i use one Neos installation for multiple domains with different content.
duplicating the package TYPO3.NeosDemoTypo3Org, removing the node-identifier and doing some replacements brought me nearby everything i need.
But only the first Settings.yaml found in Packages/Sites/ seems to be parsed. All changes to the Settings.yaml found in other packages (Test1 and Test2 in the following example) are ignored.
Packages/Sites/TYPO3.NeosDemoTypo3Org/Configuration/Settings.yaml
TYPO3:
Form:
yamlPersistenceManager:
savePath: 'resource://TYPO3.NeosDemoTypo3Org/Private/Form/'
Packages/Sites/UDF.Test1/Configuration/Settings.yaml
TYPO3:
Form:
yamlPersistenceManager:
savePath: 'resource://UDF.Test1/Private/Form/'
Packages/Sites/UDF.Test2/Configuration/Settings.yaml
TYPO3:
Form:
yamlPersistenceManager:
savePath: 'resource://UDF.Test2/Private/Form/'
When i delete the first Settings.yaml (Packages/Sites/UDF.Test2/Configuration/Settings.yaml), the next Setting.yaml in alphabetical order (Packages/Sites/UDF.Test1/Configuration/Settings.yaml) is used for all 3 site packages. When i also delete this file, the Settings.yaml from UDF.Test2 is used and so on.
would be awesome if somebody can enlighten me. I am new to flow and neos and any help is welcome. RTFM, i know, but as described here i have to believe, that it should work like i did?
alternative way?
is it possible not to set the savePath in the site package configuration but in the common settings ./Packages/Application/TYPO3.Form/Configuration/Settings.yaml
I see a {#package} placeholder in
### BASE ELEMENTS ###
# NAMING: base class for everything is RENDERABLE
'TYPO3.Form:Base':
renderingOptions:
templatePathPattern: 'resource://{#package}/Private/Form/{#type}.html'
but this doesn't work here
TYPO3:
Form:
yamlPersistenceManager:
#savePath: '%FLOW_PATH_DATA%Forms/'
savePath: 'resource://{#package}/Private/Form/'
as you see i am not really experienced with this stuff but i am very motivated.
All Settings.yaml are used, but the settings are merged in order of the package loading.
The loading order of packages again is based on their dependencies.
All three packages probably have the same dependencies so they are loaded one after the other (would need to check with which ordering), so third Settings.yaml is loaded, then second Settings.yaml is loaded and overwrites the third, then the first is loaded and again overwrites the second. Every setting path can only be set once, that's why.
In any case what you are trying to archive probably won't work. This is one of the things we have to fix (site package dependent configuration).
A possible workaround is either using a common package with the form configuration and just set the savePath to this package or using diferent subcontexts (like Production/Domain1 Production/Domain2) and setting this setting different per subcontext, then you could define the subcontext by domain (as the sites are triggered by domain anyway).
Related
I am busy making a sublime text plugin/package that will ease development of lua scripts in my workplace.
We have several lua files with different extensions depending on their purpose. I want ST3 to give the proper lua syntax to these files.
I know you can set ST3 to remember syntax for a specific file extension and this is saved as a (in my case) Lua.sublime-settings file in AppData\Roaming\Sublime Text 3\Packages\User
However, if I put this file in my new plugin's folder, it's ignored.
Am I doing something wrong or is what I want not possible?
This doesn't work because syntax specific settings are only loaded from the package that defines the syntax and from the User package (so the user can customize them).
The following is a quote from the official documentation on settings:
Settings files are consulted in this order:
1. Packages/Default/Preferences.sublime-settings
2. Packages/Default/Preferences (<platform>).sublime-settings
3. Packages/User/Preferences.sublime-settings
4. <Project Settings>
5. Packages/<syntax>/<syntax>.sublime-settings
6. Packages/User/<syntax>.sublime-settings
7. <Buffer Specific Settings>
The only places where <syntax> is referenced is from the package itself and from the user package.
