I'm at the beginning of trying to understand the requirements for developing a VoIP app. From what I've learned so far, frameworks that allow for communication using SIP/TCP are the best (I don't intend to implement SIP myself).
However, although SIP can be peer-to-peer, its recommended to use an SIP server service. But I'm finding it difficult to locate information about what SIP services are appropriate for an iOS application / what is required from me in terms of setup of the server so that I can concentrate on client-side development.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
You need to figure out your use-cases to decide. A SIP server is like an HTTP server, it will analyse the request URI, the request headers and whatever hints it can see to execute some resource at the backend. Think if you plan to have a user database and authentication. Do you want presence? Do you want voicemail, call transfers, pbx features? Do you want video, audio, IM? Do you want to support arbitrary endpoints? Encryption, NAT traversal, HA? Only then you can think about actual servers and hosting. Many "minimal" configurations will include at least one SIP/media front-end (for NAT/SBC), a SIP/media server (to act on requests), a database server (to store persistent state) and an HTTP server (for config/admin UIs). While there are products that combine some of these into single server, they are generally at least reasonably isolated modules.
Related
I'm just starting iOS app development with Swift (and in general) and I'm looking to get some information on popular practices when creating apps that require communication over arbitrary networks (i.e. not necessarily on the same network). I tried searching this on google but the answers weren't entirely what I was looking for; hopefully somebody can point be in the right direction. I wouldn't mind paying for a service, but unfortunately I don't know the first thing about backends and don't want to end up overpaying for services that I don't need. For example, I found an API called Parse, but I think it has far too many features that wouldn't benefit my app. Here's the main premise of the app:
There are two versions of the app - one for Admins and one for Employees
The Admins have the ability to post notes to a central list of notes for the employees to see
The Employees can access this list and scroll through it to pick which one they want to open. After a certain number of time, the notes expire and are removed from the list automatically
It's as simple as that. There likely won't be too many notes getting sent at once, so a large database isn't needed. My questions are as follows:
Do I need a database to store the notes, or can I handle it in some other way?
How is communication generally handled? The only things I've come across are ways to communicate when you're on the same WiFi or Bluetooth, but I haven't seen anything outside of that. How does an app like GroupMe communicate to users?
This is more of a general question, but how can you tell if you need a backend or not? I'm still kinda confused on the interaction between the frontend and backend.
Any help for any of the questions is greatly appreciated. I feel as though I don't even know where to start with a project like this.
EDIT: To clarify, I'm just looking for a place to start, not code or any implementation.
It's as simple as that. There likely won't be too many notes getting sent at once, so a large database isn't needed. My questions are as follows:
Do I need a database to store the notes, or can I handle it in some other way?
Yes you need some kind of database. That could be something complex like MySQL or something simple like writing a txt file for each note to the disk, with the filename being the date of the note.
You could use a service like Parse or run your own PHP server and write the software yourself. Parse is cheaper for a small database, running your own PHP server is cheaper for a big one and it gives you more control.
(You don't have to use PHP, but that is the most popular language for these things and it's what I use).
How is communication generally handled? The only things I've come across are ways to communicate when you're on the same WiFi or Bluetooth, but I haven't seen anything outside of that. How does an app like GroupMe communicate to users?
Usually your the phone sends a HTTP POST request to the server with some text in JSON format in the body of the HTTP request.
The server then responds with more text in JSON format in the response.
On the phone you use NSURLSession to handle to do the network communication and NSJSONSerialization to encode/decode the content. On the server, there will be something equivalent available.
Usually there would be a username and password or some other authentication system in the HTTP POST JSON text that tells the server wether or not the user is allowed to do whatever they're trying to do.
All communication between the phone and the server must be encrypted using SSL to protect your users. Do your homework and make sure you get this part right before you deploy your app to the store.
Parse will handle all of that stuff for you, but it's good to at least understand what's going on.
This is more of a general question, but how can you tell if you need a backend or not? I'm still kinda confused on the interaction between the frontend and backend.
You know you need a backend if you want two devices to communicate without being on the same WiFi/Bluetooth network. This is a security feature that cell network carriers (and home broadband ISPs) enforce to prevent malicious activity.
