I need to process cookbook metadata. I'm using jclouds to do this, but the apache2 cookbook fails with error message "Expected BEGIN_ARRAY but was BEGIN_OBJECT at line ...". I've tried versions 1.8.4 and 1.9.6 uploaded from http://community.opscode.com/cookbooks/apache2.
The code looks like this:
ZipInputStream zis = new ZipInputStream(content);
ZipEntry entry = zis.getNextEntry();
while (entry != null) {
if (entry.getName().endsWith("/metadata.json")) {
Type type = new TypeToken<Metadata>() {}.getType();
Gson gson = new Gson();
Metadata metadata = gson.fromJson(new InputStreamReader(zis, Charsets.UTF_8), type);
...
}
}
I've debug the problem and it looks like the gson failed on "default" attribute (Attribute class) which is expected as JsonBall (the defaultValue class field), but in the metadata.json it is a plain string.
Please, cloud you point me to a solution or simple example how to do it right? Or let me know if it is an issue?
Thanks a lot
It's been a while now, but I've just seen this question.
The issue was reported in the jclouds issue tracher and should be already fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-377
Could you try using the last 1.7.1 or 1.7.2 jclouds release?
Related
Trying MockWebServer for the first time on a Groovy/Spring project that uses Spock for unit testing.
I added MockWebServer dependencies as directed (I had to add the second line myself to avoid errors, but it's not documented:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:4.0.0")
testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib:1.3.40")
I have a basic Spock test that looks like this:
def 'server'() {
setup:
MockWebServer server = new MockWebServer()
expect:
server
}
But it fails with this output:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: okhttp3.internal.Util.immutableListOf([Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/util/List;
at okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockWebServer.<init>(MockWebServer.kt:176)
Is there another dependency I'm missing? Does MockWebServer not play well with Groovy and Spock?
For what it's worth, using version 3.1.4 seems to work:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:3.14.2")
(I'm a first time user of MockWebServer)
Thank you!
Try adding this:
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:4.0.0")
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:4.0.0")
With MockWebServer your OkHttp dependency must be the same version.
I got the same problem, I found the solution in version, just change the version to "3.7.0" and it's work fine.
there is some discussion about version changing to "3.4.1" but this version got the problem (Cannot inherit from final class) that discussed at this issue :
https://github.com/andrzejchm/RESTMock/issues/56
so the safest version is "3.7.0" :D
just notice that both versions should be the same..
change your to dependencies to below:
//mock retrofit
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:3.7.0")
testImplementation("com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp:3.7.0")
//if your source code is java
testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib:1.3.40")
I just moved a function from an MVC App to an MVC API App, and for some reason it all works except CloudTable.Execute.
Code:
try
{
CloudStorageAccount storageAccount = new CloudStorageAccount(new Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage.Auth.StorageCredentials(
"accountName",
"key"), true);
CloudTableClient cloudTableClient = storageAccount.CreateCloudTableClient();
CloudTable table = cloudTableClient.GetTableReference("SkypeUsers");
table.CreateIfNotExistsAsync();
TableOperation retrieveOperation = TableOperation.Retrieve<WorkUser>("Skype", skypeid);
TableResult retrievedResult = table.Execute(retrieveOperation); //Does not work
retrievedSkypeId = ((WorkUser)retrievedResult.Result).RowKey;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
Error:
Error CS1061 'CloudTable' does not contain a definition for 'Execute' and no
extension method 'Execute' accepting a first argument of type 'CloudTable' could
be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
The reference to Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage is the same version I use in my App. Ive tried cleaning and re-building. Not sure what the issue is.
EDIT:
Print of my only Execute-options:
I am targeting .NET Core & using assembly Microsoft.WindowsAzure.Storage, Version=9.2.0.0.
The ExecuteQuery does not exist within CloudTable for this version.
This might be your case as well.
Use:
table.ExecuteQuerySegmentedAsync(query, null).Result;
The ExecuteQuery sync is still available for .NET Framework version however for NET Standard use ExecuteQuerySegmentedAsync instead.
Error CS1061 'CloudTable' does not contain a definition for 'Execute' and no extension method 'Execute' accepting a first argument of type 'CloudTable' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
CloudTable.Execute Method (TableOperation, TableRequestOptions, OperationContext) accepts a TableOperation object as the first argument, and according to the code you provide, we could find you indeed pass a TableOperation object to Execute method, it should not return the error. Please try to install the latest version Microsoft Azure Storage Client Library for .NET to your project (the code works fine with WindowsAzure.Storage v8.0.0 on my side) and test if same issue will appear. You could also tell us the version of WindowsAzure.Storage you are using now, and then we will test the code with that version.
Besides, please try to use TableQuery to generate a query and call CloudTable.ExecuteQuery method to retrieve the entity.
