I'm creating an app where there're up to 40 UIViews where every view stores a drawing of a stick on it which is available in several positions, rotated to 30 degree angle, 45 degree angle etc). Background of a View is transparent. These views can intersect with each other, so I need the UIViews to be transparent in order a user could see both drawings from overlapped and overlapping view. I wonder if this affects a performance of an application seriously? (all this transparency of all 40 UIViews). And how I can track how much memory or CPU my app currently uses.
I recommend watching WWDC 2012 Session 238 - iOS App Performance: Graphics and Animations, which covers these questions.
As a broad answer:
The iPhone will probably handle your 40-view requirement fine—but its impossible to know for sure without trying it out, and without more context (are they being animated? Are they scrolling?)
More views creates more performance problems, because all of the views need to be packaged up and shipped off to be rendered (by backboardd I think).
Transparency will hurt application performance. I believe the core reason is that transparent views need to be drawn in an off-screen buffer rather than be painted over existing content (something like that).
Use Instruments for Profiling
Profile your GPU usage using the Open GL ES Driver (look at 'Device Utilization')
Measure CPU usage using Time Profiler
Measure FPS and check for common performance problems using the CoreAnimation instrument
I wouldn't bother thinking about this until you actually see performance issues. If you do, I can't recommend that WWDC session enough—it covers things like what strategy you should take to optimize performance (e.g. moving work to the GPU as long as it can handle more; the basics of profiling, etc.) as well as tips and tricks based on the implementation details of iOS.
Related
I am adding multiple UIImageView to a UIView to perform operations such as drag,pinch and zoom images.I have added gesture recogniser to all the UIImageViews.Since i'm adding multiple images(UIImageViews) it has brought down the performance of my app.Does any one have a better solution to perform this? Thanks
The adding of many images should not generally, cause enough of a problem that your app would slow down. For example, to illustrate the point with an absurd example, I added 250 (!) image views each with three gestures, and it works fine on an iPad 3, including the animating of the images into their final resting place/size/rotation.
Two observations:
Are you doing anything computationally intensive with your image views? For example:
Simply adding shadows with Quartz 2D has a huge performance impact because it's actually quite computationally expensive. In the unlikely even that you're using layer shadows, you can try using shouldRasterize, which can mitigate the problem, but not solve it. There are other (kludgy) techniques for doing computationally efficient shadows if that's the problem.
Another surprising computationally intensive process is if your images are (for example) PNGs with transparency settings or if you have reduced the alpha/opacity for your views.
What is the resolution/size of the images being loaded? If the images are very large, the image view will render them according to the contentMode, but it can be very slow if you're taking large images and scaling them down. You should use screen resolution images if possible.
These are just a few examples of things that seem so innocuous, but are really quite computationally expensive. If you're doing any Quartz embellishments on your image views, I'd suggest temporarily paring them back and see if you see any changes.
In terms of diagnosing the performance problems yourself, I'd suggest watching the following two WWDC videos:
WWDC 2012 - #211 - Building Concurrent User Interfaces on iOS includes a fairly pragmatic demonstration of Instruments to identify the source of performance problems. This video is clearly focused on one particular solution (the moving of computationally expensive processes into the background and implementing a concurrent UI), which may or may not apply in this case, but I like the Instruments demonstration.
WWDC 2012 - #235 - iOS App Performance: Responsiveness is a more focused discussion on how one measures responsiveness in apps and techniques to address problems. I don't find the instruments tutorial to be quite as good as the prior video, but it does go into more detail.
Hopefully this can get you going. If you are still stumped, you should share some relevant code regarding how the views are being added/configured and what the gestures are doing. Perhaps you can also clarify the nature of the performance problem (e.g. is it in the initial rendition, is it a low frame rate while the gestures take place, etc.).
I'm looking for any advice on ways to have a rather large scrollview (let's say 8192x8192) which is essentially a grid and it has subviews of about 5-100 buttons placed in it.
The brute force approach runs out of memory as CALayer seems to be allocating a bitmap for the size of the scrollview's content (the memory issue is especially prominent when zooming is used)
I next added CATiledLayer to it, that's fixed the memory issue but there is a blurry effect on the grid as tiles are generated asynchronously and is still not ideal in that it's using a lot of memory for what is essentially a trivial 'draw some lines' task.
It seems like if I could somehow get control to draw my own grid via OpenGL each frame and tell UIKit not to create a bitmap buffer for the scrollview it would be perfect but not sure if this is feasible or even the right approach?
On Android I just took control of the entire drawing/zooming/panning but this seems vastly overkill on iOS which seems to offer most of this already?
You should check out the WWDC 2009 video session 102: "Mastering iPhone Scroll Views" along with the ScrollViewSuite sample project from Apple. They explain how to do a tiled scroll view with different zoom levels, which sounds like it is what you need.
