I'm trying to "mirror" a view controller:
app instantiates view controller 1 (of class A)
app instantiates view controller 2 (also of class A) on another UIWindow (external display, via Airplay or physical connector)
any touch event that view controller 1 receives should be mimicked on view controller 2
I've got part of this working on things like MkMapViews and simple view controllers by just catching things like region changes or scrolling in vc1 and telling vc2 to set its region or scroll to that position, having UIControl IBActions on vc1 also call the same action in vc2, etc.
This works with simple cases, but the problem comes with complex view controllers that have things like UITableViews with custom UITableViewCells that expand / contract, etc. I find myself having to implement every single possible delegate / action and make a bunch of objects aware of things they shouldn't be aware of, which just seems wrong if I'm going to make this at all reusable.
I've tried walking the subview tree of vc1 and using objc_setAssociatedObject() to associate the UIResponders in the view controller instances with each other, but I still have to catch every delegate / action on vc1 to look up the UIResponder on vc2 to mimic the event. There has to be a simpler way to do this. I tried subclassing UIWindow and overriding sendEvent and sending the event to the external display's UIWindow as well, but each UIEvent seems to have info in it that ties it to the UIWindow it originated in, as the external display UIWindow did nothing with it when I sent it.
How would I do this in a way that would allow me to abstract away the mirroring into a nice subclass or something so I don't have to litter every view controller with special-case code? I've thought about swizzling UIView's touch events, but I'm not even sure if that will help since UITouches and UIEvents are tied to the UIWindow they originated from, and UIEvent doesn't seem to provide a way for me to create my own event.
NOTE: what I'm trying to do is not default Airplay mirroring, as I want the external display experience to take advantage of the full display resolution and dimensions. The idea is to allow an iPhone app to work on the device itself (i.e. taller than it is wide), while also providing an experience on an external display that is geared for that display (wider than it is tall, greater resolution, opportunities to present info in a more readable HDTV-friendly format).
Thoughts?
Related
There's a particular control which I'm trying to build properly. I refer to it as an ImageTile. It's basically a little square box, which, when the user taps it, will present the user (via an action sheet in a popover) the option of selecting an image from the library, or taking a photo. Depending on the response, I then either present the UIImagePickerController inside a popover (for selecting an image) or modally (for taking a new picture). Once they take/select the image, I have a modal view which appears and allows them to edit the picture in a few simple ways. When they finish editing, the modal dismisses, and the original ImageTile, rather than being a blank square box, gets filled up with the user's edited image.
The issue is that this ImageTile control is going to be used profusely throughout several different parts of the application, across numerous View Controller hierarchies, and so on... and I really want it to be a basically totally self-contained unit, such that whenever I stick an ImageTile inside a UIView onscreen, all the above functionality is handled by the ImageTile itself.
Initially, I made it a UIViewController subclass (so it could present modals etc), and just added its view as a subview of a "holder" view onscreen. I know this isn't recommended, as the controller isn't part of the VC hierarchy then... and also, I wound up with some really weird behavior regarding things like autorotation, especially when the camera was involved.
What's the "right" way to implement something like this?
I think what you've done by making it a UIViewController subclass is correct. You should just use the methods that UIViewController exposes for adding child view controllers, such as - addChildViewController:.
You will also note that Interface Builder has a Container View object designed specifically for holding a place in the hierarchy for a child View Controller:
I am subclassing UIApplication to intercept and display touches in my TouchDisplay view. I would like to extend the Application, Window, Delegate or Main ViewController in order to keep my TouchDisplay view on top of all other views. As my and most other applications work, views and controllers are added and removed all the time. I figure the correct answer will be able to deal with these additions and removals and stil keep the TouchDisplay view on top.
