I have a View as the baseView and I add a panRegconizer named : basePan;
then add a tableview on baseView, when scroll it to a point (assume the bottom)
I disable the scroll and userInteractionEnabled = NO; I hope the basePan could continue handle the touch events and move the tableview by pan point. but seems when disable the scroll the whole touch event is cancel by system.
any method to pass the touch to base down view or panRegconizer,
I tried to make another view(tView) on base view and add second panRegconizer on tView;
when pan on it, basePan doesn't do the job,
how could I transit the touch event to multiple regconizers, I know the touchbegin touchmove touchEnd could be passed to next responder. but nowadays , panregonizer seems easier to use and recommended by apple.
Related
I'm trying to build something roughly similar to the drawer menu in Apple Maps on iOS.
In this Xcode project I'm attaching a UIPanGestureRecognizer on the VC's view, and as the panning happens, move vertically a UITableView with scrolling disabled.
The issue is every time after the pan ends, the didSelectRow method is called only after a second tap happens somewhere on the UITableView. Of course I'd like it to be called after the first tap.
The funny thing is that the bug does not happen if I enable the table's scrolling, and in the gesture recognizer's delegate have shouldRecognizeSimultaneouslyWith returning true.
Other funny thing is a very similar thing seems to happen in Apple Maps itself, if you try pulling the drawer up with the finger resting on a recent location entry from the list inside the drawer.
Thanks for your help!
I don’t understand well what are your saying.
But I think that the main problem is with “Chain Responder”. When you use PanGestureRecognizerand the UITableView property isScrollEnable = false in the Responder Chain the PanGestureRecognizer it is the first who is called, and the system wait to that fails or the event is not handled, then it is passed to the next in the Responder Chain, who is the UITableView. For that reason, it takes too long to get called the didSelectRow function
I suggest to you create a new UIView and insert in the ViewController in the storyboard o nib and put the UITableVIew outside of that UIView, then link the PanGestureRecognizer to that new UIView. In that way the Responder Chain don’t get in conflict with both, because the system can detect when the drag is in the new UIView and call only to the PanGestureRecognizer and when it is in the UITableView will call to the didSelectRow
Best Regards
Write if it does not resolve
This is a pretty hypothetical question just to understand proper design but lets say I have two custom UIViews.
One of them is essentially a container that I'll call a drawer. Its purpose is to hide and show content. It's a lot like the notification center on iOS where you swipe to pull it open and flick it back up to close it. It's a generic container than can contain any other UIView. It has a UIPanGestureRecognizer to track the finger that's pulling it open/closed. It might also have a UISwipeGestureRecognizer to detect a "flick".
The other view is a custom map widget that has UIPan/Rotation/Pinch GestureRecognizers.
I think the drawer view should be the UIGestureRecognizerDelegate for the Pan/Swipe GestureRecognizers so that it can prevent touches from being delivered unless the user is grabbing "the handle".
My first instinct is for the map to be the UIGestureRecognizerDelegate of the pan/rotation/pinch gestures so that it can allow them to all run simultaneously.
The problem I'm having is that, I really don't want the map to receive any touches or begin recognizing gestures until the drawer is completely open. I'd like to be able to enforce this behavior automatically in the drawer itself so that it works for all subviews right out of the box.
The only way that I can think to do this is to wire all of the gestures handlers to the ViewController and let it do everything, but to me that breaks encapsulation as now it has to know that the map gestures need to run simultaneously, that the drawer should only get touches on it's handle and that the map should only get touches when it's open.
What are some ways of doing this where the logic can stay in the Views where I think it belongs?
I would do something like this to make the subviews of the drawer disabled while panning. Essentially loop through the drawer's subviews and disbale interaction on them.
[self.subviews enumerateObjectsUsingBlock:^(UIView *subview, NSUInteger idx, BOOL *stop){
subview.userInteractionEnabled = NO;
}];
And something similar again for when you want to re-enable user interaction on the subviews.
