In Umbraco 6, when you create a new node, it is put at the bottom.
You have to sort it manually if you want it to be on the top.
How can you make new nodes appear on the top by default?
You could create an event handler that changes the sort order of the nodes when the new node is created. See Application startup events & event registration for more details on implementing an handler of your own.
Rough untested example which I am sure you could make more elegant but should point you in the right direction:
public class YourApplicationEventHandlerClassName : ApplicationEventHandler
{
protected override void ApplicationStarted(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication, ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
ContentService.Created += ContentServiceCreated;
}
private void ContentServiceCreated(IContentService sender, NewEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
var cs = ApplicationContext.Current.Services.ContentService;
var content = e.Entity;
var parentNode = content.Parent();
content.SortOrder = parentNode.Children().OrderBy(n => n.SortOrder).First().SortOrder - 1;
cs.Save(content);
}
}
The ContentService.Created event did not work for me. Took some battles, but in v7 of Umbraco, I've used the ContentService.Saved event instead, with some double checking on dirty properties to ensure you don't end up in a saving infinite loop:
private void ContentSaved(IContentService sender, SaveEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
foreach (var content in e.SavedEntities)
{
var dirty = (IRememberBeingDirty)content;
var isNew = dirty.WasPropertyDirty("Id");
if (!isNew) return;
var parentNode = content.Parent();
if (parentNode == null) return;
var last = parentNode.Children().OrderBy(n => n.SortOrder).FirstOrDefault();
if (last != null)
{
content.SortOrder = last.SortOrder - 1;
if (content.Published)
sender.SaveAndPublishWithStatus(content);
else
sender.Save(content);
}
}
}
public class AppStartupHandler : ApplicationEventHandler
{
protected override void ApplicationInitialized(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication,
ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
ContentService.Saved += ContentSaved;
}
}
Related
I have a MapControl working just creating my route. Now, I just need to figure out a way to print it out. Using the UWP printing sample, I get a black box where the control should be. The map and route are being built, just not rendered correctly in the print preview. I thought I saw a MapControl.Print... but I think that was in the Bing.Maps stuff. Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks.
Using the UWP printing sample, I get a black box where the control should be.
It seems the MapControl can not be printed.
As a workround, we can use RenderTargetBitmap to get the image from the MapControl. That we can print the image.
Using a RenderTargetBitmap, you can accomplish scenarios such as applying image effects to a visual that originally came from a XAML UI composition, generating thumbnail images of child pages for a navigation system, or enabling the user to save parts of the UI as an image source and then share that image with other apps.
Because RenderTargetBitmap is a subclass of ImageSource, it can be used as the image source for Image elements or an ImageBrush brush.
For more info,see RenderTargetBitmap.
For example:
RenderTargetBitmap renderTargetBitmap = new RenderTargetBitmap();
await renderTargetBitmap.RenderAsync(MyMap);
MyImage.Source = renderTargetBitmap;
The printing code:
public sealed partial class MainPage : Page
{
private PrintManager printmgr = PrintManager.GetForCurrentView();
private PrintDocument printDoc = null;
private PrintTask task = null;
public MainPage()
{
this.InitializeComponent();
printmgr.PrintTaskRequested += Printmgr_PrintTaskRequested;
}
private void Printmgr_PrintTaskRequested(PrintManager sender, PrintTaskRequestedEventArgs args)
{
var deferral = args.Request.GetDeferral();
task = args.Request.CreatePrintTask("Print", OnPrintTaskSourceRequrested);
task.Completed += PrintTask_Completed;
deferral.Complete();
}
private void PrintTask_Completed(PrintTask sender, PrintTaskCompletedEventArgs args)
{
//the PrintTask is completed
}
private async void OnPrintTaskSourceRequrested(PrintTaskSourceRequestedArgs args)
{
var def = args.GetDeferral();
await Dispatcher.RunAsync(Windows.UI.Core.CoreDispatcherPriority.Normal,
() =>
{
args.SetSource(printDoc?.DocumentSource);
});
def.Complete();
}