If I had to guess, I would say that this is because outside of the original package author that defined the syntax, all other settings would be considered user customizations, and those settings need to be in the User package (specifically in the root of it) to ensure that they're loaded last.
A simple (but undesirable) solution would be to document for the user that they have to take this step manually.
Another approach would be to add some plugin code that extends the settings when your plugin is loaded:
def plugin_loaded():
settings = sublime.load_settings("Lua.sublime-settings")
extensions = settings.get("extensions", [])
if "blarb" not in extensions:
extensions.append("blarb")
settings.set("extensions", extensions)
sublime.save_settings("Lua.sublime-settings")
If you go this route you may want to include an extra sentinel setting somewhere (in settings specific to your package or some such) that says if you did this or not instead of just forcing the setting in as the example above does.
In practice you would then check if you've set that sentinel or not instead of forcing the extension in, so that if the user decides to use some other syntax for your files you're not forcing them into the Lua syntax.
It's also possible to define your own syntax that just embeds the standard Lua syntax, which allows this to Just Work⢠without having to write any code or have the user do anything:
%YAML 1.2
---
name: Blarb
scope: source.lua
file_extensions:
- blarb
contexts:
main:
- include: scope:source.lua
When you do this, the scope in the file will still be source.lua because that's what the scope in the syntax file says. and the status line will set the syntax name to Blarb. You could modify either of those to change the top level scope or displayed name, if desired.
An example would be to change the scope to source.blarb so that you could create key bindings/snippets that only apply to Lua files of your specific variant.
A potential downside/feature of this is that since the name of the syntax specific settings comes from the name of the file that provides the syntax, if the user has any Lua specific settings, they won't apply to your Blarb files by default.
Similarly anything that's specific to Lua by checking for a scope of source.lua won't work in Blarb files for same reasons, which may or may not be an issue.
My Grails (2.4.2) app was created with a bunch of "default/standard" resource bundles:
myapp/
grails-app/
i18n/
messages.properties
messages_fr.properties
I would now like to create my own "custom" resource bundle, that is, define properties in a file outside of these standard messages*.properties files that myapp was created with.
According to the i18n documentation, all bundles need to be prefixed with messages and suffixed .properties. So I added two new props files, one for English and one for French:
myapp/
grails-app/
i18n/
messages.properties
messages_fr.properties
messages_myapp.properties
messages_myapp_fr.properties
For one, I'm not 100% sure I'm interpreting the docs correctly. So if anything about my 2 new props files jumps out at you as being incorrect, please start by letting me know!
Having said that, in all the example from those docs, I don't see where you specify the bundle to use. All of the examples look like this:
<g:message code="fizz.buzz.foo" />
But what if I have a fizz.buzz.foo property defined in both messages_blah.properties and messages_bar.properties?
So I ask: How do I add my own custom resource bundles, and how do I properly refer to them from inside a GSP?
To answer your question you have to understand what Grails (well, Spring really) is doing to accomplish this.
You are on the right path with the multiple files. What you have outlined there matches the documentation and will work.
However, under the covers what is really being done is they are being combined into a single bundle (per language). So there is no need to tell Grails/Spring which bundle to use.
Finally, what happens when the same key is defined multiple times? The first one matched wins. I seem to recall that the order in which the bundles are combined is in file name order, though you should be able to test this pretty quickly.
Hope this helps, and best of luck!
I want to use chapters and chapter-menu as a e.g. image gallery, reference module or other collections in Typo3 Neos.
As there are multiple domains with different content in my installation i have a problem with the NodeTypes.yaml:
All my site packages are based on NeosDemoTypo3Org. Because i don't want to have multiple entries "chapter", "chapter menu", "youtube" and so on, i deleted the NodeTypes.yaml in my copies of NeosDemoTypo3Org (which is still installed).