Generally only a commercial internet connection (and commercial router) will allow anonymous incoming network packets to get through to a phone/computer connected via that internet connection. Consumer internet connections only allow traffic coming in from a known source (for example, if you ask Google for some data, the router will temporarily allow Google to send some data to you. But if Google just sends some data without a phone/computer in your home asking for it, then it will be rejected).
You should be able to take what I've written and do a bunch of research.
If you decide to go with writing your own system in PHP, it comes pre-installed with OS X (just has to be enabled) and you can access it by IP address from the phone as long as you're on the same IP address. That should get you started for testing/development purposes at least.
The only part you won't have is SSL. Starting in iOS 9 (it's almost here!) you will need to disable NSURLSession's built in check for SSL or else it won't let you connect to the test server.
I'm currently building a mobile application (iOS at first), which needs a backend web service to communicate with.
Since this service will be exposing data that I only want to be accessed by my mobile clients, I would like to restrict the access to the service.
However I'm in a bit of a doubt as to how this should be implemented. Since my app doesn't require authentication, I can't just authenticate against the service with these credentials. Somehow I need to be able to identify if the request is coming from a trusted client (i.e. my app), and this of course leads to the thought that one could just use certificates. But couldn't this certificate just be extracted from the app and hence misused?
Currently my app is based on iOS, but later on android and WP will come as well.
The web service I'm expecting to develop in nodejs, though this is not a final decision - it will however be a RESTful service.
Any advice on best practice is appreciated!
Simple answer: You cannot prevent just anybody from acecssing your web site from a non-mobile client. You can, however, make it harder.
Easy:
Send a nonstandard HTTP header
Set some unique query parameter
Send an interesting (or subtly non-interesting) User Agent string
(you can probably think of a few more)
Difficult:
Implement a challenge/response protocol to identify your client
(Ab)use HTTP as a transport for your own encrypted content
(you can probably think of a few more)
Of course anybody could extract the data, decompile your code, replay your HTTP requests, and whatnot. But at some point, being able to access a free Web application wouldn't be worth the effort that'd be required to reverse-engineer your app.
There's a more basic question here, however. What would be the harm of accessing your site with some other client? You haven't said; and without that information it's basically impossible to recommend an appropriate solution.
I have had experienced with iOS development but no Client Server type applications.
I have heard about HTTPS, REST, JSON, etc. I am confused on the differences.
My app that I want to build is getting a list of data to output to the user and also sending a form to the server to be processed. E.g. A Membership Application to the Server with personal information and other pertaining information to be stored in the server. I also need the connection to be secure and the user must logon to the server with a username and password.
How does my app communicate with the server? Is it using NSURLRequest?
What is the best method or protocol to accomplish this?
Thanks!
HTTPS, REST, and JSON are different tools you can use when performing networked operations (more specifically, a secure protocol, a web service architecture, and a method of object serialization, respectively). If you don't know what these mean, I would do a little reading before attempting to build an iOS app that functions as a client. The link johnathon posted in the comments is a little low-level for what you're wanting to do, but searching around for "consuming a web service with iOS" might be good.
Also, does the service already exist? If so, your task is essentially to understand how to communicate with the server.
Once you're a little more up-to-speed on the fundamentals, however, the AFNetworking library is phenomenal.
So, I'm researching methods for building a client interface for existing EMRs. I've read tons of info on HL7, as well as the various coding schemes, but I'm still really clueless.
For anyone whose worked with an EMR before: is it possible to build a web interface that can use HTTP-POST and HTTP-GET requests to pull/push data to the server database? Or would you have a separate database for the client, say a web application, then use some interface engine like Mirth to communicate between the EMR database and the web application?
A web service API is definitely a way to go. One benefit to this is that you can get https almost out-of-the box for encryption of data in transit.
The way we have configured our EMR is that we have a tcp server accepting incoming hl7 messages from certain IPs which connects directly to our EMR database. This can be beneficial by separating emr and interface processes (You don't have to restart your whole EMR if the interface goes down, for instance).
Another good feature would be to have a token system for pseudo-authentication. This only works if you are going over a secure connection though.
If you aren't into writing your own tcp server (not that hard), an api-based server is probably just as good.
