I am trying to compare two mono-chrome, basic hand drawn images, captured electronically. The scale may be different but the essences of the image is the same. I want to compare one hand drawn image to a save library of images and get a relative score of how similar they are. Think of several basic geometric shapes, lines, and curves that make up a drawing.
I have tried several techniques without much luck. Pixel based comparisons are too exact. I have tried scaling and cropping images and that did not get accurate results.
I have tried OpenCV with C# and have had a little success. I have experimented with SURF and it works for a few images, but not others that the eye can tell are very similar.
So now my question: Are there any examples of using openCV or commercial software that can support comparing drawings that are not exact? I prefer C# but I am open to any solutions.
Thanks in advance for any guidance.
(I have been working on this for over a month and have searched the internet and Stack Overflow without success. I of course could have missed something)
You need to extract features from these images and after that using a basic euclidean distance would be enough to calculate similarity. But hand writtend drawn thins are not easy to extract features. For example, companies that work on face recognition generally have much less accuracy on drawn face portraits.
I have a suggestion for you. For a machine learning homework, one of my friends got the signature recognition assingment. I do not fully know how he did it with a high accuracy, but I know feature extraction part. Firtstly he converted it to binary image. And than he calculated the each row's black pixel count. Than he used that features to train a NN or etc.
So you can use this similar approach to extract features. Than use a euclidean distance to calculate similarities.
Related
I'm attempting to take two images in OpenCV, both drawn with a program like MS Paint or a simple drawing app, and gauge their percent similarity to each other. I have passing familiarity with some OpenCV image processing methods, but the approaches I've tried so far haven't been effective.
What I've thought of doing so far has been:
Simplest approach - comparing the two images pixel by pixel. This is easy to code up but scale / rotation invariant. The solution needs to be able to recognize an imperfect version
Hausdorff distance. This seems readymade for this problem, and I read a couple of other stack overflow posts about using it, but it takes in contours and I'm not sure how to extract contours from one image and match them to contours in another. One of the images might be empty, or they might be drastically different.
Feature extraction / matching - The approach I've tried so far has been to use feature detectors (ORB, AKAZE) paired with a Flann-based matcher, and have gotten extremely poor results so far. I'm currently changing this to SIFT/SURF and brute-force, but it doesn't seem like this has worked very well.
What are other possible computer vision algorithms I can try? I attached two sample images that are representative of what I'm trying to compare (and I did grayscale the image before processing, so color is not a factor).
Thank you!
The situation is kind of unique from anything I have been able to find asked already, and is as follows: If I took a photo of two similar images, I'd like to be able to highlight the differing features in the two images. For example the following two halves of a children's spot the difference game:
The differences in the images will be bits missing/added and/or colour change, and the type of differences which would be easily detectable from the original image files by doing nothing cleverer than a pixel-by-pixel comparison. However the fact that they're subject to the fluctuations of light and imprecision of photography, I'll need a far more lenient/clever algorithm.
As you can see, the images won't necessarily line up perfectly if overlaid.
This question is tagged language-agnostic as I expect answers that point me towards relevant algorithms, however I'd also be interested in current implementations if they exist, particularly in Java, Ruby, or C.
The following approach should work. All of these functionalities are available in OpenCV. Take a look at this example for computing homographies.
Detect keypoints in the two images using a corner detector.
Extract descriptors (SIFT/SURF) for the keypoints.
Match the keypoints and compute a homography using RANSAC, that aligns the second image to the first.
Apply the homography to the second image, so that it is aligned with the first.
Now simply compute the pixel-wise difference between the two images, and the difference image will highlight everything that has changed from the first to the second.
My general approach would be to use an optical flow to align both images and perform a pixel by pixel comparison once they are aligned.
However, for the specifics, standard optical flows (OpenCV etc.) are likely to fail if the two images differ significantly like in your case. If that indeed fails, there are recent optical flow techniques that are supposed to work even if the images are drastically different. For instance, you might want to look at the paper about SIFT flows by Ce Liu et al that addresses this problem with sparse correspondences.
I have images of mosquitos similar to these ones and I would like to automatically circle around the head of each mosquito in the images. They are obviously in different orientations and there are random number of them in different images. some error is fine. Any ideas of algorithms to do this?
This problem resembles a face detection problem, so you could try a naïve approach first and refine it if necessary.
First you would need to recreate your training set. For this you would like to extract small images with examples of what is a mosquito head or what is not.
Then you can use those images to train a classification algorithm, be careful to have a balanced training set, since if your data is skewed to one class it would hit the performance of the algorithm. Since images are 2D and algorithms usually just take 1D arrays as input, you will need to arrange your images to that format as well (for instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Row-major_order).
I normally use support vector machines, but other algorithms such as logistic regression could make the trick too. If you decide to use support vector machines I strongly recommend you to check libsvm (http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/), since it's a very mature library with bindings to several programming languages. Also they have a very easy to follow guide targeted to beginners (http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/papers/guide/guide.pdf).
If you have enough data, you should be able to avoid tolerance to orientation. If you don't have enough data, then you could create more training rows with some samples rotated, so you would have a more representative training set.
As for the prediction what you could do is given an image, cut it using a grid where each cell has the same dimension that the ones you used on your training set. Then you pass each of this image to the classifier and mark those squares where the classifier gave you a positive output. If you really need circles then take the center of the given square and the radius would be the half of the square side size (sorry for stating the obvious).