This should already Just Work™. A gesture recogniser is attached to a view; when a continuous gesture is recognised, all subsequent touches associated with that gesture are associated with that view.
So in your case, when the drawer pan is recognised, no touches associated with that pan should ever cause behaviour in your map view's pan/pinch/rotation gestures (unless you explicitly specify that they should using the appropriate delegate methods).
Or do you mean that you want to prevent the user from, halfway through opening the drawer, using another finger (i.e. another gesture) to start scrolling the (half-visible) map? If so, you should just set userInteractionEnabled on the drawer's contentView (or equivalent) to NO at UIGestureRecognizerStateBegan/Changed and YES again at UIGestureRecognizerStateEnded/Cancelled.
I'm working on an app where the user is expected to rapidly touch and swipe across multiple UIViews, each of which is supposed to do an action once the user's finger has reached it. I've got a lot of views and so the typical thing to do, where I'd iterate over each view to see if a touch is inside of its bounds, is a no-go - there's just too much lag. Is there any other way to get touch events from one view to another (that is beside the first one)? I thought maybe there is some way to cancel the touch event, but I've searched and so far have come up empty.
One of the big problems I have is that if I implement my touch handling in my view controller, touchesBegan only fires for the first touch - if the user touches something and then, without moving the first finger, taps on something else, that tap is not recorded in either touchesBegan or touchesMoved. But if I implement my touch handling in the UIViews themselves, once a view registers a touch, if the user does not lift their finger up and moves it, the views around the first view do not register the touch. Only if the user lifts his finger and then puts it back down will the surrounding views register the touch.
So my question is, lets say I have two views side by side, my touch handling code is implemented in the views, and I put my finger down on view 1. I then slide my finger over to view 2 - what do I need to do to make view 2 register that touch, which started in view 1 and never "ended"?
Set userInteractionEnabled property of UIView to NO.
view.userInteractionEnabled = NO;
UIView has the following property:
#property(nonatomic, getter=isUserInteractionEnabled) BOOL userInteractionEnabled
Ok, I figured out what was going on. Thing is, I have my views as subviews of a scrollview, which is itself a subview of my main view. With scrollEnabled = NO, I could touch my subviews - but apparently the scrollview was only forwarding me the initial touch event, and all subsequent touches were part of that initial event. Because of that, I had many weird problems such as touching two views one after the other, both would select and highlight, but if I took the first finger off the screen both views would de-select. This was not the desired behavior.
So what I did is I subclassed the scrollview and overrode the touch handling methods to send the events to its first responder, which is its superview, which is the view where I'm doing my touch handling. Now it works!
I tried setting up a view with a longpress gesture and a stepper configured for continuous updates. With the longpress, the continuous feature of the stepper does not occur. For now, I've disabled the longpress. I guess I don't need it. But for future reference, how would I allow for both to coexist?
Just to be clear, here is the way the screen was set up when I tried this.
App was set up with a simple view controller.
A subview was added to this view (could have been a controller, but I just made it a UIView).
Several labels and stepper were added to this subview.
The steppers were wired up as outlets and actions.
A longpress recognizer was added to the main view in IB.
For completeness, a tap gesture was also added to the main view in IB.
Taps on the main view function as expected. Taps on the steppers function as expected. Longpress on the main view functions as expected. Longpress on the stepper does not.
I modified the code called by the longpress to check for the frame of the subview and not act if the touch location was within that rectangle, but that didn't make a difference. I did not try getting the longpress to fail in that situation, but I suppose I'll try that next. EDIT: OK, maybe not. There doesn't seem to be an API for that. However, there is this kludge, that I'm not going to try.
Attached is a screen shot from profiler with an inverted call tree so you can see what each item is being called by.
darkStepped: is the IBAction that is called by the stepper. If the stepper were triggered by a gesture recognizer, wouldn't I expect to see the gesture recognizer in the call tree?