Thanks for your help,
Joe
Here are a few approaches you could take for this:
If you're targeting iOS 5+ and iPad only, you can make a top-level view controller which has two contained view controllers. The first would be a view controller for your "TouchDisplay" view. The second would be the application's normal root view controller. (i.e. your existing main view controller; you'll need to set definesPresentationContext to YES on this view controller) Since you're writing the container view controller, you can order those two subviews however you like. There is a WWDC 2011 Talk on view controller containment that goes into great detail about this. This is the most "correct" approach IMHO, because it gives you a view controller for your TouchDisplay view, handles rotation and generally plays nice with others. (This only works on iPad, because on iPhone a new modal view always covers the full screen.)
A more straight-forward approach is to simply add your TouchView to your existing top-level UIWindow as a subview with addSubview:. Most applications don't actually remove the top-level view controller or add new top-level ones; they just present other view controllers from it. A view you add in the top-level window will stay above those. Of course, your app may not follow this rule, in which case you might try option #3 instead. This has rotation gotchas (your view will not auto-rotate when the device rotates, so you need to do this yourself.) You could also force your view back to top, say, on a 1-second timer, if you are having issues with other things covering it. This is also not as nice as option #1 because you don't get a UIViewController, just a UIView.
The most extreme approach is that you can create another UIWindow and give it a higher window level, such as UIWindowLevelAlert and put your TouchDisplay view in that. You can then make the window background transparent, and it will stay above your normal app content. There are lots of gotchas here, especially about auto-rotation and which window is the keyWindow (which is why you should use #1 or #2 instead if you can).
After some time I was able to get my app working. I have made an easy to use overlay that shows touch feedback over your existing application.
You can download the project here:
https://github.com/megaplow/FingerTracks/tree/master/FingerTracks
Happy coding,
Joe
I want to present view controllers as simple as with native presentViewController:animated:completion:, dismissViewControllerAnimated:completion: methods, but use custom animations for this.
The common way to do this is to perform custom animation (using view screenshots instead of view itself) and call presentViewController:vc animated:NO completion:… after.
But in this case view controller life-cycle messages are sent not in time. viewWillApper: and viewDidAppear: sent together instead of normal way: the first one just before animation and the last — after. Also they sent with animated parameter set to NO.
The other bad thing is that screenshot of a view (for animation) captured before viewWillApper: called. So it can be some outdated, and this will cause flicking at the end of animation.
I've searched lot of related projects on github/cocoapods (SO answers too), but did not find any with the right life-cycle of presented view controller. There are sometimes even worse solutions like simple views changing without any calls to life-cycle methods.
Possible solutions I know:
iOS7 — I can't, I need it in iOS6 too
Use transition between contained view controllers — Not as simple and reusable as "modal presenting"
Use tricky animations like here — my animation can't be implemented in similar way
While writing this question I thought about custom segue with overridden perform: method. But looks like it's not easy too. At least I don't know how to use it without storyboard and how to do dismiss in easy way.
Do you know how to present view controller with custom animation in iOS6 and make it's life-cycle happy?
Update: finally I've decided to use container view controller. It has ability to customize transitions of it's children and preserve VC's life-cycle. The bad side: it's not as easy as custom transitions in iOS7. It needs container, making xib some harder. And needs additional code to support.
Please clear some confusions regarding UIViewController
I found this article Abusing UIViewController and here are the links link1 & link2
and summarised points
This is author's (and Apple’s) advice In a nutshell:
One (and only one) view controller should be responsible for a whole hierarchy (or screenful) of UIViews.
Mostly, you should only use one view controller per screen. Essentially the rootViewController of the current UIWindow should be the only UIViewController with a visible view.
Each different screen should have a different view controller i.e. one controller should not control more than one screen.
You should NOT nest custom UIViewControllers within a view hierarchy.
If more than one UIViewController hangs off the application’s UIWindow, only one of these will get the messages for changes in orientation. The other(s) will NOT get these messages.
Nested UIViewControllers are not guaranteed, or likely, to receive messages for changes in orientation or lifecycle messages such as viewDidAppear:, viewWillAppear:, viewDidDisappear: and viewWillDisappear: even though they inherit from UIViewController. Only the topmost UIViewController is certain to get these messages.