So after you do this you might have problems with sizes (some mosquitos might appear closer to the camera than others) , since we are not trained the algorithm to be tolerant to scale. Moreover, even with all mosquitos in the same scale, we still might miss some of them just because they didn't fit in our grid perfectly. To address this, we will need to repeat this procedure (grid cut and predict) rescaling the given image to different sizes. How many sizes? well here you would have to determine that through experimentation.
This approach is sensitive to the size of the "window" that you are using, that is also something I would recommend you to experiment with.
There are some research may be useful:
A Multistep Approach for Shape Similarity Search in Image Databases
Representation and Detection of Shapes in Images
From the pictures you provided this seems to be an extremely hard image recognition problem, and I doubt you will get anywhere near acceptable recognition rates.
I would recommend a simpler approach:
First, if you have any control over the images, separate the mosquitoes before taking the picture, and use a white unmarked underground, perhaps even something illuminated from below. This will make separating the mosquitoes much easier.
Then threshold the image. For example here i did a quick try taking the red channel, then substracting the blue channel*5, then applying a threshold of 80:
Use morphological dilation and erosion to get rid of the small leg structures.
Identify blobs of the right size to be moquitoes by Connected Component Labeling. If a blob is large enough to be two mosquitoes, cut it out, and apply some more dilation/erosion to it.
Once you have a single blob like this
you can find the direction of the body using Principal Component Analysis. The head should be the part of the body where the cross-section is the thickest.
I'm trying to create a simpler OCR enginge by using openCV. I have this image: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63179/opencv/test-image.png
I have saved all possible characters as images and trying to detect this images in input image.
From here I need to identify the code. I have been trying matchTemplate and FAST detection. Both seem to fail (or more likely: I'm doing something wrong).
When I used the matchTemplate method I found the edges of both the input image and the reference images using Sobel. This provide a working result but the accuracy is not good enough.
When using the FAST method it seems like I cant get any interresting descriptions from the cvExtractSURF method.
Any recomendations on the best way to be able to read this kind of code?
UPDATE 1 (2012-03-20)
I have had some progress. I'm trying to find the bounding rects of the characters but the matrix font is killing me. See the samples below:
My font: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63179/opencv/IMG_0873.PNG
My font filled in: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63179/opencv/IMG_0875.PNG
Other font: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63179/opencv/IMG_0874.PNG
As seen in the samples I find the bounding rects for a less complex font and if I can fill in the space between the dots in my font it also works. Is there a way to achieve this with opencv? If I can find the bounding box of each character it would be much more simple to recognize the character.
Any ideas?
Update 2 (2013-03-21)
Ok, I had some luck with finding the bounding boxes. See image:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63179/opencv/IMG_0891.PNG
I'm not sure where to go from here. I tried to use matchTemplate template but I guess that is not a good option in this case? I guess that is better when searching for the exact match in a bigger picture?
I tried to use surf but when I try to extract the descriptors with cvExtractSURF for each bounding box I get 0 descriptors... Any ideas?
What method would be most appropriate to use to be able to match the bounding box against a reference image?
You're going the hard way with FASt+SURF, because they were not designed for this task.
In particular, FAST detects corner-like features that are ubiquituous iin structure-from-motion but far less present in OCR.
Two suggestions:
maybe build a feature vector from the number and locations of FAST keypoints, I think that oyu can rapidly check if these features are dsicriminant enough, and if yes train a classifier from that
(the one I would choose myself) partition your image samples into smaller squares. Compute only the decsriptor of SURF for each square and concatenate all of them to form the feature vector for a given sample. Then train a classifier with these feature vectors.
Note that option 2 works with any descriptor that you can find in OpenCV (SIFT, SURF, FREAK...).
Answer to update 1
Here is a little trick that senior people taught me when I started.
On your image with the dots, you can project your binarized data to the horizontal and vertical axes.
By searching for holes (disconnections) in the projected patterns, you are likely to recover almost all the boudnig boxes in your example.
Answer to update 2
At this point, you're back the my initial answer: SURF will be of no good here.
Instead, a standard way is to binarize each bounding box (to 0 - 1 depending on background/letter), normalize the bounding boxes to a standard size, and train a classifier from here.
There are several tutorials and blog posts on the web about how to do digit recognition using neural networks or SVM's, you just have to replace digits by your letters.
Your work is almost done! Training and using a classifier is tedious but straightforward.
We as human, could recognize these two images as same image :
In computer, it will be easy to recognize these two image if they are in the same size, so we have to make Preprocessing stage or step before recognize it, like scaling, but if we look deeply to scaling process, we will know that it's not an efficient way.
Now, could you help me to find some way to convert images into objects that doesn't deal with size or pixel location, to be input for recognition method ?
Thanks advance.
I have several ideas:
Let the image have several color thresholds. This way you get large
areas of the same color. The shapes of those areas can be traced with
curves which are math. If you do this for the larger and the smaller
one and see if the curves match.
Try to define key spots in the area. I don't know for sure how
this works but you can look up face detection algoritms. In such
an algoritm there is a math equation for how a face should look.
If you define enough object in such algorithms you can define
multiple objects in the images to see if the object match on the
same spots.
And you could see if the predator algorithm can accept images
of multiple size. If so your problem is solved.
It looks like you assume that human's brain recognize image in computationally effective way, which is rather not true. this algorithm is so complicated that we did not find it. It also takes a large part of your brain to deal with visual data.
When it comes to software there are some scale(or affine) invariant algorithms. One of such algorithms is LeNet 5 neural network.