I have a custom view (inherited from UIView) in my app. The custom view overrides
- (void) drawRect:(CGRect) rect
The problem is: the drawRect: executes many times longer on iPad 3 than on iPad 2 (about 0.1 second on iPad 3 and 0.003 second on iPad 2). It's about 30 times slower.
Basically, I am using some pre-created layers and draw them in the drawRect:. The last call
CGContextDrawLayerAtPoint(context, CGPointZero, m_currentLayer);
takes most of the time (about 95% of total time in drawRect:)
What might be slowing things so much and how should I fix the cause?
UPDATE:
There are no threads directly involved. I do call setNeedsDisplay: in one thread and drawRect: gets called from another but that's it. The same goes for locks (there are no locks used).
The view gets redrawn in response to touches (it's a coloring book app). On iPad 2 I get reasonable delay between a touch and an update of the screen. I want to achieve the same on iPad 3.
So, the iPad 3 is definitely slower in a lot of areas. I have a theory about this. Marco Arment noted that the method renderInContext is ridiculously slow on the new iPad. I also found this to be the case when trying to create a magnifying glass for a custom text view. In the end I had to forego renderInContext for custom Core Graphics drawing.
I've also been having problem hitting the dreaded wait_fences errors on my core graphics drawing here: Only on new iPad 3: wait_fences: failed to receive reply: 10004003.
This is what I've figured out so far. The iPad 3 obviously has 4 times the pixels to drive. This can cause problems in two place:
First, the CPU. All core graphics drawing is done by the CPU. In the case of rotational events, if the CPU takes too long to draw, it hits the wait_fences error, which I believe is simply a call that tells the device to wait a little longer to actually perform the rotation, thus the delay.
Transferring images to the GPU. The GPU obviously handles the retina resolution just fine (see Infinity Blade 2). But when core graphics draws, it draws its images directly to the GPU buffers to avoid memcpy. However, either the GPU buffers haven't changes since the iPad 2 or they just didn't make them large enough, because it's remarkably easy to overload those buffers. When that happens, I believe the CPU writes the images to standard memory and then copies them to the GPU when the GPU buffers can handle it. This, I think is what causes the performance problems. That extra copy is time consuming with so many pixels and slows things down considerably.
To avoid memcpy I recommend several things:
Only draw what you need. Avoid drawing anything offscreen at all costs. If you're drawing a large view, but only display part of that view (subviews covering it, for example) try to find a way to only draw what is visible.
If you have to draw a large view, consider breaking the view up in to parts either as subviews or sublayers (probably sublayers in your case). And only redraw what you need. Take the notability app, for example. When you zoom in, you can literally watch it redraw one square at a time. Or in safari you can watch it update squares as you scroll. Unfortunately, I haven't had to do this so I'm uncertain of the methodology.
Try to keep your drawings simple. I had an awesome looking custom core text view that had to redraw on every character entered. Very slow. I changed the background to simple white (in core graphics) and it sped up well. Even better would be for me to not redraw the background.
I would like to point out that my theory is conjecture. Apple doesn't really explain what exactly they do. My theory is just based on what they have said and how the iPad responds as well as my own experimentation.
UPDATE
So Apple has now released the 2012 WWDC Developer videos. They have two videos that may help you (requires developer account):
iOS App Performance: Responsiveness
iOS App Performance: Graphics and Animation
One thing they talk about I think may help you is using the method: setNeedsDisplayInRect:(CGRect)rect. Using this method instead of the normal setNeedsDisplay and making sure that your drawRect method only draws the rect given to it can greatly help performance. Personally, I use the function: CGContextClipToRect(context, rect); to clip my drawing only to the rect provided.
As an example, I have a separate class I use to draw text directly to my views using Core Text. My UIView subclass keeps a reference to this object and uses it to draw it's text rather than use a UILabel. I used to refresh the entire view (setNeedsDisplay) when the text change. Now I have my CoreText object calculate the changed CGRect and use setNeedsDisplayInRect to only change the portion of the view that contains the text. This really helped my performance when scrolling.
I ended up using approach described in #Kurt Revis answer for similar question.
I minimized number of layers used, added UIImageView and set its image to an UIImage wrapping my CGImageRef. Please read the mentioned answer to get more details about the approach.
In the end my application become even simpler than before and works with almost identical speed on iPad 2 and iPad 3.
On iOS, I was able to create 3 CGImage objects, and use a CADisplayLink at 60fps to do
self.view.layer.contents = (__bridge id) imageArray[counter++ % 3];
inside the ViewController, and each time, an image is set to the view's CALayer contents, which is a bitmap.
And this all by itself, can alter what the screen shows. The screen will just loop through these 3 images, at 60fps. There is no UIView's drawRect, no CALayer's display, drawInContext, or CALayer's delegate's drawLayerInContext. All it does is to change the CALayer's contents.
I also tried adding a smaller size sublayer to self.view.layer, and set that sublayer's contents instead. And that sublayer will cycle through those 3 images.