When i add a page with content element "chapter menu" to a package and put some chapters in it, the chapter overview is only displayed, if am putting the NodeTypes.yaml back into my package configuration. But then again i have multiple entries of the same thing.
How/where can i configure this to fit my needs?
That should be no problem. Just having the Chapter etc. in one NodeTypes.yaml is enough for now (until we implemented separation per Site which we want to have at some point). But I guess you adapted all occurances of "TYPO3.NeosDemoTypo3Org" in your TypoScript to match the new package name? You need to of course change that back for everything that is related to those NodeTypes. The TypoScript must point to the correct name for this NodeType. And you have to declare the TypoScript in each package because TypoScript is NOT shared in contrast to the NodeTypes.
What you could do is create a "base package" that contains the NodeTypes and TypoScript (and Tempaltes for those) and include the TypoScript in each of your Site packages.
I've been searching and trying to learn for ages but it just doesn't stick. There seems to be only 1 tutorial on Zend 2, and it's not very smart. Here we have a sample structure (and the tutorial proceeds with this application) http://framework.zend.com/manual/2.0/en/user-guide/modules.html :
zf2-tutorial/
/module
/Album
/config
/src
/Album
/Controller
/Form
/Model
/view
/album
/album
That's not cool - how do I know which album is which? In Zend 1 it made a lot of sense - you have modules, then you have controllers, and those controllers have actions.
Now I have a module called Album. is the src/Album/... a "single controller"? Would:
zend1application/modules/album/albumcontroller.php map to zend2application/modules/album/src/album/controller/albumcontroller.php? In that case, why are there 3 albums now? Like what happens if I change albumcontroller.php to indexcontroller.php? (I have been testing but there are so many changes it never sticks - I finally thought I should ask someone and if I know why I'll remember.
If I look at it a different way it seems the Album in module/Album and module/Album/src/Album should be the same - then why would we have it twice? Doesn't that just make room for error? Like why have a src/album folder? Why not put Controller, Form, and Model under module/Album?
Why is there a folder called Controller? There used to be a folder called controllers (plural, why singular now?) in a module before, that makes sense. But why is/are controller(s) inside a src/Album folder now?
Thank you for your time. I have tried to research but I think it's just too big absorb when (in my opinion) it seems so sparsely documented. Or, if someone could point me to a book like http://survivethedeepend.com/ but for ZF2, it'd be greatly apprecated.
Zend Framework 2 follows PHPfigs PSR-0 Standards. This means that the directory structure directly relates to the classname. But before i come close to that, let me explain the basic architecture.
First you have the ModuleNAME. Since the Module name needs to be unique, it only makes sense to map the Modulename to the Namespace of your model.
Inside the modules folder you have three sub-folders. One folder for configuration items named config. One folder for source-code files named src and one additional folder for the view files view
This separation is simply for overview. You separate configuration, view and sourcecode from another. It makes no sense to bunch them together and i guess you'd agree. This pretty much has been the same for ZF1, too.
The interesting part is the source-folder src. Earlier i mentioned about the PSR-0 Standard. And this is the place where it comes into effect. By default the source-files for each module will be looked upon from the source-folder src. So whenever you have a class, it will be using PSR-0 Standards based off of the source-folder. Mewning: My\Funky\Class would be found within src\My\Funky\Class.php
And that's basically all there is to it. Controllers usually have a FQCN like Mymodule\Controller\SomeController so you will find this class inside src\Mymodule\Controller\SomeController.php
The main question arising could be: Why are the folders sometimes all lowercase and sometimes ucfirst. The answer, once again, is PSR-Standards. Classnames and/or Namespaces are supposed to begin with an upperchar character. And since path-names are case-sensitive, the folders need to match the classnames exactly!
EDIT Another nice read i've just stumbled upon is Rob Allens latest blogpost: Thoughts on module directory structure. He explains how you can change the default setup quite easily to your likings.
