I have the following function to sum all the records of an :amount field in my Pack model for that given user:
user.rb
def total_money_spent_cents
amount = self.packs.map(&:amount).sum
return amount
end
However, when I use this function I receive the following error:
nil can't be coerced into Fixnum
Any suggestions?
EDIT
I am still having issues in regards to Fixnum in my tests, and have another question open here.
This suggests that one of your packs has an amount field which has not yet been set, so is nil. When you try and add it to something else, it undergoes Type coercion, to see if Ruby can massage its type into one that can be added to numbers, but it can't, and so you have this error.
One solution is this:
def total_amount_spent_cents
packs.map(&:amount).compact.sum
end
Array#compact removes the nil elements.
This may be fixing the symptom and not the actual problem though. It could be the case that you shouldn't have nil's in there at all, in which case you should check the initialisation of your Pack model (or perhaps its validations, to ensure that amount is mandatory).
I added some extra methods into Array and Hash for this sort of thing: they're like compact but they remove all values returning true for blank? rather than just nil: so will remove empty strings, empty arrays, hashes etc.
class Hash
def compact_blank!
self.each{|k,v| self.delete(k) if v.blank? }
self
end
def compact_blank
self.dup.compact_blank!
end
end
class Array
def compact_blank!
self.delete_if(&:blank?)
end
def compact_blank
self.dup.compact_blank!
end
end
use like
["1", "abc", "", nil, []].compact_blank
=> ["1", "abc"]
it's useful with params especially, where you might get a lot of empty strings through.
Related
i'm trying (and actually succeded, but i don't understand how it works) to write a custom method for a hash in my model (I'm working on Ruby on Rails 6).
My hash looks like this
my_hash = {
[['name_1', 'slug_1']=>value_1],
[['name_2', 'slug_2']=>value_2],
[['name_1', 'slug_1']=>value_3],
[['name_2', 'slug_2']=>value_4]
}
So basically a hash of arrays. You notice that the 'keys' are arrays that repeat themselves many times, but with different values. What i want to achieve is to write a custom method that "joins" all the keys in only one key, which will have an array of values assigned, so basically i should be able to get:
my_hash = {
['name_1', 'slug_1']=>"values": [value_1, value_3],
['name_2', 'slug_2']=>"values": [value_2, value_4]
}
For that, I have this piece of code, which i use many times:
my_hash.inject({}) do |hash, record|
# each record has the following format => [["unit_name", "axis.slug"]=>average_value(float)]
keys, value = record
# now keys has ["unit_name", "axis.slug"] and values equals average_value
hash[keys.first] ||= {}
hash[keys.first][keys.last] = value.to_f
hash
end
Since I use this many times, i wanted to write a custom method, so i did:
def format_hash_data my_hash
my_hash.inject({}) do |hash, record|
# each record has the following format => [["unit_name", "axis.slug"]=>average_value(float)]
keys, value = record
# now keys has ["unit_name", "axis.slug"] and values equals average_value
hash[keys.first] ||= {}
hash[keys.first][keys.last] = value.to_f
hash
end
end
And used it like: my_hash = format_hash_data(my_hash) with no success(it threw an error saying that 'format_hash_data' was not a valid method for the class).
So I fiddled around and added 'self' to the name of the method, leaving:
def self.format_hash_data my_hash
my_hash.inject({}) do |hash, record|
# each record has the following format => [["unit_name", "axis.slug"]=>average_value(float)]
keys, value = record
# now keys has ["unit_name", "axis.slug"] and values equals average_value
hash[keys.first] ||= {}
hash[keys.first][keys.last] = value.to_f
hash
end
end
Which, to my surprise, worked flawlessly when using my_hash = format_hash_data(my_hash)
I don't really understand why adding 'self' makes my code works, maybe anyone can shed some light? I tried using things like send() or instance_eval first, to just send the piece of code to the actual hash as a method (something like my_hash.instance_eval(my_method)) but I couldn't get it working.