So this is very similar to back in the old days even on Apple ][ or even in King's Quest III era, which are DOS video games, where there is 1 bitmap, and the screen just constantly shows what the bitmap is.
Except this time, it is not 1 bitmap, but a tree or a linked list of bitmaps, and the graphics card constantly use the Painter's Model to paint those bitmaps (with position and opacity), onto the main screen. So it seems that drawRect, CALayer, everything, were all designed to achieve this final purpose.
Is that how it works? Does the graphics card take an ordered list of bitmaps or a tree of bitmaps? (and then constantly show them. To simplify, we don't consider the Implicit animation in the CA framework) What is actually happening down in the graphics card handling layer? (and actually, is this method almost the same on iOS, Mac OS X, and on the PCs?)
(this question aims to understand how our graphics programming actually get rendered in modern graphics cards, since for example, if we need to understand UIView and how CALayer works, or even use CALayer's bitmap directly, we do need to understand the graphics architecture.)
Modern display libraries (such as Quartz used in iOS and Mac OS) use hardware accelerated compositing. The workings is very similar to how computer graphics libraries such as OpenGL work. In essence, each CALayer is kept in as a separate surface that is buffered and rendered by the video hardware much like a texture in a 3D game. This is exceptionally well implemented in iOS and this is why the iPhone is so well-known for having a smooth UI.
In the "old days" (i.e. Windows 9x, Mac OS Classic, etc), the screen was essentially one big framebuffer, and everything that was exposed by e.g. moving a window had to be redrawn manually by each application. The redrawing was mostly done by the CPU, which put an upper limit on animation performance. Animation were usually very "flickery" due to the redrawing involved. This technique was mostly suited for desktop applications without too much animation. Notably, Android uses (or at least used to use) this technique, which is a big problem when porting iOS applications over to Android.
Games of the old days days (e.g. DOS, arcade machines, etc, also used a lot on Mac OS classic), something called sprite animation was used to improve performance and reduce flickering by keeping the moving images in offscreen buffers that were rendered by the hardware and synchronized with the monitor's vblank, which meant that animations were smooth even on very low-end systems. However, the size of these images were very limited and the screen resolutions were low, only about 10-15% of the pixels of even an iPhone screen of today.
You've got a reasonable intuition here, but there are still several steps between contents and the display. First off, contents doesn't have to be a CGImage. It is often a private class called CABackingStorage which is not quite the same thing. In many cases there are hardware optimizations going on to bypass rendering the image into main memory and then copying it to video memory. And since the contents of various layers are all composited together, you're still a ways from the "real" display memory. Not to mention that modifications to contents just directly impacts the model layer, not the presentation or render layers. Plus there are CGLayer objects that can store their image directly in video memory. There's a lot of different stuff going on.
So the answer is, no, the video "card" (chip; it's the PowerVR BTW) does not take an ordered bunch of layers. It takes lower-level data in ways that are not well documented. Some things (particularly parts of Core Animation, and perhaps CGLayer) appear to be wrappers around OpenGL textures, but others are probably Core Graphics directly accessing the hardware itself. Once you get to this level of the stack, it's all private and can change from version to version and from device to device.
You also may find Brad Larson's response useful here:
iOS: is Core Graphics implemented on top of OpenGL?
You may also be interested in Chapter 6 of iOS:PTL. While it doesn't go into the implementation specifics, it does include a lot of practical discussion of how to improve drawing performance and best utilize the hardware with Core Graphics. Chapter 7 details all the developer-accessible steps involved in CALayer drawing.
I have some simple buttons in my iOS app. I'm able to draw them propperly with quartz 2d, but I could also use png-slices to build them.
What would be nicer to the iPads CPU and allocations?
If I were you I'd take the factors of resolution independence and application size into account as well. Simple UI elements even Apple recommends to draw in Quartz (See WWDC 2011 - Practical Drawing). Most of Apple's own Apps do it that way as well (Stocks App, Weather App, a good part of iPhoto etc.)
Performance wise I've ran some tests here ( https://github.com/pkluz/PKCoreTechniques ) by creating an AngryBird solely in Quartz with Bezier Curves of fairly high degrees. Now for an iPad 3 I'd have to provide fairly large images to do so (>2-3 MB just for ONE image on said device) but with Quartz it's just a couple of bytes of code. The rendering of said Angry Bird was most of the time about 15-18% slower than loading an image but I assume that'd quickly change if the pixel density increased any further. For simple shapes Quartz should most of the time be faster than loading images from the bundle. Though remember, the growth isn't linear, so depending on complexity and size those can quickly change in favor of images.
Remember how Apps doubled in size when the iPad 3 came out. You wouldn't have that problem with Quartz and your app would be ready for high-res without any additional work:)
The rule of thumb I advise people to follow is: "If I can't wrap my head around the geometric description of an object right off the bat, I will use an image."