EDIT: What language(s) do you think you'll be using?
Other things that you might run into:
Some applications prefer file drops to direct calls (either url or tcp)
Some vendors will have their own software that sits on a server of yours
Don't forget the ACK.
I don't see why you couldn't do this. You would need to build the web service to handle requests with a specific Uri. When this Uri is called the web service uses the data sent with the request to make changes in the database.
Once you had the web service built, you could build some sort of front-end that displays your information to the user. And makes HTTP-GET and HTTP-POST calls.
There is a lot of flexibililty in what you are trying to do... so go with a plan for sure.
In general though you should be able to accomplish what you need to do by building your own web service and front-end application that is able to manipulate an EMR database.
It really depends on your architecture and requirements.
Architecture 1
If you want your client to be web based, but your client is a separated app from your backend, then the web sends the info using HTTP to your client app server side, and then, that will send info to your EHR backend (another app). That second communication might be written using a standard, that will help you on integrating more systems with your backend in the future. So that interface can be HL7 based, if HL7 v2.x is used, take a look at the MLLP protocol: http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=55
This is the most performant way of communicating HL7 data. If you don't want to deal with TCP, there is a proposal for HL7 v2.x over HTTP. HAPI implemented that: http://hl7api.sourceforge.net/hapi-hl7overhttp/
If you don't want to use HL7 v2.x but HL7 v3 (a different standard, not really a version of 2.x) or CDA, you can use HTTP or SOAP.
Architecture 2
But, if you want your client just to be a UI on the user side (browser), HTTP POST will suffice to send info from the browser to the server. That means your EHR is a centralized EHR with a web iu.
In the 1st architectural case, first case you'll probably have multiple client apps (full EMRs apps) and a backend EHR server (centralized backend). On my developments I follow this second architecture.
Also there Mirth might help to manage all the communications between client apps and backend apps. In the 2nd case, using Mirth is nonsense, is just a web application and the client communicates directly with the web server. Of course, you can use Mirth as a web server, but that's not it's role, it is an ESB no a web server.
Hope that helps!
In a DELPHI 2007 application that I am developing some prospect clients just found interesting to be able to share data and information with each other.
They all have the same application.
All have independent Databases
But all have the same installed application and there are some data types that they might want to share (replicate) between their databases.
How can I enable them to share data with other users of the same application program, but not to everybody on the whole internet.
I would like this to be as automatic as possible, as I already have considered approaches that involve manually sending emails.
I know Datasnap is an option, is there any other.
UPDATE:
The idea is to enable companies that have the same application to be able to share data.
They should be able to select what partner and what to send.
I have been investigating datasnap, but would like to know if there is another way to do this
Another standard way to connect distributed applications and share data and information is through some Message-oriented middleware (MOM). There are many open source middleware products (message brokers) available, which can be used over Delphi client libraries, even in multithreaded Delphi server applications. (Disclaimer: I am the author of message broker client libraries for Delphi and Free Pascal)
There are many essential differences between web services and message brokers, like peer-to-peer and publish/subscribe communication models. They also play a key role in enterprise application integration patterns.
One standard way to connect applications to other applications is to make a web-service, and make a client that consumes that web-service, called a web-client. Technologies like SOAP and REST refer to such web service and web clients.
Your question is vague, perhaps due to english not being your language, but you should probably edit it and be more specific.
If all your applications are going to talk directly to each other that is called "peer to peer networking" and there are huge problems with enabling that kind of communication directly over the internet. It is much easier if you build a server that all these applications will connect to.
As a sample, consider the IRC Chat service, and consider writing a Web Service that will be the Chat Server, and consider all your clients to be "Chat clients". Sharing data could be the same idea as creating "rooms" or "channels" on a chat server.
I get the idea that you want something like a Peer to Peer Data Replication Service. I think that the closest you're going to get to that is something like "RSS Feeds" (used by blog syndication services). You subscribe to them via a simple web service, and pull down the new content on some periodic basis. Since that data has to be published to a central server, that means, that a peer to peer approach is out of the question. If you don't have your own web server running on a web hosting service, or on a "cloud", and you need a truly peer to peer solution, I am not aware of any way to do that, at least not without an incredible custom engineering effort.