I am trying to create a setup project for a Windows Service. I've followed the directions at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/816169 to create the setup project with no trouble.
I want to be able to get a value during the installation in order to update the app.config with the user's desired settings. I added a Textboxes (A) dialog to retrieve the values. I set the Edit1Property property to "TIMETORUN", and in my Primary Output action's CustomActionData property I put in the following: /TimeToRun="[TIMETORUN]\". So far so good. Running the setup I can retrieve the TimeToRun value from the Context.Parameters collection without issue.
In order to locate the app.config I need to also pass in the value of the TARGETDIR Windows Installer Property to my custom action. This is where things begin to fall apart. In order to achieve this, the above CustomActionData must be altered like so: /TimeToRun="[TIMETORUN]\" /TargetDir="[TARGETDIR]\". Now when I run the setup I get the following error message:
Error 1001. Exception occurred while initializing the installation.
System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Windows\SysWOW64\Files' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot
find the file specified.
If you google this problem you will inevitably find people having tremendous success by simply adding the trailing slash to the /TargetDir="[TARGETDIR]\" portion of the CustomActionData. This unfortunately does not solve my issue.
I tried so many different variations of the CustomActionData string and none of them worked. I tried logging to a file from my overridden Install method to determine where the breakage was, but no log file is created because it's not even getting that far. As the error indicates, the failure is during the Initialization step.
I have a hunch that it could be one of the dependencies that the setup project is trying to load. Perhaps somehow something is being appended to the CustomActionData string and isn't playing well with the TARGETDIR value (which contains spaces, i.e. "C:\Program Files\My Company\Project Name"). Again, this is another hunch that I cannot seem to confirm due to my inability to debug the setup process.
One further thing to mention, and yes it's another hunch, could this be an issue with Setup Projects on 64-bit version of Windows? I'm running Windows 7 Professional.
I'll provide names of the dependencies in case it helps:
Microsoft .NET Framework
Microsoft.SqlServer.DtsMsg.dll
Microsoft.SqlServer.DTSPipelineWrap.dll
Microsoft.SqlServer.DTSRuntimeWrap.dll
Microsoft.SQLServer.ManagedDTS.dll
Microsoft.SqlServer.msxml6_interop.dll
Microsoft.SqlServer.PipelineHost.dll
Microsoft.SqlServer.SqlTDiagM.dll
As you may glean from the dependencies, the Windows Service is scheduling a call to a DTSX package.
Sorry for the long rant. Thanks for any help you can provide.
The answer is so maddeningly simple. If the last argument in the CustomActionData is going to contain spaces and thus you have to surround it with quotes and a trailing slash, you must also have a space following the trailing slash, like this:
/TimeToRun="[TIMETORUN]\" /TargetDir="[TARGETDIR]\ "
The solution and explanation can be found here.
Had a similar issue. In my case, it was odd because my installer had ran successfully once, then I uninstalled my app via Add/Remove Programs successfully, did some coding (did NOT touch my CustomActionData string), and rebuilt my project and setup project. It was when I re-ran my MSI that I got this error.
The coding I had done was to bring in more values of more parameters I had been specifying in my CustomActionData string. That syntax for getting the parameter values (i.e. string filepath = Context.Paramenters["filepath"]), which was in my Installer class, was actually fine, but as I found out, the syntax of the later parameters I was now trying to get from my CustomActionData string had not been correct, from the very beginning. I had failed to add a second quote around one of those parameters, so nothing else could be obtained.
I was using the "Textboxes (A)" and "Textboxes (B)" windows in the User Interface section. A has 1 box, EDITA1, where I get the path to a file, and B has 2 boxes, EDITB1 and EDITB2, for some database parameters. My CustomActionData string looked like this:
/filepath="[EDITA1]" /host="[EDITB1] /port="[EDITB2]"
It should have been:
/filepath="[EDITA1]" /host="[EDITB1]" /port="[EDITB2]"
(closing quote on [EDITB1])