private async void appbar_Printer_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (printDoc != null)
{
printDoc.GetPreviewPage -= OnGetPreviewPage;
printDoc.Paginate -= PrintDic_Paginate;
printDoc.AddPages -= PrintDic_AddPages;
}
this.printDoc = new PrintDocument();
printDoc.GetPreviewPage += OnGetPreviewPage;
printDoc.Paginate += PrintDic_Paginate;
printDoc.AddPages += PrintDic_AddPages;
bool showPrint = await PrintManager.ShowPrintUIAsync();
}
private void PrintDic_AddPages(object sender, AddPagesEventArgs e)
{
printDoc.AddPage(this);
printDoc.AddPagesComplete();
}
private void PrintDic_Paginate(object sender, PaginateEventArgs e)
{
PrintTaskOptions opt = task.Options;
printDoc.SetPreviewPageCount(1, PreviewPageCountType.Final);
}
private void OnGetPreviewPage(object sender, GetPreviewPageEventArgs e)
{
printDoc.SetPreviewPage(e.PageNumber, this);
}
}
I am developing Umbraco 7 MVC application and my requirement is to add Item inside Umbraco. Item name should be unique. For that used the below code but I am getting the error "Oops: this document is published but is not in the cache (internal error)"
protected override void ApplicationStarting(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication,
ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
ContentService.Publishing += ContentService_Publishing;
}
private void ContentService_Publishing(IPublishingStrategy sender, PublishEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
try
{
if(newsItemExists)
{
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
e.Cancel = true;
Logger.Error(ex.ToString());
}
}
Then I tried adding code to unpublish but its not working i.e the node is getting published. Below is my code
private void ContentService_Publishing(IPublishingStrategy sender, PublishEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
try
{
int itemId=1234; //CurrentPublishedNodeId
if(newsItemExists)
{
IContent content = ContentService.GetById(itemId);
ContentService.UnPublish(content);
library.UpdateDocumentCache(item.Id);
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
e.Cancel = true;
Logger.Error(ex.ToString());
}
}
But with the above code, if you give the CurrentPublishedNodeId=2345 //someOthernodeId its unpublished correctly.
Can you please help me on this issue.
You don't have to do this, Umbraco will automatically append (1) to the name if the item already exists (so it IS unique).
If you don't want this behavior you can check in the following way:
protected override void ApplicationStarting(UmbracoApplicationBase umbracoApplication, ApplicationContext applicationContext)
{
ContentService.Publishing += ContentService_Publishing;
}
private void ContentService_Publishing(Umbraco.Core.Publishing.IPublishingStrategy sender, PublishEventArgs<IContent> e)
{
var contentService = UmbracoContext.Current.Application.Services.ContentService;
// It's posible to batch publish items, so go through all items
// even though there might only be one in the list of PublishedEntities
foreach (var item in e.PublishedEntities)
{
var currentPage = contentService.GetById(item.Id);
// Go to the current page's parent and loop through all of it's children
// That way you can determine if any page that is on the same level as the
// page you're trying to publish has the same name
foreach (var contentItem in currentPage.Parent().Children())
{
if (string.Equals(contentItem.Name.Trim(), currentPage.Name.Trim(), StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase))
e.Cancel = true;
}
}
}
I think your problem might be that you're not looping through all PublishedEntities but using some other way to determine the current page Id.
Note: Please please please do not use the library.UpdateDocumentCache this, there's absolutely no need, ContentService.UnPublish will take care of the cache state.
Trying to do some tests with a ViewPager.
I want to swipe between tabs, and I don't want to continue until the swipe is complete. But there doesn't appear to be a way to turn off the animation for the view pager (all animations under the developer options are disabled).
So this always results in a test failure, because the view pager hasn't completed it's animation, and so the view is not completely displayed yet:
// swipe left
onView(withId(R.id.viewpager)).check(matches(isDisplayed())).perform(swipeLeft());
// check to ensure that the next tab is completely visible.
onView(withId(R.id.next_tab)).check(matches(isCompletelyDisplayed()));
Is there an elegant or maybe even recommended way to do this, or am I stuck putting some kind of timed wait in there?