Please clear point number 2 and 3
because when we use UINavigationController or UITabBarController we use multiple subclasses of UIViewController. And ios device has only one screen.....
This article Abusing UIViewController highlight apple suggestion
Note: If you want to divide a view hierarchy into multiple subareas
and manage each one separately, use generic controller objects (custom
objects descending from NSObject) instead of view controller objects
to manage each subarea. Then use a single view controller object to
manage the generic controller objects.
and in apple docs under heading of Coordinating Efforts Between View Controllers apple saying
Few iOS apps show only a single screenful of content. Instead, they
show some content when first launched and then show and hide other
content in response to user actions. These transitions provide a
single unified user interface that display a lot of content, just not
all at once.....
My requirement is NOT to use any container or modal or popover, I want to do manual management, I have two view controllers VC1 & VC2. VC1 is the root view controller now I want to switch/transit/move to VC2 what should I do?
VC1 should be the only subclass of UIViewController and VC2 should be the subclass of NSObject to manage a particular view in VC1 hierarchy?(the show hide thing by apple doc).
VC2 can also be the subclass of UIViewController, I just remove VC1 from root view and add VC2 as root view?
or what is the correct way?
Container view controllers (like UINavigationController) allow working around the one-VC-per-screen rule. Since iOS 5, developers have been able and allowed to write our own container controllers (which aren't actually much different from normal VCs). Generally this means that writing non-VC controller objects is less necessary than it used to be.
In your situation, where you want to replace the root view controller, your option 2 makes more sense. Use VCs where you can, and non-VC controller objects only when you can't. Since you're replacing the whole screen's content, just switching the UIWindow rootViewController makes the most sense (edit: alternately, many devs would just use a navigation controller to present the second view, because it's simple and convenient).
I am subclassing UIApplication to intercept and display touches in my TouchDisplay view. I would like to extend the Application, Window, Delegate or Main ViewController in order to keep my TouchDisplay view on top of all other views. As my and most other applications work, views and controllers are added and removed all the time. I figure the correct answer will be able to deal with these additions and removals and stil keep the TouchDisplay view on top.
Thanks for your help,
Joe
Here are a few approaches you could take for this:
If you're targeting iOS 5+ and iPad only, you can make a top-level view controller which has two contained view controllers. The first would be a view controller for your "TouchDisplay" view. The second would be the application's normal root view controller. (i.e. your existing main view controller; you'll need to set definesPresentationContext to YES on this view controller) Since you're writing the container view controller, you can order those two subviews however you like. There is a WWDC 2011 Talk on view controller containment that goes into great detail about this. This is the most "correct" approach IMHO, because it gives you a view controller for your TouchDisplay view, handles rotation and generally plays nice with others. (This only works on iPad, because on iPhone a new modal view always covers the full screen.)
A more straight-forward approach is to simply add your TouchView to your existing top-level UIWindow as a subview with addSubview:. Most applications don't actually remove the top-level view controller or add new top-level ones; they just present other view controllers from it. A view you add in the top-level window will stay above those. Of course, your app may not follow this rule, in which case you might try option #3 instead. This has rotation gotchas (your view will not auto-rotate when the device rotates, so you need to do this yourself.) You could also force your view back to top, say, on a 1-second timer, if you are having issues with other things covering it. This is also not as nice as option #1 because you don't get a UIViewController, just a UIView.
The most extreme approach is that you can create another UIWindow and give it a higher window level, such as UIWindowLevelAlert and put your TouchDisplay view in that. You can then make the window background transparent, and it will stay above your normal app content. There are lots of gotchas here, especially about auto-rotation and which window is the keyWindow (which is why you should use #1 or #2 instead if you can).
After some time I was able to get my app working. I have made an easy to use overlay that shows touch feedback over your existing application.
You can download the project here:
https://github.com/megaplow/FingerTracks/tree/master/FingerTracks
Happy coding,
Joe