TableQuery<WorkUser> query = new TableQuery<WorkUser>().Where(
TableQuery.CombineFilters(
TableQuery.GenerateFilterCondition("PartitionKey", QueryComparisons.Equal, "Skype"),
TableOperators.And,
TableQuery.GenerateFilterCondition("RowKey", QueryComparisons.Equal, skypeid)));
retrievedSkypeId = table.ExecuteQuery(query).FirstOrDefault().RowKey;
I decided to return to Dropwizard after a very long affair with Spring. I quickly got the absolute barebones REST service built, and it runs without any problems.
Using Dropwizard 0.7.1 and Java 1.8, only POM entries are the dropwizard-core dependency and the maven compiler plugin to enforce Java 1.8, as recommended by the Dropwizard user manual
However, as soon as I try to add an Optional QueryParam to the basic controller, the application fails to start with the following error (cut for brevity):
INFO [2015-01-03 17:44:58,059] io.dropwizard.jersey.DropwizardResourceConfig: The following paths were found for the configured resources:
GET / (edge.dw.sample.controllers.IndexController)
ERROR [2015-01-03 17:44:58,158] com.sun.jersey.spi.inject.Errors: The following errors and warnings have been detected with resource and/or provider classes:
SEVERE: Missing dependency for method public java.lang.String edge.dw.sample.controllers.IndexController.index(java.util.Optional) at parameter at index 0
Exception in thread "main" javax.servlet.ServletException: com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer-6c2ed0cd#330103b7==com.sun.jersey.spi.container.servlet.ServletContainer,1,false
The code for the controller is as follows:
#Path("/")
public class IndexController {
#GET
#Timed
public String index(#QueryParam("name") Optional<String> name) {
String saying = "Hi";
if(name != null && name.isPresent()) {
saying += " " + name.get();
}
return saying;
}
}
If I remove Optional from the mix, the application runs just fine. I replace the Optional-specific code with null checks and it works perfectly.
Am I missing something fundamental here? Both Google Guava Optional and java.util.Optional fail with the same error. (And yes, I did narrow it down to the Optional object)
A quick Google/SO search yielded nothing useful, but feel free to point me to a resource I may have missed
Thanks in advance!
Moments after posting this, I found that the issue was my use of Java 1.8. If using Java 1.8, I have to add the Java8Bundle to my app:
POM Entry:
<dependency>
<groupId>io.dropwizard.modules</groupId>
<artifactId>dropwizard-java8</artifactId>
<version>0.7.0-1</version>
</dependency>
And code in the Application class:
#Override
public void initialize(Bootstrap<SampleConfiguration> bootstrap) {
bootstrap.addBundle(new Java8Bundle());
}
See: https://github.com/dropwizard/dropwizard-java8
This enables both Google Guava Optional and java.util.Optional to work just fine.
If I revert to Java 1.7 and use the Google Guava Optional, it works just fine as well and I don't have to include the Java8Bundle. I'll opt for the Java8Bundle for now, though, as using Java8 features is lucrative for me :)
Cheers!
So, I recently upgraded our Grails app from version 1.3.7 to 2.3.4. I'm now getting an exception in a SOAP handler that attempts to extract the message content and log it to the DB. This worked in 1.3.7, but I'm assuming that some new dependency or something has messed with the classpath.
The code looks like this:
private String extractSOAPMessage(SOAPMessageContext smc) {
Source source = smc.getMessage().getSOAPPart().getContent()
TransformerFactory factory = TransformerFactory.newInstance()
Transformer transformer = factory.newTransformer()
transformer.setOutputProperty( OutputKeys.METHOD, "xml" )
java.io.StringWriter writer = new StringWriter()
Result result = new StreamResult( writer )
transformer.transform( source, result )
return writer.toString()
}
The exception I'm seeing is:
Caused by: java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader (instance of <bootloader>) previously initiated loading for a different type with name "javax/activation/DataHandler"
It happens on this line:
Source source = smc.getMessage().getSOAPPart().getContent()
It looks like the culprit is the getSOAPart() call.
Note that I am using the 1.1.1 version of the cxf plugin for Grails. Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I've found several similar issues with solutions, but none of them have been for the "javax/activation/DataHandler", so I am not sure what's going on here.
I suspect something has a transitive dependency on the activation library which you need to exclude - try running a dependency-report. Since Java 6 that JAR has been un-necessary as it's built in to the core Java class library, but many things still have dependencies on it so they can work on Java 5 (or date back to when Java 5 was still in widespread use).
I'm using grails 1.3.6 and installed ws-client plugin.
I getting error in the following hello world:
def wsdlURL = "http://www.w3schools.com/webservices/tempconvert.asmx?WSDL"
def proxy = webService.getClient(wsdlURL)
def result = proxy.CelsiusToFahrenheit(0)
result = "${result} degrees Farhenheit"
render result
Error:
Could not initialize class
com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.RuntimeBuiltinLeafInfoImpl
But I have this class (Ctrl+Shift+T in STS find the class)
Thanks.
Related question: here
I removed another plugin (gsolr) that had conflicts and works.
Note: another solution is create a plugin project to wrap ws-client plugin.
(I this way there is no conflict beetween classes)