The IdlingResource #Simas suggests is actually pretty simple to implement:
public class ViewPagerIdlingResource implements IdlingResource {
private final String mName;
private boolean mIdle = true; // Default to idle since we can't query the scroll state.
private ResourceCallback mResourceCallback;
public ViewPagerIdlingResource(ViewPager viewPager, String name) {
viewPager.addOnPageChangeListener(new ViewPagerListener());
mName = name;
}
#Override
public String getName() {
return mName;
}
#Override
public boolean isIdleNow() {
return mIdle;
}
#Override
public void registerIdleTransitionCallback(ResourceCallback resourceCallback) {
mResourceCallback = resourceCallback;
}
private class ViewPagerListener extends ViewPager.SimpleOnPageChangeListener {
#Override
public void onPageScrollStateChanged(int state) {
mIdle = (state == ViewPager.SCROLL_STATE_IDLE
// Treat dragging as idle, or Espresso will block itself when swiping.
|| state == ViewPager.SCROLL_STATE_DRAGGING);
if (mIdle && mResourceCallback != null) {
mResourceCallback.onTransitionToIdle();
}
}
}
}
Since I've done this at least twice now, here is the accepted answer in Kotlin and with androidx ViewPager2:
class ViewPager2IdlingResource(viewPager: ViewPager2, name: String) : IdlingResource {
private val name: String
private var isIdle = true // Default to idle since we can't query the scroll state.
private var resourceCallback: IdlingResource.ResourceCallback? = null
init {
viewPager.registerOnPageChangeCallback(object : ViewPager2.OnPageChangeCallback() {
override fun onPageScrollStateChanged(state: Int) {
isIdle = (state == ViewPager.SCROLL_STATE_IDLE // Treat dragging as idle, or Espresso will block itself when swiping.
|| state == ViewPager.SCROLL_STATE_DRAGGING)
if (isIdle && resourceCallback != null) {
resourceCallback!!.onTransitionToIdle()
}
}
})
this.name = name
}
override fun getName(): String {
return name
}
override fun isIdleNow(): Boolean {
return isIdle
}
override fun registerIdleTransitionCallback(resourceCallback: IdlingResource.ResourceCallback) {
this.resourceCallback = resourceCallback
}
}
And here is how you use it from a UI test using ActivityScenarioRule:
#get:Rule
val testRule = ActivityScenarioRule(OnboardingActivity::class.java)
private lateinit var viewPager2IdlingResource: ViewPager2IdlingResource
....
#Before
fun setUp() {
testRule.scenario.onActivity {
viewPager2IdlingResource =
ViewPager2IdlingResource(it.findViewById(R.id.onboarding_view_pager), "viewPagerIdlingResource")
IdlingRegistry.getInstance().register(viewPager2IdlingResource)
}
}
#After
fun tearDown() {
IdlingRegistry.getInstance().unregister(viewPager2IdlingResource)
}
The androidx.test.espresso:espresso-core library offers a ViewPagerActions class which contains a number of methods for scrolling between the pages of a ViewPager. It takes care of waiting until the scroll is complete so you don't need to add any explicit waits or sleeps in your test methods.
If you need to perform similar scrolling on a ViewPager2 instance, you can take the source code of the ViewPagerActions class and make some minor tweaks to it to get it to work for ViewPager2. Here is an example which you are welcome to take and use.
