so I implemented this gem and everything works great, but when I list all of the items my user is following through "user.all_following" it lists it in descending order, from the most oldest to the most recent followed being the last item listed. Im trying to figure out how to reverse this and make the most recent followings displayed first and later following under it. Thanks.
<% allfollows = #user.all_follows %>
<% allfollows.each do |item| %>
....
<& end &>
All you have to do is pass order option to your all_follows method call.
For example:
#user.all_follows(order: "follows.id DESC")
By the way, currently you are getting records in ascending(most oldest to the most recent) order and NOT descending(most recent to most oldest).
I think the answer is given in the README of the gem: https://github.com/tcocca/acts_as_follower
The following methods take an optional hash parameter of ActiveRecord options (:limit, :order, etc…)
follows_by_type, all_follows, all_following, following_by_type
OR
Follow.descending # returns all records in a descending order based on created_at datetime
So you can basically filter by anything you wish. I haven't ever used this gem, but this would make most sense to me.
There is also method present i.e descending
Example:-
#user.follows.descending
This gives you a descending order of records.
Thanks.
Related
I want to order all the items in a model Item so it displays the most recent ones first. According to the Rails guide, the following code should work:
Item.order("created_at DESC")
However, when I type that (or varieties) in the terminal, the most recent item always shows up last, and that's how they show up on my page. How do I efficiently retrieve them with he most recent first? (I'm going to display only some of them at a time on each page.)
Note that my default scope for items is oldest first.
Update:
This is the SQL I get:
SELECT "comments".* FROM "comments" ORDER BY comments.created_at ASC, created_at DESC
So I guess I shouldn't use default scopes...
The query you posted is correct
Item.order("created_at DESC")
The only reason why it would not work is if there is anything else conflicting with it. In general, the conflict is represented by a default_scope.
If you have a default scope that overrides your order, you should first unscope the query
Item.unscoped { Item.order("created_at DESC") }
If you are using default scopes, I strongly encourage you to avoid them. They are very hard to debug and unscope.
There are very few cases where default scopes make sense. You can simply pass the (default) scope at select time in the controller or create a custom method for it.
I realise this is a really old question, but none of the answers contain the solution without writing raw SQL, which is available since Rails 3+:
Item.order(created_at: :desc)
or using the reverse_order method:
Item.order(:created_at).reverse_order
See more at http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html#ordering
and
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html#reverse-order.
I modified CDub's answer with reverse so it now works:
Item.order(:created_at).reverse
I'm still not sure why the Rails guide's way doesn't work. Also the above method doesn't work well with pagination.
Item.unscoped.order('created_at DESC') should work.Using reverse might decrease the performance when the number of records increases
Correct one and tested
#purchase_orders = current_company.purchase_orders.order(:date)
#purchase_orders = #purchase_orders.reverse_order
you can add You can also define the default order in Item model
default_scope order('created_at DESC')
I can't find this documented anywhere but here is my problem: when I query via active record and use "only" the "order" clause is ignored. For example I have a Blog model:
Blog.order('id desc')
returns all the blogs with the highest ID first - as expected but:
Blog.order('id desc').only(:id)
returns only the id's (as expected) but the order clause is completely ignored, the smallest id comes first.
I have tested this with Ruby 1.9.3p327 and both Rails 4.0.0.beta1 and Rails 3.2.13 and I get the same results.
Is this a feature or a bug? To me it's a bug because the Rails crew were trumpeting how find_by_sql is not really needed but in this case it is:
Blog.find_by_sql("select id from blogs order by id desc")
which gives the correct answer.
Try using pluck instead of only. only is used to override portions of the previously formed query chain. As the the docs demonstrate:
Post.where('id > 10').limit(20).order('id desc').only(:order, :where)
results in:
SELECT * FROM posts WHERE id > 10 ORDER BY id DESC
This is because the limit modification will be ignored, since the list passed to only doesn't include :limit.
UPDATE
If you need an actual model object returned instead of an array of id's, use select:
Blog.order('id desc').select('id')
I am new in this world of Rails. And I cannot get my head around this problem. How to get #microposts ordered by the date the micropost was created.
This is the line
#microposts = current_user.followeds.map(&:microposts).flatten
I only managed to order by date the 'followeds', but that is not what I am looking for. All the attempts I have made gave me errors, so I guess I am not aware of some syntax.
Any help is welcome!
Normally, you would add an order clause, as in:
Micropost.where(:written_by => current_user.followeds).order(:created_at)
The way you currently have this line structured doesn't permit that, however, since order is only available on ActiveRecord::Relations, and once you do map you no longer have a Relation available to chain on.
If that's the case, you'll want something like:
current_user.followeds.map(&:microposts).flatten.sort_by { |m| m.created_at }
I think you should try to approach this from another angle.
How about something like this:
#microposts = Micropost.where(author_id: current_user.followed_ids).order(:created_at).all
You might of course have to exchange author_id for whatever foreign key you have to identify what user a Micropost was written by.
If you want to reverse the posts (newest first), you just write order("created_at desc") instead.
Seems like it should be able to look at a simple tutorial or find an aswer with a quick google, but I can't...
codes = PartnerCode.find_by_sql "SELECT * from partner_codes where product = 'SPANMEX' and isused = 'false' limit 1"
I want the column named code, I want just the value. Tried everything what that seems logical. Driving me nuts because everything I find shows an example without referencing the actual values returned
So what is the object returned? Array, hash, ActiveRecord? Thanks in advance.
For Rails 4+ (and a bit earlier I think), use pluck:
Partner.where(conditions).pluck :code
> ["code1", "code2", "code3"]
map is inefficient as it will select all columns first and also won't be able to optimise the query.
You need this one
Partner.where( conditions ).map(&:code)
is shorthand for
Partner.where( conditions ).map{|p| p.code}
PS
if you are often run into such case you will like this gem valium by ernie
it gives you pretty way to get values without instantiating activerecord object like
Partner.where( conditions ).value_of :code
UPDATED:
if you need access some attribute and after that update record
save instance first in some variable:
instance=Partner.where( conditions ).first
then you may access attributes like instance.code and update some attribute
instance.update_attribute || instance.update_attributes
check documentation at api.rubyonrails.org for details
So I am trying to find all entries in my table that have a specific value in a particular column. The only way I can think off to do this is to look at each entry and see if it has the value but I was hoping there would be a more efficient solution - this gets unwieldy once you have a sizable database.
Does anyone have a better idea?
Update - I am creating an HTML table and I want to populate the table with all the entries in my model that have a certain value in a particular column. I am trying to do:
<%= render #users.where("column_name = 'value'") %>
as the answer below recommends but I get "undefined method `where' for nil:NilClass" error.
Update 2 - I am not sure why #users would be nil but I will try to figure that out later. For now, I tried
<% #user_message = User.where("column_name = 'value'") %>
<%= render #user_message %>
but it doesn't show any entries at all.
Update 3 - When I do, User.all in rails console, I get all the users so I know the data is there. However, when I do User.where("column_name = 'value'"), I get an empty array. I double checked the column name and value to make sure that the data was present.
Update 4 - Fixed! - I'm not sure why it didn't work in rails console but I got it to work in the site. I called my partial _user_message.html.erb. Apparently it still needs to be called _user.html.erb. Thanks for the help everyone!
Sounds like you want to do a where query, i.e.
#records = Model.where(:some_column => some_value)
Rails has excellent documentation, I suggest you take a look at the ActiveRecord Query guide:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html
ian.