I'm sorry about the long explanation, I hope i was clear enough so any of you who had this same dilemma can understand. Thanks in advance.
Prepending self. to the method name makes it a class method instead of an instance method. If you are not sure of the difference, you should look it up as it is fundamental to properly defining and using classes and methods.
As a class method, you would use it as:
my_hash = MyHash.format_hash_data(my_hash)
Or if you're in scope of the class, simply my_hash = format_hash_data(my_hash), which is why it worked in your case with the self. prepended (class method definition).
If you want to define it as an instance method (a method that is defined for the instance), you would use it like so:
my_hash = my_hash.format_hash_data
And the definition would use the implicit self of the instance:
def format_hash_data
self.inject({}) do |hash, record|
# each record has the following format => [["unit_name", "axis.slug"]=>average_value(float)]
keys, value = record
# now keys has ["unit_name", "axis.slug"] and values equals average_value
hash[keys.first] ||= {}
hash[keys.first][keys.last] = value.to_f
hash
end
end
Here's my Rails class
class SkinnyEmployee
include ActiveModel::Validations
attr_accessor :uid, :name
validates :uid, :presence => true
def initialize(id, name)
#uid = id
#name = name
end
def ==(other)
puts "Calling =="
raise ArgumentError.new("other is nil or bad in "+self.to_s) if other.nil? or !other.instance_of?(SkinnyEmployee)
return (self.class == other.class && self.uid == other.uid)
end
alias :eql? :==
end
I have a hash of SkinnyEmployee objects. E.g.,
skinny_hash = {SkinnyEmployee.new("123", "xyz") => 1, SkinnyEmployee.new("456", "abc") => 2}
I have another SkinnyEmployee object that I want to look up. E.g.,
entry = SkinnyEmployee.new("456", "abc")
When I do
skinny_hash.keys.index(entry)
I get 1, as expected. But when I do
skinny_hash.has_key?(entry)
I get false.
Why is that? Doesn't has_key? also use == or eql? to find whether a key exists in a hash?
Thanks much for the help!
First, this drove me nuts. What you're doing looked absolutely correct to me, and, as you already know, doesn't work.
I can take you part of the way to a solution:
http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.0.0/Object.html#method-i-hash
quoting:
Generates a Fixnum hash value for this object. This function must have the property that a.eql?(b) implies a.hash == b.hash.
The hash value is used along with eql? by the Hash class to determine if two objects reference the same hash key. Any hash value that exceeds the capacity of a Fixnum will be truncated before being used.
I added:
def hash
1
end
to your SkinnyEmployee Class, and has_key? started returning true. Obviously that's not a solution, but I'm thinking it at least puts you on the path to one.
You have overwritten the eql? method used by Array#index but not the hash method used by Hash#has_key?.
From Ruby docs for Object#hash
Generates a Fixnum hash value for this object. This function must have the property that a.eql?(b) implies a.hash == b.hash.
The Object#hash and Object#eql? methods return equal if and only if the objects occupy the same space in memory. Some classes like Array overwrite both methods to return true if the compared array's have same elements.
For your case you can define the hash method like:
def hash
"#{self.class}_#{self.uid}".hash
end
This would satisfy the docs criteria for hash method given above.
That is happening because the object you are using as a key and they one you are using to search the key are different.
Every time you call SkinnyEmployee.new it will create a new, different, object. For example
employee_1 = SkinnyEmployee.new("123", "xyz")
employee_2 = SkinnyEmployee.new("123", "xyz")
employee_1 == employee_1 #=> true
employee_2 == employee_2 #=> true
employee_2 == employee_1 #=> false
If you call object_id on both employee_1 and employee_2 you will notice that it gives you different id's.
Using has_key? will check for the exact same object, and that won't be the case if you use SkinnyEmployee.new("456", "abc").
You would need a way to retrieve the exact same object, store it in a variable or in the DB, you are using as a key and use it as an attribute for has_key? for it to work.
Hope this can help you.