Try this,
onView(withId(R.id.pager)).perform(pagerSwipeRight()).perform(pagerSwipeLeft());
private GeneralSwipeAction pagerSwipeRight(){
return new GeneralSwipeAction(Swipe.SLOW, GeneralLocation.CENTER_LEFT,
GeneralLocation.CENTER_RIGHT, Press.FINGER);
}
private GeneralSwipeAction pagerSwipeLeft(){
return new GeneralSwipeAction(Swipe.SLOW, GeneralLocation.CENTER_RIGHT,
GeneralLocation.CENTER_LEFT, Press.FINGER);
}
I was having issues with #vaughandroid approach, so I did some changes to his approach. This approach will set idle to false as soon as it detects a scrolling is happening and "force" the ViewPager to finish scrolling by using setCurrentItem().
public class ViewPagerIdlingResource implements IdlingResource {
private volatile boolean mIdle = true; // Default to idle since we can't query the scroll state.
private ResourceCallback mResourceCallback;
private ViewPager mViewPager;
public static ViewPagerIdlingResource waitViewPagerSwipe(ViewPager viewPager) {
return new ViewPagerIdlingResource(viewPager);
}
private ViewPagerIdlingResource(ViewPager viewPager) {
mViewPager = viewPager;
mViewPager.addOnPageChangeListener(new ViewPagerListener());
}
#Override
public String getName() {
return ViewPagerIdlingResource.class.getSimpleName();
}
#Override
public boolean isIdleNow() {
return mIdle;
}
#Override
public void registerIdleTransitionCallback(ResourceCallback resourceCallback) {
mResourceCallback = resourceCallback;
}
private class ViewPagerListener extends ViewPager.SimpleOnPageChangeListener {
float mPositionOffset = 0.0f;
#Override
public void onPageScrolled(int position, float positionOffset, int positionOffsetPixels) {
if (isSwipingToRight(positionOffset)) {
mIdle = false;
mViewPager.setCurrentItem(position + 1);
} else if (isSwipingToLeft(positionOffset)) {
mIdle = false;
mViewPager.setCurrentItem(position - 1);
}
mPositionOffset = positionOffset;
if (positionOffset == 0 && !mIdle && mResourceCallback != null) {
mResourceCallback.onTransitionToIdle();
mIdle = true;
mPositionOffset = 0.0f;
}
}
private boolean isSwipingToRight(float positionOffset) {
return mPositionOffset != 0.0f && positionOffset > mPositionOffset && mIdle;
}
private boolean isSwipingToLeft(float positionOffset) {
return mPositionOffset != 0.0f && positionOffset < mPositionOffset && mIdle;
}
}
}
My goal was to make a screenshot of the screen with ViewPager2 using Facebook screenshot test library. The easiest approach for me was to check almost every frame whether animation completed, if yes then it's time to make a screenshot:
fun waitForViewPagerAnimation(parentView: View) {
if (parentView is ViewGroup) {
parentView.childrenViews<ViewPager2>().forEach {
while (it.scrollState != ViewPager2.SCROLL_STATE_IDLE) {
Thread.sleep(16)
}
}
}
}
childrenViews function can be found here
You can either do a lot of work and use an IdlingResource to implement an OnPageChangeListener
or simply:
SystemClock.sleep(500);
I am working with an attached behavior for logging user actions on a ScrollBar.
my code:
class ScrollBarLogBehavior : Behavior<ScrollBar>
{
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
AssociatedObject.Loaded += new RoutedEventHandler(AssociatedObject_Loaded);
}
void AssociatedObject_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
...
var track = (Track)AssociatedObject.Template.FindName("PART_Track", AssociatedObject);
// ** HERE is the problem: track is null ! **
...
}
How can I detect that the template has loaded and I can find the Track?
(when I call AssociatedObject.Template.LoadContent() the result containt the requested Track, so it i a matter of timing and not a matter of wrong template or naming)
Override the method OnApplyTemplate
public override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
var textBox = Template.FindName("PART_Textbox", this) as TextBox;
}
I did not find any good way to detect when the template was loaded. However, I did find a way to find the Track:
in OnAttached() - register to Scroll event fo the ScrollBar (this can only happen after the entire template is loaded, of course):
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
_scrollHandler = new ScrollEventHandler(AssociatedObject_Scroll);
AssociatedObject.AddHandler(ScrollBar.ScrollEvent, _scrollHandler, true);
}
When handling the Scroll event, remove registration and find the Thumb:
void AssociatedObject_Scroll(object sender, ScrollEventArgs e)
{
var track = (Track)AssociatedObject.Template.FindName("PART_Track", Associated
if (track == null)
return;
AssociatedObject.RemoveHandler(ScrollBar.ScrollEvent, _scrollHandler);
// do my work with Track
...