If the stepper were triggered by a gesture recognizer, wouldn't I expect to see the gesture recognizer in the call tree?
The stack trace reveals that the stepper's _updateCount method is dispatched through a timer.
This could be related to the fact that a stepper has an "autoIncrement" mode where, as long as your keep it pressed, it will update at a given (varying) rate. So, instead of simply calling _updateCount, the stepper sets up a timer to handle this behaviour.
For whatever reason the timer is used, the timer explains why you do not see the gesture recogniser in the stack trace.
In your case what happens is that the stepper gets the touches, handles them, and do not forward them to any gesture recognisers attached to it.
This can be explained as follows, although this snippet does not explicitly mention a long press recogniser in relation to a UIStepper control:
According to Apple Docs:
Interacting with Other User Interface Controls
In iOS 6.0 and later, default control actions prevent overlapping gesture recognizer behavior. For example, the default action for a button is a single tap. If you have a single tap gesture recognizer attached to a button’s parent view, and the user taps the button, then the button’s action method receives the touch event instead of the gesture recognizer. This applies only to gesture recognition that overlaps the default action for a control, which includes:
A single finger single tap on a UIButton, UISwitch, UIStepper, UISegmentedControl, and UIPageControl.
...
If you have a custom subclass of one of these controls and you want to change the default action, attach a gesture recognizer directly to the control instead of to the parent view. Then, the gesture recognizer receives the touch event first. As always, be sure to read the iOS Human Interface Guidelines to ensure that your app offers an intuitive user experience, especially when overriding the default behavior of a standard control.
So, it seems you can attach the gesture recogniser directly to the control (possibly you need to subclass UIStepper for this to work, I am not really sure how to interpret the last paragraph). Hopefully this will not disable the basic workings of the stepper (but maybe it will).
After carefully reviewing Apple's docs again, I've found the solution. I added the view controller as the delegate to the longpress gesture recognizer
self.longPress.delegate = self;
(and, of course, adding <UIGestureRecognizerDelegate> to the interface, and then added this method to the view controller:
-(BOOL)gestureRecognizer:(UIGestureRecognizer *)gestureRecognizer shouldReceiveTouch:(UITouch *)touch {
// Determine if the touch is inside the custom subview
if (gestureRecognizer == self.longPress) {
CGPoint touchLocation = [touch locationInView:self.view];
if (CGRectContainsPoint(self.antControl.frame, touchLocation)) {
return NO;
}
}
return YES;
}
This way the gesture recognizer doesn't even get called when the longpress occurs within the frame of self.antControl, which is the subview mentioned in the question.
Imagine a UIButton and a user who taps somewhere OUTSIDE the button and then slides onto it. If I want the button to detect such touches I can register it for any "Touch Drag Enter" events.
My question: is there some way to achieve the same for a UIScrollView?
I.e., I tap somewhere outside the scrollview, drag my finger onto the scrollview and as soon as I enter the scrollviews frame it starts panning? (Because by default it doesn't, I have to start my touch INSIDE the scrollview in order to pan)
If you want to do this, you will have to do a custom implementation using -touchesBegan, -touchesMoved, and -touchesEnded
The documentation for the UIResponder class (which all ViewControllers inherit from) that allows you to do this is here.
Hopefully you can figure out what to do from here. :)
As an extra hint, you will also most likely need to use this function
bool contains = CGRectContainsPoint(CGRect rect, CGPoint point);
Imagine a UIButton and a user who taps somewhere OUTSIDE the button and then slides onto it. If I want the button to detect such touches I can register it for any "Touch Drag Enter" events
Actually, no you can't. A UIControl will not get any of the control events unless the touch started in the control.
And that's for the same reason that you are seeing a similar effect with the scroll view. This is the entire basis of touch delivery on iOS. A touch "belongs" to the view that was initially touched.
After all, the runtime cannot possibly know that you are going to drag into the scroll view...