to be doing what I want either? It's showing a random selection, it seems, rather than only the data with the F column being true.
Ideally, you click the checkmarks of the data you want to see, so, if you click the check under Andrew, Addison and Richie, it would only show the rows that had only Andrew, Richie, and Addison's checkmarks. I am fine with making the checkmarks a 0,1,2 list if needed. (Because checkmarks I think are only binary, unless they have an option somewhere to have a third option that I'm unaware of, and marking some data to not be seen if it doesn't have a checkmark would likely require a third option.)
this is what I've got
I'm stuck on this one, and after a number of google searches am now wondering if I'm the only person who's ever tried to do this.
I have a google sheet that users are required to fill in. There is a drop-down selection option at the top, specifying the region the user needs the file for.
However, as the user gets down to the lines for the individual items required, some (a small number) may not be for the region selected at the top.
So what I'm trying to do is add the regions to the individual lines. The default for each line should be the region selected at the top, so this should show as pre-selected. But I want the user to be able to still click on a drop-down arrow and select a different region for a line.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to do this? Thank you!
Okay,
I'm unsure of your expected outcome, your request is also not very clear -
What I've done is created a list via Data validation, however, if a user enters data into the adjacent column:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OsrQCUt-Urf_Gx8_l9CBZkaUlDc311-S-0csa9GAtCQ/edit?usp=sharing
also it's good practice to share an example of your workbook for others to edit and work on.
let me know if this is what you wanted.
i need one more help.
First question is: I understood that the sections, text, images, etc on a MonoTouch.Dialog will be created dynamically. But can i have buttons as well? If yes, how can i have the events of that button binded.
Second question is : Basically i have a search text, and a button, on the click of the button, the text is sent to the Twitter-url, to get the tweets, these tweets need to be displayed, now they contain, images, texts, and reply and a favourite. Can the search result and the Search Button+Edit box, be the part of one ViewController?
But can i have buttons as well?
Element in the DialogViewController often act like buttons. But if you want a real UIButton you can do something like: Monotouch.Dialog two tables
Can the search result and the Search Button+Edit box, be the part of one ViewController?
I don't see any problem doing that. Use the code from the above link and add a EntryElement.
the text is sent to the Twitter-url, to get the tweets, these tweets need to be displayed
Have you looked at TweetStation ? It's an open source application that is based on MonoTouch.Dialog. It can likely help you answer questions on both fronts.
I'd like to create a content box with two tabs. Each tab is associated with a table which contain server-side data. My thought right now is just to load the page with 10 rows worth of data for each table and hide/display each table respectively to begin.
I was then going to toggle display of the tabbed content based on either click events on the tabs OR GET parameters relating to which tabbed content is being acted on (through pagination, for example).
Should I just handle this with UI tabs or is toggling display reasonable in this case? Since the user can update their data, I assume that caching via the tab UI isn't helpful in this case.
Thanks,
Brendan
From what I understood, I don't think its going to be overkill. If you are worried about performance, ten rows for 2 tables is just 20, which is not much. Paginating will also get 10 more rows for each 'click' so it's still good there.
Do use tab activation through click events, but also use GET parameters to know in which page the user currently is, from which tab.
Regarding caching data that you know will change, it might be unnecessary (see my 1st paragraph). Caching can sometimes become unwieldy, so don't add an uneccesary layer of complexity.
As someone who suggests simplicity above all else, I'd discard the whole 'tab loading' thing but leaving the tabs per se (i.e. the interface elements that will be clicked) and when the user clicks each tab, it takes to another page with the tabs too, old-fashioned style.