}
If I understand correctly, you wish to create an attached behavior that will reference a template part after the ScrollBar has been loaded.
The following should work:
internal static class ScrollBarLogBehavior
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty LogUserActionProperty = DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached(
"LogUserAction",
typeof(bool),
typeof(ScrollBarLogBehavior),
new UIPropertyMetadata(default(bool), LogUserActionChanged));
public static bool GetLogUserAction(DependencyObject obj)
{
return (bool)obj.GetValue(LogUserActionProperty);
}
public static void SetLogUserAction(DependencyObject obj, bool value)
{
obj.SetValue(LogUserActionProperty, value);
}
public static void LogUserActionChanged(DependencyObject s, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (s is ScrollBar scrollBar)
{
scrollBar.Loaded += OnScrollBarLoaded;
}
}
private static void OnScrollBarLoaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
if (sender is ScrollBar scrollBar)
{
if (scrollBar.Template != null)
{
// I'm not sure, but the `name` in the following method call might be case sensitive.
if (scrollBar.Template.FindName("PART_Track", scrollBar) is Track track)
{
// do work with `track` here
}
}
}
}
}
where you would "attach" the behavior in your XAML with:
<ScrollBar guiControls:ScrollBarLogBehavior.LogUserAction="True">
<!-- more here -->
</ScrollBar>
BE ADVISED: this implementation completely ignores the bool value that is being set for LogUserAction
I am trying to implement a custom binding on a subclass of UITextField so that the bound value is set when the user is done editing instead of with each keystroke because some interim values are invalid in the viewmodel (for example, while setting 'Age' to '26', a value of '2' is invalid so I'd like to wait to set the value until both digits are there). Something similar to setting UpdateSourceTrigger in xaml. I looked at several examples here:
MvvmCross UITextField custom binding is similar, as is MvvmCross: change update source trigger property of binding on MonoDroid (but for Android). I've also watch N=28 custom binding and looked at the source for MvxUITextFieldTextTargetBinding.
I think I'm close, but my custom binding never gets created and the UITextFields in my app still FireValueChanged with every keystroke.
I created the following Custom Binding:
public class UITextFieldFocusChangedBinding : MvxTargetBinding
{
private bool _subscribed;
private UITextField _view;
public UITextFieldFocusChangedBinding(UITextField target) : base(target)
{
_view = target;
}
public override void SetValue(object value)
{
if (_view == null) return;
_view.Text = (string)value;
}
public override void SubscribeToEvents()
{
var view = _view;
if (view == null)
return;
view.Ended += TextFieldOnEnded;
}
private void TextFieldOnEnded(object sender, EventArgs eventArgs)
{
var view = _view;
if (view == null)
return;
if (!view.IsFirstResponder)
FireValueChanged(view.Text);
_subscribed = true;
}
public override Type TargetType
{
get { return typeof(string); }
}
public override MvxBindingMode DefaultMode
{
get { return MvxBindingMode.TwoWay; }
}
protected override void Dispose(bool isDisposing)
{
if (isDisposing)
{
var view = _view;
if (view != null && _subscribed)
{
view.Ended -= TextFieldOnEnded;
_subscribed = false;
}
}
base.Dispose(isDisposing);
}
}
My setup.cs contains the following:
protected override void FillTargetFactories(IMvxTargetBindingFactoryRegistry registry)
{
base.FillTargetFactories(registry);
registry.RegisterPropertyInfoBindingFactory(typeof(Bindings.UITextFieldFocusChangedBinding),typeof(UITextField), "Text");
}
and in my MvxViewController I have:
var set = this.CreateBindingSet<LifeNeedsView, LifeNeedsViewModel>();
set.Bind(_txtFinMedExpenses).To(vm => vm.FinalMedicalExpenses);
set.Apply();
The bindings work (values are passing correctly) but with every keystroke. Any suggestions on what I might be missing?