I am learning rails and going back to ruby to understand how methods in rails (and ruby really work). When I see method calls like:
validates :first_name, :presence => true
I get confused. How do you write methods in ruby that accept symbols or hashes. The source code for the validates method is confusing too. Could someone please simplify this topic of using symbols as arguments in ruby class and instance methods for me?
UPDATE:
Good one #Dave! But What I was trying out was something like:
def full_name (:first_name, :last_name)
#first_name = :first_name
#last_name = :last_name
p "#{#first_name} #{last_name}"
end
full_name("Breta", "Von Sustern")
Which obviously raises errors. I am trying to understand: Why is passing symbols like this as arguments wrong if symbols are just like any other value?
Symbols and hashes are values like any other, and can be passed like any other value type.
Recall that ActiveRecord models accept a hash as an argument; it ends up being similar to this (it's not this simple, but it's the same idea in the end):
class User
attr_accessor :fname, :lname
def initialize(args)
#fname = args[:fname] if args[:fname]
#lname = args[:lname] if args[:lname]
end
end
u = User.new(:fname => 'Joe', :lname => 'Hacker')
This takes advantage of not having to put the hash in curly-brackets {} unless you need to disambiguate parameters (and there's a block parsing issue as well when you skip the parens).
Similarly:
class TestItOut
attr_accessor :field_name, :validations
def initialize(field_name, validations)
#field_name = field_name
#validations = validations
end
def show_validations
puts "Validating field '#{field_name}' with:"
validations.each do |type, args|
puts " validator '#{type}' with args '#{args}'"
end
end
end
t = TestItOut.new(:name, presence: true, length: { min: 2, max: 10 })
t.show_validations
This outputs:
Validating field 'name' with:
validator 'presence' with args 'true'
validator 'length' with args '{min: 2, max: 10}'
From there you can start to see how things like this work.
I thought I'd add an update for Ruby 2+ since this is the first result I found for 'symbols as arguments'.
Since Ruby 2.0.0 you can also use symbols when defining a method. When calling the method these symbols will then act almost the same as named optional parameters in other languages. See example below:
def variable_symbol_method(arg, arg_two: "two", arg_three: "three")
[arg, arg_two, arg_three]
end
result = variable_symbol_method :custom_symbol, arg_three: "Modified symbol arg"
# result is now equal to:
[:custom_symbol, "two", "Modified symbol arg"]
As shown in the example, we omit arg_two: when calling the method and in the method body we can still access it as variable arg_two. Also note that the variable arg_three is indeed altered by the function call.
In Ruby, if you call a method with a bunch of name => value pairs at the end of the argument list, these get automatically wrapped in a Hash and passed to your method as the last argument:
def foo(kwargs)
p kwargs
end
>> foo(:abc=>"def", 123=>456)
{:abc=>"def", 123=>456}
>> foo("cabbage")
"cabbage"
>> foo(:fluff)
:fluff
There's nothing "special" about how you write the method, it's how you call it. It would be perfectly legal to just pass a regular Hash object as the kwargs parameter. This syntactic shortcut is used to implement named parameters in an API.
A Ruby symbol is just a value as any other, so in your example, :first_name is just a regular positional argument. :presence is a symbol used as a Hash key – any type can be used as a Hash key, but symbols are a common choice because they're immutable values.
I think all replies have missed the point of question; and the fact it is asked by someone who is - I guess - not clear on what a symbol is ?
As a newcomer to Ruby I had similar confusions and to me an answer like following would have made more sense
Method Arguments are local variables populated by passed in values.
You cant use symbols as Arguments by themselves, as you cant change value of a symbol.
Symbols are not limited to hashes. They are identifiers, without the extra storage space of a string. It's just a way to say "this is ...."
A possible function definition for the validates call could be (just to simplify, I don't know off the top of my head what it really is):
def validates(column, options)
puts column.to_s
if options[:presence]
puts "Found a presence option"
end
end
Notice how the first symbol is a parameter all of its own, and the rest is the hash.
I want to implement a method that checks if a model's instance has only nil or empty attributes, except from its id or timestamps.
I've made use of an auxiliary method that removes a key from Hash and return the remaining hash ( question 6227600)
class ActiveRecord::Base
def blank?
self.attributes.remove("id","created_at","updated_at").reject{|attr| self[attr].blank?}.empty?
end
end
I guess that there may be much simpler, efficient or safer way to do this. Any suggestion?
def blank?
self.attributes.all?{|k,v| v.blank? || %w(id created_at updated_at).include?(k)}
end
My response is almost the same that tadman gave, but expressed in a more concise way.
Be careful with two situations:
- **blank?** is not a good choice as name, since if you call **object_a.object_b.blank?** trying to know if there is or not a object_b inside object_a, you'll get true event if the object exists. **empty?** seems a better name
- If databases sets defaults values, it can be tricky.
EDIT: Since build an array every iteration is slow (thanks tadman), a beter solution is:
def empty?
ignored_attrs = {'id' => 1, 'created_at' => 1, 'updated_at' => 1}
self.attributes.all?{|k,v| v.blank? || ignored_attrs[k]}
end
You could just check that all the properties in the attributes hash are not present, or the converse:
class ActiveRecord::Base
def blank?
!self.attributes.find do |key, value|
case (key)
when 'id', 'created_at', 'updated_at'
false
else
value.present?
end
end
end
end
Unfortunately this will not account for things that are set with a default in your database, if any relationship keys are assigned, among other things. You will have to add those as exceptions, or compare the values to a known default state of some sort.
This sort of thing is probably best implemented on a case by case basis.
Need to check if a block of attributes has changed before update in Rails 3.
street1, street2, city, state, zipcode
I know I could use something like
if #user.street1 != params[:user][:street1]
then do something....
end
But that piece of code will be REALLY long. Is there a cleaner way?
Check out ActiveModel::Dirty (available on all models by default). The documentation is really good, but it lets you do things such as:
#user.street1_changed? # => true/false
This is how I solved the problem of checking for changes in multiple attributes.
attrs = ["street1", "street2", "city", "state", "zipcode"]
if (#user.changed & attrs).any?
then do something....
end
The changed method returns an array of the attributes changed for that object.
Both #user.changed and attrs are arrays so I can get the intersection (see ary & other ary method). The result of the intersection is an array. By calling any? on the array, I get true if there is at least one intersection.
Also very useful, the changed_attributes method returns a hash of the attributes with their original values and the changes returns a hash of the attributes with their original and new values (in an array).
You can check APIDock for which versions supported these methods.
http://apidock.com/rails/ActiveModel/Dirty
For rails 5.1+ callbacks
As of Ruby on Rails 5.1, the attribute_changed? and attribute_was ActiveRecord methods will be deprecated
Use saved_change_to_attribute? instead of attribute_changed?
#user.saved_change_to_street1? # => true/false
More examples here
ActiveModel::Dirty didn't work for me because the #model.update_attributes() hid the changes. So this is how I detected changes it in an update method in a controller:
def update
#model = Model.find(params[:id])
detect_changes
if #model.update_attributes(params[:model])
do_stuff if attr_changed?
end
end
private
def detect_changes
#changed = []
#changed << :attr if #model.attr != params[:model][:attr]
end
def attr_changed?
#changed.include :attr
end
If you're trying to detect a lot of attribute changes it could get messy though. Probably shouldn't do this in a controller, but meh.
Above answers are better but yet for knowledge we have another approch as well,
Lets 'catagory' column value changed for an object (#design),
#design.changes.has_key?('catagory')
The .changes will return a hash with key as column's name and values as a array with two values [old_value, new_value] for each columns. For example catagory for above is changed from 'ABC' to 'XYZ' of #design,
#design.changes # => {}
#design.catagory = 'XYZ'
#design.changes # => { 'catagory' => ['ABC', 'XYZ'] }
For references change in ROR